Motor Oil?
For those who want to read about motor oil until they turn cross-eyed, BobIsTheOilGuy.com is as good an info source as I've seen.
The short version: If you want oil that's good enough for long engine life, virtually any properly certified oil will do. If you want the best, you can't do better than Amsoil.
The short version: If you want oil that's good enough for long engine life, virtually any properly certified oil will do. If you want the best, you can't do better than Amsoil.
I think the question here really is: Is it any better, what's so better about it, do you feel more power, better gas economy, what?
no issues really isn't a good justification for spending double the money.
no issues really isn't a good justification for spending double the money.
This is very similar to the numerous octane discussions we have had here. IMO, I don't see why I should skimp on these things to save a few bucks. If I was driving a corolla, I may feel differently (although I doubt it).
I agree with tnobori. The difference is in the wear.
I can get Mobil full synthetic, mobil filter and washers for under $60. Surely you can find better than that on the Internet. Like he also said, you fill up w/ premium right? Why pay the extra $$$ when the engine has knock sensors that will retard the ignition timing to prevent damage? The answer should be, " b/c I know it is best for my car." Goes for gas and oil.
I can get Mobil full synthetic, mobil filter and washers for under $60. Surely you can find better than that on the Internet. Like he also said, you fill up w/ premium right? Why pay the extra $$$ when the engine has knock sensors that will retard the ignition timing to prevent damage? The answer should be, " b/c I know it is best for my car." Goes for gas and oil.
when we're talking about wear, are we talking about going 200k or 500k?
in the end if might really mean nothing.
As with gas, you can feel your car perform better w/ 93 vs 87 right away.
For me it's fairly simple, I got a warranty up to 120k at which point I'll probably sell the car, so it gives me no reason to deviate from what Honda prescribes.
I think it's fair to assume that their stuff will not kill the car any sooner than synthetics or they would make it mandatory like some other car makers.
in the end if might really mean nothing.
As with gas, you can feel your car perform better w/ 93 vs 87 right away.
For me it's fairly simple, I got a warranty up to 120k at which point I'll probably sell the car, so it gives me no reason to deviate from what Honda prescribes.
I think it's fair to assume that their stuff will not kill the car any sooner than synthetics or they would make it mandatory like some other car makers.
I think it's fair to assume that their stuff will not kill the car any sooner than synthetics or they would make it mandatory like some other car makers.
The increased distance intervals on oil changes makes synthetic more valuable, IMO.
http://shop.advanceautoparts.com/web...May-2011-Flyer___
Last edited by slainte_0317; May 23, 2011 at 03:59 PM. Reason: Link no workie
You are absolutly right that this isn't good justification, but from my personal experience of running a 2000 acura 3.2 TL from 78000 kms to currently 250000 kms, with no engine or tranny issues, and the car still runs like butter... i have been running amsoil in this car from day one for both engine and transmission fluids....
i also had a 2005 RL which i bought with 103,000 kms on it and it had 180,000 2 months ago when i got into a bad accident and it was written off... this car also ran like butter and i had amsoil in it from day one as well...... engine, transmission and rear diff......
I now own a 2007 Acura RL A-SPEC in Platinum Frost Metallic, and i plan on switching all fluids in this one to amsoil too
I guess its just personal preferance in my case and good experience..
i also had a 2005 RL which i bought with 103,000 kms on it and it had 180,000 2 months ago when i got into a bad accident and it was written off... this car also ran like butter and i had amsoil in it from day one as well...... engine, transmission and rear diff......
I now own a 2007 Acura RL A-SPEC in Platinum Frost Metallic, and i plan on switching all fluids in this one to amsoil too

I guess its just personal preferance in my case and good experience..
So in conclusion:
Syn is better than dino but it costs more and does not result in any advantage. The engine will outlast the rest of the car and outlast your ownership with either oil. I asked, a long time ago on this thread, if anyone had any issues attributed to oil and NOBODY has claimed a "yes".
Amsoil maybe the best but if your car outlasts your ownership even with Honda oil then what is the return on the larger investment?
Syn is better than dino but it costs more and does not result in any advantage. The engine will outlast the rest of the car and outlast your ownership with either oil. I asked, a long time ago on this thread, if anyone had any issues attributed to oil and NOBODY has claimed a "yes".
Amsoil maybe the best but if your car outlasts your ownership even with Honda oil then what is the return on the larger investment?
I use mobil1 syn 5w-20, I get a 5qt jug at Walmart for $25 and bought a K&N filter for $8 on amazon.
http://www.quickoildrainvalve.com/
This is also a good investment if you don't even want to deal with washers and getting oil on your hands/arms/garage floor.
There are a lot of amsoil fans here and I used to run it on my S2000, I'm not pushing my RL nearly as hard as my S so I think Mobil1 is fine. My friend races motox and puts amsoil in everything that requires oil and swears by it, but then again he is sponsored by them.
http://www.quickoildrainvalve.com/
This is also a good investment if you don't even want to deal with washers and getting oil on your hands/arms/garage floor.
There are a lot of amsoil fans here and I used to run it on my S2000, I'm not pushing my RL nearly as hard as my S so I think Mobil1 is fine. My friend races motox and puts amsoil in everything that requires oil and swears by it, but then again he is sponsored by them.
Last edited by PixelHarmony; Jun 20, 2011 at 10:29 AM.
That's a pretty good deal, IMHO. I can't attest to if they are all changing over or not, but it may just be a byproduct of wanting to go synthetic. Conventional can't hit 0-weight viscosity. If Honda is moving to synthetic naturally, then it only makes sense to use the lowest winter rating to ensure the best protection at low temperature start-ups.
Another thing I learned is there is a conditioner in conventional oil that is not in synthetic. It is best to run conventional in a new car for the first 20k miles to condition the seals before switching over to synthetic. Not doing so can lead to burning oil.
At least this is what "Bob is the oil guy" has taught me, and he knows his stuff.
Another thing I learned is there is a conditioner in conventional oil that is not in synthetic. It is best to run conventional in a new car for the first 20k miles to condition the seals before switching over to synthetic. Not doing so can lead to burning oil.
At least this is what "Bob is the oil guy" has taught me, and he knows his stuff.
At least this is what "Bob is the oil guy" has taught me, and he knows his stuff.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IBankMouse
1G TSX (2004-2008)
8
Jun 13, 2020 12:53 PM
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
5
Sep 28, 2015 06:51 PM
STL TL-S
3G TL Problems & Fixes
9
Sep 23, 2015 08:52 PM











