Technology Get the latest on technology, electronics and software…

Building a new PC - Intel vs AMD

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:31 PM
  #1  
fdl's Avatar
fdl
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Building a new PC - Intel vs AMD

Building a new PC, and havent really kept up on the latest and greatest in the CPU market.

What CPU's should I be considering? I want something really good, but not neccesarily the absolute best and most expensive. Intel has this "dual core" technology. Is this something I should consider?
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:44 PM
  #2  
ib_jimmy's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,193
Likes: 7
From: Dallas
i read somewhere suppostly the AMD Athlon 64 X2 would smoke the Intel Pentium D
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:46 PM
  #3  
AQUI NO!'s Avatar
It's not over yet
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 0
From: Socal
A.M.D, faster and cheaper. On a side note, AMD, for the very first time, outsold Intel .
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:46 PM
  #4  
NiteQwill's Avatar
Adventurist.
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 58
From: Orange County, CA
AMD for gaming. Intel for everything else. Their Dual cores are abosolutely awesome!
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:48 PM
  #5  
Teh Jatt's Avatar
The Oracle of Acurazine!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,706
Likes: 44
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by ib_jimmy
i read somewhere suppostly the AMD Athlon 64 X2 would smoke the Intel Pentium D
Take it to the track!
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:49 PM
  #6  
fdl's Avatar
fdl
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by NiteQwill
AMD for gaming. Intel for everything else. Their Dual cores are abosolutely awesome!

Just curious why you would suggest AMD for gaming but not anythign else?
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:49 PM
  #7  
Slooo97CL's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 12
im running pentium D 2.8 eh its ok
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:50 PM
  #8  
NiteQwill's Avatar
Adventurist.
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 58
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by fdl
Just curious why you would suggest AMD for gaming but not anythign else?
From an application standpoint, I've seen Intel outperform AMD time after time in multitasking situations. On the other hand, AMD hands Intel their asses in terms of gaming performance.
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:51 PM
  #9  
Toots's Avatar
Hairy Balls
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: The Totalitarian States of America
I dunno... I like AMD but most of the boards that are coupled with AMD don't have what I want.
Old 11-17-2005 | 12:54 PM
  #10  
NiteQwill's Avatar
Adventurist.
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,661
Likes: 58
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Toots
I dunno... I like AMD but most of the boards that are coupled with AMD don't have what I want.
Exactly... most high end boards are mated to Intel chips... I too would take an AMD over intel, just the features I want are not there. BTW, I have an Intel on an Asus board.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:02 PM
  #11  
fdl's Avatar
fdl
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
what features do you consider "must have" for your boards?
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:05 PM
  #12  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
I'd go Cyrix 6x86MX.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:07 PM
  #13  
Scottman111's Avatar
1919
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,467
Likes: 162
Originally Posted by dom
I'd go Cyrix 6x86MX.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:08 PM
  #14  
teg_to_bike's Avatar
I'm back, biatch.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
the x86 architecture sucks... but thats life.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:14 PM
  #15  
Toots's Avatar
Hairy Balls
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: The Totalitarian States of America
Originally Posted by fdl
what features do you consider "must have" for your boards?
Actually my statement might be somewhat dated since I'm off the market for the past yeare and a half. But when I was building PCs, the FSB, built in Firewire SATA/IDE RAID crap like that. I'm guessing things have changed somewhat.
I gave up on trying to stay with the industry. Graphics cards and mainboards just move too fast. Career + grad school + bills + dating = 32 hours a day.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:16 PM
  #16  
Toots's Avatar
Hairy Balls
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: The Totalitarian States of America
Originally Posted by NiteQwill
Exactly... most high end boards are mated to Intel chips... I too would take an AMD over intel, just the features I want are not there. BTW, I have an Intel on an Asus board.

I like Asus. I had a bad experience with one in the RAMBUS days, but that was fixed. Asus boards are power hogs.
I'm using a Gigabyte for my main Windows PC and an Abit for my Mandrake Linux AMD machine.

