Technology Get the latest on technology, electronics and software…

Network guys, I need your help..

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #1  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Question Network guys, I need your help..

I have my Windows XP box and my Infrant ReadyNAS hooked up through a Gb switch. That switch is hooked up to my home router.

However, when I transfer files from my computer to the NAS or vice versa and check my network utilization statistics in the task manager, it varies between 8-11% utilization.

How can I get my windows box to up how much it utilizes for the connection? The transfers are so slow even with the Gb connection it's getting annoying.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #2  
baby_igor's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 333
Likes: 5
From: Vienna, VA
Do you have all the ports set to full duplex?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #3  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by baby_igor
Do you have all the ports set to full duplex?
Which ports are you referring to?

Ports on the router? switch? nic card?

I never explicity set anything to full deplex, didn't know I needed to.

The gigabit switch does not have an interface of any kind so nothing on there can be adjusted.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 09:57 PM
  #4  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
I just checked the properties of the nic card, it's line speed and duplex setting is set to Auto detect.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:05 PM
  #5  
khiyal's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Forest Hills, NY
make it 100/full
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:10 PM
  #6  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by khiyal
make it 100/full
Don't you mean 1000/Full since It's on a Gb network??
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:18 PM
  #7  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Alright, so there's no option for 1000/Full.

there are only these options:

Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #8  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Forgot to mention, I'm also running Cat6 cables.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:24 PM
  #9  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
After doing some reading on the internet, I think I might have found the culprit. I think it's my hard drive. The read times off my hard drive may not be fast enough to fill up the network pipe and that's probably my bottleneck.

What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #10  
kyle77777's Avatar
Gonna cost to catch up
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 1
From: Olympia, WA
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
After doing some reading on the internet, I think I might have found the culprit. I think it's my hard drive. The read times off my hard drive may not be fast enough to fill up the network pipe and that's probably my bottleneck.

What do you guys think?
Thats probably correct
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2007 | 10:50 PM
  #11  
SupaRookie's Avatar
Kang Ho
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
From: SJ, CA
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
After doing some reading on the internet, I think I might have found the culprit. I think it's my hard drive. The read times off my hard drive may not be fast enough to fill up the network pipe and that's probably my bottleneck.

What do you guys think?
I'm not a network guy yet, but studying to get my CCNA. But what you are saying sound correct. I would however, change your link speed to "AutoNegotiate 1000Mbps" instead of Auto Detect. If all your equipment is Gigabit, why not choose 1000Mbps?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 01:01 AM
  #12  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
The onboard Gigabit controller on my Intel mobo doesn't support Jumbo frames either.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 07:33 AM
  #13  
doopstr's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 25,967
Likes: 2,685
From: Jersey
Originally Posted by Sly Raskal
After doing some reading on the internet, I think I might have found the culprit. I think it's my hard drive. The read times off my hard drive may not be fast enough to fill up the network pipe and that's probably my bottleneck.

What do you guys think?
What kind of hard drive you got in there? 1st gen SATA is rated at 1200Mbit/Sec. Even if you had a "slow" SATA disk I would expect it to do better than 10% of your 1Gb connection.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 07:49 AM
  #14  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
GB Switch means nothing. There are very few drive set ups that will actually function at those speeds. BOTH drives matter (read and write). This really isn't a network problem. ;]

STUPID assumption, but BOTH cards are gigabit right? =] Never know. LoL.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 11:39 AM
  #15  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by CleanCL
GB Switch means nothing. There are very few drive set ups that will actually function at those speeds. BOTH drives matter (read and write). This really isn't a network problem. ;]

STUPID assumption, but BOTH cards are gigabit right? =] Never know. LoL.
I have to check the exact model hard drive I have installed on my windows box and which drives are on the NAS.

The NAS does support Gb connections w/jumbo frames. My Intel Mobo supports Gb connections as well, but no support for jumbo frames.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 12:31 PM
  #16  
Whiskers's Avatar
Go Giants
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 70,003
Likes: 1,260
From: PA
There are many packet tracers you can use...
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #17  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
packet tracers???
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #18  
Whiskers's Avatar
Go Giants
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 70,003
Likes: 1,260
From: PA
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...+packets&meta=
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 03:39 AM
  #19  
Kikaida's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Try a crossover cable and connect the NAS directly to your PC. See if there is any difference in speed. That will rule out if the switch (or router) is the culprit (doubtful).

How many drives do you have in the NAS and what RAID type are you using? You will have overhead due to parity checking, not to mention network overhead...

8-11% of 1gb is still 80-110mb... Still faster than a 100mb connection (which might get 20-40mb transfer)...

Also, don't get bits mixed up with bytes...
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #20  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by Kikaida
Try a crossover cable and connect the NAS directly to your PC. See if there is any difference in speed. That will rule out if the switch (or router) is the culprit (doubtful).
I dont' think I have a crossover cable. If I find one, i'll give that a go.

Originally Posted by Kikaida
How many drives do you have in the NAS and what RAID type are you using? You will have overhead due to parity checking, not to mention network overhead...
I have 4 500GB Seagate barracuda drives installed. I do understand there is quite a bit of overhead for syncing the data, parity checks, etc. Hence one of the reasons why I want to upgrade the RAM in the NAS to 1GB, my NAS is an older version that only shipped with 256MB of RAM

Originally Posted by Kikaida
8-11% of 1gb is still 80-110mb... Still faster than a 100mb connection (which might get 20-40mb transfer)...
Yea, I haven't done the math behind whether my connection is faster than the normal 100Mb connection, I just wanted to ensure I was utilizing my Gb connection as much as Possible.

Originally Posted by Kikaida
Also, don't get bits mixed up with bytes...
I try not too, and I'm aware of the differences, sometimes I goof though. units was always my pitfall.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
Feb 25, 2020 09:57 AM
OculiAquilae
3G TL (2004-2008)
62
Nov 19, 2018 02:24 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
2
Sep 17, 2015 10:16 AM
IndycarFaster
2G TSX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
0
Sep 11, 2015 02:52 PM
Nicho863
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
Sep 3, 2015 09:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 AM.