The Honda/Acura Versus The World Debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2011, 09:23 AM
  #281  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 18,167
Received 4,284 Likes on 2,642 Posts
That is great news, the RWD electric motor concept fits in better with Honda's FWD centric drivetrain and allows a more efficient means to trasnfer power to RWD for handling and low-traction conditions.
Old 11-30-2011, 09:23 AM
  #282  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,050 Posts
I'm more interested in the new engines. Is this the end of the J?
Old 11-30-2011, 12:18 PM
  #283  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,249 Likes on 4,859 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
I'm not 'in the know' but it has been speculated that Honda held back direct injection in their cars because of reliability concerns. (See Lexus for examples)

I'm guessing Honda fixed those problems to its satisfation
Maybe Hyundai's new technology in the '12 Genesis was the breakthrough straw. Hyundai squeezed 11% more horsepower out of the same V6 engine from 2011 just by implementing their DI, and the reliability estimate numbers are near astounding.

2013 RL with DI, 266 ft-lb, 308 hp, and a electric rear diff! Please, please, please!!! That should also greatly reduce the drivetrain losses we see in the SH-AWD. 22-30%
Old 11-30-2011, 12:24 PM
  #284  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
I'm more interested in the new engines. Is this the end of the J?
Probably....however, we still are talking SOHC in this newer v6.

I'm anxious to see the details.
Old 11-30-2011, 12:25 PM
  #285  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Old 11-30-2011, 01:29 PM
  #286  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 25,183
Received 6,846 Likes on 4,287 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Would any of you peeps who are critical of Honda lately be happy to see the Accord coupe rebadged and upped in Acura clothing...? Personally, I think that would be a great move.
Honda need something NEW. Not another recycled idea. A RWD Coupe with 350 HP would be sweet!
Old 11-30-2011, 01:37 PM
  #287  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
^

Bring back the NSX (or similar replacement), start pushing a performance line (a la //M, AMG, "F", S/RS, etc) and step away from the vanilla. Then maybe Honda/Acura would have my attention again. Otherwise...
Old 11-30-2011, 01:57 PM
  #288  
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
 
HeartTLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Age: 38
Posts: 3,230
Received 416 Likes on 365 Posts
I don't feel as if 308 out of the 3.5 is going to lead to groundbreaking performance unless its in a very light weight vehicle. When the article mentioned Honda claiming V8 acceleration out of the new SH-AWD system what did you guys think. I can't fathom that being the case just by changing the AWD system.
Old 11-30-2011, 01:58 PM
  #289  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,319
Received 5,937 Likes on 2,928 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
^

Bring back the NSX (or similar replacement), start pushing a performance line (a la //M, AMG, "F", S/RS, etc) and step away from the vanilla. Then maybe Honda/Acura would have my attention again. Otherwise...
This.
Old 11-30-2011, 01:59 PM
  #290  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
I'm more interested in the new engines. Is this the end of the J?
From what Jeff Palmer of Temple of VTEC says, no. It's still the J series block with new cylinder heads. There is nothing wrong with the J series block either, it's remained very competitive, light and compact.
Old 11-30-2011, 02:00 PM
  #291  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by HeartTLs
I don't feel as if 308 out of the 3.5 is going to lead to groundbreaking performance unless its in a very light weight vehicle. When the article mentioned Honda claiming V8 acceleration out of the new SH-AWD system what did you guys think. I can't fathom that being the case just by changing the AWD system.
308 or better with 10% more fuel efficiency. Honda is very conservative with its numbers so it could 320 hp. Plus you're adding the electric motors to that equation and removing the parasitic losses you normally have with a driveshaft and differential.

Last edited by Ken1997TL; 11-30-2011 at 04:32 PM. Reason: Spelling... (doh!)
Old 11-30-2011, 04:30 PM
  #292  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,249 Likes on 4,859 Posts
The current RL running the 3.7L with 300 hp, 270 ft-lb, and SH-AWD puts down 210-220 hp and 210 ft-lb at the wheels (depending on the dyno). With this, it runs a 6 sec 0-60. Cut the drive train loss in half, and that 6 s drops too. I don't know what the similar TL runs with its slightly lighter weight, but like Ken is mentioning, you will be putting all of this at the front wheels and powering the back with separate electric motors.

The R-spec and 550i run 0-60 in 4.8s. It would appear Acura could pull close to the lower 5's if done correctly.
Old 11-30-2011, 04:45 PM
  #293  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy
The current RL running the 3.7L with 300 hp, 270 ft-lb, and SH-AWD puts down 210-220 hp and 210 ft-lb at the wheels (depending on the dyno). With this, it runs a 6 sec 0-60. Cut the drive train loss in half, and that 6 s drops too. I don't know what the similar TL runs with its slightly lighter weight, but like Ken is mentioning, you will be putting all of this at the front wheels and powering the back with separate electric motors.

