Offset explained
#1
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Offset explained
What is offset?
One of the most asked questions, what's the offset closely followed by what is the biggest wheel that can I fit onto my car? The offset is a gauge of how much a wheel will stick out from the arch of a car or how far it will recess into the arch of the car. If the offset is wrong, the wheels will stick out too far and will almost be a like a beach buggy!
If you take a wheel and cut it in half and draw a line down the centre of the width of a wheel (Figure 1), the offset would be the distance between the back face (mounting face) of the wheel and the centre line that you have just drawn (shown as a dotted line in Figure 1).
Figure 1
It is very important not to deviate too far from the offset of the wheel originally fitted to the vehicle. A wheel of radically different offset can cause serious clearance and handling problems along with accelerated tire and bearing wear.
The offset is commonly shown as a et number, i.e.et49. This means the offset is 49mm. The offset is always measured in millimeters and can normally be found at the back of the wheel or stamped behind the center cap (if fitted).
Negative scrub geometry had the intention that if you got a flat tire you were still able to control the car (so long as you weren't going motorway speeds). So its best to keep as close to the OEM offset as possible.
However the bigger the alloy wheel goes, the more difficult it becomes to stay close to the oem offset. The reason being is that as wheel gets bigger in diameter, it also becomes wider, and so does the tyre that fits it. This is when other items in the wheel arch can begin to foul with the alloy wheel or the tire. Namely the arch lip of the car and the suspension strut (Figure 2). When this happens the offset must change for the bigger wheel and tyre to fit in the arch. Plus if the car has been lowered, this will have to be considered too as the wheel is now tucked further up in the arch.
Figure 2
One of the most asked questions, what's the offset closely followed by what is the biggest wheel that can I fit onto my car? The offset is a gauge of how much a wheel will stick out from the arch of a car or how far it will recess into the arch of the car. If the offset is wrong, the wheels will stick out too far and will almost be a like a beach buggy!
If you take a wheel and cut it in half and draw a line down the centre of the width of a wheel (Figure 1), the offset would be the distance between the back face (mounting face) of the wheel and the centre line that you have just drawn (shown as a dotted line in Figure 1).
Figure 1
It is very important not to deviate too far from the offset of the wheel originally fitted to the vehicle. A wheel of radically different offset can cause serious clearance and handling problems along with accelerated tire and bearing wear.
The offset is commonly shown as a et number, i.e.et49. This means the offset is 49mm. The offset is always measured in millimeters and can normally be found at the back of the wheel or stamped behind the center cap (if fitted).
Negative scrub geometry had the intention that if you got a flat tire you were still able to control the car (so long as you weren't going motorway speeds). So its best to keep as close to the OEM offset as possible.
However the bigger the alloy wheel goes, the more difficult it becomes to stay close to the oem offset. The reason being is that as wheel gets bigger in diameter, it also becomes wider, and so does the tyre that fits it. This is when other items in the wheel arch can begin to foul with the alloy wheel or the tire. Namely the arch lip of the car and the suspension strut (Figure 2). When this happens the offset must change for the bigger wheel and tyre to fit in the arch. Plus if the car has been lowered, this will have to be considered too as the wheel is now tucked further up in the arch.
Figure 2
The following users liked this post:
JD TL-S (12-20-2011)
#3
Senior Moderator
Nice post, cTLgo. I think this is probably Garage-worthy and I'll try to add it.
Edit: Or you could add it to your sticky at the top of the page.
Edit: Or you could add it to your sticky at the top of the page.
#5
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Rets has added it to the garage, it will be added to the Tires/Wheels/Suspension portion of the garage and the sticky above once rets does some tweaking. Thanks
#6
Automobile Aficionado
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena, California
Age: 46
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has anyone done measurements inside the TL wheel well to determine the maximum width wheel, tire, and offset combination??
I need to confirm that a 20x9 with a 45-50 offset on a 245 wide tire will work.
I know a lot of people talk about 19x8.5 45 offset as a sure thing but I need to know about this size.
