Proposed bill would require all cameraphones to make themselves heard
Thread Starter
Moderator




Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,124
Likes: 3,377
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Proposed bill would require all cameraphones to make themselves heard
:thumbsdowhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/26/p...ke-themselves/
Proposed bill would require all cameraphones to make themselves heard
by Donald Melanson, posted Jan 26th 2009 at 7:14PM
There's already similar laws in place in Japan and South Korea, and New York Representative Pete King is hoping that the US will soon have a law requiring that all cameraphones make a noise when they snap a picture as well. To that end, King has re-introduced the so-called "Camera Phone Predator Alert Act," which was actually first introduced in 2007 but went nowhere at the time. The bill, as the name not-so-subtly suggests, aims to prevent folks from taking cameraphone pictures without others people's knowledge by forcing the phones to make a sound that's "audible within a reasonable radius" and not able to be disabled. Somewhat curiously, however, the bill apparently wouldn't apply to digital cameras and, as blogger Thomas Hawk points out, it also doesn't take video into account, or do anything to address the millions of camera-equipped phones currently in use that are able to snap pictures silently. No word on any movement of the bill just yet, but it has picked up one co-sponsor and, on the odd chance it actually becomes law, it'd be enforced by the Consumer Products Safety Commission.
* Read
by Donald Melanson, posted Jan 26th 2009 at 7:14PM
There's already similar laws in place in Japan and South Korea, and New York Representative Pete King is hoping that the US will soon have a law requiring that all cameraphones make a noise when they snap a picture as well. To that end, King has re-introduced the so-called "Camera Phone Predator Alert Act," which was actually first introduced in 2007 but went nowhere at the time. The bill, as the name not-so-subtly suggests, aims to prevent folks from taking cameraphone pictures without others people's knowledge by forcing the phones to make a sound that's "audible within a reasonable radius" and not able to be disabled. Somewhat curiously, however, the bill apparently wouldn't apply to digital cameras and, as blogger Thomas Hawk points out, it also doesn't take video into account, or do anything to address the millions of camera-equipped phones currently in use that are able to snap pictures silently. No word on any movement of the bill just yet, but it has picked up one co-sponsor and, on the odd chance it actually becomes law, it'd be enforced by the Consumer Products Safety Commission.
* Read
Thread Starter
Moderator




Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,124
Likes: 3,377
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
also it was mentioned that what if you are using your cell phone to take a picture of a crime happening?
and what is to stop someone from making a ringtone or whatever with no sound as the camera shutter sound?
and what is to stop someone from making a ringtone or whatever with no sound as the camera shutter sound?
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
billmcd
ILX
9
Oct 17, 2016 03:33 PM
Mugen TSX
Eastern Canada
0
Sep 1, 2015 11:11 PM


at the whiskers law.
