The Ultimate Cooling Mod
But at reduced effectiveness. I understand many people can't do the authentic UCM. But for the record, I want to point out that these alterations to the UCM (creating a mini UCM as it were) will significantly reduce the effectiveness.

The mini version that seems to have the most merit is where the whole center 1/3 is *completely* removed from the cowling (see pic above). I would estimate that this version would have 80% effectiveness of the authentic UCM.

Also, Bert's version (see pic above) would probably offer 80% effectiveness of the authentic UCM.

Whereas for the version with three plastic vents (see pic above), I would estimate that it would have 35% effectiveness of the authentic UCM.

For the version with a single plastic vent (see pic above), I would estimate that it would have 20% effectiveness of the authentic UCM.

The mini version that seems to have the most merit is where the whole center 1/3 is *completely* removed from the cowling (see pic above). I would estimate that this version would have 80% effectiveness of the authentic UCM.

Also, Bert's version (see pic above) would probably offer 80% effectiveness of the authentic UCM.

Whereas for the version with three plastic vents (see pic above), I would estimate that it would have 35% effectiveness of the authentic UCM.

For the version with a single plastic vent (see pic above), I would estimate that it would have 20% effectiveness of the authentic UCM.
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 30,994
Likes: 4,733
From: Kansas City, MO
^^^ bro i agree word for word and i did try to explain earlier that this version might have a stock look but wont be as effective....
I will put some pix of my version tomorrow....I think you will like that a lot
I can still retain my cabin air filter + windshield nozzle + 90+% effectiveness
I will put some pix of my version tomorrow....I think you will like that a lot
I can still retain my cabin air filter + windshield nozzle + 90+% effectiveness
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 78,247
Likes: 20,201
No more than what gets sprayed up into it! AND, yes, removal of 12 was a no brainer once you start doin it.
Inaccurate...35%...JEEZ! My calculations gave me closer to 62%. Honestly though...my main goal was the inverse relationship of keeping the cowl LOOKING 90% oem.
I tried the TOTAL removal for a day...but my pork and beans aren't as big as yours. I didn't like it!
Inaccurate...35%...JEEZ! My calculations gave me closer to 62%. Honestly though...my main goal was the inverse relationship of keeping the cowl LOOKING 90% oem.
I tried the TOTAL removal for a day...but my pork and beans aren't as big as yours. I didn't like it!
You guys are, I think, guessing at the change in AIR FLOW. The measure of "effectiveness" is change in TEMPERATURE. I'll bet there is a correlation, but I'll also bet it's not 1:1.
For example:

http://www.lytron.com/Tools-and-Tech...abinet-Cooling
IOW - once you reach a certain amount of air flow, the rate of temp change slows down. Now I'm not sure, but I don't think anyones done a full-on air flow vs temp change vs HP engineering study on these mods to say what is and is not optimum.
Although I would agree that in this case the principle of "if a little is good, more is better" probably works. That is, the minimum air flow restriction might be over-kill, but even IF it is, it doesn't hurt anything.
The point I'm making is no one is 100% sure where the "tipping point" between "good enough" and "over-kill" is.
For example:

http://www.lytron.com/Tools-and-Tech...abinet-Cooling
IOW - once you reach a certain amount of air flow, the rate of temp change slows down. Now I'm not sure, but I don't think anyones done a full-on air flow vs temp change vs HP engineering study on these mods to say what is and is not optimum.