I need to confirm that a 20x9 with a 45-50 offset on a 245 wide tire will work.
I know a lot of people talk about 19x8.5 45 offset as a sure thing but I need to know about this size.
#7
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Twenties
Has anyone done measurements inside the TL wheel well to determine the maximum width wheel, tire, and offset combination??
I need to confirm that a 20x9 with a 45-50 offset on a 245 wide tire will work.
I know a lot of people talk about 19x8.5 45 offset as a sure thing but I need to know about this size.
I need to confirm that a 20x9 with a 45-50 offset on a 245 wide tire will work.
I know a lot of people talk about 19x8.5 45 offset as a sure thing but I need to know about this size.
you can find that information in the first few posts here:
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63320
you can go with a 20x9 wheel, offset will depend on wheel design and if you have 5AT or 6MT. 245 might be not wide enough for a 9" wheel, might want to go up to 255. There are a few members on the site with 20s, you might want to check there specs.
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15225
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109712
Trending Topics
#8
Team Nighthawk Member
MY biggest problem in fitting wheels to my 6MT car was not size or offset (although I do agree this has a huge effect on rubbing etc), but rather the dimentions on the back side of the wheel. Some wheels have thicker spokes or in actuality, wrap around back the wheel in the direction of the mounting plate faster than others. This means that the BACK OF THE WHEEL won't clear the LARGER Brembo calipers no matter what offset your using. It really becomes an exercise in trial and error if the manufacture has not ever tried a specific car/wheel application.
For me, Foose said the Speedster 5's in a 45 offset would fit in a 18" wheel. When they didn't fit, they said try the 34 offset. It didn't fit either, so I tried the larger 19" wheels thinking that the spokes would not wrap in as quickly on their way to the outside of the rim....no luck. At that point Foose said to go with spacers and I declined their invitation because I wanted a low vibration hubcentric fit and went with a different wheel that fit fine with the same size and offset.
I wish there was a universal answer....but my experience would indicate that there is not.
For me, Foose said the Speedster 5's in a 45 offset would fit in a 18" wheel. When they didn't fit, they said try the 34 offset. It didn't fit either, so I tried the larger 19" wheels thinking that the spokes would not wrap in as quickly on their way to the outside of the rim....no luck. At that point Foose said to go with spacers and I declined their invitation because I wanted a low vibration hubcentric fit and went with a different wheel that fit fine with the same size and offset.
I wish there was a universal answer....but my experience would indicate that there is not.
#9
王が付いているロール
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The infamous Miami
Age: 45
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What about staggared setups..? I understand going with an 8.5 +35 up front due to the Brembos but what about the rear... wouldn't that be a lower offset with so much less caliper to space for?
I was wondering if anyone is running either staggared offsets on same width i.e. 18x8.5 +35 front / 18x8.5 +25 rear or fully staggared setups such as 8.5 front 9.5 rear...?
I am looking at two different Work wheels and these are the offsets that look to me like they would fit... does anyone know for sure?
19x8.5 +40 R - Disk (front)
19x9.5 +42 O - Disk (rear)
or
19x8.5 +39 R - Disk
19x9.5 +44 O/A - Disk
I was wondering if anyone is running either staggared offsets on same width i.e. 18x8.5 +35 front / 18x8.5 +25 rear or fully staggared setups such as 8.5 front 9.5 rear...?
I am looking at two different Work wheels and these are the offsets that look to me like they would fit... does anyone know for sure?
19x8.5 +40 R - Disk (front)
19x9.5 +42 O - Disk (rear)
or
19x8.5 +39 R - Disk
19x9.5 +44 O/A - Disk
#10
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (3)
King Leo: The R disk for the fronts should be OK be it 40 or 39 offset if you run 245/35 tires. 235/35 will give you a smidge more clearance.
The rear might be OK or rub lightly with 42 or 44 offset and 9.5" wide, especially if you have bodykit.
