Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Official Lens Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-23-2009, 06:25 PM
  #921  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Got it, I didn't know you were gone for two weeks. That might get pricey.
Old 11-23-2009, 06:34 PM
  #922  
all work and no play
 
MWalsh9152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wakefield, Ma
Age: 49
Posts: 13,916
Received 134 Likes on 97 Posts
well Im not gone for two weeks, but Im on vacation from 12/23-the first monday of the new year. Im going to NH for 3-4 days....and then my intention is to take day trips to different places to get some hopeful winter photos
Old 12-08-2009, 02:13 AM
  #923  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Oic.
Old 12-13-2009, 08:42 PM
  #924  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Well, as stated earlier, I set out to find the right 'main duty' lens for me. I tried:

24-70 F2.8
24-105 F4
17-55 F2.8

I need the f2.8 for indoor shots of the nieces and nephews, so that dumps the 24-105. The 24-105 just does not give me fast enough SS even at iso1600 without a flash, and flash is not always practical.

I am sure I would get used the reverse zoom on the 24-70, and I know it is a mainstay in the pro world, but it just seemed very awkward to me, and I missed shots with it due to the backward zoom.

So, at the end of the day, I feel like my initial instinct that the 17-55 would be the right one was properly evaluated.

Anyone want a 28-135 for cheep?
Old 12-13-2009, 09:50 PM
  #925  
all work and no play
 
MWalsh9152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wakefield, Ma
Age: 49
Posts: 13,916
Received 134 Likes on 97 Posts
$5 shipped USPS?
Old 12-13-2009, 09:56 PM
  #926  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Old 12-13-2009, 10:08 PM
  #927  
all work and no play
 
MWalsh9152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wakefield, Ma
Age: 49
Posts: 13,916
Received 134 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by stogie1020
ok $7, and no paypal, I'll send a postal money order
Old 12-13-2009, 10:34 PM
  #928  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Old 12-14-2009, 01:13 AM
  #929  
CL9 ABP
iTrader: (1)
 
lcrazyaznl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Commack, Long Island -> Queens NY
Age: 37
Posts: 4,528
Received 245 Likes on 112 Posts
stoogie i'd say go with the 17-55 i value wideness on the lens especially on cropped. Only reason i'd sell my lens is i'm going 24-70 and a d700 fx body soon.
Old 12-14-2009, 06:08 PM
  #930  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
Originally Posted by stogie1020
Well, as stated earlier, I set out to find the right 'main duty' lens for me. I tried:

24-70 F2.8
24-105 F4
17-55 F2.8

I need the f2.8 for indoor shots of the nieces and nephews, so that dumps the 24-105. The 24-105 just does not give me fast enough SS even at iso1600 without a flash, and flash is not always practical.

I am sure I would get used the reverse zoom on the 24-70, and I know it is a mainstay in the pro world, but it just seemed very awkward to me, and I missed shots with it due to the backward zoom.

So, at the end of the day, I feel like my initial instinct that the 17-55 would be the right one was properly evaluated.

Anyone want a 28-135 for cheep?
i give you best price!
Old 12-15-2009, 12:54 AM
  #931  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
please?
Old 12-15-2009, 01:36 PM
  #932  
all work and no play
 
MWalsh9152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wakefield, Ma
Age: 49
Posts: 13,916
Received 134 Likes on 97 Posts
come on Jefford, dont make the poor boy beg

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RxWJd3w3QPs&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RxWJd3w3QPs&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


Im just jealous that I cant afford it.

Last edited by MWalsh9152; 12-15-2009 at 01:38 PM.
Old 12-15-2009, 01:51 PM
  #933  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Sorry Miz. If I buy it, I will buy it new.
Old 12-15-2009, 02:55 PM
  #934  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
Ok.

Ohh hey congrats on 23,000
Old 12-15-2009, 03:42 PM
  #935  
all work and no play
 
MWalsh9152's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wakefield, Ma
Age: 49
Posts: 13,916
Received 134 Likes on 97 Posts
Miz, since Jefford doesnt want it. I would say that the best price Ive ever heard of one one would be $400 shipped
Old 12-15-2009, 05:20 PM
  #936  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Ok.

Ohh hey congrats on 23,000
I guess I want to roll my own dice with the dust issue.

Thanks on the 23k, hadn't even noticed!
Old 12-15-2009, 05:54 PM
  #937  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
Well mine was recently cleaned.
Ohh well.