I also no longer pirate software. I'm tired of searching for cracks, hacks and serials.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:17 PM
  #17  
Toots's Avatar
Hairy Balls
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: The Totalitarian States of America
Originally Posted by teg_to_bike
the x86 architecture sucks... but thats life.

x86 has come a long, long way since the mid 90's.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:22 PM
  #18  
mt6forlife's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by agui
A.M.D, faster and cheaper. On a side note, AMD, for the very first time, outsold Intel .
I'd like to see a source on that.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:25 PM
  #19  
Doc.Booty's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 1
From: Myrtle Beach
Amd.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:25 PM
  #20  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
I can see AMD outselling Intel if it was just CPU sales through retail channels. No way in hell though if it was total number of CPU's shipped.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:25 PM
  #21  
teg_to_bike's Avatar
I'm back, biatch.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Originally Posted by Toots
x86 has come a long, long way since the mid 90's.
How so?
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:29 PM
  #22  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by fdl
Building a new PC, and havent really kept up on the latest and greatest in the CPU market.

What CPU's should I be considering? I want something really good, but not neccesarily the absolute best and most expensive. Intel has this "dual core" technology. Is this something I should consider?
I just built mine, and posted the question about dual-core vs p4 on the forums too. The Dual core won in the Vote, but practically speaking, the p4 hyperthreaded was enough for my needs at the moment. And after I put it together I was really happy.

https://acurazine.com/forums/technology-16/building-new-computer-intel-processor-question-319994/



I ended up going with a standard P4 3.6Ghz (660 Prescott) hyper-threaded for a few reasons:

1 - dual cores are only as good as the software that use them

2 - for a little bit extra $$$ you can get a faster p4 than a dual core. ( $349 for a dual core 3.0Ghz OR P4 3.6Ghz $409 (current sale price) www.newegg.com)

3 - Dual core technology is still relatively new and things are gonna change on this end. Dual Core's just came out not too long ago and mac already had a Dual Processor Dual Core G5!!!

4 - Unless you go with the extreme edition, the standard dual cores are not hyper-threaded. Since the chip has two cores, hyper-threading wasn't built in to the standard Pentium D processors. But that may change in the newer models. Imaging Dual Core Hyper-Threaded, that would be hella fast if software manufacturers wrote their code to utilize the dual core features. But until Dual core is the standard they probably won't be.

So in the end I'd stick with a standard processor whether it's a intel or AMD, just get one that does hyper-threading, for now.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:29 PM
  #23  
mt6forlife's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by Billiam
I can see AMD outselling Intel if it was just CPU sales through retail channels. No way in hell though if it was total number of CPU's shipped.
Yeah that's what I was thinking. AMD does well in the starving college student market but Intel owns the OEM channel.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:36 PM
  #24  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Oh I also stuck a CPU Cooler on my processor that helps a lot too....

You can add an additional 100mm fan to the back of the cooler which I also did. It keeps the processor really really cool and it's kept my computer running really smooth so far.

It's a cheaper investment to speed up your computer than buying ram, unless of course you need more memory cuz you run out. The cooler ran me about approx $65+ including the additional fan. YOu have to order the additional fan directly from coolermaster. it costs about $7

CoolerMaster Hyper6 CPU Cooler




Be warned though, this thing is really huge! it'll take up a lot of space in your computer. My case had enough room for it, but others may not.

Antec P180

Last edited by slyraskal; 11-17-2005 at 01:39 PM.
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:39 PM
  #25  
fdl's Avatar
fdl
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
sly, thanks for the info. What are the other specs on the PC you built?
Old 11-17-2005 | 01:51 PM
  #26  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by fdl
sly, thanks for the info. What are the other specs on the PC you built?

