Ive Been Tweetered

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-16-2005, 03:03 PM
  #121  
Racer
 
PHUNBALL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ATL
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PHUNBALL
There are not any PLASMA's I know of that have a native resolution of 1920x1080. Even my Hitachi 42HDT51 has a native resolution of 1024x1024, but displays 1080i HD content like a champ. Even the most expensive Pioneer Elite on the market does not have a native resolution that high.
This is where fixed pixel and projection televisions are different. All fixed pixel displays on the market have to do some sort of scaling for HD content (whether 720p or 1080i). That is not to say it is a bad thing because from where I sit on my couch every evening I am very impressed with my TV.

To sum up what everyone is saying:

480p Content (DVD) - Will look just fine on a 42" plasma with either 1024x768 or 1024x1024 resolution.

720p Content (HD) - Will look just fine and display in Widescreen, but conversion will take place to do so and you will not get 100% of the available pixels.

1080i Content (HD) - Will look just fine and display in Widescreen, but conversion will take place to do so and you will not get 100% of the available pixels.

Bottom line from someone that has one, don't sweat it, but you can do better on the native resolution of a 42" plasma (1024x1024).

Last edited by PHUNBALL; 05-16-2005 at 03:07 PM.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:06 PM
  #122  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Originally Posted by Scrib
why not get a nice DLP and be done with it?
Cost and it doesn't hang on the wall.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:11 PM
  #123  
Administrator Alumnus
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by wsklar
Cost


Last time I checked, you could get a kickass DLP for right around $3,000

and it doesn't hang on the wall.
OK, you got me there.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:16 PM
  #124  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Ok, this is where that pic that says arguing on the Internet is like the special olympics...

JarodL - There is a difference between having a discussion and being an asshole.

SiGGy - Thanks for the help. I am not spending 2x the amount of money on a TV that has a better resolution when 95% of the plasmas have the same specs as the Panasonic or worse. I am not comfortable getting and ED TV when HD is becoming the standard. I saw the picture on the HD and it had a "prettier picture" then the ED.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:16 PM
  #125  
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Billiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 52
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This thread is making me really happy I'm not in the market for a TV right now.

<-------------------- Expects TV to blow up now that he's said that.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:17 PM
  #126  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Originally Posted by Scrib


Last time I checked, you could get a kickass DLP for right around $3,000



OK, you got me there.
No wall, no deal....
Old 05-16-2005, 03:18 PM
  #127  
Suzuka Master
 
rise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,010
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My brain is about to explode, but I want to thank SiGGY for explaining all this!!

So just to clarify, the only resolutions that are TRUE HD are the ones that are 1.77?
Would be a 1366 x 768 be considered HD then? since 1366/768=1.7786

Or is only 1920x1080 TRUE(FULL) HDTV?
And what's this I hear about sports (fast moving objects) looking better on 1280x720?
Old 05-16-2005, 03:20 PM
  #128  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Originally Posted by Billiam
This thread is making me really happy I'm not in the market for a TV right now.

<-------------------- Expects TV to blow up now that he's said that.
Your telling me brother....
Old 05-16-2005, 03:22 PM
  #129  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Originally Posted by rise
My brain is about to explode, but I want to thank SiGGY for explaining all this!!

So just to clarify, the only resolutions that are TRUE HD are the ones that are 1.77?
Would be a 1366 x 768 be considered HD then? since 1366/768=1.7786

Or is only 1920x1080 TRUE(FULL) HDTV?
And what's this I hear about sports (fast moving objects) looking better on 1280x720?
Im wondering if SiGGY should go public with this information and warn consumers to not buy any Plasma HDTV under 7K

And to think, I would going to get the Dell HDTV
Old 05-16-2005, 03:23 PM
  #130  
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Billiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 52
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rise
And what's this I hear about sports (fast moving objects) looking better on 1280x720?
I'd be willing to bet that's more due to progressive scan (720p) vs. interlaced (1080i). Just a guess though. I'd also guess that's probably more on the side of opinion than fact.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:24 PM
  #131  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
wsklar, have you been able to find a place that sells the screen that Jarod recommended? It would be good if you could see it in person before making your decision. It seems that most plasma TV's were designed with standard computer resolutions in mind rather than TV signals. 1024x768 isn't SD or HD it's somewhere in between which is strange. It might look fine in person but I think the set that Jarod recommended is fundamentally better.

