The Honda/Acura Versus The World Debate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2011, 05:16 PM
  #361  
Racer
 
GoldenShoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: 724&412,PA
Age: 38
Posts: 261
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts
+1 on the snow tires. had a civic hatch that was gutted and worked at a ski resort. nothing a set of Blizzaks on Si wheels couldn't handle. I actually used to laugh at the yuppies who would get their Benzes and Bimmers stuck goin up the moutain while my little FWD ~2300lb car just kept chugging along.
Old 12-16-2011, 05:35 PM
  #362  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
Snow tires and/or common sense.

I don't have snow tires, and I get along just fine. Never been stuck. It's just about knowing how to drive.
Common sense goes a long ways, but snow tires simply stay pliable and sticky in the lower temperatures. Cheap all-seasons and sport tires turn into the proverbial hockey puck.
Old 12-19-2011, 10:37 PM
  #363  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,614 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
that whole drive train thing for the snow is null and void if you buy snow tires.
On my third winter in a 550 whp CTS-V wearing snow tires. Snow tires, stability control, and knowing how to drive make drivetrain choice moot nowadays.
Old 12-20-2011, 03:58 PM
  #364  
1st Gear
 
dan aldrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Age: 77
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cruise control

the tsx is the best looking acura 2012 out there. I own A 2009, the thing I would change is cruise control that would slow down in traffic and speed up with traffic so I do not have to brake or puss on the gas.
Old 12-20-2011, 04:31 PM
  #365  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
Originally Posted by dan aldrich
the tsx is the best looking acura 2012 out there. I own A 2009, the thing I would change is cruise control that would slow down in traffic and speed up with traffic so I do not have to brake or puss on the gas.
Don't be a puss....god gave you a right leg and foot for a reason....use it. :wink:
Old 12-20-2011, 04:54 PM
  #366  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,604
Received 22,917 Likes on 14,038 Posts
Originally Posted by dan aldrich
the tsx is the best looking acura 2012 out there. I own A 2009, the thing I would change is cruise control that would slow down in traffic and speed up with traffic so I do not have to brake or puss on the gas.
Adaptive cruise control is nice...but, I'd still rely on my own leg to hit the brakes.
Old 12-20-2011, 05:27 PM
  #367  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
or just take a cab
Old 01-10-2012, 11:14 AM
  #368  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,604
Received 22,917 Likes on 14,038 Posts
Given the new concepts shown recently (NSX, ILX), do you feel better/worse about Honda/Acura's future...?
Old 01-10-2012, 11:18 AM
  #369  
Burning Brakes
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 927
Received 63 Likes on 56 Posts
Time will tell, that's for sure. I loved my parent's Legend. That was the last car I really liked.
Old 01-10-2012, 02:34 PM
  #370  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Given the new concepts shown recently (NSX, ILX), do you feel better/worse about Honda/Acura's future...?
I think worse for Honda. The 9th gen Accord looks practically the same as the 8th gen Accord. I consider the 9G a MMC/refresh.

From 1G Accord all the way up to 8G Accord, there was a notable change in body style. Not so with the 8G to 9G.

1G Accord

2G Accord

3G Accord

4G Accord

5G Accord

6G Accord

7G Accord

8G Accord




With Acura... not sure, but the ILX and NSX look promising. Maybe they'll stay where they're at... slightly below tier 1 status.
Old 01-10-2012, 07:17 PM
  #371  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,248 Likes on 4,859 Posts
Given this:

I feel MUCH better. Mid engine DI powering the rear wheels with electric motors for the front wheels and V8 acceleration? Where do I sign up?

Also, the ILX will make a great IS 250/350 competitor.

Last edited by oo7spy; 01-10-2012 at 07:27 PM.
Old 01-10-2012, 07:40 PM
  #372  
Safety Car
 
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Received 168 Likes on 122 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy

Also, the ILX will make a great IS 250/350 competitor.

At a glance, it makes it (The IS) a bit moot. Its a good car, but most of the people that drive IS250s don't know what wheels drive the car. All they see is the L on the badge.

No offense to those that are enthusiasts though...but most of these cars are bought because they are Lexuses (or Lexi?). I don't know if an 'A' badge will fulfill that need, but if they can get past that, what's the point of an IS for these people?

