Uni -Chip Owners Only Discussion Thread......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2004, 12:19 PM
  #201  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by scalbert
Almost definitely we would need the software to view them.

That's the problem, I don't know how I would go about doing that.
Old 07-02-2004, 12:20 PM
  #202  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
From Mike at AMM:

Steve,
I did not see a heck of alot of timing advancements, but we never checked the race-gas maps. Next time we'll hook up and check out the high octane map to see what they have if you want.
Mike
Old 07-02-2004, 12:29 PM
  #203  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Jonesi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 19,827
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
Headers were supported by dynos to verify gains. I am not bahsing Unichip or its product.

I am fed up with alll that rubbish, I "feel" that gain or "It feels the same"!.. Please be scientific.
I'm fed up with you coming in here and bashing the UniChip.. Stay Out.. You haven't contributed one thing to any of the threads except for your negative comments..
Old 07-02-2004, 12:30 PM
  #204  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Jonesi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 19,827
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrsteve
That's the problem, I don't know how I would go about doing that.
See if you can get the maps and we'll figure it out from there..
Old 07-02-2004, 12:33 PM
  #205  
Pro
 
juice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boutte, LA 70070
Age: 47
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the instructions it does say that Map B adds more timing.
Old 07-02-2004, 12:35 PM
  #206  
Suzuka Master
 
scalbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
Headers were supported by dynos to verify gains. I am not bahsing Unichip or its product.

I am fed up with alll that rubbish, I "feel" that gain or "It feels the same"!.. Please be scientific.
You have asked the same of others, myself included, to stay out if not contributing anything positive. Does it not works the other way??
Old 07-02-2004, 12:36 PM
  #207  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by juice
In the instructions it does say that Map B adds more timing.

Yes but I never felt the Map B was very practical. I mean having to run 100 octane just isn't something I plan on doing regularly. We'll see what happens.
Old 07-02-2004, 12:38 PM
  #208  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Jonesi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 19,827
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by scalbert
You have asked the same of others, myself included, to stay out if not contributing anything positive. Does it not works the other way??
I've been telling him that but I guess it's not getting through..
Old 07-02-2004, 12:40 PM
  #209  
Suzuka Master
 
scalbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jonesi
I've been telling him that but I guess it's not getting through..
IMO, it is not bad to discuss and question. It just needs to works both ways!!!
Old 07-02-2004, 12:42 PM
  #210  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
I emailed AAM and asked to have the map sent to me.
Old 07-02-2004, 12:44 PM
  #211  
Pro
 
juice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boutte, LA 70070
Age: 47
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrsteve
Yes but I never felt the Map B was very practical. I mean having to run 100 octane just isn't something I plan on doing regularly. We'll see what happens.
The instructions do not say anything about running a higher octane. But, i know UniChip mentioned it to someone. It just says thst it may not work because some cars may be very sensitive to denotation.
Old 07-02-2004, 12:46 PM
  #212  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
When I dyoned with Map B the dyno graph was nearly identical to Map A. This was using 100 octane too.
Old 07-02-2004, 12:57 PM
  #213  
Pro
 
juice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boutte, LA 70070
Age: 47
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrsteve
When I dyoned with Map B the dyno graph was nearly identical to Map A. This was using 100 octane too.

Who knows? Maybe the ECU was cutting back on the timing when in map B.
Old 07-02-2004, 12:58 PM
  #214  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by juice
Who knows? Maybe the ECU was cutting back on the timing when in map B.

Which would make Map B useless.
Old 07-02-2004, 01:08 PM
  #215  
Pro
 
juice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boutte, LA 70070
Age: 47
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrsteve
Which would make Map B useless.

This is true.

That is probably why they say to use higher octane. To help reduce denotation so the ECU will not retard the timing, which will cause you to lose power.

I think your dyno proves this.
Old 07-02-2004, 01:12 PM
  #216  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
I had higher octane during my original dyno. The Map B was identical to the Map A when it came to results. Map B was still too lean and didn't make any additional power.
Old 07-02-2004, 01:29 PM
  #217  
Pro
 
juice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boutte, LA 70070
Age: 47
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrsteve
I had higher octane during my original dyno. The Map B was identical to the Map A when it came to results. Map B was still too lean and didn't make any additional power.
That is also true. Everything is pointing towards the lean conditions. Hopefully we can get enough data and UniChip will give us a quick re-flash.
Old 07-02-2004, 01:33 PM
  #218  
Pro
 
juice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boutte, LA 70070
Age: 47
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scalbert
Interesting as I would have thought that is was mostly from timing.