Both sets will have to scale the image, but if you're going to scale the image, I'd rather have a set that retains the same aspect ratio.

Either way, you should see if you can check one out in person.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:24 PM
  #132  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Oh, and if I get banned for this thread, Im gonna be pissed
Old 05-16-2005, 03:27 PM
  #133  
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Billiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 52
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
wsklar, have you been able to find a place that sells the screen that Jarod recommended? It would be good if you could see it in person before making your decision.
My friend just purchased the one Jarod recommended and he got it from the local Tweeter.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:27 PM
  #134  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
wsklar, have you been able to find a place that sells the screen that Jarod recommended? It would be good if you could see it in person before making your decision. It seems that most plasma TV's were designed with standard computer resolutions in mind rather than TV signals. 1024x768 isn't SD or HD it's somewhere inbetween which is strange. It might look fine in person but I think the set that Jarod recommended is fundamentally better.

Both sets will have to scale the image, but if you're going to scale the image, I'd rather have a set that retains the same aspect ratio.

Either way, you should see if you can check one out in person.
I saw the ED version as well. They both looked about the same to me. I am stopping at a few places on the way home look again.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:27 PM
  #135  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by wsklar
Oh, and if I get banned for this thread, Im gonna be pissed
Well at least it'll give you more time to watch your new TV.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:28 PM
  #136  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Originally Posted by Billiam
My friend just purchased the one Jarod recommended and he got it from the local Tweeter.
They have it. It's about $600 cheaper then the HD.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:30 PM
  #137  
Racer
 
PHUNBALL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ATL
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rise
My brain is about to explode, but I want to thank SiGGY for explaining all this!!

So just to clarify, the only resolutions that are TRUE HD are the ones that are 1.77?
Would be a 1366 x 768 be considered HD then? since 1366/768=1.7786

Or is only 1920x1080 TRUE(FULL) HDTV?
And what's this I hear about sports (fast moving objects) looking better on 1280x720?

1280x720 = 720p HD

1920x1080 = 1080i HD
Old 05-16-2005, 03:30 PM
  #138  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
Well at least it'll give you more time to watch your new TV.
Good point. I would probably work more also.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:36 PM
  #139  
Suzuka Master
 
rise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,010
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok, now whats the difference between 720p and 1080i?

I think I'm about to just give up and wait 4 years and see what's out there.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:38 PM
  #140  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by wsklar
Ok, this is where that pic that says arguing on the Internet is like the special olympics...

JarodL - There is a difference between having a discussion and being an asshole.

SiGGy - Thanks for the help. I am not spending 2x the amount of money on a TV that has a better resolution when 95% of the plasmas have the same specs as the Panasonic or worse. I am not comfortable getting and ED TV when HD is becoming the standard. I saw the picture on the HD and it had a "prettier picture" then the ED.



THAT TV IS NOT HD... dude... haven't you gotten this by now?

You have NO advantage getting that TV over the EDTV. You have MANY disadvantages.


Secondly 99% of HD today is 1920x1080. Your 1024x768 isn't even 50% of HD resolution. Not to mention you WILL NOT have 1024x768 available when displaying a HD picture. It'll be more like 800x580. So those extra pixels will be useless. (basically back down to the EDTV resoltuon) lol, which is why you should buy the EDTV instead. Because that TV has a 4:3 resolution is has to convert the signal to 16:9 essentially reducing the 1024x768 to 800x580 (my guessitmate)

If you have to have a plasma go buy it. But realize if you had the EDTV and the supposed "HD" TV side by side the EDTV will look better. AS I have said just by looking at the specs, and VERIFIED by the people on the AVSFORUM. The TV your looking at doesn't look better. PERIOD.

