Rode in my Coworker M3!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2001, 01:26 AM
  #1  
Happy CL-S Pilot
Thread Starter
 
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Nashua, NH, USA
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Rode in my Coworker M3!!!

First, let me tell I am *not* impressed.

It was 97 M3 Stick, coupe and loaded.

The first thing I noticed, that this is not a luxury car that you would spend some $50k on. A Sport Coupe, you bet! Did I see leather, sure. High Quality interior? Of course!.

However, It was evident that the road/tire noise is filling the cabin. Sure, it would kick ass amd kill any car any time anywhere. However, if you ask me is this the car that I would like to commute with to work daily. No way! First, it is stick and that would make let you hate yourself if you got stuck in bumper to bumper traffic, road noise is nice if you would like to feel the car in sunny day while taking some moutain curves, but not that nice when you want to enjoy some 80mph cruising time...

This is just my opinion, I may, however, like to drive that M3 one day in the summer

------------------
Black, Eboney, 3.2 CL Type-S.
- Acura NAV.
- 3M clear bra (full front bumper, and side mirros)
- Wheels locks.
- Mooonroof visor
- Splash guards,
- Winter mats,
- Trunk liner,
- Acura Spoiler.
- Valentine V1 Radar Locator.
- PIAA 19169 road lamps.

[This message has been edited by Nashua_Night_Hawk (edited 02-23-2001).]
Old 02-24-2001, 04:45 PM
  #2  
Back to Four Doors
 
lead_sled_dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Rafael, CA USA
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Night_Hawk,

I 100% completely agree. I think many of us lose sight of the fact that our cars have more luxury than sport and we bought them for that very reason. Manuals are fine and I would love one in the CL but with daily commuting, I much prefer the auto with a CD going in the background not distracted by the outside noises of the other cars.

------------------
Rex -
'01 CL Type S - Satin Silver, Navi, BBS RK
Lic: THX CBOE
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?...770&p=36712116
Old 02-24-2001, 09:49 PM
  #3  
Senior Moderator
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: location location
Posts: 10,925
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
The luxury features in our cars are what contribute to the extra weight of the vehicle.

------------------
2001 Satin Silver Cl Type S.
Comptech:Headers, Springs & Sways
Muds
Wheel locks
35% Llumar metallic tint
My Car
Old 02-24-2001, 10:09 PM
  #4  
Pro
 
DtEW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure you'll feel even more this way about the S2K/ITR.

------------------
051/LP/SR/LD/HH
Old 02-25-2001, 07:59 PM
  #5  
Acura_CL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mike, I disagree. The S is 500~ pounds heavier than the P even when both don't have the NAV. So the extra weight is that big engine and better tranny that gives that extra 50hp.

------------------
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/Album...698&a=11616550
Red 3.2 CL-S.
"Life is too short not to be Italian." -Paul Sorvino
Old 02-25-2001, 08:20 PM
  #6  
Powered By HONDA
 
Type S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere
Age: 48
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yah..the new m3 will wealth that value..becuae the very powerful engine and good exterior.. wwant to buy a m3 if i can....working hard...haha

------------------
2001 Acura Red CL Type S.
1997 Honda Civic EX.
!!!! VTEC Power !!!!
Powered by HONDA
Powered by MUGEN


typescl@yahoo.com
Old 02-25-2001, 08:25 PM
  #7  
Senior Moderator
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: location location
Posts: 10,925
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Nope. According to Edmunds the CLS weighs in @ 3538 & the CLP @ 3461 which is a difference of 77 pounds. The engine and the tranny are the same in both models. The CLS was just tuned a little for the extra 35 ponies.

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Acura_CL:
Mike, I disagree. The S is 500~ pounds heavier than the P even when both don't have the NAV. So the extra weight is that big engine and better tranny that gives that extra 50hp.

</font>


------------------
2001 Satin Silver Cl Type S.
Comptech:Headers, Springs & Sways
Muds
Wheel locks
35% Llumar metallic tint
My Car
Old 02-25-2001, 09:16 PM
  #8  
Unregistered Member
 
Tom2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 3,472
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
While I definitely find the CL-S a more relaxed highway cruiser, the M3 is far from a car that would annoy its driver on the open highway or stuck in traffic.

For a performance car, its got a relatively light clutch, which makes traffic jams a snap. As far as road noise, I haven't noticed any increased noise levels between the either of the two cars. I'd be happy commuting in either car, as long as I wasn't driving in bumper to bumper traffic EVERY day.

------------------
CL-S and M3
Old 02-25-2001, 10:09 PM
  #9  
Acura_CL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh... hmm... i wonder where I got that 500 piund difference. maybe between the CL and TL?
How exactly do that 'tune' the engine? What is the real difference? Look at the Firebird/Camaro its the same 5.7L engine as the Corvette... Couldn't a good mechanic tune that engine and get the same performance as a Corvette?

------------------
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/Album...698&a=11616550
Red 3.2 CL-S.
"Life is too short not to be Italian." -Paul Sorvino
Old 02-26-2001, 12:23 AM
  #10  
Senior Moderator
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: location location
Posts: 10,925
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Don't know The TL weighs in at 3493 lbs. I tried checking the acura site but it's way slow.

Here are the enhancements to the CLS.

higher compression ratio
a two-stage induction system
free-flowing exhaust

------------------
2001 Satin Silver Cl Type S.
Comptech:Headers, Springs & Sways
Muds
Wheel locks
35% Llumar metallic tint
My Car



[This message has been edited by Mike (edited 02-25-2001).]
Old 02-26-2001, 12:27 AM
  #11  
Instructor
 
Hollywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed, nothing is sweeter than Miss Jackie

------------------
Hollywood is back, and so is...

Miss "Jackie Black"
Black on Black 2001 CLS
Tint | airbox gutted - waiting for AEM CAI| resonator replaced by straightpipe | 12" JL Audio sub
PIAA 19170s | spoiler


14.61 at 96.04mph 1/4 mile - Take that Car&Driver!!
Old 02-26-2001, 01:18 AM
  #12  
Three Wheelin'
 
tel1sps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Live NYC , Work Northern NJ
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do not even compare the 3series to the CLs. The 3 series is clasified as a sub-compact and the CLS is a mid-sized car.

------------------
2001 Silver 3.2CLS
-Muds, Spoiler, Hardwire 8500, Prolarg M-6 lamps
Planning: Comptech Headers, Sways, CAI
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Redsand353
Car Talk
5
09-06-2015 01:03 PM



Quick Reply: Rode in my Coworker M3!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.