I need to get off my lazy ass and post it for sale.
Old 12-23-2009, 12:10 PM
  #938  
Quarterlife Crisis....
iTrader: (5)
 
gr8ness97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Texas
Age: 39
Posts: 2,952
Received 108 Likes on 84 Posts
I need some help here. What do the first and second numbers mean (like 18-55)? And secondly, I need a wide-angle lens for landscape shots..Any recommendations for a Canon owner?
Old 12-23-2009, 01:06 PM
  #939  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Originally Posted by gr8ness97
I need some help here. What do the first and second numbers mean (like 18-55)? And secondly, I need a wide-angle lens for landscape shots..Any recommendations for a Canon owner?
http://photography.lovetoknow.com/Wh...ra_Lenses_Mean
Old 01-03-2010, 02:15 PM
  #940  
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
 
einsatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 7,140
Received 445 Likes on 214 Posts
I think I've noted here before I've been eyeing the EF 35mm 1.4L USM... Well last night I went to look at the canonusa site and didn't see it listed. I posted something on a flickr pool about the lens and someone pointed out that Canon will be making an announcement in early Feb, and that there are a lot of lenses removed from the website.

I noticed the story had been picked up on canonrumors:
http://www.canonrumors.com/2010/01/w...ave-they-gone/

I need to start saving!
Old 01-03-2010, 02:50 PM
  #941  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
70-200 f2.8L IS is missing? WTH?
Old 01-05-2010, 08:48 AM
  #942  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
MISSISSAUGA, ON, January 5, 2009 – Canon Canada Inc., a leader in digital imaging, introduces the new EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens. Arguably the most popular focal range in Canon’s telephoto arsenal and a staple lens for any professional photographer, the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens provides the focal length, maximum aperture and zoom power for capturing everything from fast-action sports to studio portraits. Built for the professional, the body structure of the new EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens has been enhanced to provide better durability and strength without a significant increase in weight. Canon has improved optical performance on the new EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens by redesigning the internal elements, incorporating a fluorite element and a fifth UD element. The use of the fluorite element and five UD elements helps to minimize secondary chromatic aberrations and produce better image quality with improved contrast and resolution through the entire zoom range; the end result is an optically precise lens worthy of becoming the leader of Canon’s L-series lenses.

Along with its redesigned optical elements, the new lens design features improved AF speed due to a new focusing algorithm and has reduced the minimum focusing distance to 1.2 metres (3.9 feet) through the entire zoom range, allowing photographers to capture tighter portraiture shots in a small studio space. The previous lens model’s minimum focusing distance was 1.4 metres (4.6 feet), whereas now photographers can stand nearly 20 centimetres (8 inches) closer to their subject and achieve sharp focus and tight crops. Canon has also enhanced the Image Stabilization allowing it to compensate for shutter speeds up to four steps slower than 1/focal length, a one step improvement over the previous lens model.

“Canon’s core has always been our optics, and we are constantly challenging ourselves to produce better and more advanced optical systems for our customers. The new EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens incorporates the best advancements in Canon lens technology from the past few years and packages it into what we believe will be the most popular lens for professionals and advanced photographers,” stated Ian Macfarlane, Vice President and General Manager of the Consumer Imaging Group at Canon Canada Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Canon U.S.A., Inc.

The enhanced magnesium alloy barrel design of the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens features added strength with a minimal 20-gram increase in weight compared with the previous model (1490g vs. 1470g) and retains Canon’s protective seals and fittings providing dust and water resistance for those photographers working in adverse conditions. A new bayonet mount on the front of the lens includes a locking mechanism to ensure the supplied lens hood remains securely in place. Other noticeable improvements include a wider focusing ring, and sleeker design by reducing the thickness of any protruding elements such as the switch panel. The new lens is also compatible with Canon’s existing EF1.4X II and EF2X II Extenders as well as EF Extension Tubes and the 77mm Close-Up Lens 500D.

Pricing and Availability
The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens is supplied with a detachable tripod collar, a reversible bayonet mount lens hood and a lens pouch. The new lens is scheduled to be delivered to Canadian dealers in April, price to be determined.
I believe this lens was supposed to come out over a year ago. Not sure what the delay was.

Last edited by dom; 01-05-2010 at 09:11 AM.
Old 01-05-2010, 10:22 AM
  #943  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
do want.
Old 01-05-2010, 10:40 AM
  #944  
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Billiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 53
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dom
I believe this lens was supposed to come out over a year ago. Not sure what the delay was.
I'd guess the fluorite glass was the limiting factor. Knowing what I do from the astronomy side of things, there's only three (or so) suppliers of this sort of glass in the world. Schott in Germany and a couple of companies in Russia. Considering the volume that this lens will sell, it wouldn't surprise me at all if it took the better part of a year for one of these companies (or Canon themselves) to commit to the fluorite glass production resources necessary for this lens.

Technically speaking, I believe 'glass' is actually in incorrect term. Where optics are concerned, I seem to recall that "fluorite" is actually calcium fluorite crystals that are grown.

Last edited by Billiam; 01-05-2010 at 10:43 AM.
Old 01-05-2010, 11:51 AM
  #945  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
As much as I like my 70-200 f/4, I have serious lust for this one. The improved MTF's, increased magnification, and 4-stop IS all look great. I imagine it's going to be in tight supply for a long time.