Case: Antec P180

Processor: P4 660 3.6 Ghz

CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper6 CPU Cooler + Additional 100mm fan (The cooler only comes with one fan, but the cooler supports two)

Motherboard: Intel D955XBK

Intel Back Panel USB/Firewire Bracket - The motherboard I bought came with 2 front panel USB and Firewire ports. My case only used one of each. So I bought this bracket for a cheap $12 from Intel and installed in the rear of my computer so I could add more ports and make use of them (if I ever need them)

Ram: 2 GB (I'm gonna add more because I'm still noticing I'm running out when I'm working on large graphic files)

Video Card: PNY GeForce 7800 GT PCI Express

DVD Drive/Burner: Sony DVD-RW Model: DW-Q30A BK

Hard Drive:
I used my previous WD Raptor Drive for the OS. I added a 400GB Seagate drive to store my data. In addition, I didn't do a clean install. I Simply swapped my old raptor drive and put it in the new computer and booted it up, updated my drivers for the new motherboard and ide devices and it worked fine. For more info:

https://acurazine.com/forums/ramblings-12/changing-mobo-324478/
Good Luck! If you have any more questions just let me know.
Old 11-17-2005 | 02:10 PM
  #27  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
fdl, check out this place for prices. They're usually cheap.

www.infonec.com

CAD pricing.
Old 11-17-2005 | 02:13 PM
  #28  
fdl's Avatar
fdl
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by dom
fdl, check out this place for prices. They're usually cheap.

www.infonec.com

CAD pricing.

thx
Old 11-17-2005 | 02:36 PM
  #29  
Toots's Avatar
Hairy Balls
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: The Totalitarian States of America
good choice on the board. Intel is certainly the best.
Old 11-17-2005 | 02:46 PM
  #30  
97BlackAckCL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
Regional Coordinator
(Mid-Atlantic)
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 92,262
Likes: 4,489
From: ShitsBurgh
Originally Posted by Toots
good choice on the board. Intel is certainly the best.
Intel is the way to go. We just started playing with the dual cores here at work
Old 11-17-2005 | 02:57 PM
  #31  
mt6forlife's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by Toots
good choice on the board. Intel is certainly the best.
Yep. I love my Intel motherboards. Easily the most stable systems I've ever built.
Old 11-17-2005 | 02:59 PM
  #32  
Toots's Avatar
Hairy Balls
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: The Totalitarian States of America
Originally Posted by mt6forlife
Yep. I love my Intel motherboards. Easily the most stable systems I've ever built.

Yes, very stable. I'm willing to give up some speed for reliability. I guess thats why I drive an Acura.
Old 11-17-2005 | 03:06 PM
  #33  
Hondan53's Avatar
Pink as a pistol
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere, USA
I just bought 200 PCs for my work with Intel Pentium D 830 3.0 GHz CPUs. we have had the computers installed for only 4 days, and 1 Processor already had a level 2 cache data thrash errors and needed to be replaced... I don't know if this is a possible defect with the Pentium D Dual Core CPU, but if another processor fails, I am returning this shipment...
Old 11-17-2005 | 03:12 PM
  #34  
SwervinCL's Avatar
Nom Nom Nom Nom
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,801
Likes: 76
From: Universal City
Originally Posted by Toots
I like Asus. I had a bad experience with one in the RAMBUS days, but that was fixed. Asus boards are power hogs.
I'm using a Gigabyte for my main Windows PC and an Abit for my Mandrake Linux AMD machine.

I also no longer pirate software. I'm tired of searching for cracks, hacks and serials.
You just dont know where to look. The only software that was giving me a hard time was XP pro. But not anymore.

Asus, Gigabyte, DFI, Abit are the only boards that i would go with. If your going to be using it for gaming, make sure it has 8x AGP and/or a pci express slot. I think there are some high end boards out there with a 1gig FSB.

There is no point in having a fast processor if the FSB of the board is low. SO if you want a screaming machine make sure you have a high FSB.

