TSX or RSX type S???
i fully modded my 2004 rsx s for 2+ years and sold it this past summer and got an 07 tsx... lets just say i dont miss the rsx really. the tsx is more lux/sport and nice to cruise in and its quiet. not as much mod as a type s, but you can make a tsx look really clean and unique.
I'm young and I went with the TSX. Even when you mod a TSX it still retains a bit of class, which I was looking for. When you mod a RSX it looks like pure sports car, which is not bad but wasn't what I was looking for. What I'm trying to say is that age has nothing to do whether you chose a TSX or RSX, it depends what you want to do with it.
Trending Topics
Good choice on the TSX. When I bought my TSX I was 23 so not that much older then you. The dealer had the RSX-S and I was cross shopping both. After driving both back to back, almost everything was better in the TSX. You picked a car you grow up with you. I am chiropractor know and driving the TSX fits my lifestyle and will continue to do so for years to come. If I chose the RSX I most likely would have sold it already. Pics of your TSX?
Even when you mod a TSX it still retains a bit of class, which I was looking for. When you mod a RSX it looks like pure sports car, which is not bad but wasn't what I was looking for.


The 4 door vs. 2 door: that is a matter of taste and utility but to say modding the RSX makes it "look" like a sports car is incorrect. Just my 2 cents.
Ok... How many people have a S/C, headers, exhaust, etc and have their car completely stock on the outside?? Very few... You're the first I've seen that has done this.... Most people that have what you have under your hood, do not leave their car stock on the outside....To my point, not many RSX owners would leave their car bone stock on the outside and put all that stuff under their hood. Even with something as subtle as a drop and aftermarket rims, the RSX looks more sportier than the TSX IMO... That's the only reason I said that. I'm talking about the norm, not the few exceptions like you.
Last edited by renedcruz; Nov 4, 2010 at 08:45 PM.
Touche. And I agree with your point. I did not mean to come down that hard on your generalization (even though I said I disagree 100%)
and your comments are well taken on my end. Personally I think both are great looking cars on the outside and don't need much aesthetic help but I seem to be one of the few who sits around the fire of camp Keep it Stock. I think most degrade the classy nature of both of these cars (more so the TSX) with many of the mods they do especially to the exterior. I hope the OP makes the right choice for themselves.
and your comments are well taken on my end. Personally I think both are great looking cars on the outside and don't need much aesthetic help but I seem to be one of the few who sits around the fire of camp Keep it Stock. I think most degrade the classy nature of both of these cars (more so the TSX) with many of the mods they do especially to the exterior. I hope the OP makes the right choice for themselves.
Touche. And I agree with your point. I did not mean to come down that hard on your generalization (even though I said I disagree 100%)
and your comments are well taken on my end. Personally I think both are great looking cars on the outside and don't need much aesthetic help but I seem to be one of the few who sits around the fire of camp Keep it Stock. I think most degrade the classy nature of both of these cars (more so the TSX) with many of the mods they do especially to the exterior. I hope the OP makes the right choice for themselves.
and your comments are well taken on my end. Personally I think both are great looking cars on the outside and don't need much aesthetic help but I seem to be one of the few who sits around the fire of camp Keep it Stock. I think most degrade the classy nature of both of these cars (more so the TSX) with many of the mods they do especially to the exterior. I hope the OP makes the right choice for themselves.
I agree with carmagnut's sense of aesthetics. But I also agree that he is probably in the minority with regard to how most people approach modifications of both performance and exteriors.
When I was younger, I always thought about what I could bolt on next to modify not only the performance but the look of the exterior.
But I think the TSX is different than most cars in terms of aesthetics and image. It was intended to compete in the marketplace with the BMW 3 series. And when people see mine, (completely stock on the exterior), they ask what it is, sometimes confusing it for the 3 series. It has the "look" of a german sports sedan, whether you want to admit it or not.
But think of it this way...almost no one modifies the exterior of their new BMW sedan. (Unless the car is older or used for racing.) It would ruin the cache and class of the car. Would you do that to a new 3 series, to a Lexus IS, an Infiniti G? I feel the same thing holds true for our cars -- with regard to most exterior changes. You can make the TSX look more aggressive and more sporty...but you can easily cross the line into street racer Honda Civic territory...and in my opinion, that is not where this car deserves to go.
When I was younger, I always thought about what I could bolt on next to modify not only the performance but the look of the exterior.
But I think the TSX is different than most cars in terms of aesthetics and image. It was intended to compete in the marketplace with the BMW 3 series. And when people see mine, (completely stock on the exterior), they ask what it is, sometimes confusing it for the 3 series. It has the "look" of a german sports sedan, whether you want to admit it or not.
But think of it this way...almost no one modifies the exterior of their new BMW sedan. (Unless the car is older or used for racing.) It would ruin the cache and class of the car. Would you do that to a new 3 series, to a Lexus IS, an Infiniti G? I feel the same thing holds true for our cars -- with regard to most exterior changes. You can make the TSX look more aggressive and more sporty...but you can easily cross the line into street racer Honda Civic territory...and in my opinion, that is not where this car deserves to go.
