General Car Talk Discussion Thread
#3241
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#3242
But, that's good because you're posting a lot of misinformed thoughts.
Porsche does hold their own for technology and advancement, and they also have an illustrious racing heritage. The 918 Spyder is incredible. Look I'm not saying that participation in F1 is the ONLY THING that makes an exotic car company. You are reading too far into it there. I said, IN MY OPINION, Ferrari's extreme involvement and history with F1 trumps Lambo, from that angle. It's already been mentioned that Ferrari's supercars have no equal from Lambo. What are Lambo's top cars over the years? Countach, Diablo, Murci, Aventador. The similar line on Ferrari's end is Testarossa, 550, 575, F12. Probably missed some there.
You worded your original post as if to say Lamborghini must be in some sort of "state of affairs" because they aren't in F1. I've asked repeatedly what those "affairs" are then, because outside of Mercedes, none of the Germans, Japanese, or Americans are in F1 at the moment, either.
#3243
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
I might be misinformed if Ferrari was not actually doing what they said, putting F1 tech into their cars. But if a company basically puts a detuned F1 motor into their top-level car, how is that a gimmick? Please tell me.
My Lamborghini comment was in the direction of Lambo's classic rivalry with Ferrari. Ferrari does not have this kind of rivalry with any other of the companies you mention.
Therefore, the conclusion is, Ferrari > Lamborghini.
My Lamborghini comment was in the direction of Lambo's classic rivalry with Ferrari. Ferrari does not have this kind of rivalry with any other of the companies you mention.
Therefore, the conclusion is, Ferrari > Lamborghini.
#3244
The F40 was a 471Bhp, TT V8 with a 0-60 of 4 seconds & a top speed of 201. The Diablo was a 490Bhp V12 with a 0-60 of 4.5 & a top speed of 202 w/ a distinct weight disadvantage.
Fast forward to the F50 with a 512Bhp V12, 0-60 of 3.7 & a top speed of 194mph. The SV came with 510Bhp, 0-60 of 3.9 & a top speed of 204mph.
Oh yeah, Lamborghini was never on the level of Ferrari supercars.
#3245
I might be misinformed if Ferrari was not actually doing what they said, putting F1 tech into their cars. But if a company basically puts a detuned F1 motor into their top-level car, how is that a gimmick? Please tell me.
My Lamborghini comment was in the direction of Lambo's classic rivalry with Ferrari. Ferrari does not have this kind of rivalry with any other of the companies you mention.
Therefore, the conclusion is, Ferrari > Lamborghini.
My Lamborghini comment was in the direction of Lambo's classic rivalry with Ferrari. Ferrari does not have this kind of rivalry with any other of the companies you mention.
Therefore, the conclusion is, Ferrari > Lamborghini.
As much as I love the F50, it was never what Ferrari reported it to be. All the regulations in placed ended up making it anything but a "F1-derived supercar". The Enzo up until now, has been the only thing Ferrari could truly market as a F1-derived supercar because it was one of the first cars to really bring Formula 1 tech. to the streets. Every road Ferrari since then has just been given updated tech. the Enzo debuted.
#3246
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
This is not about horsepower and top speed. This is about intents and purposes. The F40 and F50, along with the other supercar level Ferrari's, are road-going race cars. That is the level the Lambos are not at.
#3247
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Because the end result was nothing like a Ferrari derived Formula 1 car.
As much as I love the F50, it was never what Ferrari reported it to be. All the regulations in placed ended up making it anything but a "F1-derived supercar". The Enzo up until now, has been the only thing Ferrari could truly market as a F1-derived supercar because it was one of the first cars to really bring Formula 1 tech. to the streets. Every road Ferrari since then has just been given updated tech. the Enzo debuted.
As much as I love the F50, it was never what Ferrari reported it to be. All the regulations in placed ended up making it anything but a "F1-derived supercar". The Enzo up until now, has been the only thing Ferrari could truly market as a F1-derived supercar because it was one of the first cars to really bring Formula 1 tech. to the streets. Every road Ferrari since then has just been given updated tech. the Enzo debuted.
lol we are not going to get anywhere with this. I love both brands, btw.
#3248
Road-going race cars met equally in engineering by companies with no Formula 1 tech. what so ever.
#3249
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
think what you want.
your point is as asinine as if I said the Veyron is superior to the McLaren F1 because it has so much more power and top speed.
your point is as asinine as if I said the Veyron is superior to the McLaren F1 because it has so much more power and top speed.