Not to be on the negative side but if it were mostly due to MAP signal alterations then the VAFC and E-Manage could do the same if enough were taken. I would love to see the maps though as I suspect timing to be a critical part of it.

scalbert -

Maybe you could give UniChip a call a discuss with them the tuning methid that they used to produce the results. Maybe they will tell you if they did it with timing, fuel, or a combination of the 2.
Old 07-02-2004, 03:30 PM
  #219  
dj5
Burning Brakes
 
dj5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rocket City
Posts: 1,144
Received 49 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by AuCLSman
i spoke with jack @ unichip yesterday to ask about a tuning shop in the milwaukee area, as i have followed the threads regarding this mod and fully expect i'll need to visit one for actual chip tuning.the nearest location is genisis racing development , naperville, illinois. (102 mi. 2+ hrs drive) my preference is to have a baseline dyno done with my existing mods then a second set of pulls done with the chip installed then further tuning done if the tuner believes more power is achieveable.this would allow for all dyno runs being comparable with "same day" atomospheric conditions. the only drawback to this scenario is the timing between baseline and chip install and tuning (doesnt allow for ecu self adjustment) - comments anyone?

I work less than 5 miles from GRD. I called them and set up an appointment for a before and after Unichip dyno for Saturday afternoon on July 10th. I have been wanting to do a dyno on my '02 TLS for some time so now would be a good time.

They said they could also custom tune the Unichip if needed. Cost for the first hour is $150 and $100 for the second hour if needed. Will let you guys know the results.
Old 07-02-2004, 07:58 PM
  #220  
Audi S4 driver
 
blader's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Forked River NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, you guys were definetly right about Jack.

Got off the phone with him a little while ago after a 20 minute conversation. I explained to him what I had been observing after using the chip for a week, my concerns, some of the weird things it was doing, and asked him my options. We discussed the possibility of a custom tune, although there are NO unichip shops in the area, infact the closest one is Altered Atmosphere in Maryland where steve got his done!

Pretty much what was decided is that I'll sit tight til the revised chip he sent out to one member can be tested, and if this chip works he will reflash my chip for free. This should take care of all lean conditions and any other concerns. He said of course I will get the most out of a custom tune but unless I am looking for max dyno numbers (which I'm not) then it will be enough of a tuning with the reflash just for having some fun on the street.
Old 07-02-2004, 08:08 PM
  #221  
BC
nearsighted visionary
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Gresham, Oregon
Age: 74
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just got an e-mail from Todd. They want my car for some dyno workouts on thursday with a friday pickup. I'm in. Still runnin' the stock intake though. Have to hooky a couple of 40 mile rides now. I should of checked the option box for the official Acura fold up trunk mounted mini-bike. Sieze ya.
Old 07-02-2004, 08:27 PM
  #222  
Senior Moderator
 
mattg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OR
Age: 48
Posts: 22,909
Received 388 Likes on 196 Posts
you're a good man, BC.
Old 07-02-2004, 08:45 PM
  #223  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Jonesi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 19,827
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by blader
Wow, you guys were definetly right about Jack.
He defintley stands behind his product and is more then willing to help us get this straightened out.. I'd wait til they get BC's car in for some dyno tuning to see what comes up.. Then I will go from there.. I want to see what his car does under same the same conditions as Matt and Brian.. We will get a better account then.. Otherwise we will go off of dyno sheets to have ours tweaked..
Old 07-02-2004, 10:57 PM
  #224  
Sweet as Gold
 
Ant7701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NY
Age: 44
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BC
Just got an e-mail from Todd. They want my car for some dyno workouts on thursday with a friday pickup. I'm in. Still runnin' the stock intake though. Have to hooky a couple of 40 mile rides now. I should of checked the option box for the official Acura fold up trunk mounted mini-bike. Sieze ya.

Some one lend this man an intake!!!!!! Also post ur mods that u do have.
Old 07-02-2004, 11:57 PM
  #225  
///M POWER
 
darrinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i couldnt get a dyno appointment today, gonna go in tommorw but its gonna be like 90 degrees!!!!
Old 07-03-2004, 12:45 AM
  #226  
BC
nearsighted visionary
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Gresham, Oregon
Age: 74
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Ant. I've been waiting for an icebox to come up for sale on the black market. Fat chance. My car has the CT headers and suspension and rolls on 17 inch GT1's and 225 es100's.
Old 07-03-2004, 01:58 PM
  #227  
Sweet as Gold
 
Ant7701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NY
Age: 44
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
U got a Type-S right BC??? I'm sure someone around the area can lend u an intake of some kind to get this tuning dyno done. Ask around.
Old 07-03-2004, 02:15 PM
  #228  
///M POWER
 
darrinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just got back from the dyno

car is running way to lean, af ratio is 14.5 w/ chip, 12.5 w/o
car is actually detonating through vtec.

as far as gains though there really isnt anything, like 1 hp and about 5 ft pounds for only like 500 rpms

i put down 250whp w/ the unichip and 248 w/o it

i will post the graphs later i have to scan them....
Old 07-03-2004, 02:21 PM
  #229  
Sweet as Gold
 
