M-010: Putting the TL on a diet (Update Links in Post #1)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2011, 07:23 AM
  #881  
Instructor
 
aimtimes100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 123
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nice accomplishments.do u ever think ull get enough hp to eat up mustang gt's?id also love to see a walkaround of the whole car both inside and outside.photos would be nice but a video would be better
Old 04-23-2011, 07:39 AM
  #882  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
Lazer187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 42
Posts: 585
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by aimtimes100
id also love to see a walkaround of the whole car both inside and outside.photos would be nice but a video would be better
Ditto, I also asked for this a while ago still waiting. Also do you plan on running your car in the quater mile this year? I along with a lot of others i assume would love to see the ETAs! Btw once again congrats on your work
Old 04-23-2011, 08:46 PM
  #883  
Three Wheelin'
 
HQTL6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Spring TX
Age: 38
Posts: 1,329
Received 27 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by aimtimes100
Nice accomplishments.do u ever think ull get enough hp to eat up mustang gt's?id also love to see a walkaround of the whole car both inside and outside.photos would be nice but a video would be better
You gotta read the thread a bit more

A mustang gt is small potatoes for this car
Old 04-23-2011, 10:37 PM
  #884  
6spd FTW
 
Tehvine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: is everything.
Age: 36
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 49 Likes on 33 Posts
I love your TL Diet. Next thing we know, you'll be filling your trunk with a thin latex bladder and helium.
Old 04-24-2011, 05:37 PM
  #885  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,191
Received 8,350 Likes on 4,913 Posts
You sir are my hero.
Old 05-10-2011, 09:21 PM
  #886  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
Originally Posted by aimtimes100
Nice accomplishments.do u ever think ull get enough hp to eat up mustang gt's?id also love to see a walkaround of the whole car both inside and outside.photos would be nice but a video would be better
It'll certainly take pre 05' GT's, put up a good fight with '05-10' GT's but it's gonna need at least a 75 hp shot of nitrous to play with the '11 GT, more likely a 100 shot. Those things are no joke, dynoing at 380-395 whp, bone stock and trapping 110-112 mph.

Maybe he's already done the nitrous, not sure. I know he was planning on it.
Old 05-11-2011, 09:59 AM
  #887  
Intermediate
 
demarco5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What type of gas mileage are you getting? AT correct.

I read in depth the first 5 pages but that took a while and I don't have the time at work to keep reading
Old 07-07-2011, 04:12 PM
  #888  
ReDevil
iTrader: (2)
 
r3devi7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 39
Posts: 328
Received 40 Likes on 32 Posts
Just read this end to end, yes every post lol. I must say I am inspired. Strong work, and great write up!
Old 07-12-2011, 04:02 PM
  #889  
Racer
 
jpm3071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 466
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
I just came from the Nissan world so these types of things didn't exist to me. What is a vibration damper? Is it for the sub woofer? Whats the ramifications of removing it?
Old 07-12-2011, 05:11 PM
  #890  
Lone Wolf
iTrader: (5)
 
brian6speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,982
Received 497 Likes on 399 Posts
Originally Posted by jpm3071
I just came from the Nissan world so these types of things didn't exist to me. What is a vibration damper? Is it for the sub woofer? Whats the ramifications of removing it?
The words are pretty much self explanatory. A vibration dampener, dampens vibration so you dont feel it in the cockpit. It is used on luxury cars. It is not for subwoofers. Acura has them on the bumpers, trunk lid, clutch, motor mounts, etc. I removed all of mine.
Old 07-12-2011, 05:13 PM
  #891  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,191
Received 8,350 Likes on 4,913 Posts
Even the steering wheel has them.
Old 07-15-2011, 09:27 AM
  #892  
Racer
 
jpm3071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 466
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
What do the Vibration Dampers do?
Old 07-15-2011, 10:30 AM
  #893  
AZ Track Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
They dampen vibration lol Just helps smooth out little bumps and shit.
Old 07-15-2011, 03:31 PM
  #894  
Racer
 
jpm3071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 466
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
What exactly does the vibration damper do?
Old 07-15-2011, 03:33 PM
  #895  
Racer
 
jpm3071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 466
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by vill0169
They dampen vibration lol Just helps smooth out little bumps and shit.
Lol thanks. They obviously dampen vibration but is it to counteract vibration from car movement, the bumps on the road, or something else?
Old 07-15-2011, 03:34 PM
  #896  
Racer
 
jpm3071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 466
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by brian6speed
The words are pretty much self explanatory. A vibration dampener, dampens vibration so you dont feel it in the cockpit. It is used on luxury cars. It is not for subwoofers. Acura has them on the bumpers, trunk lid, clutch, motor mounts, etc. I removed all of mine.
Ahh thanks. For some reason I couldnt see all your responses. Thank you gentlemen.
Old 07-15-2011, 03:37 PM
  #897  
AZ Track Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
again pretty obvious it's all of the above of what you said. But they're nothing magical so you probably wouldn't even notice them not there.
Old 07-15-2011, 03:38 PM
  #898  
Racer
 
jpm3071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 466
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by CleanCL
ill post the whole list i have going very soon.

