Offset explained

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 02:03 PM
  #1  
cM3go's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,295
Likes: 131
From: IL
Offset explained

What is offset?


One of the most asked questions, what's the offset closely followed by what is the biggest wheel that can I fit onto my car? The offset is a gauge of how much a wheel will stick out from the arch of a car or how far it will recess into the arch of the car. If the offset is wrong, the wheels will stick out too far and will almost be a like a beach buggy!

If you take a wheel and cut it in half and draw a line down the centre of the width of a wheel (Figure 1), the offset would be the distance between the back face (mounting face) of the wheel and the centre line that you have just drawn (shown as a dotted line in Figure 1).


Figure 1

It is very important not to deviate too far from the offset of the wheel originally fitted to the vehicle. A wheel of radically different offset can cause serious clearance and handling problems along with accelerated tire and bearing wear.

The offset is commonly shown as a et number, i.e.et49. This means the offset is 49mm. The offset is always measured in millimeters and can normally be found at the back of the wheel or stamped behind the center cap (if fitted).

Negative scrub geometry had the intention that if you got a flat tire you were still able to control the car (so long as you weren't going motorway speeds). So its best to keep as close to the OEM offset as possible.

However the bigger the alloy wheel goes, the more difficult it becomes to stay close to the oem offset. The reason being is that as wheel gets bigger in diameter, it also becomes wider, and so does the tyre that fits it. This is when other items in the wheel arch can begin to foul with the alloy wheel or the tire. Namely the arch lip of the car and the suspension strut (Figure 2). When this happens the offset must change for the bigger wheel and tyre to fit in the arch. Plus if the car has been lowered, this will have to be considered too as the wheel is now tucked further up in the arch.


Figure 2
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #2  
6mtV6's Avatar
I6
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 1
From: NY
What is the OEM 17" wheels offset?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #3  
neuronbob's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 20,067
Likes: 4,698
From: Cleveland area, OH
Nice post, cTLgo. I think this is probably Garage-worthy and I'll try to add it.

Edit: Or you could add it to your sticky at the top of the page.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #4  
Hawhyen51's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Excellent Post - sticky this bad boy. And 6mtV6, the offset for the stock 17 is 45.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 11:48 PM
  #5  
cM3go's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,295
Likes: 131
From: IL
Rets has added it to the garage, it will be added to the Tires/Wheels/Suspension portion of the garage and the sticky above once rets does some tweaking. Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:08 PM
  #6  
Twenties's Avatar
Automobile Aficionado
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, California
Has anyone done measurements inside the TL wheel well to determine the maximum width wheel, tire, and offset combination??

I need to confirm that a 20x9 with a 45-50 offset on a 245 wide tire will work.

I know a lot of people talk about 19x8.5 45 offset as a sure thing but I need to know about this size.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 08:09 AM
  #7  
cM3go's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,295
Likes: 131
From: IL
Originally Posted by Twenties
Has anyone done measurements inside the TL wheel well to determine the maximum width wheel, tire, and offset combination??

I need to confirm that a 20x9 with a 45-50 offset on a 245 wide tire will work.

I know a lot of people talk about 19x8.5 45 offset as a sure thing but I need to know about this size.

you can find that information in the first few posts here:

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63320

you can go with a 20x9 wheel, offset will depend on wheel design and if you have 5AT or 6MT. 245 might be not wide enough for a 9" wheel, might want to go up to 255. There are a few members on the site with 20s, you might want to check there specs.

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15225
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109712
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 09:41 AM
  #8  
SKIUL8R's Avatar
Team Nighthawk Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 1
From: Denver
MY biggest problem in fitting wheels to my 6MT car was not size or offset (although I do agree this has a huge effect on rubbing etc), but rather the dimentions on the back side of the wheel. Some wheels have thicker spokes or in actuality, wrap around back the wheel in the direction of the mounting plate faster than others. This means that the BACK OF THE WHEEL won't clear the LARGER Brembo calipers no matter what offset your using. It really becomes an exercise in trial and error if the manufacture has not ever tried a specific car/wheel application.