No offense, but with all of these facts proprosed to you. You still call it a HD tv and think you'll be sad down the road that you didn't buy a HD tv. This "HD" plasma your looking at is NOT HD, and is a hack. hello? knock, knock. anyone listening? so your NOT buying a HD TV.

Save the $$$ and buy a real HD TV in the future, buy the BETTER picture EDTV for now...

I dunno how you keep ignoring all the facts... it's killing me.

And please stop calling 1024x768 on a 16:9 TV HD, it's not. Your so sold on the word "HD" in the writing... when it's so far from it in reality.

When it all comes down to it, buy what makes you happy. BUT PLEASE stop responding to the posts in this thread like you didn't read them. You have been told the EDTV looks better already, and that the Tvyour looking at is not HD.

the guys in AVSFORUM should be good enough review for your purchase decision.

I don't care what you buy, but please stop ignoring the facts presented to you. it's annoying me...
Old 05-16-2005, 03:44 PM
  #141  
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Billiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 52
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rise
Ok, now whats the difference between 720p and 1080i?

I think I'm about to just give up and wait 4 years and see what's out there.
720p - lower resolution of the two but progressive scanning.

1080i - higher resolution of the two but interlaced scanning.

Check out this CNet page if you don't know the difference between interlaced & progressive.

http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-...1.html?tag=txt
Old 05-16-2005, 03:44 PM
  #142  
Suzuka Master
 
rise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,010
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ouch...harsh...


btw, thanks billiam
Old 05-16-2005, 03:45 PM
  #143  
Go Giants
Thread Starter
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 52
Posts: 69,901
Received 1,231 Likes on 821 Posts
I am not ignoring a thing.

To me it's a HD TV because, yes, it's has the HD logo. Just like a Dell is a Dell because it's branded that way.

This is a good article:

The Difference Between HDTV, EDTV, and SDTV
Evan Powell, ProjectorCentral, October 2, 2003
http://www.projectorcentral.com

The consumer electronics industry has done a spectacular job spreading mass confusion about video. Time was when there was just TV. Now we've got SDTV, EDTV, HDTV, 480i, 480p, 525p, 720p, 1080i, progressive scan, component video, composite video, blah blah blah. Enough to make you feel like you need an engineering degree to buy a projector or TV.

And if you think you are confused now, just go talk to any sales rep on the floor of your local Buster's Big Screen Megastore and you will get some insight into what true confusion is all about. Many of those reps have little training and can't tell you anything meaningful about good video. Invariably however they are pushing the deal of the week and selling equipment that may be exactly wrong for your needs.

Let's talk basics. You want the best picture you can get for your money, right? OK. Getting there is actually easier than you think. Reading the rest of this article will give you most of what you need to sort out the good stuff from the junk.

Our Television/Video System. There are over 250 million televisions in the United States. Almost all of them work exactly the same way. A video signal pumps information into a TV at the rate of 30 frames per second. Each frame is a still picture. But they are displayed so rapidly that they give the appearance of continuous motion, just like an animated cartoon.

Each frame of video contains about 480 active lines of information (482.5 actually, but we will talk round numbers here to communicate the concept). Now a single frame of video is actually painted on the screen line-by-line in two passes. On the first pass, the beam paints all of the odd numbered lines from 1 to 479, top to bottom. That takes 1/60 second. On the second pass it paints all of the even numbered lines from 2 to 480. That also takes 1/60 second. So it takes a total of 1/30 second to display all 480 lines of the frame. This display technique is known as "interlacing."

When they broadcast video information, they need to give CRT-type TVs time to reset the electronic beam to the top of the screen so it can get ready to paint the next sequence of lines. So they build in an interframe gap that equals about 45 lines. There is no picture information in this 45 line gap—it is there just to allow the TV time to get ready to receive the next frame. So the total number of lines in each frame is 480 + 45 = 525. You've probably heard that a TV set has 525 lines. Not so. The signal has 525 lines, but only 480 of them contain active video information that ends up on your screen.

Sometimes you will see this standard analog TV format designated as 525i, which means 525-interlaced. In common usage, a lot of people also use the term "480i" to refer to analog interlaced 480-line active video. However, the industry has recently defined a digital interlaced 480-line format under the array of DTV formats which is known as Standard Definition Television, or SDTV, and 480i is the correct designation for this format.