#3250
The simple fact is that you buy into Ferrari marketing bullshit. F1 is without a doubt, the pinnacle of motorsport technology, but there isn't shit in Ferrari's road cars these days that makes them better because of "F1-derived" tech. The Germans have & always will be at or ahead of Ferrari without needing to report how all their cars are derived from Formula 1.
Hell, at least a Porsche race car starts on the same assembly line as the road car. There's more linkage there than there is from a 458 to a Formula 1 car.
Last edited by Rick_TL-S; 03-06-2013 at 07:31 PM.
#3251
Suzuka Master
And yet both still bought by rich folks with no intention but to show off their fortune.
On that note, have you driven either? I'd like to know because the only people who typically make such an argument are those who haven't. It's been a while, but I recall the Superleggera doing very well at what it was built to do on the track.
Tell me where Ferrari's stake in any racing outside of Formula 1 is again? Or when the last time they even made an effort?
And I mean factory backed teams.
On that note, have you driven either? I'd like to know because the only people who typically make such an argument are those who haven't. It's been a while, but I recall the Superleggera doing very well at what it was built to do on the track.
Tell me where Ferrari's stake in any racing outside of Formula 1 is again? Or when the last time they even made an effort?
And I mean factory backed teams.
Ferrari has always been the better drivers car. Lamborghini is known for being a big scary car to drive. Ferrari is much more nimble.
And Lambo has its factory team but Ferrari has F1, which may seem like a gimmick to you but I think it works. Its not only that some tech gets passed down, its the fact that they have resources to use as well.
Do you think the Mclaren F1 would have been so good without Mclaren being a part of F1? I kinda doubt it.
Now I'm not saying that because they're in F1 they're better, but its IMO a general consensus that the rival lambo will be slower around a track. And if its quicker its probably not as fun to drive , again this all comes from what I read.
#3252
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
I backed up my statement with facts, facts that I don't think you will ever agree with. And that is OK.
#3253
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#3254
Suzuka Master
#3255
What you stand by are not actual facts. What you stand by are statements by Ferrari, a company notoriously well known for holding itself as a superior automaker, despite the fact it needs to cheat & bribe to get there.
#3256
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
I said I <strike>like</strike> love both brands, and have respect for both. But they have intrinsically different focus. Ferrari is more about racing and Lambo is more about sports/GT. Not sure why butts are getting hurt because I think Ferrari > Lambo.
#3257
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
ok now I'm not really sure what we are talking about.
#3258
Suzuka Master
The F1 was groundbreaking. Capable of being a daily driver, the driver's position, naturally aspirated V12 with a true 6-speed manual... was really the pinnacle of supercar performance before they primarily became status symbols. Not that people didn't buy supercars for the badge, but still. Almost everything that followed it for the next decade was still either barely an improvement or not nearly as capable.
#3259
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#3260
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
"Lamborghinis are such good handling cars!!!!!!!"
said no one ever.
said no one ever.
#3261
What I questioned is your assumption is that they're for different people when they have been bought by the same people forever.
And Lambo has its factory team but Ferrari has F1, which may seem like a gimmick to you but I think it works. Its not only that some tech gets passed down, its the fact that they have resources to use as well.
Do you think the Mclaren F1 would have been so good without Mclaren being a part of F1? I kinda doubt it.
Now I'm not saying that because they're in F1 they're better, but its IMO a general consensus that the rival lambo will be slower around a track. And if its quicker its probably not as fun to drive , again this all comes from what I read.
#3262
I don't care if you think Ferrari are superior. It was the statement made though, that they are because of their Formula 1 linkage & that Lamborghini are in a "state of affairs" because they aren't (would still LOVE to know what state this is).
It's just an ignorant thing to say.
#3263
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
It sounds like "state of affairs" hit some kind of button on you. I didn't mean it in any literal or pointed manner. Forget I said it.
#3264
It didn't hit a button. But, when someone refers to something as you did, it seems to imply something's wrong. All I asked repeatedly was what that was & you refused to elaborate on what you meant.
#3265
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
"state of affairs" apparently means something to you that it doesn't mean to me.
I am not implying anything is wrong with Lamborghini. How could I? I love Lambos. All I said was I personally think Ferrari has beaten them, in the race.
Furthermore, when I mentioned F1 presence, it was an answer to this post above it:
I've never been a lambo person. Sure they're amazing to look at (most) but I'll take a ferrari any day of the week over a lambo. Ferrari is a drivers car. Lambo makes its point to show off more than be a drivers car. That may be changing a ltl as they are making better drivers car. But my point still stands. They're for different people.
my mistake for not quoting it
I am not implying anything is wrong with Lamborghini. How could I? I love Lambos. All I said was I personally think Ferrari has beaten them, in the race.
