The Honda/Acura Versus The World Debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2011, 11:42 PM
  #241  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,248 Likes on 4,859 Posts
I think that 1G RL looks sick. That's some VIP mob shit. I wonder how many bodies can fit in the trunk?
Old 11-24-2011, 09:46 AM
  #242  
Drifting
iTrader: (5)
 
HeartTLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Age: 38
Posts: 3,230
Received 416 Likes on 365 Posts
When my wife saw the picture she was also more interested in the RL, haha..
Old 11-24-2011, 10:04 AM
  #243  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,602
Received 22,916 Likes on 14,037 Posts
Well, in fairness to Honda...they do offer a Civic with um, leather and etc. in the CSX. But, the competition does not have a lux-version of their econo-car!
Old 11-24-2011, 11:28 AM
  #244  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Well, in fairness to Honda...they do offer a Civic with um, leather and etc. in the CSX. But, the competition does not have a lux-version of their econo-car!
They have a Civic EX-L now as well. Believe it was also available on the previous gen Civic.
Old 11-24-2011, 12:03 PM
  #245  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Yumchah if you're attempting to argue that BMW gets a pass because well, its BMW....you're right. Not sure what you're point is though?

Its what every automaker aims for.

I think we can all agree the RL is a good car. But if a writer's bias of BMW, Audi and MB make it seem like the RL is dated and outclassed, even if its false, that's still Acura's problem. Its on them to prove otherwise.

Its also funny how we never heard claims of bias when Honda was winning comparo after comparo for several years. Suddenly when the shoes on the other foot the mag's are corrupt. Pretty sure the RL was C&D's ten best at one point.

People have always claimed C&D was guilty of BMW and Honda bias. Did Honda stop paying? Or are their products no longer deserving?
Spot on post Dom!
Old 11-25-2011, 12:09 AM
  #246  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,248 Likes on 4,859 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
They have a Civic EX-L now as well. Believe it was also available on the previous gen Civic.
I pointed out the Civic trim capabilities awhile ago. The EX-L is a well put together car IMHO.
Old 11-26-2011, 09:47 AM
  #247  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
to the OP for starting a compelling discussion.

As I just picked a 12 Accord EX sedan, I started to think a little more about Honda's lineup (as well as Acura) and came away with more than

Here's my angle (and I apologize for repeating anything that may have been stated earlier), Honda doesn't necessarily have to compete head-to-head with its competitors. Rather (and styling aside), the do need to have a more compelling lineup and (to me) it's as simple as tweaking what they already have. Here are a few examples.

Accord: The coupes are fine as is IMHO. As far as the sedan goes, re-position the SE model from its current LX premium placement to a lineup topper that is essentially an EX-L with 6MT and a set of 18" wheels (i.e.: the coupe V6). Granted, this car is in the final year of the current design but, the same could apply to the 9G Accord.

TSX: See Accord Sedan above

RDX: This could have been better served with a J-series variant. Especially since the K23A returns horrible fuel economy. Other than that, it's a nice ride.

Civic: Get rid of the Si and import the Civic Type R....better yet, rename it Integra and sell it as a Honda.

RL: While it is a bit nicer and has a slightly better build quality than the TL SH-AWD, it's still not worth its premium over the latter. Honda should have developed the Hybrid V6 program started in the 05 AV6, which may have resulted in a more powerful halo sedan and a counterpunch to the Lexus GSh.

MDX: I love my 09 MDX in every way....except when it comes to its hole-in-the-fuel-tank gas mileage. As with my comment on the RL, "Honda should have further developed the Hybrid V6 program started in the 05 AV6, which may have resulted in a more fuel efficient MDX." This could have been a respectable rival to the Lexus RXh.

Obviously there are plenty of other tweaks that Honda should have addressed....and could have easily been implemented.