The Problem with Interlacing: Screen Size

For most of the 50 years that the plain ole "525i" television has been in existence, it has worked just fine. That's because TVs were small. On a 19" TV set the picture looks terrific because the scan lines and the errors introduced by interlacing are too small to see. But as TVs have gotten larger, the scan lines have become more visible.

Not only that, but the interlacing system creates weird "artifacts" when blown up to big-screen proportions. When there is motion in the picture, an object will have moved between the time the first half and the second half of the frame are painted. That makes straight lines break up and look like they've got jagged edges. And on a 60" TV or a genuine really big-screen image from a front projector, the visible scan lines and jaggies are enough to drive you nuts.

If you want a good demo of really bad video, just go into any Buster's Big Screen in your area and look at some of the 60" TVs they have set up. Many of them look terrible—enough to make you want to give up TV altogether. Of course, if you stand back about 30 feet, they look great. But at the distance from which you intend to watch them, you see scan lines, jaggies, and overall picture disintegration that'll make you go blind in a hurry.

The fact is that the 525-line interlaced system we have today was never meant to be blown up to large screen proportions. What works beautifully at 19" is a disaster at 60". And TV designers and marketers know that they couldn't sell really bad video forever just on the WOW factor of the screen size. So they've come up with ways to clean up the picture.

The New Solutions

The single largest step that can be taken toward better big-screen video is to eliminate the interlacing. Interlacing was originally invented to save transmission bandwidth, since with an interlaced signal you only need to send half the frame at a time. But now we have media such as DVD from which we can read and transmit picture information much faster than ever before. So there is no need to stay with an interlaced format.

If we can paint all of the scan lines sequentially from 1, 2, 3…up to 480 on one pass, we can eliminate the jaggies that come from interlacing. This is called "progressive scanning." Note that we don't have any more lines of information—it's still the same 480 lines. But we paint them in sequence from top to bottom. This 480-line progressive scan technique is commonly referred to as 480p. However, there is still the interframe gap, and there are still 525 total lines. So some people call it 525p instead of 480p. But it's the same thing.

Of course the marketers needed to come up with a snazzy name for this marvelous new concept. So they did—Enhanced Definition Television, or EDTV.

EDTV is a major advance

EDTV, or 480p, doesn't sound like much compared to HDTV. But it is in fact a major step forward in picture quality. On a big screen it looks closer in quality to HDTV than it does regular television. And it is here today in its full glory. Most DVD players on the market output both interlaced and progressive signals, and they are getting better and cheaper by the month. So every DVD on the market can be played in EDTV right now!

Now in order to take advantage of 480p, you need two things: (1) a video source such as a DVD player that outputs that signal, and (2) a television or projector that can take that signal as an input. Warning: Most televisions being sold cannot take 480p. Most home theater projectors, even the least expensive ones under $2,000, can.

So here is your first absolute rule for buying a new video display, whether it is a projector or a TV: if you want maximum video quality, make sure to buy a TV or projector that is 480p compatible.

But, you ask, what about regular interlaced video sources like cable television, VCR, laserdisc, and so on—how do I play those signals on a progressive scan video system?

Well, no problem. You simply to feed your new projector or TV the interlaced signal. All progressive scan display systems can take interlaced signals as well. That is because they have a device on board called a deinterlacer or line doubler.

Here is what a line doubler (deinterlacer) does: It takes a 480-line interlaced signal from your cable TV or VCR or laserdisc player or DVD player and recombines the odd and even lines into a sequential 480-line progressive signal. Furthermore, when good line doublers recombine the lines, they look for motion offsets (the jaggies), and make adjustments to smooth them out. So their job is to convert a 525i signal into a much cleaner 480p signal. Some of them do this better than others, but most of them produce a much better signal than they started with.

Furthermore, since the projector/TV scans from top to bottom in 1/60 second, all 480 lines are displayed in that time. So what does the line doubler do with the second 1/60 second, since new frames are arriving at the speed of only 30 frames per second? Simple. It feeds the same 480-line frame to the display a second time.