The R-spec and 550i run 0-60 in 4.8s. It would appear Acura could pull close to the lower 5's if done correctly.
You have to wonder if 0-60 and 1/4 mile is the ultimate goal or behavior in a turn is the ultimate goal.

Hopefully it would be competitive against these cars, but given that much handling is the concentration, I think the engineers are calibrating behavior in and around an apex.
Old 11-30-2011, 07:10 PM
  #294  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,249 Likes on 4,859 Posts
I think Acura knows that handling a corner is of much more real world use than 0-60, but how will Motor Trend approve if the 0-60 is lacking?

Last edited by oo7spy; 11-30-2011 at 07:12 PM.
The following users liked this post:
VTEC Racer (12-22-2011)
Old 11-30-2011, 08:08 PM
  #295  
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
 
HeartTLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Age: 38
Posts: 3,230
Received 416 Likes on 365 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy
I think Acura knows that handling a corner is of much more real world use than 0-60, but how will Motor Trend approve if the 0-60 is lacking?
Negative as always.

But really, who gives a F.
Old 12-01-2011, 09:19 AM
  #296  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,249 Likes on 4,859 Posts
Well, maybe Acura isn't as out of touch as we thought they were. Or at least they are willing to admit it and change it. "After three years of concentrating on "efficient" designs such as the Insight, it was time to let go and provide a bit more visual excitement."
Originally Posted by Yoshinori Asahi, Creative Director of Honda's styling design development division
Honda will make a dramatic change. But of course, in terms of the mass production vehicle, it will take two or three years. Because, to begin with, we believe that we are an exciting company, so we want to actually demonstrate that. Frankly speaking, we think that in the past few years the cars have been a bit boring. Please wait for two or three years, and then we will be more exciting. We want to go from efficient to exciting. We'll give you the specific details when those models are released.
Now, while these particular statements are geared towards appearance and not performance, I think the latest developments show Honda's willingness to upgrade their drive trains to compete again, i.e. 7-speed dual clutch trannys. Honda seems to be aware of the funk they have created and want to change it. I can't imagine the people that have been working on the same Hondas that have captured our enthusiasm over the past decades all of a sudden "lost their soul". Here's to hoping these promises come to fruition.

http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-news/h...130-1o5ud.html
Old 12-01-2011, 09:54 AM
  #297  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
The very reason for drastic changes in direction is that people, magazines, and the automotive industry criticize Honda for not being Honda.

Its because people give an F about a great company that they at least try to change. Motor Trend, Road & Track, and Car and Driver used to 'biased' FOR Honda not against them.

I'm glad Honda is listening.

Last edited by CarbonGray Earl; 12-01-2011 at 09:57 AM.
Old 12-01-2011, 11:03 AM
  #298  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
I'm more interested in the new engines. Is this the end of the J?
nope. the J will soon be the new B
Old 12-01-2011, 11:06 AM
  #299  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,645
Received 22,942 Likes on 14,058 Posts
Well, with each motorshow that passes and yet again with nothing truly -worthy in a good way...the impatient waiting continues.
Old 12-01-2011, 02:09 PM
  #300  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
TRIUMPHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 589
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Well, with each motorshow that passes and yet again with nothing truly -worthy in a good way...the impatient waiting continues.
Pretty much i say the same thing. I can't speak for others. But i don't believe that there are any cars right now that's AFFORDABLE at this point that is a MUST HAVE. That's my opinion all across the board not starting or stopping with honda.
Old 12-01-2011, 03:44 PM
  #301  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,249 Likes on 4,859 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Well, with each motorshow that passes and yet again with nothing truly -worthy in a good way...the impatient waiting continues.
Would you be satisfied with a new NSX in Detroit next month?
Old 12-01-2011, 10:21 PM
  #302  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
^^^^
That would be a good start. I plan (weather willing) to be in Detroit for the auto show--I go almost every year.

As for Asahi-san's words a few posts above..... Honda admitting they got boring? Really? And they will bring exciting models in the next 2-3 years? Really? Prove it!
Old 12-02-2011, 07:04 AM
  #303  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
As for Asahi-san's words a few posts above..... Honda admitting they got boring? Really? And they will bring exciting models in the next 2-3 years? Really? Prove it!


Seems like we've been down this road before. Let's hope they produce this time...
Old 12-02-2011, 07:24 AM
  #304  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Meh... If we get a new NSX, it'll apparently be a front-engine AWD hybrid...

If they absolutely MUST put AWD and a hybrid drivetrain in their halo car, which the don't, I really hope they don't call it an NSX.
Old 12-02-2011, 08:01 AM
  #305  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
^
Old 12-02-2011, 08:46 AM
  #306  
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
 
HeartTLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Age: 38
Posts: 3,230
Received 416 Likes on 365 Posts
AWD
Old 12-02-2011, 10:05 AM
  #307  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
AWD or RWD doesn't matter if a sports car doesn't press the right buttons. Performance (in more traditional terms) and design are the key points you have to hit. Those purchases are based on emotion.

