The Official 2009 TSX Thread **Unvelied in NY**
#1641
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by cmschmie
I find it funny that people are insisting on a RWD platform for Acura (Honda).
If they wanted to, they would (could) have done it a long time ago.
--
Let's put this in another perspective:
You own a company that makes jeans. All of your jeans have a zip fly. You've sold MILLIONS of pairs.
You call 100 customers into your office for a review of your products.
99 love your jeans, don't want you to change
1 person wishes you made a pair with a button fly.
Do you change it to appease that one person and possible piss off the other 99?
You guys/gals asking, pleading, bitching for a RWD (or SH-AWD) TSX are like that 1 person to Honda.
"We'll take that into consideration, thanks for stopping by"
If they wanted to, they would (could) have done it a long time ago.
--
Let's put this in another perspective:
You own a company that makes jeans. All of your jeans have a zip fly. You've sold MILLIONS of pairs.
You call 100 customers into your office for a review of your products.
99 love your jeans, don't want you to change
1 person wishes you made a pair with a button fly.
Do you change it to appease that one person and possible piss off the other 99?
You guys/gals asking, pleading, bitching for a RWD (or SH-AWD) TSX are like that 1 person to Honda.
"We'll take that into consideration, thanks for stopping by"
And if you'd read the rest of my posts, you'd have realized I know this already. My comments are nothing more than what I would have liked to see.
Acura clearly doesn't want to go RWD (well either that or the mother ship won't let them) As much as I don't agree, 35MPG CAFE standards say otherwise. We'll see what the sales figures have to say.
#1642
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by joerockt
Unreal how so many people can completely dismiss the car when there hasn't even been any really decent pictures at multiple angles, much less not having seen the car in person yet
There are several pictures of the Euro Accord available over at TOV. Multiple angles and all.
Not that I hate the styling, just doesn't do much for me. If you think it will look any different, (besides the grille) let me have some of whatever it is you're smoking.
#1643
Originally Posted by cmschmie
I find it funny that people are insisting on a RWD platform for Acura (Honda).
If they wanted to, they would (could) have done it a long time ago.
--
Let's put this in another perspective:
You own a company that makes jeans. All of your jeans have a zip fly. You've sold MILLIONS of pairs.
You call 100 customers into your office for a review of your products.
99 love your jeans, don't want you to change
1 person wishes you made a pair with a button fly.
Do you change it to appease that one person and possible piss off the other 99?
You guys/gals asking, pleading, bitching for a RWD (or SH-AWD) TSX are like that 1 person to Honda.
"We'll take that into consideration, thanks for stopping by"
If they wanted to, they would (could) have done it a long time ago.
--
Let's put this in another perspective:
You own a company that makes jeans. All of your jeans have a zip fly. You've sold MILLIONS of pairs.
You call 100 customers into your office for a review of your products.
99 love your jeans, don't want you to change
1 person wishes you made a pair with a button fly.
Do you change it to appease that one person and possible piss off the other 99?
You guys/gals asking, pleading, bitching for a RWD (or SH-AWD) TSX are like that 1 person to Honda.
"We'll take that into consideration, thanks for stopping by"
Seriously, I want RWD as much as the next guy, but its not going to happen so there's little point in 'crying about spilled milk"
#1644
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Colin
Seriously, I want RWD as much as the next guy, but its not going to happen so there's little point in 'crying about spilled milk"
Lets just hope there's Type S that appeases those of us who want a higher performing TSX.
#1646
Originally Posted by dom
If complaining wasn't allowed on Auto forums. Might as well shut them all down.
Lets just hope there's Type S that appeases those of us who want a higher performing TSX.
Lets just hope there's Type S that appeases those of us who want a higher performing TSX.
#1647
Originally Posted by CarbonGray Earl
About the 5AT: First, I own one, and I think its great....FOR ITS TIME. In 2005, a >5speed AT was a rarity. So for the first gen, the 5at was a fine transmission. Its no manual, but it was no run of the mill unit. And yes, reliablity did figure in my decision making too.
Originally Posted by CarbonGray Earl
Now, on a 6-speed AT/DSG/SMG, Acura wouldn't put it on a typical TSX. Its a base model. If we do see it, it would be on a Type S. That seems to be the way Honda operates. Special transmission with special cars first. The closer ratio MTs were always reserved for the GSRs, Type Rs, etc. Even a 5at was a special thing for the 2nd gen TL- even though it had issues.
