The Honda/Acura Versus The World Debate
#281
AZ Community Team
That is great news, the RWD electric motor concept fits in better with Honda's FWD centric drivetrain and allows a more efficient means to trasnfer power to RWD for handling and low-traction conditions.
#282
Your Friendly Canadian
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes
on
1,050 Posts
I'm more interested in the new engines. Is this the end of the J?
#283
Senior Moderator
2013 RL with DI, 266 ft-lb, 308 hp, and a electric rear diff! Please, please, please!!! That should also greatly reduce the drivetrain losses we see in the SH-AWD. 22-30%
#284
#285
Your Friendly Canadian
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes
on
1,050 Posts
#286
My first Avatar....
#288
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
I don't feel as if 308 out of the 3.5 is going to lead to groundbreaking performance unless its in a very light weight vehicle. When the article mentioned Honda claiming V8 acceleration out of the new SH-AWD system what did you guys think. I can't fathom that being the case just by changing the AWD system.
#289
Moderator
#290
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
From what Jeff Palmer of Temple of VTEC says, no. It's still the J series block with new cylinder heads. There is nothing wrong with the J series block either, it's remained very competitive, light and compact.
#291
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
I don't feel as if 308 out of the 3.5 is going to lead to groundbreaking performance unless its in a very light weight vehicle. When the article mentioned Honda claiming V8 acceleration out of the new SH-AWD system what did you guys think. I can't fathom that being the case just by changing the AWD system.
Last edited by Ken1997TL; 11-30-2011 at 04:32 PM. Reason: Spelling... (doh!)
#292
Senior Moderator
The current RL running the 3.7L with 300 hp, 270 ft-lb, and SH-AWD puts down 210-220 hp and 210 ft-lb at the wheels (depending on the dyno). With this, it runs a 6 sec 0-60. Cut the drive train loss in half, and that 6 s drops too. I don't know what the similar TL runs with its slightly lighter weight, but like Ken is mentioning, you will be putting all of this at the front wheels and powering the back with separate electric motors.
The R-spec and 550i run 0-60 in 4.8s. It would appear Acura could pull close to the lower 5's if done correctly.
The R-spec and 550i run 0-60 in 4.8s. It would appear Acura could pull close to the lower 5's if done correctly.
#293
The current RL running the 3.7L with 300 hp, 270 ft-lb, and SH-AWD puts down 210-220 hp and 210 ft-lb at the wheels (depending on the dyno). With this, it runs a 6 sec 0-60. Cut the drive train loss in half, and that 6 s drops too. I don't know what the similar TL runs with its slightly lighter weight, but like Ken is mentioning, you will be putting all of this at the front wheels and powering the back with separate electric motors.
The R-spec and 550i run 0-60 in 4.8s. It would appear Acura could pull close to the lower 5's if done correctly.
The R-spec and 550i run 0-60 in 4.8s. It would appear Acura could pull close to the lower 5's if done correctly.
Hopefully it would be competitive against these cars, but given that much handling is the concentration, I think the engineers are calibrating behavior in and around an apex.
#294
Senior Moderator
I think Acura knows that handling a corner is of much more real world use than 0-60, but how will Motor Trend approve if the 0-60 is lacking?
Last edited by oo7spy; 11-30-2011 at 07:12 PM.
The following users liked this post:
VTEC Racer (12-22-2011)
#296
Senior Moderator
Well, maybe Acura isn't as out of touch as we thought they were. Or at least they are willing to admit it and change it. "After three years of concentrating on "efficient" designs such as the Insight, it was time to let go and provide a bit more visual excitement."
Now, while these particular statements are geared towards appearance and not performance, I think the latest developments show Honda's willingness to upgrade their drive trains to compete again, i.e. 7-speed dual clutch trannys. Honda seems to be aware of the funk they have created and want to change it. I can't imagine the people that have been working on the same Hondas that have captured our enthusiasm over the past decades all of a sudden "lost their soul". Here's to hoping these promises come to fruition.
http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-news/h...130-1o5ud.html
Originally Posted by Yoshinori Asahi, Creative Director of Honda's styling design development division
Honda will make a dramatic change. But of course, in terms of the mass production vehicle, it will take two or three years. Because, to begin with, we believe that we are an exciting company, so we want to actually demonstrate that. Frankly speaking, we think that in the past few years the cars have been a bit boring. Please wait for two or three years, and then we will be more exciting. We want to go from efficient to exciting. We'll give you the specific details when those models are released.
http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-news/h...130-1o5ud.html
#297
The very reason for drastic changes in direction is that people, magazines, and the automotive industry criticize Honda for not being Honda.