If I were you, I'd get something of the same width but different offset to give you the staggered look but without worse understeer. I also think that the lowest offset for 8.5" is 30 mm for the rear.
Once again, it's all based on my experience wheel-shopping for the car and my calculations. Also different tires of the same size will have different actual sizes. Keep this in mind.
The rear might be OK or rub lightly with 42 or 44 offset and 9.5" wide, especially if you have bodykit.
If I were you, I'd get something of the same width but different offset to give you the staggered look but without worse understeer. I also think that the lowest offset for 8.5" is 30 mm for the rear.
Once again, it's all based on my experience wheel-shopping for the car and my calculations. Also different tires of the same size will have different actual sizes. Keep this in mind.
#12
王が付いているロール
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The infamous Miami
Age: 45
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 260 HP
King Leo: The R disk for the fronts should be OK be it 40 or 39 offset if you run 245/35 tires. 235/35 will give you a smidge more clearance.
The rear might be OK or rub lightly with 42 or 44 offset and 9.5" wide, especially if you have bodykit.
If I were you, I'd get something of the same width but different offset to give you the staggered look but without worse understeer. I also think that the lowest offset for 8.5" is 30 mm for the rear.
Once again, it's all based on my experience wheel-shopping for the car and my calculations. Also different tires of the same size will have different actual sizes. Keep this in mind.
The rear might be OK or rub lightly with 42 or 44 offset and 9.5" wide, especially if you have bodykit.
If I were you, I'd get something of the same width but different offset to give you the staggered look but without worse understeer. I also think that the lowest offset for 8.5" is 30 mm for the rear.
Once again, it's all based on my experience wheel-shopping for the car and my calculations. Also different tires of the same size will have different actual sizes. Keep this in mind.
That's exactly what I needed to find out.
~Leo
Originally Posted by Nandito28
Why would you want more witdh in the rear on a fwd car?
why dont you try same witdh with different offsets.
why dont you try same witdh with different offsets.
I am looking for that staggared look.. but didn't want to run different widths for aparent FWD issues, i.e. heavy understeer.
I think the best setup would be 19x8.5 with +40 front and +30 rear.
It would look stagarred and not cause to much understeer.
~Leo
#13
Yeah, I personally dont like the staggered look. But I had to go with it since I have the brembo breaks up front. I wish I had the regular breaks up in the front although the Brembos are nice!!! they've been nothing but a headache to me in choosing rims for it and all the squeaking they create for me!!!
BTW, I dont know my offsets. Sorry
All I know the lip in the front is going to 1.5' and the rear is going to be 2.5" from what I was told that was the max they could get.
I would of loved to do 2.5 all around!
BTW, I dont know my offsets. Sorry
All I know the lip in the front is going to 1.5' and the rear is going to be 2.5" from what I was told that was the max they could get.
I would of loved to do 2.5 all around!
#14
王が付いているロール
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The infamous Miami
Age: 45
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nandito28
Yeah, I personally dont like the staggered look. But I had to go with it since I have the brembo breaks up front. I wish I had the regular breaks up in the front although the Brembos are nice!!! they've been nothing but a headache to me in choosing rims for it and all the squeaking they create for me!!!
BTW, I dont know my offsets. Sorry
All I know the lip in the front is going to 1.5' and the rear is going to be 2.5" from what I was told that was the max they could get.
I would of loved to do 2.5 all around!
BTW, I dont know my offsets. Sorry
All I know the lip in the front is going to 1.5' and the rear is going to be 2.5" from what I was told that was the max they could get.
I would of loved to do 2.5 all around!
That's the setup I currently have on my S2000.
So 2.5 is the most that can be dished on a 3G TL... Not bad for a FWD car
#15
Originally Posted by King Leo
That's a hott setup though... 1.5 front and 2.5 rear...
That's the setup I currently have on my S2000.
So 2.5 is the most that can be dished on a 3G TL... Not bad for a FWD car
That's the setup I currently have on my S2000.