Why is it ok for Acura not to, even while they claim ascension into Tier-1 luxury status? I don't buy it.
Originally Posted by CarbonGray Earl
So before getting into a discussion with base model TSX's, I'd wait to see if the i-Dtec or Type S will have the latest, greatest transmission everyone seems to be crying over (I mean that figuratively, of course).
p.s. Even relatively "pedestrian" vehicles like the Chevy Malibu, Ford Fusion, Mazda6 & Toyota Camry have 6ATs as options. If I were Acura I'd be embarrassed to admit that fact. Even more so after claiming to join the ranks of premium luxo makes like Aston Martin/Bentley or whatever similarly unlikely target they claimed to be aiming for.
Again, just my .
#1648
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Colin
On the bright side, I did notice a little space on the steering wheel for a Type-S badge....
So I guess this means you've seen it in person? Does it pretty much look like the Euro Accord that we've seen? And how close is the interior to that Euro Accord?
#1649
jgs
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southern California
Age: 64
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09 Tsx
Has anyone seen this photo on Autoblog? Supposedly, it's the 2009 TSX.
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/x-200...-tsx-x/633872/
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/x-200...-tsx-x/633872/
#1650
> 100K Mile Club Member
Originally Posted by Texas
Torque? Here is what I am considering for replacing my 04 tsx...Torque: 385lb, HP: 361, 6 sp A/T, RWD, EPA: 15/24 regular, $33,000 loaded, handles well hope the ride is good...no turbos here...
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/.../photo_13.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/.../photo_13.html
#1651
where is my garage?!
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: nassau county, ny
Age: 47
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by jsalaita
Has anyone seen this photo on Autoblog? Supposedly, it's the 2009 TSX.
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/x-200...-tsx-x/633872/
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/x-200...-tsx-x/633872/
OMG, NO WAY!?
#1652
where is my garage?!
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: nassau county, ny
Age: 47
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by TSXinTN
Good luck. You are giving up reliability, gas mileage, styling and ammenities. Hope it is worth it for more HP and torque.
#1653
> 100K Mile Club Member
Originally Posted by jsalaita
Has anyone seen this photo on Autoblog? Supposedly, it's the 2009 TSX.
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/x-200...-tsx-x/633872/
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/x-200...-tsx-x/633872/
#1655
Just dial 1911
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by dom
There are several pictures of the Euro Accord available over at TOV. Multiple angles and all.
Not that I hate the styling, just doesn't do much for me. If you think it will look any different, (besides the grille) let me have some of whatever it is you're smoking.
Not that I hate the styling, just doesn't do much for me. If you think it will look any different, (besides the grille) let me have some of whatever it is you're smoking.
I'm just saying a car looks different when someone actually takes "real" pictures of it. I'm waiting till then to pass judgment.
God, the wheels on the Euro are just begging to be ripped off for something else...
#1656
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by jsalaita
Has anyone seen this photo on Autoblog? Supposedly, it's the 2009 TSX.
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/x-200...-tsx-x/633872/
http://www.autoblog.com/photos/x-200...-tsx-x/633872/
Posted about 4 pages back.
So people are getting on others for dismissing the TSX before we've seen it. But it's perfectly ok to that to the G8?
Go have a look at the CTS and tell me if it has a cheap interior.
#1657
Originally Posted by Aspire705
I agree with you 100% that for it's time, it was a competitive AT option. I was never denying that. But again, my point is that it's time is well passed & it's long overdue for an "upgrade" plain & simple.
See, I have trouble understanding why such a tranny shouldn't be standard across ALL Acura models when virtually every other luxury makers' competing models (and some non-luxo brands) have them as standard. Audi, BMW, M-B, Caddy, Infiniti (very soon), & Lexus all have 6ATs or better as standard equip.
Why is it ok for Acura not to, even while they claim ascension into Tier-1 luxury status? I don't buy it.
About this comment on waiting for 'higher trim level TSXs' to see if they debut a more competitive AT option, see my reply above about how virtually all of Acura's peers have such options.
p.s. Even relatively "pedestrian" vehicles like the Chevy Malibu, Ford Fusion, Mazda6 & Toyota Camry have 6ATs as options. If I were Acura I'd be embarrassed to admit that fact. Even more so after claiming to join the ranks of premium luxo makes like Aston Martin/Bentley or whatever similarly unlikely target they claimed to be aiming for.
