dyno results from yesterday, 356WHP 296WTQ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2004, 02:04 PM
  #81  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
mattg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OR
Age: 48
Posts: 22,909
Received 388 Likes on 196 Posts
yes it does. but the easiest way to close it is to let it drop from 8" or so. and it's too light to drop w/ the struts attached.
Old 10-27-2004, 08:02 AM
  #82  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Nice numbers Matt.
Old 10-28-2004, 12:18 PM
  #83  
Racer
 
fiveoh-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mahopac, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice #'s. I'm surprised there's such a big difference in hp to trq.......you usually see a great trq imrpovement w/ n2o than hp.

10% sounds a little on the low side though.......especially w/ an auto.
Old 10-28-2004, 12:30 PM
  #84  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by fiveoh-tl
Nice #'s. I'm surprised there's such a big difference in hp to trq.......you usually see a great trq imrpovement w/ n2o than hp.

10% sounds a little on the low side though.......especially w/ an auto.

I don't know what you are looking at. Seems to me there is about a 100 point increase in both hp and torque.

hp no n2o = 280
hp w/n20 = 390
tq no n20 = 222
tq w/ n20 = 329

Old 10-29-2004, 12:39 PM
  #85  
Racer
 
fiveoh-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mahopac, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrsteve
I don't know what you are looking at. Seems to me there is about a 100 point increase in both hp and torque.

hp no n2o = 280
hp w/n20 = 390
tq no n20 = 222
tq w/ n20 = 329

My bad. I didn't realize the car was so weak in the torque department pre-n2o (almost 60 less than hp). What I was actually trying to say was that you normally see a greater increase increase in torque than hp when you use n2o....not specifically that the peak # is lower necessarily.

Plus, there's no way there's only a 10% loss w/ the auto.......because you won't see 100 hp/trq gain from a 100 shot......a 20-25% loss would be more accurate. Still, good #'s anyway even w/ the more than likely true #'s of: 310/265.
Old 10-29-2004, 06:11 PM
  #86  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
Actually he did see a 100 hp gain from the 100 shot. His car doesn't make 256 whp without N20. His car probably makes 240whp off the bottle. He didn't gain quite 100 in torque, but damn close. His car should make roughly 200-210 at the wheels. I do agree 10% is low, but whp is all that matters and he made 356whp.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
02-23-2023 01:54 PM
Houston
3G TL Problems & Fixes
5
10-08-2015 01:27 AM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
09-29-2015 10:43 PM
Tribalheads
4G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
1
09-29-2015 03:24 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
09-28-2015 05:43 PM



Quick Reply: dyno results from yesterday, 356WHP 296WTQ



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 AM.