For me, Foose said the Speedster 5's in a 45 offset would fit in a 18" wheel. When they didn't fit, they said try the 34 offset. It didn't fit either, so I tried the larger 19" wheels thinking that the spokes would not wrap in as quickly on their way to the outside of the rim....no luck. At that point Foose said to go with spacers and I declined their invitation because I wanted a low vibration hubcentric fit and went with a different wheel that fit fine with the same size and offset.

I wish there was a universal answer....but my experience would indicate that there is not.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #9  
King Leo's Avatar
王が付いているロール
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: The infamous Miami
What about staggared setups..? I understand going with an 8.5 +35 up front due to the Brembos but what about the rear... wouldn't that be a lower offset with so much less caliper to space for?

I was wondering if anyone is running either staggared offsets on same width i.e. 18x8.5 +35 front / 18x8.5 +25 rear or fully staggared setups such as 8.5 front 9.5 rear...?

I am looking at two different Work wheels and these are the offsets that look to me like they would fit... does anyone know for sure?

19x8.5 +40 R - Disk (front)
19x9.5 +42 O - Disk (rear)

or

19x8.5 +39 R - Disk
19x9.5 +44 O/A - Disk
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 02:17 PM
  #10  
260 HP's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 2
From: Socal
King Leo: The R disk for the fronts should be OK be it 40 or 39 offset if you run 245/35 tires. 235/35 will give you a smidge more clearance.

The rear might be OK or rub lightly with 42 or 44 offset and 9.5" wide, especially if you have bodykit.

If I were you, I'd get something of the same width but different offset to give you the staggered look but without worse understeer. I also think that the lowest offset for 8.5" is 30 mm for the rear.

Once again, it's all based on my experience wheel-shopping for the car and my calculations. Also different tires of the same size will have different actual sizes. Keep this in mind.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #11  
Nandito28's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: FLorida
Why would you want more witdh in the rear on a fwd car?

why dont you try same witdh with different offsets.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #12  
King Leo's Avatar
王が付いているロール
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: The infamous Miami
Originally Posted by 260 HP
King Leo: The R disk for the fronts should be OK be it 40 or 39 offset if you run 245/35 tires. 235/35 will give you a smidge more clearance.

The rear might be OK or rub lightly with 42 or 44 offset and 9.5" wide, especially if you have bodykit.

If I were you, I'd get something of the same width but different offset to give you the staggered look but without worse understeer. I also think that the lowest offset for 8.5" is 30 mm for the rear.

Once again, it's all based on my experience wheel-shopping for the car and my calculations. Also different tires of the same size will have different actual sizes. Keep this in mind.
Thx 260!
That's exactly what I needed to find out.
~Leo

Originally Posted by Nandito28
Why would you want more witdh in the rear on a fwd car?

why dont you try same witdh with different offsets.
Nandito28,

I am looking for that staggared look.. but didn't want to run different widths for aparent FWD issues, i.e. heavy understeer.

I think the best setup would be 19x8.5 with +40 front and +30 rear.
It would look stagarred and not cause to much understeer.
~Leo
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #13  
Nandito28's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: FLorida
Yeah, I personally dont like the staggered look. But I had to go with it since I have the brembo breaks up front. I wish I had the regular breaks up in the front although the Brembos are nice!!! they've been nothing but a headache to me in choosing rims for it and all the squeaking they create for me!!!

BTW, I dont know my offsets. Sorry

All I know the lip in the front is going to 1.5' and the rear is going to be 2.5" from what I was told that was the max they could get.

I would of loved to do 2.5 all around!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #14  
King Leo's Avatar
王が付いているロール
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: The infamous Miami
Originally Posted by Nandito28
Yeah, I personally dont like the staggered look. But I had to go with it since I have the brembo breaks up front. I wish I had the regular breaks up in the front although the Brembos are nice!!! they've been nothing but a headache to me in choosing rims for it and all the squeaking they create for me!!!

BTW, I dont know my offsets. Sorry

All I know the lip in the front is going to 1.5' and the rear is going to be 2.5" from what I was told that was the max they could get.

I would of loved to do 2.5 all around!
That's a hott setup though... 1.5 front and 2.5 rear...
That's the setup I currently have on my S2000.