Again, just my .
See, I have trouble understanding why such a tranny shouldn't be standard across ALL Acura models when virtually every other luxury makers' competing models (and some non-luxo brands) have them as standard. Audi, BMW, M-B, Caddy, Infiniti (very soon), & Lexus all have 6ATs or better as standard equip.
Why is it ok for Acura not to, even while they claim ascension into Tier-1 luxury status? I don't buy it.
About this comment on waiting for 'higher trim level TSXs' to see if they debut a more competitive AT option, see my reply above about how virtually all of Acura's peers have such options.
p.s. Even relatively "pedestrian" vehicles like the Chevy Malibu, Ford Fusion, Mazda6 & Toyota Camry have 6ATs as options. If I were Acura I'd be embarrassed to admit that fact. Even more so after claiming to join the ranks of premium luxo makes like Aston Martin/Bentley or whatever similarly unlikely target they claimed to be aiming for.
Again, just my .
Better than letting you continue to pound sand, right? Trust me, a 6 speed AT/DSG/SMG would be nice. If you would have told me about this 10 years ago, I would have said Honda would have gotten to it first as opposed to other makes.
#1658
Originally Posted by TSXinTN
Does anyone besides me read the previous posts before posting???
#1659
Originally Posted by datadr
Raw and unrefined. Cheap interior, flimsy switchgear... It's a GM product and can't hold a candle to and Acura.
#1660
Originally Posted by xjohnkdoex
OMG, NO WAY!?
#1661
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by joerockt
Ah, which just came out today.
I'm just saying a car looks different when someone actually takes "real" pictures of it. I'm waiting till then to pass judgment.
God, the wheels on the Euro are just begging to be ripped off for something else...
I'm just saying a car looks different when someone actually takes "real" pictures of it. I'm waiting till then to pass judgment.
God, the wheels on the Euro are just begging to be ripped off for something else...
The new Accord is a good example of looking much better in person than in pics. I wrote it off until I saw it in person. But its so pointless arguing styling. Someone's F430 is another's Aztek.
#1663
Originally Posted by joerockt
Ah, which just came out today.
I'm just saying a car looks different when someone actually takes "real" pictures of it. I'm waiting till then to pass judgment.
God, the wheels on the Euro are just begging to be ripped off for something else...
I'm just saying a car looks different when someone actually takes "real" pictures of it. I'm waiting till then to pass judgment.
God, the wheels on the Euro are just begging to be ripped off for something else...
Heck, even watching a car in motion on the internet can give you a different opinion than the static pictures.
#1664
Originally Posted by dom
So I guess this means you've seen it in person? Does it pretty much look like the Euro Accord that we've seen? And how close is the interior to that Euro Accord?
#1665
日本国内市場の売春婦
Looks good, I like it. Hopefully the rear looks good too, unlike the euro accord.
Here is my chop!
ABP-ish Blue
Dropped
Mugen NR's
35% Tint
Color-matched Lower Grille
JDM Headlights
Here is my chop!
ABP-ish Blue
Dropped
Mugen NR's
35% Tint
Color-matched Lower Grille
JDM Headlights
#1666
Pro
Originally Posted by CarbonGray Earl
We haven't seen the TSX interior yet. Those are Euro Accord shots floatin about. The euro accord gets the US accord dash, hence "Accord like" was spot on...for the Euro Accord and not the TSX.
TSX needs some wood in the interior. Wood adds luxury. Most buyers like it.
#1667
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mooresville, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 43,640
Received 3,860 Likes
on
2,580 Posts
Originally Posted by wackura
I'm surprised how so similar the Pontiac G8's steering wheel looks to that of the new Accord. How does this come to pass? Do car companies secretly trade design cues with eachother? How do they all decide what will look cool next year when the general public hasn't weighed in? There's many similarites besides the steering wheel but that particular common aesthetic seems to come out of nowhere. I'm not a conspiracy theorist but it's like a there's a guy on a grassy knoll yelling "look at me!"
#1668
Originally Posted by datadr
Raw and unrefined. Cheap interior, flimsy switchgear... It's a GM product and can't hold a candle to and Acura.