Just whatever you do stay way away from ECS boards. I fried 3 of them within 2 weeks. GARBAGE.
Old 11-17-2005 | 03:16 PM
  #35  
tiguy99's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by fdl
sly, thanks for the info. What are the other specs on the PC you built?

Well you never really said what you were going to use your new computer for. I used to sell pcs retail a few years ago but the basic principle is the same. Tell us what the main usage will be and we'll be in a better position to help
Old 11-17-2005 | 03:18 PM
  #36  
tiguy99's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by dom
fdl, check out this place for prices. They're usually cheap.

www.infonec.com

CAD pricing.
Don't forget www.pricewatch.com and www.newegg.com
Old 11-17-2005 | 03:20 PM
  #37  
fdl's Avatar
fdl
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by tiguy99
Well you never really said what you were going to use your new computer for. I used to sell pcs retail a few years ago but the basic principle is the same. Tell us what the main usage will be and we'll be in a better position to help
Some gaming (not alot), a bit of photo and video editing, and the usuall office apps and web surfing.
Old 11-17-2005 | 03:28 PM
  #38  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally Posted by Toots
Yes, very stable. I'm willing to give up some speed for reliability.


The last 4 computers I"ve built have all used Intel mobo's
Old 11-17-2005 | 03:32 PM
  #39  
tiguy99's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,015
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by fdl
Some gaming (not alot), a bit of photo and video editing, and the usuall office apps and web surfing.
This is what I was able to build a year ago

AMD Athlon 64 3400 (recently upgraded to the 3700) Socket 754
Asus K8N-E Deluxe Mobo
1GB PC3200 Ram
320GB HDD (1 Hitachi 160GB PATA and 1 Seagate 160GB SATA)
16X DVD RW +/-
52X CD Rom Drive
Thermaltake Tsunami Silver 3400 Case with upgraded 500W Power Supply
MSI Nvidia Geforce 6600GT Graphics Card
MSI Tv Tuner (sux I'm about to upgrade it to ATI HDTV Model)
Logitech 5.1 Channel Surround
Logitech Wireless Keyboard and mouse
Wifi built into the house
Sony 17" Xbrite Flat Panel Screen (Silver one)

That's what I can remember for now. The theme is silver and black for the entire system and of course I've got to add a little jazz to that as well. I've got color fans and 2 black light cold cathode tubes in there (badd@zz).

Bottom line, the system kills/eats anything I toss at it. You should see how many windows I have open and I have 0 slow down. Games, dvd authoring/editing/burning, internet, some graphic desing, you name it it does it all at the same time with no hiccups. I've yet to see what my system can 't do and I push the hell out of it.

The good thing about AMD is you can overclock it if you're running good cooling. I've put mine to Athlon 64 4000 speed and its still stable as a whisle. Even at stock speed with stock cooling, it'll kill whatever you can toss at it. Go for it. By the way, AMD Athlon 64 4000 speed is the same as the legendary Athlon FX processors they have (FX53) and they still sell at 1000 a chip alone because of the performance. You won't be dissappointed. Are you going to get yours custom made or prebuilt like a Dell or something?

Last edited by tiguy99; 11-17-2005 at 03:35 PM.
Old 11-17-2005 | 03:37 PM
  #40  
Toots's Avatar
Hairy Balls
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: The Totalitarian States of America
Originally Posted by SwervinCL
You just dont know where to look. The only software that was giving me a hard time was XP pro. But not anymore.

Asus, Gigabyte, DFI, Abit are the only boards that i would go with. If your going to be using it for gaming, make sure it has 8x AGP and/or a pci express slot. I think there are some high end boards out there with a 1gig FSB.

There is no point in having a fast processor if the FSB of the board is low. SO if you want a screaming machine make sure you have a high FSB.

Just whatever you do stay way away from ECS boards. I fried 3 of them within 2 weeks. GARBAGE.

trust me, I know where to look. I've been doing this since 1994. Its not that I can't find them Its just that it wastes time.


Quick Reply: Building a new PC - Intel vs AMD



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 PM.