So, contrary to what you might assume, a line doubler does NOT double the number of lines. Rather it doubles the number of times the 480 lines are painted on the screen during the 1/30 second frame display time. This increases brightness and stability of the image. But most importantly, the elimination or reduction of the jaggies gives you a much cleaner picture.

It used to be that the internal line doublers in projectors and TVs were not very good. They could recombine the lines easily enough, but they weren't capable of smoothing out the motion artifacts. So many folks invested in separate external line doublers that were much more sophisticated. These days internal line doublers are MUCH more comprehensive than they used to be. So the need for an external doubler has diminished. Today, whether you could benefit from investing in an external line doubler or not depends on the quality of the doubler already built into the projector.

So let's forget about HDTV for a moment. The big leap forward that is accessible to everyone right now is EDTV, which is simply progressive scanning. I had friends over recently and I put on the Eagles "Hell Freezes Over" DVD, displaying it on a 120" diagonal screen. They were stunned at the picture quality—"I've never seen ANY big screen ever look that good," said one. "So that's HDTV huh?" Nope. That's just regular DVD my friends, played on a progressive scan DVD player.

Well then, what about HDTV?

The broadcast industry is struggling toward conversion of our system to High Definition Television (HDTV), a conversion which presumably will be complete in another five years. HDTV does two things. First, it increases the number of scan lines on the screen. Second, it widens the aspect ratio of the screen from the standard 4:3 which is what most televisions are today, to 16:9. The wider screen format has a more theatrical look.

The most popular HDTV format is 1080i, or 1080 lines interlaced. As with 525i, the system paints the odd lines first, then the even lines in a second pass. But since there are so many more scan lines, both the lines themselves and the motion jaggies are much less visible.

Nevertheless, the world of videophiles who seek video perfection are looking forward to the day when even this 1080i signal will be presented progressively—1080p. Faroudja is marketing a video processor that will convert 1080i to 1080p, and there are a few very expensive projectors that will handle the scan rates required for this signal. But for those who don't want to spend $30,000 on a big-screen TV just yet, 1080i is the most prevalent format today.

An alternative HDTV format is 720-lines progressive scan, or 720p. Though it has fewer lines, the native progressive scan format eliminates motion artifacts that originate in interlacing, and are still visible in large screen 1080i. So for subject matter that contains a lot of rapid motion--Monday Night Football for example--you can get a clearer, more stable picture from 720p than you can from 1080i. Alternatively, for subject matter that has very little motion, 1080i is capable of rendering more picture detail. Notice that most of the HDTV demo clips being broadcast on HDNet are very slow pans of detailed scenes. They are beautiful images, but those slow pans are intended to disguise the deinterlacing flaws inherent in the 1080i format.

The bottom line is that 1080i and 720p are both very good HDTV formats. One is not better than the other; they are just each better with particular types of subject matter. When done right, both are clearly superior to the NTSC 480-line format we have today.

The funny thing is this. For the videophile who wants to spend a great deal of money to get the best possible picture, HDTV is the solution in theory. But the quality of HDTV signals will be dependent upon a host of variables. And economics will be the primary determinant. One can expect broadcasters to minimize production costs and save bandwidth whenever possible. There is one thing that is certain, and that is that broadcasters have absolutely no interest in boosting the cost of production in order to satisfy the desires of a small contingent of videophiles. They want to spend just enough money make picture quality acceptable to the mass market and no more.

That being the case, don't imagine that HDTV is going to be uniformly as glorious as the pristine demos you might see in well-calibrated retail showrooms. Just as there are variations in picture quality today between channels, and between programs on given channels, so will the quality of production HDTV vary as well.

Meanwhile, the quality of the 480-line system continues to improve. Video decoders, deinterlacers, and scalers have all gotten much better at a rapid pace. The video transfer quality on DVDs has improved even since DVDs were introduced. So even without HDTV, large screen projectors today look amazingly good compared to similar products released just 18 months ago. On occasion we see DVD material that is superior to some of the broadcast HDTV we are getting. So the fact is that for the mass consumer market there is not a great deal of difference between HDTV and today's new 480p when it is done right. The quality difference is certainly nothing that the majority of the population would want to pay much extra for.