#1669
Originally Posted by dom
There are a couple of things that really bother me about Acura right now.
But lets see what the sales numbers say. Maybe none of us have a clue what we're talking about.
But lets see what the sales numbers say. Maybe none of us have a clue what we're talking about.
The A-Vtec is forgotten somewhere, maybe the next TL will get it?
About the 2.4, I believe our european Accord will LESS powerful of the TSX.
It was 190 hp vs 205 hp till now, now it will be 200 vs... the 240 hp Turbo.
I believe the TSX will get a Turbo RDX version too.
#1670
08 MDX with Sports
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Age: 45
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by VorteC
Looks good, I like it. Hopefully the rear looks good too, unlike the euro accord.
Here is my chop!
ABP-ish Blue
Dropped
Mugen NR's
35% Tint
Color-matched Lower Grille
JDM Headlights
Here is my chop!
ABP-ish Blue
Dropped
Mugen NR's
35% Tint
Color-matched Lower Grille
JDM Headlights
Anyways I think USDM usually get better gauges /Center console compare to euro accord models, and 10-15HP. TL steering wheel with paddle shifter is a plus!!! wooohoo~ Def buying my ticket to NY auto show this April..
#1671
08 MDX with Sports
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NJ
Age: 45
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://sohc.vtec.net/news_files/740462/09acc_eu-02.jpg
I have to admit that exhaust tip is so nasty, but U.S will probably get dual exhaust like previous gen..
I have to admit that exhaust tip is so nasty, but U.S will probably get dual exhaust like previous gen..
#1672
Originally Posted by joerockt
Unreal how so many people can completely dismiss the car when there hasn't even been any really decent pictures at multiple angles, much less not having seen the car in person yet
Ok, now I totally understand what you're saying about seeing the car in person, test driving it, kicking the tires yourself, & all of that other good stuff, before deciding if it's right for you & criticizing it if it's not. But let me put it to you like this.
As an enthusiast who would love to see your brand do a better job living up to expectations & to its full potential, don't we have the right to complain when it doesn't? When it's a product you're considering purchasing for the right price, don't you have the right to expect it to live up to certain specs b4 taking it seriously as a possible candidate for your next vehicle? Well if not, I'm sorry, because that's exactly how I feel.
To me it just doesn't make sense to further consider a vehicle (or any other product really) if it doesn't live up to a few reasonable design specs. Maybe it's just me I guess.
Anyway don't take this as me looking down on anyone else's p.o.v. on the matter. After-all, when it really comes down to it, it's really our money we're spending and no1 else's right? So we should all just do what makes us happy in the end right. Besides, I really like playing devils advocate sometimes.
Oh, & one more thing.. :-)
Seeing as how this is a chat forum (of which I'm an "upstanding member" lol), & the fact that I am also an auto enthusiast at heart, I reserve the right to b#tch, mo@n & otherwise complain about anything & everything relating to Acura, it's products, marketing strategy(ies) or whatever else I (& the really cool & hardworking Mods here ;-p) deem acceptable/appropriate discussion topics within reason. (Until I'm told otherwise of course. :-D) Cool? Great!
/Rant.
#1673
Originally Posted by TMQ
I mean if the TSX gets the Euro Accord dash.
TSX needs some wood in the interior. Wood adds luxury. Most buyers like it.
TSX needs some wood in the interior. Wood adds luxury. Most buyers like it.
As for wood, that's subjective. Depends on the application. I'm willing to wait and see.
#1674
Go Big Blue!
Originally Posted by krio
.
I believe the TSX will get a Turbo RDX version too.
I believe the TSX will get a Turbo RDX version too.
#1675
Intermediate
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jackson, MS
Age: 39
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by datadr
Raw and unrefined. Cheap interior, flimsy switchgear... It's a GM product and can't hold a candle to and Acura.
#1676
Originally Posted by Aspire705
^^Not sure if I'm one of the people this was directed at, but I'll respond anyway.
Ok, now I totally understand what you're saying about seeing the car in person, test driving it, kicking the tires yourself, & all of that other good stuff, before deciding if it's right for you & criticizing it if it's not. But let me put it to you like this.
As an enthusiast who would love to see your brand do a better job living up to expectations & to its full potential, don't we have the right to complain when it doesn't? When it's a product you're considering purchasing for the right price, don't you have the right to expect it to live up to certain specs b4 taking it seriously as a possible candidate for your next vehicle? Well if not, I'm sorry, because that's exactly how I feel.