So 2.5 is the most that can be dished on a 3G TL... Not bad for a FWD car
I haven't gotten the wheels yet and I have no clue how the 1.5' lip will look...other than a tape measure...I'll PM you my email.
Thanks
#16
Oderint dum metuant.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes
on
446 Posts
Nandito
1) You could've gotten 1.5" all around if you wanted to avoid the staggered look.
2) Pics of 1.5"/2.5":
cTLgo's car
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...=smoked+ronjon
Pics 24-33
http://www.ronjonwheels.com/hidden/i...nprogresspics/
1) You could've gotten 1.5" all around if you wanted to avoid the staggered look.
2) Pics of 1.5"/2.5":
cTLgo's car
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...=smoked+ronjon
Pics 24-33
http://www.ronjonwheels.com/hidden/i...nprogresspics/
#17
王が付いているロール
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The infamous Miami
Age: 45
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chill_dog
Nandito
...cTLgo's car
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...=smoked+ronjon
Pics 24-33
http://www.ronjonwheels.com/hidden/i...nprogresspics/
...cTLgo's car
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...=smoked+ronjon
Pics 24-33
http://www.ronjonwheels.com/hidden/i...nprogresspics/
^^^^
Wow now that is a clean setup!!!
What are the widths and offset for that setup???
#18
Originally Posted by chill_dog
Nandito
1) You could've gotten 1.5" all around if you wanted to avoid the staggered look.
1) You could've gotten 1.5" all around if you wanted to avoid the staggered look.
#19
Oderint dum metuant.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes
on
446 Posts
Leo - RonJon 3pc Devotions, 19X8.5, et37 all around for AT, 43.5 F/37 R for MT. Check out www.ronjonwheels.com
Nandito - lol...I know what you mean...I'd love a BBK, but not worth giving up that 2.5 all around...I love it!
Nandito - lol...I know what you mean...I'd love a BBK, but not worth giving up that 2.5 all around...I love it!
#20
Chill_dog,
Wow I didn't know Ron was working on cars straight off the Trailer (new) with the wrapping still on them...that was like three new cars!
Thanks for the pics...I really wanted to see (from an angle) how the 1.5' lip looked...How come he doesn't have this on his site...would be helpful IMO, But than again I never asked him if he had more pics.
Thanks!
Wow I didn't know Ron was working on cars straight off the Trailer (new) with the wrapping still on them...that was like three new cars!
Thanks for the pics...I really wanted to see (from an angle) how the 1.5' lip looked...How come he doesn't have this on his site...would be helpful IMO, But than again I never asked him if he had more pics.
Thanks!
#23
王が付いているロール
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The infamous Miami
Age: 45
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chill_dog
Leo - RonJon 3pc Devotions, 19X8.5, et37 all around for AT, 43.5 F/37 R for MT. Check out www.ronjonwheels.com
...
...
as far as the 19x8.5 43.5 offset for the fronts...
how pushed out is that, is the same setup as the pics listed above?
what I was looking for was a width and offset the pushes the wheel as close to the edge of the fender as possible without sticking out. Something as aggressive as the concept A-Spec offset.
BTW.. the RJ wheels are insanely gorgeous
#24
Oderint dum metuant.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes
on
446 Posts
Originally Posted by King Leo
I like the sound of that!
as far as the 19x8.5 43.5 offset for the fronts...
how pushed out is that, is the same setup as the pics listed above?
BTW.. the RJ wheels are insanely gorgeous
as far as the 19x8.5 43.5 offset for the fronts...
how pushed out is that, is the same setup as the pics listed above?
BTW.. the RJ wheels are insanely gorgeous
Ron makes some great looking wheels...top notch quality...excellent customer service. I know I sound like a commercial, but that was my (and many other member's) experience. I also like his new 1pF's...a set of 20's that weigh just shy of 20 lbs! I have to admit, it's tempting.
