2012 GT-R goes 0-60 mph in 2.7 seconds!?!
02-06-2011, 12:13 PM
#121
Burning Brakes
02-06-2011, 12:46 PM
#122
Senior Moderator
. Driving with the VDC off,
. Racing,
. Any competitive driving of any sort whatsoever,
. Use on a track or driving on any airstrip,
. Racing,
. Any competitive driving of any sort whatsoever,
. Use on a track or driving on any airstrip,
02-06-2011, 07:00 PM
#123
Trolling Canuckistan
THis is just silly and way out of proportion. The number of GT-R owners whose trannys failed and were denied warranty work was very minor. It was blown way up by the net but the number of GT-R customers whose trannys have been completely fine faaaaaaaaaaaaar outnumbers those with problems.
Nissan could have handled the HANDFUL of problems in a better way, granted, but this was by far no common occurence. And now with the 2012 the situation is fully resolved so lets stop beating a dead horse, mmmkay?
Nissan could have handled the HANDFUL of problems in a better way, granted, but this was by far no common occurence. And now with the 2012 the situation is fully resolved so lets stop beating a dead horse, mmmkay?
See the post above above yours, that's why I brought it up. For some reason DEman19901's post struck a nerve or maybe it was the straw that broke the camels back. I'm just sick of people bitching about Acura's transmission problem that was for all intents and purposes resolved in 2003. If we're talking about beating a dead horse, that's the only major mechanical complaint people have with Honda and Acura and they ended up backing their product for longer than most people keep their cars.
DEman19901, sorry I attacked you over it, it was something that just reached a breaking point with me apparently with all the Honda/Acura transmission bashing that goes on around here. Yeah, they made a shitty transmission 8 years ago other than being kinda ugly, what have they made that was bad lately?
And to whoever said the 996 and early Boxsters had engine problems, Porsche backed those cars as well and replaced many many engines.
Nobody makes a perfect product, it's how you back it that matters in the end to those who pony up the cash for it.
For the record, I think the GT-R is pretty bad ass, I'd love to be able to have anything from an R32 up. I'm just disappointed with the way Nissan backs their product.
02-06-2011, 10:50 PM
#124
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HERE IS SOMETHING YOU CANT UNDERSTAND
http://www.nagtroc.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=33578
how i can just kill a man
http://www.nagtroc.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=33578
how i can just kill a man
Last edited by ghttf; 02-06-2011 at 11:04 PM.
02-07-2011, 07:17 PM
#125
Burning Brakes
Let's talk about dead horses.
See the post above above yours, that's why I brought it up. For some reason DEman19901's post struck a nerve or maybe it was the straw that broke the camels back. I'm just sick of people bitching about Acura's transmission problem that was for all intents and purposes resolved in 2003. If we're talking about beating a dead horse, that's the only major mechanical complaint people have with Honda and Acura and they ended up backing their product for longer than most people keep their cars.
DEman19901, sorry I attacked you over it, it was something that just reached a breaking point with me apparently with all the Honda/Acura transmission bashing that goes on around here. Yeah, they made a shitty transmission 8 years ago other than being kinda ugly, what have they made that was bad lately?
And to whoever said the 996 and early Boxsters had engine problems, Porsche backed those cars as well and replaced many many engines.
Nobody makes a perfect product, it's how you back it that matters in the end to those who pony up the cash for it.
For the record, I think the GT-R is pretty bad ass, I'd love to be able to have anything from an R32 up. I'm just disappointed with the way Nissan backs their product.
See the post above above yours, that's why I brought it up. For some reason DEman19901's post struck a nerve or maybe it was the straw that broke the camels back. I'm just sick of people bitching about Acura's transmission problem that was for all intents and purposes resolved in 2003. If we're talking about beating a dead horse, that's the only major mechanical complaint people have with Honda and Acura and they ended up backing their product for longer than most people keep their cars.
DEman19901, sorry I attacked you over it, it was something that just reached a breaking point with me apparently with all the Honda/Acura transmission bashing that goes on around here. Yeah, they made a shitty transmission 8 years ago other than being kinda ugly, what have they made that was bad lately?
And to whoever said the 996 and early Boxsters had engine problems, Porsche backed those cars as well and replaced many many engines.
Nobody makes a perfect product, it's how you back it that matters in the end to those who pony up the cash for it.
For the record, I think the GT-R is pretty bad ass, I'd love to be able to have anything from an R32 up. I'm just disappointed with the way Nissan backs their product.
I don't see any problem what so ever with the new warranty on LC though.
Do other car makers actually allow track use or competitive racing under warranty??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
05-30-2020 12:40 AM