So 2.5 is the most that can be dished on a 3G TL... Not bad for a FWD car
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 02:57 PM
  #15  
Nandito28's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: FLorida
Originally Posted by King Leo
That's a hott setup though... 1.5 front and 2.5 rear...
That's the setup I currently have on my S2000.

So 2.5 is the most that can be dished on a 3G TL... Not bad for a FWD car
Can you take pics of the front wheel with the 1.5'

I haven't gotten the wheels yet and I have no clue how the 1.5' lip will look...other than a tape measure...I'll PM you my email.

Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 03:30 PM
  #16  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Nandito

1) You could've gotten 1.5" all around if you wanted to avoid the staggered look.

2) Pics of 1.5"/2.5":

cTLgo's car

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...=smoked+ronjon

Pics 24-33

http://www.ronjonwheels.com/hidden/i...nprogresspics/
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 03:51 PM
  #17  
King Leo's Avatar
王が付いているロール
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: The infamous Miami

^^^^
Wow now that is a clean setup!!!
What are the widths and offset for that setup???
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 07:12 AM
  #18  
Nandito28's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: FLorida
Originally Posted by chill_dog
Nandito

1) You could've gotten 1.5" all around if you wanted to avoid the staggered look.
Yeah I know, but I love the deep look to much! At least now (later) I can see them from the back.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #19  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Leo - RonJon 3pc Devotions, 19X8.5, et37 all around for AT, 43.5 F/37 R for MT. Check out www.ronjonwheels.com

Nandito - lol...I know what you mean...I'd love a BBK, but not worth giving up that 2.5 all around...I love it!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 08:47 AM
  #20  
Nandito28's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: FLorida
Chill_dog,

Wow I didn't know Ron was working on cars straight off the Trailer (new) with the wrapping still on them...that was like three new cars!

Thanks for the pics...I really wanted to see (from an angle) how the 1.5' lip looked...How come he doesn't have this on his site...would be helpful IMO, But than again I never asked him if he had more pics.

Thanks!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #21  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Those pics were originally posted in the Group Buy thread waaaay back. The thread's long gone and you can't search the Black Market to find archived threads.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 11:35 AM
  #22  
cM3go's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 15,295
Likes: 131
From: IL
I like my staggered setup
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #23  
King Leo's Avatar
王が付いているロール
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: The infamous Miami
Originally Posted by chill_dog
Leo - RonJon 3pc Devotions, 19X8.5, et37 all around for AT, 43.5 F/37 R for MT. Check out www.ronjonwheels.com

...
I like the sound of that!
as far as the 19x8.5 43.5 offset for the fronts...
how pushed out is that, is the same setup as the pics listed above?

what I was looking for was a width and offset the pushes the wheel as close to the edge of the fender as possible without sticking out. Something as aggressive as the concept A-Spec offset.

BTW.. the RJ wheels are insanely gorgeous
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 01:58 PM
  #24  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Originally Posted by King Leo
I like the sound of that!
as far as the 19x8.5 43.5 offset for the fronts...
how pushed out is that, is the same setup as the pics listed above?

BTW.. the RJ wheels are insanely gorgeous
Yeah, that's what's in the pics I linked (both cTLgo's and the AM at the dealer).

Ron makes some great looking wheels...top notch quality...excellent customer service. I know I sound like a commercial, but that was my (and many other member's) experience. I also like his new 1pF's...a set of 20's that weigh just shy of 20 lbs! I have to admit, it's tempting.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #25  
invincible569's Avatar
*
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by cTLgo
I like my staggered setup
me too! im not going to buy what others like.. but what I think looks great.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 08:59 PM
  #26  
GreatWhite's Avatar
10th Gear
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Just purchased some 19x8.5's and 19x9.5's with a 38mm offset all around!!!! Does any one know if this will be okay??? I am also looking for tires at the moment...any tire size recommendations for this staggered set up to prevent rubbing issues? My car sits at stock height. Thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 09:43 PM
  #27  
italian_spak's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Montreal Canada
re

i got my eye on these 18 inch 7.5'' wheels, and i wanna stay with 235/40/18, what offset would i need to fit it nice like the oem wheels? can i fit 235 on the car with a narrower mag?

