Acura: NSX News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2014, 01:35 PM
  #4361  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
sigh

That article just made to dislike the direction Acura is headed today even more.
Old 08-01-2014, 01:38 PM
  #4362  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by brian6speed
I love how ppl on a honda/acura forum are such honda haters. Why are you still on here? The forum for the car you have sucks or something? You need Internet friends?

It is too bad honda can't build cars that are reliable and of the same build and material quality as Government Motors.

Honda motors are garbage.

Noone complains about honda switching from double wishbone suspension on all 4 corners to strut setup in front and beam setup in rear. Noone even knows the difference. They just complain about power numbers and bashing fwd.

I don't blame honda at all for their lineup. I blame the consumers. They make cars that sell for profits, unlike original nsx or s2000 that both lost honda money on every car they sold.


So how is that working out for Acura so far?
Old 08-01-2014, 01:45 PM
  #4363  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,637
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
And certainly, valid. Cars going on fire is not foreign to Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini, and etc. Heck, remember the exploding M3 engines?

STILL...that being said, a brand like Honda, IMO is desperate for some GOOD PR regarding their halo/flagship car after it's been beset by cancellations, delays, more cancellations that has left a fanbase reeling. Speaking for myself, I was guardedly excited about the incoming NSX. So, to have it go up in smoke like this while testing is a black-eye that from a perception's perspective, Honda did not need to have. Above all. Horrid timing.

Just my 2 cents.
Fire was caused by a bad fuel line. The problem was unique to that particular line on that particular car, not the design itself.
Old 08-01-2014, 02:50 PM
  #4364  
Engineer
 
savage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston
Age: 41
Posts: 4,525
Received 76 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by brian6speed
I don't blame honda at all for their lineup. I blame the consumers. They make cars that sell for profits, unlike original nsx or s2000 that both lost honda money on every car they sold.
Are you crazy??? You can't blame the consumers. Blame Honda/Acura for not meeting the consumers needs. If they can't do that they are destined to fail as a business.

Honda has completely distanced itself from what made it great. Their competitors have all destroyed them with better value, performance, and styling. All while making a profit! These car manufacturers are not into the business of losing money.

What evidence do you have the Honda lost money on the NSX or S2000? Give me reputable links.

I for one am still a fan of Honda and that is probably why I am so critical of their failures. They need to innovate and advance their value as a product if they want to survive and sadly they have been lost in a sea of mediocrity the last few years.

When was the last time someone told you about that hot new Honda or Acura???
Old 08-01-2014, 03:29 PM
  #4365  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,274
Received 5,898 Likes on 2,905 Posts
Originally Posted by brian6speed
I love how ppl on a honda/acura forum are such honda haters. Why are you still on here? The forum for the car you have sucks or something? You need Internet friends?

It is too bad honda can't build cars that are reliable and of the same build and material quality as Government Motors.

Honda motors are garbage.

Noone complains about honda switching from double wishbone suspension on all 4 corners to strut setup in front and beam setup in rear. Noone even knows the difference. They just complain about power numbers and bashing fwd.

I don't blame honda at all for their lineup. I blame the consumers. They make cars that sell for profits, unlike original nsx or s2000 that both lost honda money on every car they sold.
You are so full of crap.
Old 08-01-2014, 04:59 PM
  #4366  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Don't feed the obnoxiously obvious troll
Old 08-01-2014, 05:04 PM
  #4367  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,637
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Brian is a troll and he 'got' you all upset. Meanwhile the Napoleonic-douchebag is chuckling away in his mom's basement.

Don't feed him.
Old 08-01-2014, 05:10 PM
  #4368  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,274
Received 5,898 Likes on 2,905 Posts
Originally Posted by Costco
Don't feed the obnoxiously obvious troll
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Brian is a troll and he 'got' you all upset. Meanwhile the Napoleonic-douchebag is chuckling away in his mom's basement.

Don't feed him.
Just stating he's full of crap...which is...in every thread he posts.
Old 08-01-2014, 05:27 PM
  #4369  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Originally Posted by savage
Are you crazy??? You can't blame the consumers. Blame Honda/Acura for not meeting the consumers needs. If they can't do that they are destined to fail as a business.

Honda has completely distanced itself from what made it great. Their competitors have all destroyed them with better value, performance, and styling. All while making a profit! These car manufacturers are not into the business of losing money.

What evidence do you have the Honda lost money on the NSX or S2000? Give me reputable links.