Last edited by CarbonGray Earl; 01-10-2012 at 07:42 PM.
Old 01-10-2012, 07:51 PM
  #373  
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
JS + XES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Socal
Age: 39
Posts: 20,301
Received 2,603 Likes on 1,571 Posts
girls like to buy Lexus IS and BMW 328i so much because they are the only Lexus and BMW that they can afford to drive.

do girls like Acura as much as they like Lexus and BMW?
Old 01-10-2012, 09:30 PM
  #374  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
Originally Posted by AZuser
From 1G Accord all the way up to 8G Accord, there was a notable change in body style. Not so with the 8G to 9G.

1G Accord

6G Accord

7G Accord

8G Accord

I hadn't thought of it much but, your post made me realize that I've owned each of the Accord generations above.
Old 01-11-2012, 07:24 AM
  #375  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
Given the new concepts shown recently (NSX, ILX), do you feel better/worse about Honda/Acura's future...?
I feel the same. As I mentioned in other topics... we'll see what happens when the production models hit the pavement (remember the HSC Concept?). IF... big IF... the production models are similar to their concept siblings, then Acura will be trending in the right direction.

What really needs to happen is Acura needs to come out with a completely new RL to compete with the likes of Audi, Lexus, and BMW (among a few others). Until then, they are not going to change their image. Sure, the ILX is nice, but is a mid-$20k car really what Acura needs to change its direction? I think they need to aim higher. The NSX is a good start, but you're talking 3 years before it's produced. A lot can change between now and then... and hinging their future on a fancy re-designed/re-badged Civic really is betting the farm. Get a new TL out there, drop the TSX (or merge the two as rumored) and give me a large sedan I would want to cross-shop with an A8, 7-series, or LS (or even the Genesis)... then we'll talk. Until then Acura (in my mind) is still competing with the likes of Toyota and Nissan and not their upper class siblings. They've been stuck in a rut for so long that I do not think what they have shown so far will get them out.

Concept vehicles are a good start... but means nothing until they're in showrooms and selling.

Last edited by juniorbean; 01-11-2012 at 07:31 AM.
The following users liked this post:
dom (01-11-2012)
Old 01-11-2012, 07:59 AM
  #376  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
I feel the same. As I mentioned in other topics... we'll see what happens when the production models hit the pavement (remember the HSC Concept?). IF... big IF... the production models are similar to their concept siblings, then Acura will be trending in the right direction.

What really needs to happen is Acura needs to come out with a completely new RL to compete with the likes of Audi, Lexus, and BMW (among a few others). Until then, they are not going to change their image. Sure, the ILX is nice, but is a mid-$20k car really what Acura needs to change its direction? I think they need to aim higher. The NSX is a good start, but you're talking 3 years before it's produced. A lot can change between now and then... and hinging their future on a fancy re-designed/re-badged Civic really is betting the farm. Get a new TL out there, drop the TSX (or merge the two as rumored) and give me a large sedan I would want to cross-shop with an A8, 7-series, or LS (or even the Genesis)... then we'll talk. Until then Acura (in my mind) is still competing with the likes of Toyota and Nissan and not their upper class siblings. They've been stuck in a rut for so long that I do not think what they have shown so far will get them out.

Concept vehicles are a good start... but means nothing until they're in showrooms and selling.
I think too many people are glancing over the part about 3 more years until it hits the pavement. A lot can happen in 3 years as we well know. The Front engined V10 car was being tested at the Ring and got cancelled. They probably haven't yet built a rolling chassis for this new NSX and we're jumping for joy? Hold your horses......its still a vaporcar.

I don't think there's any question the ILX and new RDX will improve Acura sales, just not sure they'll really help advance the brand. Its still Honda+ in my eyes but I think we'll have to wait for the new TL to see where this goes.

Honda on the other hand looks in pretty good shape. New CR-V will sell by the boatload as will the new Accord (barring a styling disaster for the sedan) and the Civic should get fixed by year's end. The new power trains announced will really help. Problem I still see, is that those new power trains are not adequate for Acura. I'd like to see FI and more than just warmed over Honda engines.

Last edited by dom; 01-11-2012 at 08:05 AM.
Old 01-11-2012, 10:12 AM
  #377  
Op is too busy to care
 
KillerG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,257
Received 913 Likes on 540 Posts
Originally Posted by JS + MS3
girls like to buy Lexus IS and BMW 328i so much because they are the only Lexus and BMW that they can afford to drive.

do girls like Acura as much as they like Lexus and BMW?
It's purely anecdotal, but my experience with los chicas has been that they hadn't even put Acura on lux status until they sat in my car (2G TSX), after that they were usually impressed and said that they had no idea it would be so nice inside. Oh and they love the backup camera

Bitches love backup cameras
Old 01-11-2012, 12:53 PM
  #378  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,248 Likes on 4,859 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
I feel the same. As I mentioned in other topics... we'll see what happens when the production models hit the pavement (remember the HSC Concept?). IF... big IF... the production models are similar to their concept siblings, then Acura will be trending in the right direction.