Last edited by F23A4; 11-26-2011 at 10:11 AM.
Old 11-26-2011, 10:19 AM
  #248  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
They could use the k23A in the tsx and have a truly sporty entry level car ala 135
Old 11-26-2011, 10:33 AM
  #249  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
They could use the k23A in the tsx and have a truly sporty entry level car ala 135
Sub out the J35 in favor of the K23A.
Old 11-26-2011, 10:35 AM
  #250  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 25,067
Received 6,728 Likes on 4,232 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
They could use the k23A in the tsx and have a truly sporty entry level car ala 135
They'd still need to change it to RWD.
Old 11-26-2011, 12:26 PM
  #251  
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Hapa DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 9,860
Received 810 Likes on 522 Posts
I though Acura was headed in the direction of Audi which I wouldn't have had a problem with...
Old 11-26-2011, 05:25 PM
  #252  
Racer
 
GoldenShoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 724&412,PA
Age: 38
Posts: 261
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl
They'd still need to change it to RWD.
going a lil bit further. what about adding the 6MT from the extinct RSX-S and adapting SH-AWD a la Evo or Sti?

that would be a car that I believe many people on this forum would absolutely love.


or even better, bring over the Canadian CSX and do above stated things to? slightly smaller and lighter chassis, yup sounds like $$$ to me.

Last edited by GoldenShoes; 11-26-2011 at 05:28 PM. Reason: forgot important shizzz yo!
Old 11-26-2011, 08:15 PM
  #253  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
TRIUMPHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 589
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Botomline anybody have a problem with honda/acura :tonguefaw
Old 11-26-2011, 08:20 PM
  #254  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
another 4g owner
Old 11-26-2011, 08:27 PM
  #255  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
TRIUMPHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 589
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
another 4g owner
PROUD OWNER

Last edited by TRIUMPHT; 11-26-2011 at 08:30 PM.
Old 11-26-2011, 10:13 PM
  #256  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
Originally Posted by Hapa DC5
I though Acura was headed in the direction of Audi which I wouldn't have had a problem with...
...even more reason to adapt the RDX's powertrain for TSX consumption. At least then, every model in the lineup would have an AWD option, a la Audi.
Old 11-26-2011, 10:18 PM
  #257  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy
I think that 1G RL looks sick. That's some VIP mob shit. I wonder how many bodies can fit in the trunk?
3 adult males, 5 if you chop them up. That car has some room. I've got another week or two left with my '02 RL before we get our CR-Z.
The following users liked this post:
oo7spy (11-27-2011)
Old 11-26-2011, 10:37 PM
  #258  
אני עומד עם ישראל
 
Hapa DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 9,860
Received 810 Likes on 522 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
...even more reason to adapt the RDX's powertrain for TSX consumption. At least then, every model in the lineup would have an AWD option, a la Audi.
Bingo.
Old 11-26-2011, 11:31 PM
  #259  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 25,067
Received 6,728 Likes on 4,232 Posts
Originally Posted by TRIUMPHT
Botomline anybody have a problem with honda/acura :tonguefaw


How do possibly expect to be taken seriously?
Old 11-27-2011, 01:05 AM
  #260  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,602
Received 22,916 Likes on 14,037 Posts
Originally Posted by TRIUMPHT
Botomline anybody have a problem with honda/acura :tonguefaw
Yes, that's some really compelling arguments, right there.
Old 11-27-2011, 07:05 AM
  #261  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by Hapa DC5
I though Acura was headed in the direction of Audi which I wouldn't have had a problem with...
For a while that was true. Now I don't think anyone is sure where Acura is going.

Originally Posted by F23A4
to the OP for starting a compelling discussion.

neuronbob:

Accord: The coupes are fine as is IMHO. As far as the sedan goes, re-position the SE model from its current LX premium placement to a lineup topper that is essentially an EX-L with 6MT and a set of 18" wheels (i.e.: the coupe V6). Granted, this car is in the final year of the current design but, the same could apply to the 9G Accord.

neuronbob: Doesn't matter as the 9G Accord is coming very soon. Hopefully Honda will SHRINK the Accord a little, it's too big now IMHO.

RDX: This could have been better served with a J-series variant. Especially since the K23A returns horrible fuel economy. Other than that, it's a nice ride.

neuronbob: I think Honda's issue is that adding a J-series engine brings the RDX that much closer to the MDX, but I do agree with you.

