RL Cams 2006

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #1  
johntypes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
Question RL Cams 2006

I was told we can change our cams to the new RL cams and can expect a 12HP gain is this true, and if so has any one done it,and besides the RL being a 3.5 how do they get the extra HP
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 01:07 AM
  #2  
Time For Sleeep's Avatar
That's Racist
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,634
Likes: 0
From: San Diego native. UCLA resident. =)
Havne't heard this @ all before...
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 07:55 AM
  #3  
CL Platano's Avatar
Tristate ViP Crew
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
I'm pretty sure Type R or ThinJim can chime on this. I always wondered about upgrading our cams.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #4  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
check my sticky at the top of the forum titled: my 3.5L journey begins...
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 06:19 PM
  #5  
Time For Sleeep's Avatar
That's Racist
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,634
Likes: 0
From: San Diego native. UCLA resident. =)
Makes me wonder though, can the cams even fit ? Or would we ahve to go even further with a 3.5 swap?
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 06:28 PM
  #6  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
the 3.5 is essentially a longer stroke, thats it. a 3.2 w/ RL cams should clear the valves no problem. i don't see why not.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 06:31 PM
  #7  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
they will the high lift spec on the RL is the same as the type S its pre vtec where any gains will be had and they are there ...if you can do the swap your self this is a good mod...the RL gets it's gains from the stroke the 11:1 compression and improved heads and upper intake
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 07:32 PM
  #8  
pits200's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 24
From: Mt. Lebanon
the 2 cams cost about $600 right? How much would a shop charge to do this, if I was going to get my timing belt changed at the same time.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 07:58 PM
  #9  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
Front: 231.38
Rear: 231.38

That's before shipping. But its recommended to change the valve springs too.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #10  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by CleanCL
. But its recommended to change the valve springs too.
why the high lift side of these cams is identicle to the type S
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #11  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
primary and secondary are the only things increased, right?

i will agree, you don't HAVE to change the springs. but i replaced my springs bc i was told by thinjim the rates are different. the RL springs are rated for the higher lift, thus i would assume a bit more effecient.

for someone swapping in cams, i don't think it matters much, but since i rebuilt my whole motor i went all out on every step. just a recommendation, not a necessity. but to this day, i dont know of a single person who ran their car with the cams. as far as i know, i will more than likely be the first. i know jim test fit it, but he never made mention of running the motor with it for an extended period of time.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 10:14 PM
  #12  
CL Platano's Avatar
Tristate ViP Crew
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Maybe with my next bonus from work I'll do the cams upgrade.
Reply
Old May 24, 2006 | 11:13 PM
  #13  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
should be about $500 for cams shipped to your door. not including install. and no one knows how much HP? i'd wait on it for someone else to do it, or for me to get my car done and hit the dynos.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 01:53 AM
  #14  
GayLove's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: yay area
just an urban legend
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 02:40 AM
  #15  
av6ent's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
From: us 'n a
Yeah, they fit and lift is on RL

Originally Posted by 02AV6

Camshaft specs:

J32A2 '01-03 CL-S/TL-S
intake (pri), (mid), (sec), exhaust
34.737mm, 36.445mm, 34.919mm, 36.389mm

J35A8 '05+ RL
35.284 , 36.445, 35.284 , 36.389
And valves identical too.

Originally Posted by 02AV6

J32A2 '01-03 TL-S/CL-S: 36mm/30mm (intake/exhaust)
J35A8 '05+ RL: 36mm/30mm
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 03:26 AM
  #16  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by GayLove
just an urban legend


Search before you type.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 07:45 AM
  #17  
banana's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: montreal
Wow, this sounds good !! We need a guinea pig to test the 3.5RL cams ..... Would you need somekind of fuel management to get the full potential of those new cam profiles ? (Like a VAFC).

I'm dreaming of going past the 250whp number with my N/A auto..... this might just do it ...
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #18  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
i don't disagree the valves are different, but someone may want to search more into the valve springs.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 11:47 AM
  #19  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by CleanCL
i don't disagree the valves are different, but someone may want to search more into the valve springs.
our vavlve springs were engineered to take the 7100 rpm fuel cut of the 36.389 lobe
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 11:47 AM
  #20  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by banana

I'm dreaming of going past the 250whp number with my N/A auto..... this might just do it ...
250's easy go for 275
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 12:13 PM
  #21  
rondog's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 129
From: yonkers, NY
anythng have to be done besides swapping out the cams? liek ECU or other parts? is it that direct and problem free? Would it be compared with the same gains as headers?
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #22  
JBlueCLS6's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 50
Ugh, making me reach into my wallet again!