I for one am still a fan of Honda and that is probably why I am so critical of their failures. They need to innovate and advance their value as a product if they want to survive and sadly they have been lost in a sea of mediocrity the last few years.

When was the last time someone told you about that hot new Honda or Acura???
To be fair, Honda is doing fine these days. For instance, it will be hard to find a car that offers better performance, features, styling, value, AND (not or) handling than the Accord. Acura on the whole is doing okay. The SUV's and CUV's are carrying the Acura brand while the sedans are doing badly.

On the other hand, the S2000 was probably okay in terms of making money, but Honda was losing money for each NSX they built. I think it will be difficult and unrealistic to ask for proof though. But it is not rocket science for one to figure that one out - aluminium monocoque, titanium con rods, hand built, etc. The whole idea was to show what Honda could do back then. So even though Honda was losing money per car sold, it helped build the Honda brand and people began seeing it as a company that can make sporty cars. It made it easier for people to accept the Type R models, and their regular variants.
Old 08-02-2014, 09:57 AM
  #4370  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,839
Received 4,043 Likes on 2,514 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
To be fair, Honda is doing fine these days. For instance, it will be hard to find a car that offers better performance, features, styling, value, AND (not or) handling than the Accord. Acura on the whole is doing okay. The SUV's and CUV's are carrying the Acura brand while the sedans are doing badly.

On the other hand, the S2000 was probably okay in terms of making money, but Honda was losing money for each NSX they built. I think it will be difficult and unrealistic to ask for proof though. But it is not rocket science for one to figure that one out - aluminium monocoque, titanium con rods, hand built, etc. The whole idea was to show what Honda could do back then. So even though Honda was losing money per car sold, it helped build the Honda brand and people began seeing it as a company that can make sporty cars. It made it easier for people to accept the Type R models, and their regular variants.
+1, NSX lost money (production facility built for 25 cars/day but only made 5/day). S2000 had a profit, criteria for the business case was that going in. Was in a article about Honda in WSJ in early 2000's.
Old 08-03-2014, 08:53 AM
  #4371  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Cars going on fire is not foreign to Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini, and etc. Heck, remember the exploding M3 engines?
Some pretty good company listed there.


STILL...that being said, a brand like Honda, IMO is desperate for some GOOD PR regarding their halo/flagship car after it's been beset by cancellations, delays, more cancellations that has left a fanbase reeling.
At this point, the next next next NSX has been delayed so long its much better for Honda to take their time and get it right. Sounds like its about 15 months away from showing up at your local Acura dealer. Still plenty of time for the vapor fans to crack jokes. I'm actually cautiously starting to get excited that this puppy might, just might be better than expected.
Old 08-03-2014, 09:27 AM
  #4372  
7th Gear
 
TypeS_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How Much

Any ballpark idea what they're going to MSRP this one at? over or under $100k?
Old 08-03-2014, 09:56 AM
  #4373  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
if guess still stands at starting at 125K
Old 08-04-2014, 12:47 PM
  #4374  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,839
Received 4,043 Likes on 2,514 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
Fire was caused by a bad fuel line. The problem was unique to that particular line on that particular car, not the design itself.
Good to know.

Fires are not uncommon during testing, here's a 2016 Ford Super Duty burning down to the ground during testing in the dessert.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/2016-for...g-testing.html


Old 08-05-2014, 06:17 PM
  #4375  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by TypeS_Rob
Any ballpark idea what they're going to MSRP this one at? over or under $100k?
Since I nailed spot-on the 2015 TLX SH-AWD V6 9AT TECH pricing at $42k, will throw a dart at the NSX order sheet at $149k MSRP.
Old 08-06-2014, 01:40 AM
  #4376  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Old 08-06-2014, 01:58 AM
  #4377  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
^ Explains why Honda/Acura paint is the suck


Autoline: You also talked about a new paint process that you're using on your mass production cars that cut, I think you said, 40% energy. Explain that a little bit.

Jon Minto: Well, traditionally we've used a 4 coat and 3 bake process, paint process. By eliminating one of the coating and baking processes, of course we can reduce the energy that's used in the baking process of the ovens, and that's what's allowed us to do it. And we can maintain the same or improve the level of quality.

Autoline: How do you do that? Because, I think, a lot of people watching right now would be, "What do you mean you're putting less paint on a car?" How can that be better?

Jon Minto: Yeah, we... umm... of course we do all the testing to make sure that things such as corrossion protection, etc. are maintained. But just by looking at... work with our supplies for paint development and working with our Honda engineering company for the application, we've found a way that we can manage to use less coats and get the same protection.