thanks
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 03:46 AM
  #28  
whatjones911's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: SF bay area
Opinions needed for 18x8 with offset of +50. Will that look funnie or should i get some spacers with it?
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 11:46 PM
  #29  
miketreeez's Avatar
2nd Gear
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
what would be the offset for 22 x 8.5 rims? and tire size? on a 06 TL automatic
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #30  
ityper's Avatar
3G TL
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 1


19x8 5x114 30gmm

19x8 5x114 42gmm

19x8 5x114 48gmm

Which of the above offset sizes will offer the deepest lip?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 02:07 PM
  #31  
ityper's Avatar
3G TL
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by ityper


19x8 5x114 30gmm

19x8 5x114 42gmm

19x8 5x114 48gmm

Which of the above offset sizes will offer the deepest lip?
okay i think i found the answer to that question. now does anyone know if 30mm will work with a TL?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #32  
260 HP's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 2
From: Socal
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 11:52 PM
  #33  
TANE's Avatar
SXC-LEX
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: WESTCHESTER,NY
ok so this thread is ancient but i will give it a shot looking for some help
i cant understaand the offset terminology.
the tl has a stock wheel offset of 40 i believe correct me if im wrong
so does a lower offset bring the wheel further away from the face of the wheel or closer.
in other words does a higher offset make the wheel bulge out of the fenders or the opposite? please im looking att some wheels but the offset is crazzy here it goes i want to see if i can fit 10's in the rear..

F: 19x9 +36 O-disc /
R: 19x10 +23 O-disc
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 12:32 AM
  #34  
flydog's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 428
Likes: 3
From: Arizona
Lower offset moves the wheel out. Stock is 45mm. You can use this calculator to check what changing the offset will do http://www.1010tires.com/WheelOffsetCalculator.asp

According to the calculator, that rear wheel would move out almost 2", so over an inch of the wheel would stick out of the fenderwell.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 12:55 AM
  #35  
TANE's Avatar
SXC-LEX
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: WESTCHESTER,NY
thanks for the link
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 02:18 AM
  #36  
emracer's Avatar
EMRacer
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento area
FlyDog's link above is pretty good but I think this one gives a better visual indication and gives you an estimate on suspension and fender clearances:

http://www.rims-n-tires.com/rt_specs.jsp
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #37  
madtraction39's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by Nandito28
Why would you want more witdh in the rear on a fwd car?

why dont you try same witdh with different offsets.
The problem with this theory is if you buy a 1 piece wheel. With a 1 piece changing offset doesn't change the lip size.
Reply
Old May 16, 2008 | 10:27 PM
  #38  
flydog's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 428
Likes: 3
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by emracer
FlyDog's link above is pretty good but I think this one gives a better visual indication and gives you an estimate on suspension and fender clearances:

http://www.rims-n-tires.com/rt_specs.jsp
That link is pretty cool, but it doesn't properly calculate how much the wheel face comes out.

I entered 235/45-17 on the stock 8" wheel and 235/40/18 on an 8.5" wheel. That works out to 16mm (10mm increase in offset + half the increase in wheel width, which is 6mm). But that calculator said it was 10mm total. It didnt take the increased rim width into account.

Then I entered a 9 in wheel and it gave me the same thing, 10mm (should be about 22mm).
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #39  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
madtraction39 - yes it does...see Axis Maxx lips.

flydog - How much the face comes out? Who cares? What matters is how much the whole thing sticks out...it's usually the tire that sticks out more, if the wheel, it's the lip. The face almost never sticks out past the tire and edge of the lip.

That's the calculator I use, and it's very effective. If there was an error with it, it was operator error. The only thing it doesn't tell you is brake clearance, which no online calculator will tell you.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2009 | 11:36 PM
  #40  
rolan04tl's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 1
From: Puerto Rico
So I am Looking for 18 x 8 wheels witha 45mm offset? would that be the best fit for a 2004 TL on 18s?

Rolan
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.