But do you think it'd hurt if you decide to put on a Supercharger with the RL Cams?
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #23  
Lord Helmet's Avatar
I'm here in spirit...
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,607
Likes: 0
From: CO
I kind of like the sound of this...

I question the same thing as banana though... Would you need a VAFC to tune it properly or could the gains be had right out of the box?

EDIT: I'm actually very interested in this mod.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 02:51 PM
  #24  
banana's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: montreal
I mean with the stock bloc ...

Originally Posted by typeR
250's easy go for 275
You think one could reach 275 N/A whp without the 3.5L swap ?
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 03:09 PM
  #25  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
cams will bolt on, no tuning necessary. no tuning needed for the 3.5 stroker either.
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 03:18 PM
  #26  
banana's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: montreal
Originally Posted by CleanCL
cams will bolt on, no tuning necessary. no tuning needed for the 3.5 stroker either.
And no valve clearance problem at all ? just want to make sure .....
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #27  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by banana
You think one could reach 275 N/A whp without the 3.5L swap ?
unlikely but possible would probablly have to turn 8.5K rpms
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 08:40 AM
  #28  
pits200's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 24
From: Mt. Lebanon
How much would a shop charge for changing the cams on our car. This would be a pretty nice upgrade especially if it helps with the low end torque. I hope I am understanding this right??
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 09:57 AM
  #29  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by pits200
How much would a shop charge for changing the cams on our car. This would be a pretty nice upgrade especially if it helps with the low end torque. I hope I am understanding this right??
depends ...if the CAMs cane be changed w/o pulling the heads which i think they can cant be more than a couple hundred
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #30  
johntypes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
NO I ck with my mech. who is going to do the work I Will be the first one,We just put in E-mangement ,after the Cams s/c will follow I will dyno before and after
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #31  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
let us know the results, when are you planning the install? did you source out the cams already?
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 03:07 PM
  #32  
leolebo28's Avatar
Drive FAst and Swirve
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 963
Likes: 1
From: TEXAS
this should definately be interesting....
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #33  
JBlueCLS6's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 50
Are you gonna dyno the car before and after NA? Or with/without the SC? It'd be more helpful for the rest of the board if you just do a dyno for the cams.
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 03:46 PM
  #34  
johntypes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
will dyno before and after

I will dyno be fore and after,like I always do.In the next few weeks I am waiting to be operated on other wise it would already be installed hoping for about 12HP I am now at 242 HP and 202 torque Have all comptech mods plus a few others ,when I installed NOS it was more like a toy after the S/C that will come off
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 04:19 PM
  #35  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
12whp? sounds good. i'm glad someone is doing it to a regular j32 motor. if you see 12, i'd guess i should see over 15. good luck with everything john.
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #36  
CLsuperhero's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 576
Likes: 3
I'm just curious can you swap in these cams if you have a UR crank pulley? I don't want to sound like a noob but would this mess up the timing if you didn't use the stock crank pulley?
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #37  
ThinJim's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 10
From: 3rd rock
Originally Posted by rondog
anythng have to be done besides swapping out the cams? liek ECU or other parts? is it that direct and problem free? Would it be compared with the same gains as headers?
no, I personally beleive the the stock ecu will automatically compensate for any additional fuel the car may need. the o2 sensors will tell the ecu if the car is lean or rich and make adjustments. I think the change will be small in the demand for fuel, and think the ecu can handle it.

the rl springs have a few lbs more seat pressure. we had check the springs on the cl and rl and the rl springs are slightly stronger. I had the tensions from both and can not find them but they are better. I wouldn't push this valve train above 7500-7700, I think that's all it's good for with a fresh set of rl springs. and besides, you'd never be able to get beyond the rev limit, so no worries in that department anyways.
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 09:52 PM
  #38  
CL Platano's Avatar
Tristate ViP Crew
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
hmmm this is becoming more and more interesting to do. Cams+Headers+Crank Pulley would make a nice J32 without completely breaking the bank. I might have to scrap the kit and do this
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #39  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by johntypes
I will dyno be fore and after,like I always do.In the next few weeks I am waiting to be operated on other wise it would already be installed hoping for about 12HP I am now at 242 HP and 202 torque Have all comptech mods plus a few others ,when I installed NOS it was more like a toy after the S/C that will come off
just so you guys dont ahve the wrong idea...i dont think you'll see any peak gain...the high lobe of these cams are idneticle ..but down low you may very well get 10-12
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 10:16 PM
  #40  
CL Platano's Avatar
Tristate ViP Crew
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by typeR
just so you guys dont ahve the wrong idea...i dont think you'll see any peak gain...the high lobe of these cams are idneticle ..but down low you may very well get 10-12
Down low is the key because these freakin cars suck on the low end.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.