Civic: Get rid of the Si and import the Civic Type R....better yet, rename it Integra and sell it as a Honda.

neuronbob: Hell yes. I mean, DUH, Honda!

RL: While it is a bit nicer and has a slightly better build quality than the TL SH-AWD, it's still not worth its premium over the latter. Honda should have developed the Hybrid V6 program started in the 05 AV6, which may have resulted in a more powerful halo sedan and a counterpunch to the Lexus GSh.

neuronbob: This has been true since the 4G TL-SH-AWD was released. With the 3G TL, the RL was well worth the premium. I can tell you that because I owned a 3G TL and a 2G RL. Acura should have upped the ante on the 2G RL to add to its premium once the 4G TL was released.

MDX: I love my 09 MDX in every way....except when it comes to its hole-in-the-fuel-tank gas mileage. As with my comment on the RL, "Honda should have further developed the Hybrid V6 program started in the 05 AV6, which may have resulted in a more fuel efficient MDX." This could have been a respectable rival to the Lexus RXh.

neuronbob: MDX rocks.
Originally Posted by F23A4
...even more reason to adapt the RDX's powertrain for TSX consumption. At least then, every model in the lineup would have an AWD option, a la Audi.
What, and add 200 pounds to a nice, relatively light car? I don't think this should happen until someone figures a way to lighten the system....which I'm quite sure Honda is working on. TSX is fine as is other than that the V6 version needs a 6MT.

Originally Posted by TRIUMPHT
Botomline anybody have a problem with honda/acura :tonguefaw
You are missing the entire point of the thread.
Old 11-27-2011, 09:25 AM
  #262  
Pro
iTrader: (1)
 
TRIUMPHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 589
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl


How do possibly expect to be taken seriously?
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Yes, that's some really compelling arguments, right there.
Originally Posted by neuronbob


You are missing the entire point of the thread.
Wasn't really be meant to be taken serious
Old 11-27-2011, 02:26 PM
  #263  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
What, and add 200 pounds to a nice, relatively light car? I don't think this should happen until someone figures a way to lighten the system....which I'm quite sure Honda is working on. TSX is fine as is other than that the V6 version needs a 6MT.
.
Honestly, I think 200 pounds is a fair trade-off for SH-AWD on the TSX. What does it weigh now, 3600 pounds? Another 200 would make it heavier than average, but I think most people would be okay with the trade-off. I would.
Old 11-27-2011, 05:44 PM
  #264  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,602
Received 22,916 Likes on 14,037 Posts
Originally Posted by TRIUMPHT
Wasn't really be meant to be taken serious
Well, you should use red text next time.







Old 11-28-2011, 09:25 AM
  #265  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
Honestly, I think 200 pounds is a fair trade-off for SH-AWD on the TSX. What does it weigh now, 3600 pounds? Another 200 would make it heavier than average, but I think most people would be okay with the trade-off. I would.
true, add 1lb of boost and some timing advance 20hp right there to make up for the weight.
Old 11-29-2011, 03:16 AM
  #266  
Instructor
 
gwhizkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: La Jolla, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 205
Received 43 Likes on 30 Posts
The times are changing. We all need to accept the fact that Honda has changed their market investment strategy and is now going green. It is obvious that most of their R&D funds are going into hybrids and alternative fuel vehicles as reflected by their new Civic NGV. Recycling old engines and transmissions into face-lifted exteriors means only one thing. Honda/Acura is producing the current line of cars now to keep a stable form of income to fuel (so to speak) their development of energy efficient cars. The end to the performance line of Honda vehicles has long been passed.
Old 11-29-2011, 02:59 PM
  #267  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,602
Received 22,916 Likes on 14,037 Posts
Originally Posted by gwhizkid
The times are changing. We all need to accept the fact that Honda has changed their market investment strategy and is now going green. It is obvious that most of their R&D funds are going into hybrids and alternative fuel vehicles as reflected by their new Civic NGV. Recycling old engines and transmissions into face-lifted exteriors means only one thing. Honda/Acura is producing the current line of cars now to keep a stable form of income to fuel (so to speak) their development of energy efficient cars. The end to the performance line of Honda vehicles has long been passed.
I'd sure be happier about their "green" strategy if they made a diesel car...
Old 11-29-2011, 03:00 PM
  #268  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,602
Received 22,916 Likes on 14,037 Posts
Would any of you peeps who are critical of Honda lately be happy to see the Accord coupe rebadged and upped in Acura clothing...?