If the 24-70 is the highest volume lens in the Canon L-series lineup, the 70-200 f/2.8IS has to be the second. I wonder how many millions of them are floating around out there?
Old 01-05-2010, 12:03 PM
  #946  
is learning to moonwalk i
 
moeronn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 15,520
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
As much as I like my 70-200 f/4, I have serious lust for this one. The improved MTF's, increased magnification, and 4-stop IS all look great. I imagine it's going to be in tight supply for a long time.

If the 24-70 is the highest volume lens in the Canon L-series lineup, the 70-200 f/2.8IS has to be the second. I wonder how many millions of them are floating around out there?
Not sure, but it's safe to bet that many of them will be showing up on CL, ebay, POTN and other sites for sale over the next several months.
Old 01-05-2010, 12:15 PM
  #947  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by moeronn
Not sure, but it's safe to bet that many of them will be showing up on CL, ebay, POTN and other sites for sale over the next several months.
My thoughts exactly. I've been wanting to upgrade to an IS version. The original has been a go-to lens for years, I don't need the very newest. (Not to say I don't want it.) I'll be on the lookout for a good deal.
Old 01-05-2010, 12:27 PM
  #948  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Billiam
I'd guess the fluorite glass was the limiting factor. Knowing what I do from the astronomy side of things, there's only three (or so) suppliers of this sort of glass in the world. Schott in Germany and a couple of companies in Russia. Considering the volume that this lens will sell, it wouldn't surprise me at all if it took the better part of a year for one of these companies (or Canon themselves) to commit to the fluorite glass production resources necessary for this lens.

Technically speaking, I believe 'glass' is actually in incorrect term. Where optics are concerned, I seem to recall that "fluorite" is actually calcium fluorite crystals that are grown.
I could have sworn I read somewhere that Canon does their own fluorite.
Old 01-05-2010, 12:31 PM
  #949  
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Billiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 53
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There was that video about the 600/f4 where they mentioned Canon doing their own glass. I honestly don't remember if it was fluorite though.
Old 01-05-2010, 04:22 PM
  #950  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
MSRP is estimated to be ~2800 GBP or roughly ~$4300 USD

Last edited by Mizouse; 01-05-2010 at 04:24 PM.
Old 01-05-2010, 04:43 PM
  #951  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Don't be surprised when it is about $500-$600 more than the current price.
Old 01-05-2010, 05:13 PM
  #952  
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
stogie1020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 52,768
Received 2,000 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
MSRP is estimated to be ~2800 GBP or roughly ~$4300 USD
Old 01-05-2010, 07:24 PM
  #953  
Unofficial Goat
iTrader: (1)
 
The Dougler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 39
Posts: 15,744
Received 112 Likes on 89 Posts
anyone selling a 24-70? I wouldn't mind having one for my trip next week.
Old 01-05-2010, 07:27 PM
  #954  
Moderator
 
Mizouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,256
Received 2,787 Likes on 1,987 Posts
Since I will be going to CES I will check out the 70-200 2.8 IS II since I read it will be on display there
Old 01-05-2010, 07:37 PM
  #955  
is learning to moonwalk i
 
moeronn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 15,520
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mizouse
MSRP is estimated to be ~2800 GBP or roughly ~$4300 USD
Usually, the price is a lot cheaper in the US than a straight conversion from GBP. Based on 2800 GBP, my guess is it will list for under 3500 USD, which is still pretty damn expensive.
Old 01-05-2010, 10:13 PM
  #956  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by moeronn
Usually, the price is a lot cheaper in the US than a straight conversion from GBP. Based on 2800 GBP, my guess is it will list for under 3500 USD, which is still pretty damn expensive.
Exactly. When the 7D came out, the Brits were complaining (rightfully) about getting screwed on price.

I'm just hoping it's priced well enough to inspire people to let go of their gently used Mk I's.
Old 01-05-2010, 10:50 PM
  #957  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
I'm betting it will be right around $2600 or perhaps a little lower. It'll probably be around $2900 up here to pay for the French manuals that come in the box....
Old 01-06-2010, 08:34 AM
  #958  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
Old 01-06-2010, 08:38 AM
  #959  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
I'm betting it will be right around $2600 or perhaps a little lower. It'll probably be around $2900 up here to pay for the French manuals that come in the box....
Translation ain't cheap.
Old 01-06-2010, 12:00 PM
  #960  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
KaMLuNg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Age: 41
Posts: 15,510
Received 1,090 Likes on 767 Posts
im looking into a wide angle lense for my XTi. any alternatives to the 10-22mm lens? it is a bit out of my budget...

i would like to use it to take indoor photos as well as some scenic views...


Quick Reply: Official Lens Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.