Although I would agree that in this case the principle of "if a little is good, more is better" probably works. That is, the minimum air flow restriction might be over-kill, but even IF it is, it doesn't hurt anything.
The point I'm making is no one is 100% sure where the "tipping point" between "good enough" and "over-kill" is.
The other 'dark horse' here is that, depending on HOW it was modified, you may be introducing turbulence and static zones...but whatever. I did this mod, IMHO is a no brainer!
I agree 100%, that it's a good mod.
I'm just saying that quibbling over this cut-out style vs that cut-out style 1.) based on estimates of air flow and 2.) without any comparative data, is mostly
.Edit:
I also wonder if some kind of die or punch would be useful for speed, accuracy, uniformity, etc. Something on these lines, but probably more heavy duty; a "chisel"-style punch would be great, I think.
Last edited by Bearcat94; Dec 10, 2011 at 11:51 AM.
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 78,247
Likes: 20,201
I agree 100%, that it's a good mod.
I'm just saying that quibbling over this cut-out style vs that cut-out style 1.) based on estimates of air flow and 2.) without any comparative data, is mostly
.
Edit:
I also wonder if some kind of die or punch would be useful for speed, accuracy, uniformity, etc. Something on these lines, but probably more heavy duty; a "chisel"-style punch would be great, I think.
Attachment 1495
I'm just saying that quibbling over this cut-out style vs that cut-out style 1.) based on estimates of air flow and 2.) without any comparative data, is mostly
.Edit:
I also wonder if some kind of die or punch would be useful for speed, accuracy, uniformity, etc. Something on these lines, but probably more heavy duty; a "chisel"-style punch would be great, I think.
Attachment 1495
...BOY, WAS I WRONG. I drive an hour to work each way...in the latter portion of the drive, having the speed to overtake turtles is a huge plus, and this mod has absolutely proven itself in maintaining performance over long hauls!
hey inacurate, I saw you had two pieces disks somewhere and I cant seem to find the post and was wondering if they requiered modding to install and how they worked out up till now.
I was also wondering what kind of changes you saw in your MPG with all that weight gone compared to original.
I was also wondering what kind of changes you saw in your MPG with all that weight gone compared to original.
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 78,247
Likes: 20,201
Read on page before this one...I got lucky at home depot, but death metal had to go to ace hardware online or something.
But, who knows...it's just a plastic grill piece...you can buy ANY of those and cut them and shape them to fit. This one just happens to work well cause it has a lip that you can use to slide into place.
J
But, who knows...it's just a plastic grill piece...you can buy ANY of those and cut them and shape them to fit. This one just happens to work well cause it has a lip that you can use to slide into place.
J
Read on page before this one...I got lucky at home depot, but death metal had to go to ace hardware online or something.
But, who knows...it's just a plastic grill piece...you can buy ANY of those and cut them and shape them to fit. This one just happens to work well cause it has a lip that you can use to slide into place.
J
But, who knows...it's just a plastic grill piece...you can buy ANY of those and cut them and shape them to fit. This one just happens to work well cause it has a lip that you can use to slide into place.
J
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 78,247
Likes: 20,201
Yes sir...well, I don't have a "stock" of it! LOL
Was just letting you know where the other forum members have found it. Look for posts by Deathmetal specifically.
Was just letting you know where the other forum members have found it. Look for posts by Deathmetal specifically.
I saw something somewhere about putting spacers between the hood and the hinge which raised the rear of the hood something like 1/2 inch or so....
Looked a little odd, but still retain some the stock looks...
Being an "Old Hot Rodder"....you could use the old hot rodders technique of putting in louvers....that would get ya some out flow
Looked a little odd, but still retain some the stock looks...
Being an "Old Hot Rodder"....you could use the old hot rodders technique of putting in louvers....that would get ya some out flow
Just a friendly fyi to anyone whos going to do this mod, be patient when fighting the wiper arms to break free so you dont crack your windshield like I did today :/ I guess I hit the edge of the glass just right with my elbow and it split the hell out of my windshield!
Here is my contribution to the thread, $220 later with a shiny new windshield! I wanted to make it look as oem as possible and I think I suceeded but let me know what you guys think...

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
^Nice work...Now i just need to get mine done and quit thinking about it. Will be doing the MDX spacer mod while im at it.
Looking back at those pics, did you use any kind of stencil or guide, because your lines are near perfect
Looking back at those pics, did you use any kind of stencil or guide, because your lines are near perfect
Last edited by 05_NBP_TL; Dec 28, 2011 at 08:24 PM.
I used a ruler and drew out the lines before cutting then I made the holes just big enough to fit the sanding wheel on the dremmel so the holes were all as wide as the sanding wheel...it did take a while!







