Acura: NSX News
#4601
Some dude
#4603
I don't mind the vents. What I meant to say was that the concept lighting looked better.
#4604
Team Owner
That car looks awful. And it already looks dated big time.
Hi, Audi called... They've been on hold for 8 years.
And acura/Honda still won't drop that stupid beak up front. NO ONE LIKES BEAKS. Their headquarters must be full of bird lovers.
Those wheels posted on the red car look nice, but beyond that, wow.
Hi, Audi called... They've been on hold for 8 years.
And acura/Honda still won't drop that stupid beak up front. NO ONE LIKES BEAKS. Their headquarters must be full of bird lovers.
Those wheels posted on the red car look nice, but beyond that, wow.
#4606
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
That car looks awful. And it already looks dated big time.
Hi, Audi called... They've been on hold for 8 years.
And acura/Honda still won't drop that stupid beak up front. NO ONE LIKES BEAKS. Their headquarters must be full of bird lovers.
Those wheels posted on the red car look nice, but beyond that, wow.
Hi, Audi called... They've been on hold for 8 years.
And acura/Honda still won't drop that stupid beak up front. NO ONE LIKES BEAKS. Their headquarters must be full of bird lovers.
Those wheels posted on the red car look nice, but beyond that, wow.
imo, the body style has a lot of potential. looking foward to seeing the production version in january.
#4607
Am I missing something? Why is there an H instead of an A on the NSX?
#4610
#4613
Team Owner
#4617
I understand that, but didn't know that the NSX specifically would be marketed as a Honda outside NA.
Yeah see I honestly had no idea the 1G was marketed as Honda elsewhere.
Yeah see I honestly had no idea the 1G was marketed as Honda elsewhere.
#4620
Team Owner
#4622
Team Owner
yah i know because obviously you were talking about yourself.
#4624
I am calling the hp right now.
Because they were too lame to give the TLX 300hp even (like why 290?... why not 300hp even???) the NSX will have combined hp of..... 590hp
It should be at 600hp but just for the sake of reverse arrogance, they will keep it a shade under 600hp but above 550hp.....
0-60? 3.2
1/4 mile? 11.5 @ 120
Weight? 3,200
Nurburgerkingring= 7:10
We will see soon enough.... I think Ted Klauss is going to get this right
Because they were too lame to give the TLX 300hp even (like why 290?... why not 300hp even???) the NSX will have combined hp of..... 590hp
It should be at 600hp but just for the sake of reverse arrogance, they will keep it a shade under 600hp but above 550hp.....
0-60? 3.2
1/4 mile? 11.5 @ 120
Weight? 3,200
Nurburgerkingring= 7:10
We will see soon enough.... I think Ted Klauss is going to get this right
#4625
Team Owner
I am calling the hp right now.
Because they were too lame to give the TLX 300hp even (like why 290?... why not 300hp even???) the NSX will have combined hp of..... 590hp
It should be at 600hp but just for the sake of reverse arrogance, they will keep it a shade under 600hp but above 550hp.....
0-60? 3.2
1/4 mile? 11.5 @ 120
Weight? 3,200
Nurburgerkingring= 7:10
We will see soon enough.... I think Ted Klauss is going to get this right
Because they were too lame to give the TLX 300hp even (like why 290?... why not 300hp even???) the NSX will have combined hp of..... 590hp
It should be at 600hp but just for the sake of reverse arrogance, they will keep it a shade under 600hp but above 550hp.....
0-60? 3.2
1/4 mile? 11.5 @ 120
Weight? 3,200
Nurburgerkingring= 7:10
We will see soon enough.... I think Ted Klauss is going to get this right
P1 is 3100 lbs RWD with probably the lightest material known to men and cost over $1M.....
#4626
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes
on
526 Posts
That trend is as old as my age. The only thing I care about is now and the future. How the NSX will fair against the GTR which has been the super car killers for years now is what I'm interested in.
The GTRs ain't that cheap now. So, the NSX has a lot of market room to penetrate into. It's not just about how well it performs. The pricing will be a huge factor for NSX. Hopefully they will go reasonably low on the price to hype it up from the get go.
The GTR was a huge success in both actual comparison tests and marketing because of its humongous bang for the buck factor when it first came out like 7 years ago.
The GTRs ain't that cheap now. So, the NSX has a lot of market room to penetrate into. It's not just about how well it performs. The pricing will be a huge factor for NSX. Hopefully they will go reasonably low on the price to hype it up from the get go.
The GTR was a huge success in both actual comparison tests and marketing because of its humongous bang for the buck factor when it first came out like 7 years ago.
All I'm saying is thatin the past, the NSX wasn't designed to be a bang for the buck performance car like the GT-R. So don't be surprised if the new NSX is again not high on performance/cost ratio. With that said, I'm not saying the price is not important. Obviously if Honda decides to price the car at $300k and the performance is only at a stock Corvette level, then that's no good.
For reference, the R32 GTR was at 4.5 mil yen, and the new GTR is at 9.5 mil yen. The 1992 NSX-R was at 9.7 mil yen (stock NSX was about 15% cheaper I believe). That's not considering inflation.
#4627
Some dude
#4628
Azine Jabroni
#4629
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
The following users liked this post:
00TL-P3.2 (12-22-2014)
#4630
#4631
Suzuka Master
#4632
#4633
Team Owner
Carbon fibre only goes so far.
#4634
Team Owner
#4635
Suzuka Master
#4636
Team Owner
I think it's still there, but painted black at least.
#4637
Suzuka Master
#4640
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes
on
526 Posts
With that said I don't see the 2G NSX being less than 3000lb....