but you should get one of these:


i'm running this battery, it weighs about 15.5 lbs, my stock battery was close to 40 lbs. also this has available tiedowns and holders for it. i ended up yanking my whole battery tray and using a custom aluminum one for this saving even more weight. a very easy mod that shaved 25 lbs off. i live in NY and have no trouble starting in cold temperates, no dimming lights, everything powered just fine. just dont leave your lights on for a very long time.

http://www.odysseybatteries.com/battery/pc680mjt.htm
Where in NY are you?
Old 07-15-2011, 03:39 PM
  #899  
Racer
 
jpm3071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 466
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Im in Nassau, Long Island
Old 07-15-2011, 03:41 PM
  #900  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
The dampers are meant to reduce any slight vibration that might be felt thru the steering wheel and seats. When I removed my dampers, I did not notice any increase in vibration. I would rate them as "overkill" by Acura to produce the smoothest car possible.
Old 07-21-2011, 04:37 AM
  #901  
Instructor
 
DisgustipatedAP1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
It says using 3 gallons of fuel at a time saves 44 lbs. Actually, it saves more than that. A gallon of gas weighs roughly 6 lbs, and the tank is 18 or so gallons, correct? If one were to measure it out so that the car only has a max of 3 gallons inside at once, the missing 15 gallons would account for 90 lbs of weight saved.

Just a thought I had.
Old 07-21-2011, 03:50 PM
  #902  
Three Wheelin'
 
geekybiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Age: 48
Posts: 1,562
Received 120 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
The dampers are meant to reduce any slight vibration that might be felt thru the steering wheel and seats. When I removed my dampers, I did not notice any increase in vibration. I would rate them as "overkill" by Acura to produce the smoothest car possible.
They are all about NVH- noise vibration and harshness. You know that annoying buzz you get in your rear deck or door panels sometimes? That's what this sort of stuff is designed to kill.

I bet if you went from a stock car to removing all the NVH stuff like Incaccurate has, you'd notice the difference. Its a harder thing to quantify when doing incremental changes, much like the performance gains from reducing weight.
Old 07-21-2011, 10:15 PM
  #903  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by DisgustipatedAP1
It says using 3 gallons of fuel at a time saves 44 lbs. Actually, it saves more than that. A gallon of gas weighs roughly 6 lbs, and the tank is 18 or so gallons, correct? If one were to measure it out so that the car only has a max of 3 gallons inside at once, the missing 15 gallons would account for 90 lbs of weight saved.

Just a thought I had.

Whoop !!! After how many years? Finally, someone took notice of this and questioned it. Years ago when I wrote it, I was expecting someone to question the obvious and no one did ever question it until now.

My logic is stating the 44 lbs is because that would be the average weight savings. If I had said 90-lb reduction, then someone would had complained "Well, that is only when your tank was full and the tank doesn't stay full all of the time." Thus, the 44-lb reduction is the average savings between being full and empty (90/2=45).

Thanks for the question
Old 07-21-2011, 10:16 PM
  #904  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by geekybiker
They are all about NVH- noise vibration and harshness. You know that annoying buzz you get in your rear deck or door panels sometimes? That's what this sort of stuff is designed to kill.
I agree.
Old 08-23-2011, 11:29 PM
  #905  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
UPDATE

I GOT ANOTHER 13 POUNDS OFF OF THE CAR !!!!!

:gheywave::gheywave:
















Weight Reduction Since Last Update
-----------------------------------------------
10.9 RacingBrake Two-piece rotors
1.8 Exterior Roof Molding
--------------------------------------------
12.7 lbs NET TOTAL REMOVED









Interestingly, the published weight by RacingBrake (see pic above) for the oem rotor and their 2-piece rotor were incorrect. However, the weight reduction was very close to the RacingBrake's claim. RacingBrake claims a weight reduction of 11.4 lbs for the pair, whereas my actual reduction was 10.9 lbs. This is a half pound less reduction than the claim.

RacingBrake's chart shows the oem rotor being 18.6 lbs. My scale said 17.90 lbs.

RacingBrake's chart shows their rotor being 12.8 lbs. My scale said 12.46 lbs.

Perhaps I am misinterpreting RacingBrake's chart. Maybe they mean the RacingBrake (not oem) one-piece weighs 18.6 lbs.