So the bottom line is this--don't worry about HDTV for now. It will continue to evolve over the next few years and it will be whatever it will be. Who cares? The unfortunate thing is that people are sitting on the sidelines waiting for HDTV to get serious, and they are missing out on EDTV, which is the biggest advance in video quality since color TV.

The real reason to step up to the latest video systems is not HDTV, but EDTV, or more simply 480p. If you are buying for home theater, get a projector or big-screen that handles 480p as well as 1080i and 720p. If a projector or TV takes 480p it will probably take 1080i and 720p as well. But that won't be its major benefit since there is not a huge amount of HDTV source material at hand. But today every DVD on the market can be played in EDTV.

Once you've got the fundamentals of 480p installed, then just sit back and enjoy your new vastly improved video system. Once you experience the quality of today's EDTV, you may find yourself thinking that you don't care quite as much about HDTV as you once did.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:50 PM
  #144  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts


whatever man...

you know it all already, why did you bother asking/posting in here?


explain how a 4:3 aspect ratio 1024x768 16:9 TV converts a 1920x1080 video input to fit a 4:3 1024x768 picture but scales to 16:9... I'd like to hear how this happens in your words.

I'll be nice and tell you... What happens is you end up with a final reduced effective resolution as I posted above i.e. you have a EDTV in the end anyway for HD 16:9 content.

That article doesn't even get into that... not even close.

What i'm explaining is obviously over your head...or I'm not explaining it well... im out... I hope you enjoy whatever it is you purchase.

ignorance is bliss
Old 05-16-2005, 03:53 PM
  #145  
Banned
 
JarodL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wsklar
Ok, this is where that pic that says arguing on the Internet is like the special olympics...

JarodL - There is a difference between having a discussion and being an asshole.

SiGGy - Thanks for the help. I am not spending 2x the amount of money on a TV that has a better resolution when 95% of the plasmas have the same specs as the Panasonic or worse. I am not comfortable getting and ED TV when HD is becoming the standard. I saw the picture on the HD and it had a "prettier picture" then the ED.

How many times do I have to tell you 5 is bigger then 2 for you to understand it. It is frustrating as hell to tell someone something 100x and have them keep thinking the same thing. Especially when you have multiple people telling you. You did not see the new ED version, you saw the old one. There is a HUGE difference. Secondly, if your buying external speakers you should be buying one of the Panasonic commercial displays, not the ones your looking at. I seriously give up trying to explain this to you. You are either too dumb to understand english or you are just dead set on buying that TV. Call me an asshole or whatever. Everyone here is trying to save you thousands of dollars and you would get a better TV and you keep ignoring us.


And the to me its HD because it has an HD logo. That is real mature and intelligent.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:55 PM
  #146  
4dr & I like it that way
 
Davediego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Diego
Age: 39
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wsklar - WHAT YOU ARE BUYING IS NOT A HDTV NO MATTER WHAT LOGO IS STUCK ON IT . as siggy has tried to get through to you, 1024x768 IS NOT A HDTV RESOLUTION, YOU ARE NOT BUYING A HDTV.

If Tweeter is telling it is a HDTV, you are being flat out lied to. Its your money, but you are really screwing yourself by buying something that is completely non-standard. You have said you aren't comfortable buying an EDTV when HDTV sets are availible, why then are you buying a set that is not a HDTV?
Old 05-16-2005, 03:58 PM
  #147  
Banned
 
JarodL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Davediego
wsklar - WHAT YOU ARE BUYING IS NOT A HDTV NO MATTER WHAT LOGO IS STUCK ON IT . as siggy has tried to get through to you, 1024x768 IS NOT A HDTV RESOLUTION, YOU ARE NOT BUYING A HDTV.

If Tweeter is telling it is a HDTV, you are being flat out lied to. Its your money, but you are really screwing yourself by buying something that is completely non-standard. You have said you aren't comfortable buying an EDTV when HDTV sets are availible, why then are you buying a set that is not a HDTV?