Ant7701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NY
Age: 44
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
250WHP!!!!!!!! dayum thats good for an auto!!!!!Post those graphs allready.
Old 07-03-2004, 02:41 PM
  #230  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
darrin, what are you running again?
Old 07-03-2004, 03:40 PM
  #231  
Pro
 
juice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boutte, LA 70070
Age: 47
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by darrinb
just got back from the dyno

car is running way to lean, af ratio is 14.5 w/ chip, 12.5 w/o
car is actually detonating through vtec.

as far as gains though there really isnt anything, like 1 hp and about 5 ft pounds for only like 500 rpms

i put down 250whp w/ the unichip and 248 w/o it

i will post the graphs later i have to scan them....
Thanks for getting the dyno. This is just more data to share with UniChip about the A/F ration.
Old 07-03-2004, 05:25 PM
  #232  
Audi S4 driver
 
blader's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Forked River NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow 250whp, impressive! Maybe I need a crank pulley
Old 07-03-2004, 11:02 PM
  #233  
///M POWER
 
darrinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
engine is running alot smoother now that the chip isnt in...

as smart as the people at uni-chip are wouldnt they know that a universal chip wont work, if i would of kept it in any longer my engine could of possible blown up

i'm gonna talk to jack on monday and if things dont work out imma tune it with the greddy e-man
Old 07-03-2004, 11:35 PM
  #234  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
No it would not have "blown up" Your ECU will detect the lean condition and retard timing accordingly to keep things safe, this is why you aren't getting gains. The ECU is cutting timing.
Old 07-04-2004, 01:04 AM
  #235  
Has been sold for a while
 
J.T.'s 3.2CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by darrinb
engine is running alot smoother now that the chip isnt in...

as smart as the people at uni-chip are wouldnt they know that a universal chip wont work, if i would of kept it in any longer my engine could of possible blown up

i'm gonna talk to jack on monday and if things dont work out imma tune it with the greddy e-man
Sorry to hear that the chip doesn't work as advertised. Are you going to get a full refund if things don't work out after talking with Jack? On a positive note 248whp without the chip is great. I'd be happy with that from my 6 speed. What kind of dyno was it BTW and are those #'s SAE or STD?
Old 07-04-2004, 11:09 AM
  #236  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
I'm assuming you used a dynojet and although they have become the "standard" for dyno testing because of their "reliability" you have to look at these numbers for what they are. Dyno testing only give you an estimate of the power being produced. Now with Darrin's mods, 248 whp seems nuts! That would mean he is pushing over 300 crank horsepower. I'm not saying it is impossible, but the real thing to look at is the difference is stock vs UniChip dynos. It is very possible that Darrin could have his car tested at my dyno and run 25 whp less, or I could have my car tested on his dyno and run 25 whp more!

The factor that doesn't change (at least shouldn't change that greatly) from dyno to dyno is the A/F ratio. It seems as if Darrin's car is right around where mine was with the UniChip. You'll need to get that back around 13.0-13.5 to get it running better.
Old 07-04-2004, 12:33 PM
  #237  
Suzuka Master
 
scalbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by darrinb
out imma tune it with the greddy e-man
So, you are going to spend an even greater amount of money on something you won't be able to just get your money back and end up with about the same, if not less, gains.
Old 07-04-2004, 01:10 PM
  #238  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by scalbert
So, you are going to spend an even greater amount of money on something you won't be able to just get your money back and end up with about the same, if not less, gains.

It would be cheaper to get a custom tune on the UniChip man.
Old 07-04-2004, 02:19 PM
  #239  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
New email from Jack:

Steve,
Thanks for the reply and the additional information. The changes AA made are
what I would have expected from the A/F trace we saw from the first dyno...
what they really did was have the Unichip pull less fuel. Why your car is so
much leaner even before the Unichip was added is a bit of a puzzle.
I don't think timing is a big power factor... if there's not a big difference
between the A-map and the B-map, timing isn't what the car wants. Comparing
Matt's dyno runs isn't ready valid... different car on a different dyno; the
only useful comparison is looking at the before and after charges between the
two cars... his vs. his compared to yours vs. yours. Even then, they're
different cars.
Please let me know if I can answer any additional questions and let me know how
the next drags go.

Cheers,
Jack

Jack Friedman, General Manager
Unichip of North America
www.unichip.us
Toll Free 866.643.7400
Old 07-04-2004, 02:46 PM
  #240  
Audi S4 driver
 
blader's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Forked River NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I spoke with Jack on Friday he said to just hang tight til they can get the modified map tested; and if it works he'll offer anyone a reflash who is running lean. But I forget when he said it would be ready and tested, I think the beginning of this week .. has he mentioned this to anyone else?


Quick Reply: Uni -Chip Owners Only Discussion Thread......



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 PM.