I easily noticed a weight difference while handling the RacingBrake rotor versus handling the oem rotor. I found it interesting that the weight reduction is not due to just the hat being aluminum. The outer steel disc itself is lighter too due to having thinner surface faces. That is, the RacingBrake vent slots are wider. This was a fortunate thing which allowed me to claim additional dynamic weight loss. Prior to ordering the RacingBrake rotors, I thought that I would be unable to claim any dynamic weight loss due to the weight savings being centered around the axle (i.e., the hat).

Given the speculation that each pound saved at wheel RPM is normally equivalent to 3 pounds of static body weight, I feel it is fair to give the RacingBrake rotors an equivalency factor of 2. The reason I am giving it a factor of 2, and not 3, is because the moment-of-inertia of the weight reduction is not as far outward as it would be with a wheel. Thus, the RacingBrake rotors will give the perception (during braking and acceleration) that 20 lbs was removed from the car.

How do they feel? Immediately, I noticed easier cornering and easier lane changing. Not anything drastic or very obvious. It is more of a subtle improvement. To me, this gives me a perception of having quicker steering (although technically, the steering ratio did not change).













As part of this update, two pounds were removed by deleting the exterior roof molding. This came about from having my cracked windshield replaced. The molding was taken off at the time as part of the process of replacing the windshield. The technician that was installing the new windshield half joked that I should leave the roof molding off to save a few pounds. So, I stood back to look at how the car would look without the molding. I liked the appearance and told him to just leave them off. Done.

As a side note, I had some anxiety that the replacement windshield glass might weigh more than my original oem glass. The technician was a friendly guy. So, I felt comfortable to ask him to jump on my bathroom scale (while holding the glass) so I could get the weight of the old glass and the replacement glass. Surprisingly, the replacement glass and the oem glass weighed the same (31.0 Lbs +/- 0.5 lb).


Originally Posted by csmeance (Moderator)
All members posting from this point on, read POST #1 before posting. Failure to do so may result in a ban!
Originally Posted by csmeance (Moderator)
To be honest, I'd take 5 minutes to have someone banned at this point with all the garbage and trash talk that I deleted in this thread, than clean it up time after time and have it keep on coming back; no more!




Thanks for allowing me to share my TL Diet with you !!!










ITEMIZED LIST OF WEIGHT REDUCTION
-----------------------------------------------------
84.0 Racing seats and racing restraint system (see Warning #3 below)
44.0 Reduced fuel (buy just 3.0 gallons at a time)
40.0 Rims
36.0 Rear seat delete
34.0 Spare tire delete
31.0 Sunroof delete
31.0 Interior trim & misc pieces
27.5 Braille battery
24.0 Interior carpet
23.0 Trunk panels
22.0 Lightweight tires
18.0 Front door interior panels
18.0 Firewall Insulation
17.5 Parking brake and lever (see Warning #1 below)
17.0 Front bumper
16.0 Rear bumper
14.0 Rear door interior panels
14.0 RV6 Precat delete (incl race pipe & misc brackets)
13.0 Radio delete
13.0 Personal weight loss (attributed to this project)
12.0 Center console
10.9 RacingBrake Two-piece rotors
10.0 Front seat kick panels
9.9 Evap charcoal canister (see Warning #4 below)
9.0 Side curtain airbags (see Warning #2 below)
8.5 Mid muffler delete
8.5 Seatbelts for rear seat
8.0 CAI
7.5 Front damper
7.0 UR crank pulley
6.5 Floor mats (incls driver's too)
6.0 Engine bay panels
6.0 Rear seat arm rest
5.5 Subwoofer speaker
5.5 Ground effect panels
5.5 Rear deck
5.5 Center console armrest
5.0 Headliner
4.5 XLR8 J-Pipe (incls removing misc brackets)
4.3 Shark Mouth grill (incl removed lower duct obstruction)
4.0 Reduced wiper fluid (use 1 pint at a time)
3.7 Rear seat insulation
3.7 Rear speakers
3.5 Engine cradle damper
3.5 Small airbags in front seats (see Warning #2 below)
3.5 Windshield washer reservoir (incl pint of water)
3.4 Glovebox delete
3.0 Megan pipe replacing oem 3rd cat
2.6 Cowl plastic panels
2.5 Glovebox plate
2.5 Innovative engine mounts
2.4 Owner manual
2.0 Roof console
2.0 Grab handles
2.0 Removed 12V air pump
1.8 Hood insulation
1.8 Exterior Roof Molding
1.5 Trunk damper
1.5 Splash guards for front brake rotors
1.4 Kick panels under front dash
1.4 Footrest
1.2 Xm radio reciever
1.2 Airbag brackets & radio antenna booster
1.2 Trunk panel over latch
1.0 Exhaust heat shield
1.0 Rear Door Hook Pin and Catch
0.5 Coin holder & sunglass holders
0.5 Xm antenna
------------------------------------------------------------
742.9 Lbs TOTAL




