Tech people: is this a good TV for the price?
#1
Q('.')=O
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Tech people: is this a good TV for the price?
Samsung - 32" 1080p Flat-Panel LCD HDTV
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....=1202648738906
My friend says his boss has a hookup from his work where he gets discounts thru best buy. This says its currently selling for $950 and he says he can get it for me for $600, but the deal ends in 8 hrs so I need to let him know asap. If I'm correct, 1080p is best, right?
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....=1202648738906
My friend says his boss has a hookup from his work where he gets discounts thru best buy. This says its currently selling for $950 and he says he can get it for me for $600, but the deal ends in 8 hrs so I need to let him know asap. If I'm correct, 1080p is best, right?
#3
StayAtHomeDad
I think it's a good deal IF you are getting the 1080P...I didn't think that anything under 40" was 1080P....I stand to be corrected....
As for Circuit City...they are going out of business.....aren't they?
As for Circuit City...they are going out of business.....aren't they?
#5
I think it is overpriced.. $1000 for a 32"... if it was Sony XBR series or Philips TV..yes.
#6
Benchwarmer
Trending Topics
#8
Samsung? TV over the innovators? OH-K.
Sony XBR series will blow anything other LCD tv away, Philips has the deepest blacks for an LCD, and Samsung, should stick to Monitors.
I cant wait for the Laser TV or maybe I'll go with OLED if they ever get cheaper.
$600 is great price, I'll tell my friend, has has been looking for a 32" LCD.
Sony XBR series will blow anything other LCD tv away, Philips has the deepest blacks for an LCD, and Samsung, should stick to Monitors.
I cant wait for the Laser TV or maybe I'll go with OLED if they ever get cheaper.
$600 is great price, I'll tell my friend, has has been looking for a 32" LCD.
#9
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1080p is a marketing gimmick now. Let me try to find that chart to show how far you should sit to notice the picture. I think $600 is way too much to spend on a 32" HDTV. Are you putting this into your room? You planning to use this with the computer as well?
#11
Matt
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 43
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Samsung? TV over the innovators? OH-K.
Sony XBR series will blow anything other LCD tv away, Philips has the deepest blacks for an LCD, and Samsung, should stick to Monitors.
I cant wait for the Laser TV or maybe I'll go with OLED if they ever get cheaper.
$600 is great price, I'll tell my friend, has has been looking for a 32" LCD.
Sony XBR series will blow anything other LCD tv away, Philips has the deepest blacks for an LCD, and Samsung, should stick to Monitors.
I cant wait for the Laser TV or maybe I'll go with OLED if they ever get cheaper.
$600 is great price, I'll tell my friend, has has been looking for a 32" LCD.
#12
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Samsung? TV over the innovators? OH-K.
Sony XBR series will blow anything other LCD tv away, Philips has the deepest blacks for an LCD, and Samsung, should stick to Monitors.
I cant wait for the Laser TV or maybe I'll go with OLED if they ever get cheaper.
$600 is great price, I'll tell my friend, has has been looking for a 32" LCD.
Sony XBR series will blow anything other LCD tv away, Philips has the deepest blacks for an LCD, and Samsung, should stick to Monitors.
I cant wait for the Laser TV or maybe I'll go with OLED if they ever get cheaper.
$600 is great price, I'll tell my friend, has has been looking for a 32" LCD.
Last edited by SupaRookie; 11-24-2008 at 12:19 PM.
#13
StayAtHomeDad
Don't forget (innovator?), Ford "invented" the car, Sony also "invented" digital cameras.....neither of them is on top anymore.....
I don't think that the deal is for everyone....this guy has the Hookup
#14
And it is not a gimmick, but simple math. 720pixel vs 1080 pixels of width will always yield a crispier/more detailed frame.
source in 1920x1080 is the ultimate 1080p quality.
This is a good 32" set, with 3 HDMIs, and 5ms is not bad, I wonder what's contrast ratio is, but again for $600 bux it's a good deal.
#15
#16
BUT! Quality of your TV also depends on the color of your walls, sunlight, and over all viewers positioning....
The rule of thumbs is to measure the distance between where you will be watching TV and where the TV will be standing.. Take that distance and divide it by three, the result is your optimum diagonal for your new TV...
So at 32", you should be seating at least 96 inches away, for the best TV enjoyment (not to see the grains)
#17
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1080p works best when you are steaming blue-ray and true 1080p content, let's say via laptop HDMI... Cable/Satellie is all unconverted bullshit to 1080i
And it is not a gimmick, but simple math. 720pixel vs 1080 pixels of width will always yield a crispier/more detailed frame.
source in 1920x1080 is the ultimate 1080p quality.
This is a good 32" set, with 3 HDMIs, and 5ms is not bad, I wonder what's contrast ratio is, but again for $600 bux it's a good deal.
And it is not a gimmick, but simple math. 720pixel vs 1080 pixels of width will always yield a crispier/more detailed frame.
source in 1920x1080 is the ultimate 1080p quality.
This is a good 32" set, with 3 HDMIs, and 5ms is not bad, I wonder what's contrast ratio is, but again for $600 bux it's a good deal.
Originally Posted by technoking
I live on avsforum lol
But I only use Sony XBR Braiva line for my TVs.... I don't use Sony brand for anything else.
Phliips, yep, lol, they are refurbished a lot, but they are cheaper
But I only use Sony XBR Braiva line for my TVs.... I don't use Sony brand for anything else.