Furthermore, when I mentioned F1 presence, it was an answer to this post above it:
I've never been a lambo person. Sure they're amazing to look at (most) but I'll take a ferrari any day of the week over a lambo. Ferrari is a drivers car. Lambo makes its point to show off more than be a drivers car. That may be changing a ltl as they are making better drivers car. But my point still stands. They're for different people.
#3267
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
When's the wedding?
#3268
Fahrvergnügen'd
For what a company learns in racing to matter, they have to want to apply it to their road cars. Ferraris does and that is largely because they can charge what they need to transfer the technology.
But there is a reason why Honda stopped participating in Formula One after Senna ... The investment they made in the sport would never help them sell more Civic DXs and Odysseys.
But there is a reason why Honda stopped participating in Formula One after Senna ... The investment they made in the sport would never help them sell more Civic DXs and Odysseys.
#3269
The standard roadgoing car was designed to be daily driven. The frunk is a storage compartment, and there is one on each side of the car behind the doors. Gordon Murray was inspired by how well the NSX managed the compromise between performance and comfort and set out to make the F1 the same way.
#3270
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Not sure where you got that from... I just checked and Honda quit F1 in 2008, citing the worldwide financial crisis as the main reason.
#3271
For anyone who wants to build the new GT3.
German version
http://cc.porsche.com/icc_euro/ccCal...x1050&vLevel=2
US version
http://cc.porsche.com/icc_pcna/ccCal...x1050&vLevel=2
The German version has a few more options such as another seat, auto dimming, lift system, & from what I've been told, an additional track pack.
German version
http://cc.porsche.com/icc_euro/ccCal...x1050&vLevel=2
US version
http://cc.porsche.com/icc_pcna/ccCal...x1050&vLevel=2
The German version has a few more options such as another seat, auto dimming, lift system, & from what I've been told, an additional track pack.
Last edited by Rick_TL-S; 03-07-2013 at 06:57 PM.
#3273
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
For anyone who wants to build the new GT3.
German version
http://cc.porsche.com/icc_euro/ccCal...x1050&vLevel=2
US version
http://cc.porsche.com/icc_pcna/ccCal...x1050&vLevel=2
The German version has a few more options such as another seat, auto dimming, lift system, & from what I've been told, an additional track pack.
German version
http://cc.porsche.com/icc_euro/ccCal...x1050&vLevel=2
US version
http://cc.porsche.com/icc_pcna/ccCal...x1050&vLevel=2
The German version has a few more options such as another seat, auto dimming, lift system, & from what I've been told, an additional track pack.
#3275
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#3277
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
all I'm going by is when Honda 100% pulled out from F1. I am not entirely sure on it but I think they quit chassis after the time period you mention and engines in 2008. I do agree Honda's participation in F1 was not going to help them sell Odyssey's. But it could have helped them sell NSX's.
#3278
Fahrvergnügen'd
all I'm going by is when Honda 100% pulled out from F1. I am not entirely sure on it but I think they quit chassis after the time period you mention and engines in 2008. I do agree Honda's participation in F1 was not going to help them sell Odyssey's. But it could have helped them sell NSX's.
But as we all know, Honda never figured out the importance of a halo car.
#3279
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
heh. :-/
#3280
Living the Dream
Dealer Trades?
Has anyone on here ever done a dealer trade to get the car they want?
What were your pros and cons?
How do they work?
Will the dealer/salesman screw me in negotiations since they have to find the car?
I am inching ever closer to getting a new car and the one that is highest on my list is a VW Jetta SportWagen TDI w/ sunroof (and maybe nav) with a 6-spd manual transmission. (Or the Jetta TDI w/ premium & nav 6-spd)
None of the dealerships that I've searched between Raleigh and Atlanta have the correct spec and color combination.
NOTE:
I am not ruling out the DSG and I do like it, it's just that it will be hard for me to give up the manual (current car, '06 TSX is a manual).
If the traffic I've hit in the last couple weeks keeps up, I may decide to go automatic.
What were your pros and cons?
How do they work?
Will the dealer/salesman screw me in negotiations since they have to find the car?
I am inching ever closer to getting a new car and the one that is highest on my list is a VW Jetta SportWagen TDI w/ sunroof (and maybe nav) with a 6-spd manual transmission. (Or the Jetta TDI w/ premium & nav 6-spd)
None of the dealerships that I've searched between Raleigh and Atlanta have the correct spec and color combination.
NOTE:
I am not ruling out the DSG and I do like it, it's just that it will be hard for me to give up the manual (current car, '06 TSX is a manual).
If the traffic I've hit in the last couple weeks keeps up, I may decide to go automatic.