No one is thinking of fuel efficiency in that realm of car. If anything, it comes 3rd or 4rd down the list.

Last edited by CarbonGray Earl; 12-02-2011 at 10:08 AM.
Old 12-02-2011, 11:46 AM
  #308  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,645
Received 22,942 Likes on 14,058 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy
Would you be satisfied with a new NSX in Detroit next month?
Well, that's a start.


I'm not in the Honda-hater group per se, I think I've been quite clear about that in this thread. But, their lack of an RWD platform, V8 and a halo car does disappoint me.
Old 12-02-2011, 01:45 PM
  #309  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Well, that's a start.


I'm not in the Honda-hater group per se, more of a Bangle/BMW hater. I think I've been quite clear about that in this thread. But, their lack of an RWD platform, V8 and a halo car does disappoint me.
Fixed.

The V8 ship has sailed IMO. There's no longer a need for one, but there is still a great need for a FI 6 cylinder IMO. Disappointed that no mention of FI was made at these recent announcements.
Old 12-02-2011, 02:44 PM
  #310  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,645
Received 22,942 Likes on 14,058 Posts
Old 12-02-2011, 02:58 PM
  #311  
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
 
HeartTLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Age: 38
Posts: 3,230
Received 416 Likes on 365 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Fixed.

The V8 ship has sailed IMO. There's no longer a need for one, but there is still a great need for a FI 6 cylinder IMO. Disappointed that no mention of FI was made at these recent announcements.
Actually, there has been. Scroll up and look for the links.
Old 12-02-2011, 03:22 PM
  #312  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by HeartTLs
Actually, there has been. Scroll up and look for the links.
? I can't find any mention of FI?

Besides' the diesel, which are pretty much all FI.
Old 12-03-2011, 03:59 PM
  #313  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
? I can't find any mention of FI?

Besides' the diesel, which are pretty much all FI.
HeartTLs meant DI, I believe.

http://blog.caranddriver.com/honda-f...inder-engines/
Old 12-03-2011, 05:06 PM
  #314  
Racer
 
GoldenShoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 724&412,PA
Age: 38
Posts: 261
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Fixed.

The V8 ship has sailed IMO. There's no longer a need for one, but there is still a great need for a FI 6 cylinder IMO. Disappointed that no mention of FI was made at these recent announcements.
I also believe the V8 ship has sailed. plus, even though it was 7 years ago in its last MY, the "halo" car of Acura the NSX relied on V6 power. I know this is an obvious statement to all of the members on this forum. my point on this is even without a V8, the NSX was still a very capable car in its segment.

another thing that Honda hasn't done since the NSX was make a DOHC V6, what better way to "resurrect" themselves than to bring back a newer, more advanced version of the C-series.

Hondas have never been about torque. to me, they seem to be able to produce high-compression motors with the almighty VTEC and seem to make power where other resort to displacement.

so, in conclusion, new C-series with DOHC in a nice sexy exterior= new NSX FTMFW!

one last thing, if Honda does do such; please don't
make it $450,000 a la LFA.(normal people enjoy supercars too, not just the super rich)

Last edited by GoldenShoes; 12-03-2011 at 05:10 PM.
Old 12-03-2011, 05:18 PM
  #315  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 25,183
Received 6,846 Likes on 4,287 Posts
yeah...torque is boring and highly over rated.
Old 12-03-2011, 05:31 PM
  #316  
Racer
 
GoldenShoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 724&412,PA
Age: 38
Posts: 261
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts
^ I get the whole sarcasm thing, but I NEVER said that torque was "boring and highly overrated"

I said: "Hondas have never been about torque." which is a true statement, they haven't, nor will they probably ever be.
Old 12-03-2011, 06:04 PM
  #317  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by GoldenShoes
^ I get the whole sarcasm thing, but I NEVER said that torque was "boring and highly overrated"

I said: "Hondas have never been about torque." which is a true statement, they haven't, nor will they probably ever be.
The one motor they ever tuned for torque was the 1st gen RL. It really did feel like a V8 from the 90's.

Almost all of the power was from 0 to 3500 rpms.
Old 12-03-2011, 10:47 PM
  #318  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,645
Received 22,942 Likes on 14,058 Posts
Hey, a Honda/Acura equivalent to take on the GT-R is fine by my books as a start. I'd definitely take that even though it is a notch lower than what the NSX was first intended since they were aiming at Ferrari.

Still, I'd take anything right now that brings Honda/Acura back into the sportscar segment.
Old 12-03-2011, 11:23 PM
  #319  
Op is too busy to care
 
KillerG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,257
Received 913 Likes on 540 Posts
the last thing from honda that got my blood pumping:

rest in peace, sweet prince

Old 12-04-2011, 12:39 AM
  #320  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,645
Received 22,942 Likes on 14,058 Posts


Quick Reply: The Honda/Acura Versus The World Debate



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.