Last edited by AZuser; 08-06-2014 at 02:00 AM.
Old 08-06-2014, 11:59 AM
  #4378  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
I bet the VaporSX will have higher pricing tag and lower performance figures than GTR.
Old 08-06-2014, 12:07 PM
  #4379  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,637
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by Fibonacci
Since I nailed spot-on the 2015 TLX SH-AWD V6 9AT TECH pricing at $42k, will throw a dart at the NSX order sheet at $149k MSRP.
That's what several reliable sources have said too.
Old 08-06-2014, 12:48 PM
  #4380  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
skd2k1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in traffic
Posts: 6,942
Received 762 Likes on 570 Posts
Originally Posted by JS + BRZ
I bet the VaporSX will have higher pricing tag and lower performance figures than GTR.
that's true of just about every high performance car out there.
Old 08-06-2014, 12:59 PM
  #4381  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by JS + BRZ
I bet the VaporSX will have higher pricing tag and lower performance figures than GTR.
There is little point of bringing it out if it cant match it or beat it unless the price tag comes in less than.
Old 08-06-2014, 01:09 PM
  #4382  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
There is little point of bringing it out if it cant match it or beat it unless the price tag comes in less than.
Acura's selling point is you can get "similar" performance at 30mpg.

But they can't accept the fact that those people do not give a shit about your 30mpg and they shouldn't.
Old 08-06-2014, 01:34 PM
  #4383  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11,981
Received 641 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by AZuser
^ Explains why Honda/Acura paint is the suck
All Japanese cars will rust. That's what my Audi mechanic tells me.
Old 08-06-2014, 03:26 PM
  #4384  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
correction, All cars will rust. it is just a matter of time. unless Audi is made of gold.

wait, can gold rust?
Old 08-06-2014, 04:14 PM
  #4385  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
There is little point of bringing it out if it cant match it or beat it unless the price tag comes in less than.
The first gen NSX came out later than the R32 GTR and couldn't beat the GTR, and it was more expensive than the GTR.
Old 08-07-2014, 05:36 AM
  #4386  
I feel the need...
 
Fibonacci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Motown
Posts: 14,957
Received 515 Likes on 363 Posts
Originally Posted by AZuser
^ Explains why Honda/Acura paint is the suck
Not sure why this video post is in the NSX thread. It is referring to new paint process in Acura's "mass produced" vehicle lines, not the NSX.

Just sayin'
Old 08-07-2014, 08:11 AM
  #4387  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
Acura's selling point is you can get "similar" performance at 30mpg.

But they can't accept the fact that those people do not give a shit about your 30mpg and they shouldn't.
Yea, and once again they are behind. I could go out and buy a corvette and get 30mpg and similar performance. It just sounds like another excuse for not being able to meet or beat so they settle on something else as a goal.

If i wanted something FAST the last thing i would be worried about is getting 30mpg driving.
Old 08-07-2014, 08:23 AM
  #4388  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
The first gen NSX came out later than the R32 GTR and couldn't beat the GTR, and it was more expensive than the GTR.
by 92 when the NSX R came out it was beating the GTR on the track
Old 08-07-2014, 12:21 PM
  #4389  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
by 92 when the NSX R came out it was beating the GTR on the track
Yup and we don't know if there will be a Type R version of the new NSX.
Old 08-07-2014, 12:36 PM
  #4390  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
So what if the NSX went down in flames, isn’t that what most new Ferarri’s are doing?






Ferrari FF


Last edited by Black Tire; 08-07-2014 at 12:46 PM.
Old 08-07-2014, 01:07 PM
  #4391  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
There are no surprises anymore about Ferrari on fire.

but an unreliable Honda? that will kill Honda.
Old 08-07-2014, 07:46 PM
  #4392  
6G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,176
Received 1,140 Likes on 815 Posts
^^^^^

Agree.

The Honda/Acura brand is solely built on exceptional Japanese reliabilities.

Honda/Acura vehicles are not suppose to breakdown, let alone on fire.
Old 08-08-2014, 07:47 AM
  #4393  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
Yup and we don't know if there will be a Type R version of the new NSX.
Lets just say odds are it will be safe to assume that the days of Type-S and Type-R versions are probably long gone. And if it has taken them 20 years to come out with a new nsx, odds are it will take them at min 10 years to come out with a type -r version to compete with something already outdated
Old 08-08-2014, 12:31 PM
  #4394  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
There are no surprises anymore about Ferrari on fire.

but an unreliable Honda? that will kill Honda.
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
^^^^^

Agree.