Personally, I think that would be a great move.
Old 11-29-2011, 03:33 PM
  #269  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
Originally Posted by gwhizkid
The times are changing. We all need to accept the fact that Honda has changed their market investment strategy and is now going green. It is obvious that most of their R&D funds are going into hybrids and alternative fuel vehicles as reflected by their new Civic NGV. Recycling old engines and transmissions into face-lifted exteriors means only one thing. Honda/Acura is producing the current line of cars now to keep a stable form of income to fuel (so to speak) their development of energy efficient cars. The end to the performance line of Honda vehicles has long been passed.
So, in essence, these cars are a stopgap before the big push into green.

First, Honda has always been chasing fuel efficiency and 'green'. They've led and had high horsepower and/or fun to drive cars. So if that truly is what Honda is after, times are decidedly not changing. The only thing changing is that other manufacturers have caught up.

Secondly, if these cars are just stopgaps and the real Honda stuff is coming? Should I not wait?

If I wait, which I and many have been, how will I know that this great car of the future has better, more reliable tech than a car the VW, Toyota, or Hyundai is already on the streets?

You could very well be right, but why would I buy a car that isn't the supposed best of today's tech? I'm not going to fund a company so that someone else can get a good car in the future. I'm buying for myself today.
Old 11-29-2011, 05:00 PM
  #270  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Would any of you peeps who are critical of Honda lately be happy to see the Accord coupe rebadged and upped in Acura clothing...?

Personally, I think that would be a great move.
Financially or from an enthusiast's POV?

As an enthusiast, meh. The problem with Acura was that they didn't differentiate themselves from their Honda counterparts as much as the competition (read: Infiniti, Lexus) did. I think this is becoming less and less of a problem nowadays, but dressing an Accord coupe as an Acura would be a step back.

Now a stylish TL coupe? CL maybe? I think that would be a fantastic move.
Old 11-29-2011, 05:01 PM
  #271  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,311
Received 5,935 Likes on 2,927 Posts
Originally Posted by aman
financially or from an enthusiast's pov?

As an enthusiast, meh. The problem with acura was that they didn't differentiate themselves from their honda counterparts as much as the competition (read: Infiniti, lexus) did. I think this is becoming less and less of a problem nowadays, but dressing an accord coupe as an acura would be a step back.

Now a stylish tl coupe? Cl maybe? I think that would be a fantastic move.
+1
Old 11-29-2011, 06:46 PM
  #272  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Would any of you peeps who are critical of Honda lately be happy to see the Accord coupe rebadged and upped in Acura clothing...?

Personally, I think that would be a great move.
No.
Old 11-29-2011, 10:12 PM
  #273  
Instructor
 
gwhizkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: La Jolla, CA
Age: 34
Posts: 205
Received 43 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by CarbonGray Earl
So, in essence, these cars are a stopgap before the big push into green.

First, Honda has always been chasing fuel efficiency and 'green'. They've led and had high horsepower and/or fun to drive cars. So if that truly is what Honda is after, times are decidedly not changing. The only thing changing is that other manufacturers have caught up.

Secondly, if these cars are just stopgaps and the real Honda stuff is coming? Should I not wait?

If I wait, which I and many have been, how will I know that this great car of the future has better, more reliable tech than a car the VW, Toyota, or Hyundai is already on the streets?

You could very well be right, but why would I buy a car that isn't the supposed best of today's tech? I'm not going to fund a company so that someone else can get a good car in the future. I'm buying for myself today.
Creating highly efficient gasoline powered engines is good for the environment, but a thing of the past. Greenhouse effects are inevitable no matter how efficient our cars are due to the skyrocketing population growth and its demand for fuel. That being said, car manufacturing is a business. Those speaking of the recent lack of "soul" in Honda cars (although true) is probably due to opposing shareholder ideology at the headquarters. There is no doubt that alternative energy is the future so I think Honda is trying to achieve something revolutionary to put on the road that will dominate the competition in terms of efficiency and environmental compatibility.