Last edited by Boulder TSX; Nov 10, 2010 at 10:51 AM.
I also wanted to keep the car as clean as possible without all those exterior modifications that some do to "ruin" the look of the car as is. I decided to go with the subtle look of the complete A-Spec package (wheels, underbody spoler kit, suspension, deck spoiler) just to enhance the look of the car and to make it fun to drive. I don't regret this at all and I think it looks great.
I agree with carmagnut's sense of aesthetics. But I also agree that he is probably in the minority with regard to how most people approach modifications of both performance and exteriors.
When I was younger, I always thought about what I could bolt on next to modify not only the performance but the look of the exterior.
But I think the TSX is different than most cars in terms of aesthetics and image. It was intended to compete in the marketplace with the BMW 3 series. And when people see mine, (completely stock on the exterior), they ask what it is, sometimes confusing it for the 3 series. It has the "look" of a german sports sedan, whether you want to admit it or not.
But think of it this way...almost no one modifies the exterior of their new BMW sedan. (Unless the car is older or used for racing.) It would ruin the cache and class of the car. Would you do that to a new 3 series, to a Lexus IS, an Infiniti G? I feel the same thing holds true for our cars -- with regard to most exterior changes. You can make the TSX look more aggressive and more sporty...but you can easily cross the line into street racer Honda Civic territory...and in my opinion, that is not where this car deserves to go.
When I was younger, I always thought about what I could bolt on next to modify not only the performance but the look of the exterior.
But I think the TSX is different than most cars in terms of aesthetics and image. It was intended to compete in the marketplace with the BMW 3 series. And when people see mine, (completely stock on the exterior), they ask what it is, sometimes confusing it for the 3 series. It has the "look" of a german sports sedan, whether you want to admit it or not.
But think of it this way...almost no one modifies the exterior of their new BMW sedan. (Unless the car is older or used for racing.) It would ruin the cache and class of the car. Would you do that to a new 3 series, to a Lexus IS, an Infiniti G? I feel the same thing holds true for our cars -- with regard to most exterior changes. You can make the TSX look more aggressive and more sporty...but you can easily cross the line into street racer Honda Civic territory...and in my opinion, that is not where this car deserves to go.
As you can see, this guy, IMO, did not ruin the cache and class of the car. If not, I think he enhanced it. But then again, that's why I said it all depends on the person because some people would not do this to their BMW. It's all a matter of personal preference. That's why I don't knock anyone on what kind of mods they do to their cars. To each it's own.
Yes, you're right, and I think the key word you used is "subtle".
And that's why I said you can modify the exterior tastefully, but it's easy to cross the line into a bad area...(if you are not subtle about it.) To me, wheels, deck/lip spoliers, etc., are not significant modifications.
As for the Bimmer above, I agree it still looks good. (My only problem is that it's lowered a little too much. With that little clearance, you don't have much tolerance for spirited driving on uneven surfaces. If it rolled over a cigarette butt, it would be impacting the wheel wells.)
And that's why I said you can modify the exterior tastefully, but it's easy to cross the line into a bad area...(if you are not subtle about it.) To me, wheels, deck/lip spoliers, etc., are not significant modifications.
As for the Bimmer above, I agree it still looks good. (My only problem is that it's lowered a little too much. With that little clearance, you don't have much tolerance for spirited driving on uneven surfaces. If it rolled over a cigarette butt, it would be impacting the wheel wells.)
Yes, you're right, and I think the key word you used is "subtle".
And that's why I said you can modify the exterior tastefully, but it's easy to cross the line into a bad area...(if you are not subtle about it.) To me, wheels, deck/lip spoliers, etc., are not significant modifications.
As for the Bimmer above, I agree it still looks good. (My only problem is that it's lowered a little too much. With that little clearance, you don't have much tolerance for spirited driving on uneven surfaces. If it rolled over a cigarette butt, it would be impacting the wheel wells.)
And that's why I said you can modify the exterior tastefully, but it's easy to cross the line into a bad area...(if you are not subtle about it.) To me, wheels, deck/lip spoliers, etc., are not significant modifications.
As for the Bimmer above, I agree it still looks good. (My only problem is that it's lowered a little too much. With that little clearance, you don't have much tolerance for spirited driving on uneven surfaces. If it rolled over a cigarette butt, it would be impacting the wheel wells.)

Here we go! LOL
Last edited by renedcruz; Nov 10, 2010 at 08:38 PM.
the RSX is a POS.. and is a disgrace to the Acura brand if you ask me.. even if its not as "mod-capable" as the RSX, the TSX is cleary the better choice. it is smoother, looks nicer and has that "Acura" feel to it. the RSX is just a slightly higher Honda Civic coupe.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cycdaniel
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
8
Dec 17, 2019 10:58 AM
acura_dipset_tl
Car Parts for Sale
1
Jan 1, 2016 03:02 PM
mugen_kid
Member Cars for Sale
7
Nov 13, 2015 10:38 PM