Because he thinks if it says HDTV on it that means the picture is better then EDTV on it.
Old 05-16-2005, 03:59 PM
  #148  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
There's so much love in this thread. :gheyhug:
Old 05-16-2005, 04:00 PM
  #149  
Team Owner
 
doopstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jersey
Age: 52
Posts: 25,339
Received 2,052 Likes on 1,138 Posts
The problem with buying an EDTV is that when you tell all your uninformed friends that you bought and EDTV they say "wtf is that?"
Old 05-16-2005, 04:01 PM
  #150  
Administrator Alumnus
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
1024 x 768 > *

Old 05-16-2005, 04:01 PM
  #151  
Administrator Alumnus
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
Old 05-16-2005, 04:01 PM
  #152  
4dr & I like it that way
 
Davediego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Diego
Age: 39
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JarodL
Because he thinks if it says HDTV on it that means the picture is better then EDTV on it.
yea great logic, but I still say that a real HDTV running at actual HDTV resolutions will look hands down better then an EDTV. I'd say your EDTV would look better than this weird non-standard set wsklar wants to get however.
Old 05-16-2005, 04:01 PM
  #153  
Banned
 
JarodL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by doopstr
The problem with buying an EDTV is that when you tell all your uninformed friends that you bought and EDTV they say "wtf is that?"

thats a great reason not to buy one. lots of nobel prize winners in this thread.
Old 05-16-2005, 04:01 PM
  #154  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
There's so much love in this thread. :gheyhug:





No hard feelings from me, I'm just trying to spread some information to him. I just wish I could get it accross in a way he'd grasp.

anyhoo, I'm out... time for beer everyone!
Old 05-16-2005, 04:04 PM
  #155  
Banned
 
JarodL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Davediego
yea great logic, but I still say that a real HDTV running at actual HDTV resolutions will look hands down better then an EDTV. I'd say your EDTV would look better than this weird non-standard set wsklar wants to get however.

I looked at the panasonic commercial models, the 42" ed and HD. The HD looked marginally better for HD content. But yes, a proper HDTV resolution should have a better picture then the same EDTV model. However, Plasmas do not have the proper HD resolutions yet, at least in the sub 10k models.
Old 05-16-2005, 04:06 PM
  #156  
4dr & I like it that way
 
Davediego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Diego
Age: 39
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SiGGy




No hard feelings from me, I'm just trying to spread some information to him. I just wish I could get it accross in a way he'd grasp.

anyhoo, I'm out... time for beer everyone!
maybe someone should photoshop some diagrams for him
Old 05-16-2005, 04:07 PM
  #157  
Banned
 
JarodL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea, no hard feelings from me either. I can't hold a grudge against people with a learning disability.
Old 05-16-2005, 04:11 PM
  #158  
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Billiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 52
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JarodL
I looked at the panasonic commercial models, the 42" ed and HD.
You don't happen to know the model numbers for them do you? I found what appears to be the commercial equivalent of the ED set at B&H but I don't know if it's the new 8th generation display that's in the retail ED set we've been discussing. It says 4000:1 contrast ratio so I'm thinking this might be it.

LINKY
Old 05-16-2005, 04:12 PM
  #159  
Administrator Alumnus
 
Scrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Northwest IN
Posts: 26,326
Received 131 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by JarodL
Yea, no hard feelings from me either. I can't hold a grudge against people with a learning disability.



that's harsh

Old 05-16-2005, 04:18 PM
  #160  
Banned
 
JarodL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Billiam
You don't happen to know the model numbers for them do you? I found what appears to be the commercial equivalent of the ED set at B&H but I don't know if it's the new 8th generation display that's in the retail ED set we've been discussing. It says 4000:1 contrast ratio so I'm thinking this might be it.

LINKY

Thats the one I bought. I bought two actually. The 8th generations areny coming out until later this year. They don't release the consumer and commercial lines at the same time. I would buy it sight unseen. The picture is AMAZING. Almost, if not as good as the fujitsu. The Panny commercials are the best plasmas on the market. Check out avsforum.com


Quick Reply: Ive Been Tweetered



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.