I do not work for Honda so I cannot answer your questions. I am merely hypothesizing from what I've seen coming from them.

And to reply to your last comment: isn't that why we're having this discussion in the first place?
The following users liked this post:
oo7spy (11-30-2011)
Old 11-29-2011, 11:37 PM
  #274  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by CarbonGray Earl
So, in essence, these cars are a stopgap before the big push into green.

First, Honda has always been chasing fuel efficiency and 'green'. They've led and had high horsepower and/or fun to drive cars. So if that truly is what Honda is after, times are decidedly not changing. The only thing changing is that other manufacturers have caught up.

Secondly, if these cars are just stopgaps and the real Honda stuff is coming? Should I not wait?

If I wait, which I and many have been, how will I know that this great car of the future has better, more reliable tech than a car the VW, Toyota, or Hyundai is already on the streets?

You could very well be right, but why would I buy a car that isn't the supposed best of today's tech? I'm not going to fund a company so that someone else can get a good car in the future. I'm buying for myself today.
You may wish to look at what Honda released today. And this is just vague information. Concrete numbers and actual vehicles should be released in then next two months...

http://blog.caranddriver.com/honda-f...inder-engines/

http://blog.caranddriver.com/acuras-...ectric-motors/
Old 11-30-2011, 12:45 AM
  #275  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
You may wish to look at what Honda released today. And this is just vague information. Concrete numbers and actual vehicles should be released in then next two months...

http://blog.caranddriver.com/honda-f...inder-engines/

http://blog.caranddriver.com/acuras-...ectric-motors/
Finally!! Something interesting. I do like what I see...but as I always say, I will believe it when I see it. Let's see if they've finally come out of their funk.

If not, my TSX can carry me through for awhile.

Edit: That SH-AWD system looks pretty groundbreaking. I really want to see how well its executed.

Last edited by CarbonGray Earl; 11-30-2011 at 12:59 AM.
Old 11-30-2011, 12:53 AM
  #276  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
Originally Posted by gwhizkid
Creating highly efficient gasoline powered engines is good for the environment, but a thing of the past. Greenhouse effects are inevitable no matter how efficient our cars are due to the skyrocketing population growth and its demand for fuel. That being said, car manufacturing is a business. Those speaking of the recent lack of "soul" in Honda cars (although true) is probably due to opposing shareholder ideology at the headquarters. There is no doubt that alternative energy is the future so I think Honda is trying to achieve something revolutionary to put on the road that will dominate the competition in terms of efficiency and environmental compatibility.

I do not work for Honda so I cannot answer your questions. I am merely hypothesizing from what I've seen coming from them.

And to reply to your last comment: isn't that why we're having this discussion in the first place?
That's fine and dandy. I get it. I've spoken and written the same line of thought on ideology in defense of Honda....swing for the fences, right?

The problem is, the game may pass you by if all you are doing is trying to hit the perfect pitch for a homer. I rather not see Honda lose its standing.

That all being said, I'm excited about what I've read, but I hope it comes to fruition in the near future. Hopefully whatever it is is groundbreaking and enticing for both the tree-huggers and automobile enthusiast.
Old 11-30-2011, 01:03 AM
  #277  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
No.
+1
Old 11-30-2011, 01:19 AM
  #278  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
I'm not 'in the know' but it has been speculated that Honda held back direct injection in their cars because of reliability concerns. (See Lexus for examples)

I'm guessing Honda fixed those problems to its satisfation
Old 11-30-2011, 04:46 AM
  #279  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
I hope you're right. As the Rock would say: (Honda) just bring it!
Old 11-30-2011, 05:19 AM
  #280  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
That's great news. I've been waiting on Honda to put DI in their engines.

also really interested on seeing how this new SH-AWD turns out.


Quick Reply: The Honda/Acura Versus The World Debate



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.