What really needs to happen is Acura needs to come out with a completely new RL to compete with the likes of Audi, Lexus, and BMW (among a few others). Until then, they are not going to change their image. Sure, the ILX is nice, but is a mid-$20k car really what Acura needs to change its direction? I think they need to aim higher. The NSX is a good start, but you're talking 3 years before it's produced. A lot can change between now and then... and hinging their future on a fancy re-designed/re-badged Civic really is betting the farm. Get a new TL out there, drop the TSX (or merge the two as rumored) and give me a large sedan I would want to cross-shop with an A8, 7-series, or LS (or even the Genesis)... then we'll talk. Until then Acura (in my mind) is still competing with the likes of Toyota and Nissan and not their upper class siblings. They've been stuck in a rut for so long that I do not think what they have shown so far will get them out.

Concept vehicles are a good start... but means nothing until they're in showrooms and selling.
2013 RL will be just that this spring.
Next up is the flagship RL, which has had little success competing in the $50,000 sedan segment against the likes of the Mercedes-Benz E class, BMW 5 series and Lexus GS. Critics have called it overweight and underpowered, and the interior is cramped.

Poponi said the redesigned version will have more cabin space, with rear legroom going from worst-in-class to the best-in-class.

"It will have [BMW] 7 series cabin space with the agility of a 5 series," Poponi said. "Our sedans need to instill passion and emotion. The new flagship establishes that, and sets the ceiling for premium pricing. Once we have set that, then our SUVs can come into the market and leverage that prestige."

The RL will debut in April at the New York auto show and go on sale next fall.


I expect a DI 3.7 for the front wheels, electric motors for the back wheels, and a 7-speed tranny. Pretty much the NSX reversed.



Originally Posted by KillerG
It's purely anecdotal, but my experience with los chicas has been that they hadn't even put Acura on lux status until they sat in my car (2G TSX), after that they were usually impressed and said that they had no idea it would be so nice inside. Oh and they love the backup camera

Bitches love backup cameras
When my wife's friend saw my RL for the first time, she said out-loud, "Isn't that a Honda?" I could see it in her eyes that she was thinking Civic (even though when she got in my wife's Civic EX-L she was impressed), and thought her brand new Equinox would surely be nicer. As she went through the features of her Equinox, I quietly sat there laughing inside. She pretty much ate her words after sitting in the RL.

The problem with Acura in the unopened female eye is that Acura is "just a Honda" and Honda makes "cheap" cars. I would put money on some women going ape shit when they buy their Lexus and find a Toyota gas cap or something similar on their car.
Old 01-12-2012, 06:48 AM
  #379  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy
2013 RL will be just that this spring.
We will see. It's all well and good if it has more room and handles better, but if it still looks like a bloated Accord or TL... not gonna tickle my fancy. Some of the speculative photos/sketches look interesting... but we'll see what April brings...
Old 01-12-2012, 10:36 AM
  #380  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,248 Likes on 4,859 Posts
I agree, and BTW, I can't see how the Genesis offers any more leg room than an RL.
Old 01-13-2012, 09:32 PM
  #381  
Honda Fanboy
 
VTEC Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,288
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy
2013 RL will be just that this spring.


I expect a DI 3.7 for the front wheels, electric motors for the back wheels, and a 7-speed tranny. Pretty much the NSX reversed.





When my wife's friend saw my RL for the first time, she said out-loud, "Isn't that a Honda?" I could see it in her eyes that she was thinking Civic (even though when she got in my wife's Civic EX-L she was impressed), and thought her brand new Equinox would surely be nicer. As she went through the features of her Equinox, I quietly sat there laughing inside. She pretty much ate her words after sitting in the RL.

The problem with Acura in the unopened female eye is that Acura is "just a Honda" and Honda makes "cheap" cars. I would put money on some women going ape shit when they buy their Lexus and find a Toyota gas cap or something similar on their car.
When they say the RL has worst in class rear legroom, I wonder what class of cars it is being compared to. The RL has 36.3 inches of rear leg room while the GS, E-Class, and 5-Series have 36.4, 35.8, and 36.1 inches of space, respectively.

BTW, when did BMW start using a 4 cylinder in the new 5-series?