The Honda/Acura brand is solely built on exceptional Japanese reliabilities.

Honda/Acura vehicles are not suppose to breakdown, let alone on fire.
haha! there's always a first time!

It's funny how the engineers were wearing flame suits in the car...it's like they were expecting a fire....

And boy were they calm, simply took out the camera and started snapping pics while the car was on fire.

Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Lets just say odds are it will be safe to assume that the days of Type-S and Type-R versions are probably long gone. And if it has taken them 20 years to come out with a new nsx, odds are it will take them at min 10 years to come out with a type -r version to compete with something already outdated
Haha that might be true. But my point was that, when the 1st NSX came out it wasn't exactly outrunning the R32 GT-R, and it was also more $$.
Old 08-14-2014, 12:53 PM
  #4395  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
skd2k1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in traffic
Posts: 6,942
Received 762 Likes on 570 Posts
Originally Posted by supergt.net
Never flinching in the tough conditions! Weider Modulo NSX CONCEPT-GT scores a stunning win



The FUJI GT 300km RACE, Round 5 of the 2014 AUTOBACS SUPER GT took place at Fuji Speedway in Shizuoka Pref. on Aug. 10. In a race thrashed by the effects of Typhoon #11 that brought out the Safety Car twice, the No. 18 Weider Modulo NSX CONCEPT-GT driven by Naoki Yamamoto and Frederic Makowiecki was the winner of the GT500 class race, bringing the Honda NSX CONCEPT-GT its first win of the season. In the GT300 class race the winner for the first time this season was the No. 61 SUBARU BRZ R&D SPORT that led all the way for a pole to checkers victory.

http://supergt.net/news/single/1135?ln=en

Old 08-14-2014, 08:34 PM
  #4396  
Pro
 
Mugen.Justice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 36
Posts: 576
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Think the RLX Sport Hybrid's issues/delays will end up manifesting in the NSX?
Old 08-15-2014, 01:23 AM
  #4397  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by Mugen.Justice
Think the RLX Sport Hybrid's issues/delays will end up manifesting in the NSX?
i think it is the other way around.

Maybe the flame in the NSX had Acura reconsider RLX hybrid.
Old 10-07-2014, 04:38 PM
  #4398  
Engineer
 
savage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston
Age: 41
Posts: 4,525
Received 76 Likes on 53 Posts
Once Again, The Acura NSX Targets Ferrari For A Fraction Of The Price
Once Again, The Acura NSX Targets Ferrari For A Fraction Of The Price

It's been kind of a while since we've heard anything about the upcoming 2015 Acura NSX, but the folks at Honda are still apparently hammering away at their hybrid supercar. And now they've released some actual performance targets: Ferrari 458 performance for an Audi R8 price tag. Sound familiar?

It should, because the original NSX was benchmarked against the Ferrari 328 and 348 back during its development in the 1980s. It looks like Honda wants the new car to go the same way.

Here's what NSX development chief Ted Klaus told What Car:

'We have to achieve the type of acceleration that the customer is achieving with the Ferrari,' said Klaus. 'More importantly we have to achieve this every day and also at the Nurburgring.'

However, he said that the intention is to keep Honda's new petrol-electric hybrid supercar more affordable than the 458. 'I think we are aiming within the range of the Audi R8,' he said. 'I realise that is a wide range but the NSX will still be extremely accessible.'
Of course, the new NSX will be a very different car than the 458 Italia, using a twin turbo hybrid V6 instead of the Ferrari's naturally aspirated V8. But with more and more supercars going hybrid, like the Audi R8, it should be in good company.

Klaus also implied there could be more variants of the new NSX down the road, like a more high-performance version or a convertible, but they haven't decided which to go with first.

Honda says the next NSX will be unveiled in production form a year from now at the 2015 Tokyo Motor Show. It's been a long, long wait for this car, and Honda is talking a big game.

Let's hope the NSX can back it up.

That's late October 2015. Which means you probably won't see anything on the road until Spring/Summer 2016.
Old 10-07-2014, 04:42 PM
  #4399  
Senior Moderator
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,261
Received 22,669 Likes on 13,905 Posts
Vaporcar. Nothing to see. Move along.
Old 10-07-2014, 05:33 PM
  #4400  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by savage
Once Again, The Acura NSX Targets Ferrari For A Fraction Of The Price



That's late October 2015. Which means you probably won't see anything on the road until Spring/Summer 2016.
and who knows what else will happen before Summer 2016?


Quick Reply: Acura: NSX News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 PM.