To me it just doesn't make sense to further consider a vehicle (or any other product really) if it doesn't live up to a few reasonable design specs. Maybe it's just me I guess.
Anyway don't take this as me looking down on anyone else's p.o.v. on the matter. After-all, when it really comes down to it, it's really our money we're spending and no1 else's right? So we should all just do what makes us happy in the end right. Besides, I really like playing devils advocate sometimes.
Oh, & one more thing.. :-)
Seeing as how this is a chat forum (of which I'm an "upstanding member" lol), & the fact that I am also an auto enthusiast at heart, I reserve the right to b#tch, mo@n & otherwise complain about anything & everything relating to Acura, it's products, marketing strategy(ies) or whatever else I (& the really cool & hardworking Mods here ;-p) deem acceptable/appropriate discussion topics within reason. (Until I'm told otherwise of course. :-D) Cool? Great!
/Rant.
Ok, now I totally understand what you're saying about seeing the car in person, test driving it, kicking the tires yourself, & all of that other good stuff, before deciding if it's right for you & criticizing it if it's not. But let me put it to you like this.
As an enthusiast who would love to see your brand do a better job living up to expectations & to its full potential, don't we have the right to complain when it doesn't? When it's a product you're considering purchasing for the right price, don't you have the right to expect it to live up to certain specs b4 taking it seriously as a possible candidate for your next vehicle? Well if not, I'm sorry, because that's exactly how I feel.
To me it just doesn't make sense to further consider a vehicle (or any other product really) if it doesn't live up to a few reasonable design specs. Maybe it's just me I guess.
Anyway don't take this as me looking down on anyone else's p.o.v. on the matter. After-all, when it really comes down to it, it's really our money we're spending and no1 else's right? So we should all just do what makes us happy in the end right. Besides, I really like playing devils advocate sometimes.
Oh, & one more thing.. :-)
Seeing as how this is a chat forum (of which I'm an "upstanding member" lol), & the fact that I am also an auto enthusiast at heart, I reserve the right to b#tch, mo@n & otherwise complain about anything & everything relating to Acura, it's products, marketing strategy(ies) or whatever else I (& the really cool & hardworking Mods here ;-p) deem acceptable/appropriate discussion topics within reason. (Until I'm told otherwise of course. :-D) Cool? Great!
/Rant.
#1677
Go Big Blue!
Originally Posted by bgriffin
That might have been true 5 years ago, but things are changing. Take a look at the products that have been released since Bob Lutz was hired. Quality and reliability have improved a lot. I bet you even think Toyotas are still reliable.
#1678
Originally Posted by bgriffin
That might have been true 5 years ago, but things are changing. Take a look at the products that have been released since Bob Lutz was hired. Quality and reliability have improved a lot. I bet you even think Toyotas are still reliable.
#1679
Pro
No matter what photochop you do, an ugly grille is an ugly grille.
Pontiac - it's for a different crowd. Most Acura buyers would never, ever, ever, consider a Pontiac. Not from someone who invented the Aztek.
Now, you'll say, never say never. yeah, with that bucktooth signature grille, I say, never thought an Acura could be this ugly.
Pontiac - it's for a different crowd. Most Acura buyers would never, ever, ever, consider a Pontiac. Not from someone who invented the Aztek.
Now, you'll say, never say never. yeah, with that bucktooth signature grille, I say, never thought an Acura could be this ugly.
#1680
Intermediate
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jackson, MS
Age: 39
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SpicyMikey
Perception does seem to lag reality. In some cases 10 years!
Buick 145 PP100 (tie)
Lexus 145 PP100 (tie)
Cadillac 162 PP100
Mercury 168 PP100
Honda 169 PP100
Toyota 178 PP100
BMW 182 PP100 (tie)
Lincoln 182 PP100 (tie)
Subaru 192 PP100
Oldsmobile 196 PP100
http://editorial.autos.msn.com/artic...umentid=435214
Most cars today are very reliable. I think its a safe bet to buy an Acura, GM product, or anything today. Now to get back on topic. I keep looking at the '09 TSX pics, and I'm starting to like it. I think its about time to trade in my '04. I can't wait to see and drive one.