I wonder how many woman, or buyers for that matter actually know that Acura is owned by Honda. I'm guessing not many. I think it just has to do more with the fact that Acura doesn't have the panache/bling-factor of a Mercedes and BMW (and possibly even Audi now).

P.S.
The Genesis has 38.6 inches of rear leg room. More than any of the cars mentioned above.
Old 01-13-2012, 09:57 PM
  #382  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,050 Posts
I think many more people know Acura is owned by Honda than those that know Infiniti is owned by Nissan, or Lexus by Toyota. The problem is that Acura hasn't done much to change this view, certainly not as much as Infiniti or Lexus.
The following users liked this post:
juniorbean (01-16-2012)
Old 01-13-2012, 10:42 PM
  #383  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Originally Posted by VTEC Racer
When they say the RL has worst in class rear legroom, I wonder what class of cars it is being compared to. The RL has 36.3 inches of rear leg room while the GS, E-Class, and 5-Series have 36.4, 35.8, and 36.1 inches of space, respectively.

P.S.

The Genesis has 38.6 inches of rear leg room. More than any of the cars mentioned above.
This is how I see it.

RL vs 7 series, S class, A8, LS

TL vs 5 series, E class, A6, GS

TSX vs 3 series, C class, A4, IS or ES

ILX vs 1 series, A3


So technically, there's room in Acura's lineup for another sedan. Acura just needs to move the RL significantly upmarket and then move the TL up a notch to differentiate it from the TSX.
Old 01-14-2012, 12:31 AM
  #384  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,050 Posts
^ If that was Acura's intention, they should've made the ILX a different body style. Four sedans is a lot in a product lineup. This would eat into TSX sales a LOT.

I don't think there's any space for the TSX. What Acura should've done instead is just name this car the new generation TSX.
Old 01-14-2012, 06:38 AM
  #385  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
^ If that was Acura's intention, they should've made the ILX a different body style. Four sedans is a lot in a product lineup. This would eat into TSX sales a LOT.

I don't think there's any space for the TSX. What Acura should've done instead is just name this car the new generation TSX.
Someone should tell that to Lexus; they have five sedans in their lineup. Then again, no one needs to tell Lexus anything.
Old 01-14-2012, 02:47 PM
  #386  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Not all of them are successful. The HS isn't selling anywhere near what it's supposed to, and the ES hasn't been selling well for a while. But at least they cater to different audiences. Even though the ES and GS are about the same size, the ES seems much softer, and it's FWD. The GS seems to be a more sport-oriented sedan, and RWD.

The ILX and current TSX are much more similar.

Last edited by Aman; 01-14-2012 at 02:49 PM.
Old 01-14-2012, 10:47 PM
  #387  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
Not all of them are successful. The HS isn't selling anywhere near what it's supposed to, and the ES hasn't been selling well for a while. But at least they cater to different audiences. Even though the ES and GS are about the same size, the ES seems much softer, and it's FWD. The GS seems to be a more sport-oriented sedan, and RWD.

The ILX and current TSX are much more similar.

HS is a niche vehicle and the ES is at the end of its model cycle.
Old 01-15-2012, 02:28 AM
  #388  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
Not all of them are successful. The HS isn't selling anywhere near what it's supposed to, and the ES hasn't been selling well for a while. But at least they cater to different audiences. Even though the ES and GS are about the same size, the ES seems much softer, and it's FWD. The GS seems to be a more sport-oriented sedan, and RWD.

The ILX and current TSX are much more similar.
r u sure ILX & TSX are similar. ILX is too small with no curves in body. It is more copy of Optima. look at the small boot relative to body and pretty similar tail light arrangement with no curves in the body.





Old 01-15-2012, 06:44 AM
  #389  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 18,143
Received 4,260 Likes on 2,631 Posts
Originally Posted by f23a4
someone should tell that to lexus; they have five sedans in their lineup. Then again, no one needs to tell lexus anything.
+1
Old 01-15-2012, 11:53 PM
  #390  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,248 Likes on 4,859 Posts
The TSX is on te chopping block. They will sell what they can, but it won't get a redesign. The HS supposedly is too. For some reason, I was under the impression the GS sold worse than the ES.