ESTIMATED DYNAMIC WEIGHT REDUCTION
----------------------------------------------
663 Static weight loss (minus Dynamic items)
120 Dynamic weight loss from rims
105 Dynamic weight loss from UR Pulley
66 Dynamic weight loss from lightweight tires
20 RacingBrake Two-piece rotors
---------------------------------------------
974 Lbs DYNAMIC TOTAL




ESTIMATED WEIGHT
------------------------------------
3580 - 743 = 2837 Lbs. Static
3580 - 974 = 2606 Lbs. Dynamic




ESTIMATED EQUIVALENT WHEEL HP WITH MODS
------------------------------------------
343 WHP (equivalent output)

Note: Assuming mods produce 250 WHP
Mods (J32A3 w/5AT) = XLR8 j-pipe, RV6 precat delete, RV6 race pipe (3rd cat delete),
Custom insulated AEM CAI w/ oversized Dryflow filter, UR Pulley undersize,
Ultimate Cooling Mod, Outlaw Engineering Thermoblock Spacer, throttle body coolant bypass.





Warning #1: Parking brake is mandatory to pass state inspection in many states.
Warning #2: Tampering with oem airbags is illegal in many states.
Warning #3: Use of aftermarket seats and/or seatbelts can cause injury or death.
Warning #4: Removal of Evap will cause CEL and will fail state inspection.







-------- The TL Diet: Woo Hoo, What a Ride !!! --------
Old 08-23-2011, 11:35 PM
  #906  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Good to see an update! I'm glad you finally did part of the brakes, I had no idea there was a 2-piece stock sized rotor.
Old 08-24-2011, 07:04 AM
  #907  
AZ Track Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
vill0169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 36
Posts: 1,674
Received 298 Likes on 212 Posts
Good work man! Gotta get me a set of these too
Old 08-24-2011, 10:03 AM
  #908  
Instructor
 
aimtimes100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 123
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
might of over looked it but may i suggest a carbon fiber hood/roof/ and trunk?also when do we get to see in depth pics of the car inside and out
Old 08-24-2011, 11:07 AM
  #909  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts


slotted brakes FTW....damn I would love to race you just to see how heavy my car is LOL....
Old 08-31-2011, 09:16 AM
  #910  
Racer
 
endles/acura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Age: 45
Posts: 387
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Props, love this thread.What is your actual miles on the car as of today?

Old 08-31-2011, 09:49 PM
  #911  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
^ Odometer is 67,750. Thanks for the props.

Last edited by Inaccurate; 08-31-2011 at 09:53 PM.
Old 10-03-2011, 03:01 AM
  #912  
B A N N E D
 
phatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Age: 34
Posts: 229
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Happen to know if any other slotted rotors weigh less than oem?
Old 10-03-2011, 06:53 AM
  #913  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
^ The RacingBrake Two-piece rotor is the lightest rotor (among one-piece and two-piece) that I am aware of. Please be aware that the RacingBrake two-piece rotor is lighter than the RacingBrake one-piece rotor. However, I do not know what the lightest one-piece rotor is.
Old 10-03-2011, 01:38 PM
  #914  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
nice. i recently shed 1500 lbs
Old 10-03-2011, 02:12 PM
  #915  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,191
Received 8,350 Likes on 4,913 Posts
Yea but you cheated
Old 10-10-2011, 11:20 PM
  #916  
B A N N E D
 
phatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Age: 34
Posts: 229
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Checked out the racing brake 2 pieces for the MT.

It only loses sub 3 lbs. :|

I don't know if it's worth getting the 2 piece @ $680+shipping a pair to lose 3 lbs per wheel.
Old 10-11-2011, 07:03 AM
  #917  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
^ For weight saving purposes, the money would be much better spent on the lightest rims that you can find. However for braking performance, the RacingBrake rotors with ET500 pads are awesome.
Old 10-11-2011, 08:08 AM
  #918  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
The lighter wheels will also improve braking..
Old 10-14-2011, 01:14 AM
  #919  
tehLEGOman
 
ACCURATEin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 41
Posts: 9,135
Received 1,982 Likes on 1,335 Posts
I should go through your list and check off what I have taken out of my TL and see where it's at.
Old 10-14-2011, 10:43 AM
  #920  
Racer
 
jpm3071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 466
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Is there anyway to take the steel plate off of the glove box and reinstall the vinyl cover?

How much of a difference did it make to swap out the rear door insulation to the accoustic foam?


Quick Reply: M-010: Putting the TL on a diet (Update Links in Post #1)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 AM.