Phliips, yep, lol, they are refurbished a lot, but they are cheaper
Last edited by SupaRookie; 11-24-2008 at 12:29 PM.
#18
But then again, I've seen a Laser-TV in action, no words to describe it.
#19
But for a 720p, I think $600 for a 32" is way too much, you can get a higher contrast low ms LCD monitor. newegg.com
#20
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course $600 for a 32" 7020p is expensive. For the price, you can get 42". I'm a plasma guy.
#21
Q('.')=O
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
ok here's the deal. i will be using this for a tv in my bedroom, will be watching from 10 feet away. i have a regular dvd player (non blueray or hddvd) although MIGHt get one later. is the 1080p worth it in this case? or should i get 720p?
#22
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#23
Even though Plasma will give you better blacks, and are safer nowadays against burn-ins.. I'm still afraid of them, I pause my TV a lot, or it just sits on my laptop desktop.. I'd be paranoid. But yes, for a viewing angle and blacks, Plasma wins hands down... Plus you can get a monster size Plasma =]
#24
Benchwarmer
720p is fine, really no difference from 10 feet away. It will be another couple years before TV is broadcast in 1080p, so your only sources today are Blu-Ray and video games.
#25
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
And Yes Samsung are the current winners in the TV market. Even over the XBR line. Why? Price. The XBR line isnt better that a Sammy 950 for the cost. You want to talk XBRs...keep them relative to the models youre comparing.
And phillips. They dont even register on the map.
#26
Benchwarmer
The only OLED on the market right now is 11"...
And Yes Samsung are the current winners in the TV market. Even over the XBR line. Why? Price. The XBR line isnt better that a Sammy 950 for the cost. You want to talk XBRs...keep them relative to the models youre comparing.
And phillips. They dont even register on the map.
And Yes Samsung are the current winners in the TV market. Even over the XBR line. Why? Price. The XBR line isnt better that a Sammy 950 for the cost. You want to talk XBRs...keep them relative to the models youre comparing.
And phillips. They dont even register on the map.
Samsung also has a much more friendly costumer service department and will extend a warranty 3 months if you ask nicely.
#27
The only OLED on the market right now is 11"...
And Yes Samsung are the current winners in the TV market. Even over the XBR line. Why? Price. The XBR line isnt better that a Sammy 950 for the cost. You want to talk XBRs...keep them relative to the models youre comparing.
And phillips. They don't even register on the map.
And Yes Samsung are the current winners in the TV market. Even over the XBR line. Why? Price. The XBR line isnt better that a Sammy 950 for the cost. You want to talk XBRs...keep them relative to the models youre comparing.
And phillips. They don't even register on the map.
You are right about Samsung vs XBR in terms of comparable pricing...
And Philips, average Joe will be very happy with it as they are definitely cheaper.
Since we are on the topic, is there any good software to zoom in with? When I connect my lappy to my 52", I can't ever see my IM's text And I don't want to lower my desktop resolution (1920x1080) on the laptop. Suggestions please.
#28
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
OK, the graph is almost accurate...
BUT! Quality of your TV also depends on the color of your walls, sunlight, and over all viewers positioning....
The rule of thumbs is to measure the distance between where you will be watching TV and where the TV will be standing.. Take that distance and divide it by three, the result is your optimum diagonal for your new TV...
So at 32", you should be seating at least 96 inches away, for the best TV enjoyment (not to see the grains)
BUT! Quality of your TV also depends on the color of your walls, sunlight, and over all viewers positioning....
The rule of thumbs is to measure the distance between where you will be watching TV and where the TV will be standing.. Take that distance and divide it by three, the result is your optimum diagonal for your new TV...
So at 32", you should be seating at least 96 inches away, for the best TV enjoyment (not to see the grains)
The color of your walls has nothing to do with the quality of your TV...It can affect how your eyes perceive the colors on your TV...but that is with any set be it cheap or top end. Same with sunlight or ambient light.
For someone who "lives" on avs forums, you either retain the crappier members "knowledge" or you are purposely trying to see if BS flies on here.
#29
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
OLED are beautiful, thus macs have a huge advantage.
You are right about Samsung vs XBR in terms of comparable pricing...
And Philips, average Joe will be very happy with it as they are definitely cheaper.
Since we are on the topic, is there any good software to zoom in with? When I connect my lappy to my 52", I can't ever see my IM's text And I don't want to lower my desktop resolution (1920x1080) on the laptop. Suggestions please.
You are right about Samsung vs XBR in terms of comparable pricing...
And Philips, average Joe will be very happy with it as they are definitely cheaper.
Since we are on the topic, is there any good software to zoom in with? When I connect my lappy to my 52", I can't ever see my IM's text And I don't want to lower my desktop resolution (1920x1080) on the laptop. Suggestions please.
The only OLED on the market is an 11" Sony unit.
There are however several LED LCD panels on the markets now. The Sammy 950 series being one example. And yes the new macs all use LED LCDs for their panels.
#30
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
#32
^ room ambiance plays an important role in the day time TV viewing experience. And I only follow advice of certified ISF members. Not all their advice is true, as some of their calibrating methods, left me hating my TV, lol.
#33
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
Comparable. And many will say better.
#34
I thought new mac books pro used this new technology..
#35
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
#36
Hmm, I need a new TV for my bedroom, time to check out Samsung 950.. How is it with a computer connected to it via hdmi/dvi? This is important to me.
#37
Kang Ho
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#38
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts
#40
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,437
Received 5,105 Likes
on
2,708 Posts