The RL should be in the LS, 7-series, S-class, etc. class, but it currently isn't, neither size or price wise. The TL has taken its spot next to the 5-series, E-class, A6, etc., and the RL is supposed to go from worst in class to best in class. At least that's what we were told as I posted above. Let's hope Acura hits it out of the park in NY this April. That would be a great B-day present to me from them.
Old 01-16-2012, 10:05 AM
  #391  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
I think many more people know Acura is owned by Honda than those that know Infiniti is owned by Nissan, or Lexus by Toyota. The problem is that Acura hasn't done much to change this view, certainly not as much as Infiniti or Lexus.
Exactly! Too many people know that Acura is owned by Honda. Why? B/C, as was mentioned by several, it's basically viewed as a Honda+1, where as people perceive Lexus and Infiniti to be their "own" brands. I'm always amazed that people do not make the Toyota/Lexus or Infiniti/Nissan connection, but they know Acura is Honda.

This is one of the biggest things Acura needs to change. Even if they come out with some phenominal new models and/or redesigns, their marketing game plan needs a huge shot in the arm so they can work on changing their image in the market.
Old 01-16-2012, 10:20 AM
  #392  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Yumcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,604
Received 22,917 Likes on 14,038 Posts
To be honest, I'm quite aware I'm driving a glorified Nissan.
Old 01-16-2012, 10:31 AM
  #393  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by Yumcha
To be honest, I'm quite aware I'm driving a glorified Nissan.
Most forum folks and enthusiasts do... but most of the general public is clueless...

Quick funny story... we were at the auto show late last year and this woman looked flabbergasted as to why the Lexus and Toyota booths seemed to always be next to each other. Worst part... her husband didn't now the answer . We happened to both be looking at the GS, so I just said it was likely b/c the layout is by company and Toyota and Lexus are the same company. They looked at me like I had three heads... it was pretty amusing...

Last edited by juniorbean; 01-16-2012 at 10:33 AM.
Old 01-16-2012, 10:34 AM
  #394  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by juniorbean
Most forum folks and enthusiasts do... but most of the general public is clueless...

Quick funny story... we were at the auto show late last year and this woman looked flabbergasted as to why the Lexus and Toyota booths seemed to always be next to each other. Worst part... her husband didn't now the answer . We happened to both be looking at the GS, so I just said it was likely b/c the layout is by company and Toyota and Lexus are the same company. They looked at me like I had three heads... it was pretty amusing...


I've had similar experiences. People actually OFFENDED that they drive a 'mere' Toyota.
Old 01-16-2012, 10:49 AM
  #395  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,248 Likes on 4,859 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy
I would put money on people going ape shit when they buy their Lexus and find a Toyota gas cap or something similar on their car.
Fixed my own comment.
Old 01-16-2012, 12:02 PM
  #396  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL


I've had similar experiences. People actually OFFENDED that they drive a 'mere' Toyota.
Same here. Several years ago, I can recall telling my neighbor that his 99 3.2TL was effectively a fairly enhanced version of his wife's 99 Honda Accord V6 sedan....and then him giving me a look as though I don't know what I was talking about.

Last edited by F23A4; 01-16-2012 at 12:07 PM.
Old 01-16-2012, 09:25 PM
  #397  
Your Friendly Canadian
 
Aman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 32
Posts: 17,433
Received 1,491 Likes on 1,050 Posts
^ To be fair, the TL is very different than the Accord where it matters to consumers. Everything you see, touch, even hear is different in the TL. It's even more so in the third and fourth generation TLs.

Your neighbor might've been offended because he thought you were comparing the TL to the badge-engineered excuses for separate models that were rampant in the market ten years ago.

One thing you have to give credit to Honda for: They do make a strong effort to differentiate models using the same basic platform.
Old 01-16-2012, 09:45 PM
  #398  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,248 Likes on 4,859 Posts
Originally Posted by Aman
One thing you have to give credit to Honda for: They do make a strong effort to differentiate models using the same basic platform.
Just think, the Civic can look like an ILX.
Old 01-17-2012, 01:20 AM
  #399  
Op is too busy to care
 
KillerG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,257
Received 913 Likes on 540 Posts
^ the one misstep they made was rebranding the civic to the csx in canada

... led to alot of uninformed "enthusiasts" assuming that the ILX was going to end up as another civic rebrand because apparently the meaning of "platform sharing" isnt as widely understood as I previously thought
Old 01-17-2012, 08:26 AM
  #400  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,248 Likes on 4,859 Posts
I defended the ILX all of December in the RL forum because everyone kept posting pictures of the CSX, and I had to remind them that no one had seen an ILX yet. As soon as they said Civic platform/factory everyone assumed it was a terrible move. Then throw in removing the TSX...


Quick Reply: The Honda/Acura Versus The World Debate



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 PM.