The following users liked this post:
JD TL-S (12-20-2011)
#26
10th Gear
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 46
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just purchased some 19x8.5's and 19x9.5's with a 38mm offset all around!!!! Does any one know if this will be okay??? I am also looking for tires at the moment...any tire size recommendations for this staggered set up to prevent rubbing issues? My car sits at stock height. Thanks!
#27
Pro
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Montreal Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 725
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
re
i got my eye on these 18 inch 7.5'' wheels, and i wanna stay with 235/40/18, what offset would i need to fit it nice like the oem wheels? can i fit 235 on the car with a narrower mag?
thanks
thanks
#31
Originally Posted by ityper
19x8 5x114 30gmm
19x8 5x114 42gmm
19x8 5x114 48gmm
Which of the above offset sizes will offer the deepest lip?
#33
SXC-LEX
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: WESTCHESTER,NY
Age: 41
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok so this thread is ancient but i will give it a shot looking for some help
i cant understaand the offset terminology.
the tl has a stock wheel offset of 40 i believe correct me if im wrong
so does a lower offset bring the wheel further away from the face of the wheel or closer.
in other words does a higher offset make the wheel bulge out of the fenders or the opposite? please im looking att some wheels but the offset is crazzy here it goes i want to see if i can fit 10's in the rear..
F: 19x9 +36 O-disc /
R: 19x10 +23 O-disc
i cant understaand the offset terminology.
the tl has a stock wheel offset of 40 i believe correct me if im wrong
so does a lower offset bring the wheel further away from the face of the wheel or closer.
in other words does a higher offset make the wheel bulge out of the fenders or the opposite? please im looking att some wheels but the offset is crazzy here it goes i want to see if i can fit 10's in the rear..
F: 19x9 +36 O-disc /
R: 19x10 +23 O-disc
#34
Lower offset moves the wheel out. Stock is 45mm. You can use this calculator to check what changing the offset will do http://www.1010tires.com/WheelOffsetCalculator.asp
According to the calculator, that rear wheel would move out almost 2", so over an inch of the wheel would stick out of the fenderwell.
According to the calculator, that rear wheel would move out almost 2", so over an inch of the wheel would stick out of the fenderwell.
#36
EMRacer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sacramento area
Age: 62
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FlyDog's link above is pretty good but I think this one gives a better visual indication and gives you an estimate on suspension and fender clearances:
http://www.rims-n-tires.com/rt_specs.jsp
http://www.rims-n-tires.com/rt_specs.jsp
#37
Originally Posted by Nandito28
Why would you want more witdh in the rear on a fwd car?
why dont you try same witdh with different offsets.
why dont you try same witdh with different offsets.
#38
Originally Posted by emracer
FlyDog's link above is pretty good but I think this one gives a better visual indication and gives you an estimate on suspension and fender clearances:
http://www.rims-n-tires.com/rt_specs.jsp
http://www.rims-n-tires.com/rt_specs.jsp
I entered 235/45-17 on the stock 8" wheel and 235/40/18 on an 8.5" wheel. That works out to 16mm (10mm increase in offset + half the increase in wheel width, which is 6mm). But that calculator said it was 10mm total. It didnt take the increased rim width into account.
Then I entered a 9 in wheel and it gave me the same thing, 10mm (should be about 22mm).
#39
Oderint dum metuant.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes
on
446 Posts
madtraction39 - yes it does...see Axis Maxx lips.
flydog - How much the face comes out? Who cares? What matters is how much the whole thing sticks out...it's usually the tire that sticks out more, if the wheel, it's the lip. The face almost never sticks out past the tire and edge of the lip.
That's the calculator I use, and it's very effective. If there was an error with it, it was operator error. The only thing it doesn't tell you is brake clearance, which no online calculator will tell you.
flydog - How much the face comes out? Who cares? What matters is how much the whole thing sticks out...it's usually the tire that sticks out more, if the wheel, it's the lip. The face almost never sticks out past the tire and edge of the lip.
That's the calculator I use, and it's very effective. If there was an error with it, it was operator error. The only thing it doesn't tell you is brake clearance, which no online calculator will tell you.