Its because people give an F about a great company that they at least try to change. Motor Trend, Road & Track, and Car and Driver used to 'biased' FOR Honda not against them.
I'm glad Honda is listening.
Its because people give an F about a great company that they at least try to change. Motor Trend, Road & Track, and Car and Driver used to 'biased' FOR Honda not against them.
I'm glad Honda is listening.
Last edited by CarbonGray Earl; 12-01-2011 at 09:57 AM.
#299
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Well, with each motorshow that passes and yet again with nothing truly -worthy in a good way...the impatient waiting continues.
#301
Senior Moderator
#302
Senior Moderator
^^^^
That would be a good start. I plan (weather willing) to be in Detroit for the auto show--I go almost every year.
As for Asahi-san's words a few posts above..... Honda admitting they got boring? Really? And they will bring exciting models in the next 2-3 years? Really? Prove it!
That would be a good start. I plan (weather willing) to be in Detroit for the auto show--I go almost every year.
As for Asahi-san's words a few posts above..... Honda admitting they got boring? Really? And they will bring exciting models in the next 2-3 years? Really? Prove it!
#304
Your Friendly Canadian
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes
on
1,050 Posts
Meh... If we get a new NSX, it'll apparently be a front-engine AWD hybrid...
If they absolutely MUST put AWD and a hybrid drivetrain in their halo car, which the don't, I really hope they don't call it an NSX.
If they absolutely MUST put AWD and a hybrid drivetrain in their halo car, which the don't, I really hope they don't call it an NSX.
#307
AWD or RWD doesn't matter if a sports car doesn't press the right buttons. Performance (in more traditional terms) and design are the key points you have to hit. Those purchases are based on emotion.
No one is thinking of fuel efficiency in that realm of car. If anything, it comes 3rd or 4rd down the list.
No one is thinking of fuel efficiency in that realm of car. If anything, it comes 3rd or 4rd down the list.
Last edited by CarbonGray Earl; 12-02-2011 at 10:08 AM.
#308
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#309
Senior Moderator
The V8 ship has sailed IMO. There's no longer a need for one, but there is still a great need for a FI 6 cylinder IMO. Disappointed that no mention of FI was made at these recent announcements.
#310
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#313
Senior Moderator
#314
Racer
another thing that Honda hasn't done since the NSX was make a DOHC V6, what better way to "resurrect" themselves than to bring back a newer, more advanced version of the C-series.
Hondas have never been about torque. to me, they seem to be able to produce high-compression motors with the almighty VTEC and seem to make power where other resort to displacement.
so, in conclusion, new C-series with DOHC in a nice sexy exterior= new NSX FTMFW!
one last thing, if Honda does do such; please don't
make it $450,000 a la LFA.(normal people enjoy supercars too, not just the super rich)
Last edited by GoldenShoes; 12-03-2011 at 05:10 PM.
#315
My first Avatar....
yeah...torque is boring and highly over rated.
#316
Racer
^ I get the whole sarcasm thing, but I NEVER said that torque was "boring and highly overrated"
I said: "Hondas have never been about torque." which is a true statement, they haven't, nor will they probably ever be.
I said: "Hondas have never been about torque." which is a true statement, they haven't, nor will they probably ever be.
#317
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
Almost all of the power was from 0 to 3500 rpms.
#318
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Hey, a Honda/Acura equivalent to take on the GT-R is fine by my books as a start. I'd definitely take that even though it is a notch lower than what the NSX was first intended since they were aiming at Ferrari.
Still, I'd take anything right now that brings Honda/Acura back into the sportscar segment.
Still, I'd take anything right now that brings Honda/Acura back into the sportscar segment.
#319
the last thing from honda that got my blood pumping:
rest in peace, sweet prince
rest in peace, sweet prince
#320
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter