Ford: Recall News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2011, 11:16 AM
  #201  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,261 Likes on 11,972 Posts
the auto is faster.
Old 09-25-2011, 11:53 AM
  #202  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,230
Received 6,018 Likes on 3,865 Posts
Originally Posted by justnspace
the auto is faster.
Almost every auto tranny is faster on a drag strip no matter what the car. But the driving experience is somewhat diminished when driving an auto sports car. imo.
Old 09-25-2011, 09:31 PM
  #203  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
Originally Posted by pttl
Almost every auto tranny is faster on a drag strip no matter what the car. But the driving experience is somewhat diminished when driving an auto sports car. imo.


I haven't driven a supercar to see if the lack of a manual transmission would really matter, but as is I don't care if it's a whole second faster in the 1/4, I prefer the manual every time. I know dual clutch trannies are fast and all too, but I'd maybe only take it on a daily driver AND if I lived/commuted in traffic hell-hole LA.
Old 09-25-2011, 09:56 PM
  #204  
That was uncalled for...
 
S A CHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 35
Posts: 7,288
Received 43 Likes on 27 Posts
Wow, aside from the transmissions on some cars, I don't know of any other major issues with these cars, which leads me to disagree with the True Delta ratings...

An average of 6000 miles before a major service is required? What kind of major service? This data is useless without details...
Old 09-25-2011, 11:13 PM
  #205  
Chapter Leader (Southern Region)
 
Majofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Waffles, BU
Posts: 88,888
Received 11,841 Likes on 8,573 Posts
I went to their site.. it's total bullshit.
Old 09-26-2011, 12:21 AM
  #206  
AZ Community Team
 
Bearcat94's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes on 4,341 Posts
I'm surprised that some of you are surprised at Ford's actions (or lack thereof). Even more surprised at those supporting Ford.

A corporation will evade, deny and even lie if they think that is less costly than "doing the right thing" or telling the truth. When "doing the right thing" becomes the lower cost option, then they'll do that. This is true of any large corporation. It's the nature of the beast.


Let's not forget the Ford/Firestone Explorer fiasco. After denial after denial after denial they started blaming each other. Eventually NHTSA stepped in. Those unsold recall vehicles were then shipped to South America and sold, as new, without being repaired.

Yeah Ford!!



And this comes from a Ford "fan". One of the best cars I've ever owned was a 2000-era Taurus (ugly as sin, but solid as a rock). I'm currently driving a 2011 Fusion and we've aslo got an '05 V6 Mustang. Based on personal history/experience and general preferences, I prefer Ford over the other American manufacturers.

But that doesn't mean I'm dumb enough to trust them.
Old 12-20-2011, 09:30 PM
  #207  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Just the Facts:
Federal safety regulators have dropped a probe into 29,807 2011-'12 Ford Mustangs equipped with manual transmissions after consumer complaints alleging an inability to shift into gear while driving.
"There is no indication of loss of motive power or unreasonable safety risk associated with the alleged defect in the subject vehicles," said the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
NHTSA said it analyzed data provided by Ford and "364 unique reports indicating various shift quality issues while driving" from consumers.

WASHINGTON — Federal safety regulators have dropped a probe into 29,807 2011-'12 Ford Mustangs equipped with manual transmissions after consumer complaints alleging an inability to shift into gear while driving.

"There is no indication of loss of motive power or unreasonable safety risk associated with the alleged defect in the subject vehicles," said the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in a statement on its Web site. "The preliminary evaluation is closed."

NHTSA said it analyzed data provided by Ford and "364 unique reports indicating various shift quality issues while driving" from consumers.

"Ford identified several factors that may contribute to shift quality concerns in the subject vehicles, including cold transmission, clutch stay-out at high engine speeds, gear clash or grinding, and gradual loosening of clutch plate bolts in some early production vehicles," said NHTSA in its defect investigations summary.

It said the largest percentage of complaints indicated higher-than-expected shift efforts in cold ambient temperatures. The complaints "resolved themselves with the drivetrain warming," said NHTSA.

It noted that its analysis also identified "only five complaints alleging an inability to shift into gear due to loose clutch plate bolts.

"A revised fastener was designed and implemented into production and is available for service," NHTSA noted.

Such an investigation can sometimes lead to a recall.

Inside Line says: No recall or any other action as NHTSA drops a federal probe into the 2011-'12 Ford Mustangs with manual transmissions.
Only 364?
Old 12-20-2011, 09:42 PM
  #208  
Moderator Alumnus
 
teranfon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,547
Received 196 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
Only 364?

My dealer is a huge SVT/performance Ford dealership. Speaking to the operations manager I asked him how many were back in for warranty claims. Of the the V6, GT, Boss, and Boss LS six speeds (of which they've sold a tremendous amount and many used for X-crossing or drag racing, a total of three difficult to shift gearboxes have been reported. Those three were corrected with a fluid change.

A number of Ford contacts have also told me although that they were aware of a potential problem with early production models, the so called catastrophic events that many on-line "contributors" claimed would happen never materialized.

Last edited by teranfon; 12-20-2011 at 09:47 PM.
Old 12-20-2011, 10:26 PM
  #209  
Three Wheelin'
 
mY sLOW UA6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: CT
Age: 31
Posts: 1,368
Received 151 Likes on 145 Posts
Didn't read the whole thread but I watched the videos, O MY.
Old 12-20-2011, 10:59 PM
  #210  
My first Avatar....
 
pttl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 24,230
Received 6,018 Likes on 3,865 Posts
Well I guess the peeps who have the bad trannys have to lemon their cars. What else are they going to do?
Old 03-12-2012, 06:06 PM
  #211  
Team Owner
 
doopstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jersey
Age: 52
Posts: 25,352
Received 2,057 Likes on 1,142 Posts
Ford: Sticky Pedal in Taurus/Sable

http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_new...9-million-cars
Federal safety regulators are investigating sticky accelerators in Ford Taurus and Mercury Sable sedans that could affect more than 1.9 million vehicles in the 2001 through 2006 model years.
Earlier federal safety regulators said the investigation covered an estimated 360,000 cars.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration started the probe last week, but expanded it on Monday. The safety agency has received 14 complaints of Taurus sedans accelerating on their own. So far it has no reports of crashes or injuries because of the problem.

A faulty cruise control cable may be the cause of the problems. The cable can become detached and hold the throttle open, the agency said in documents posted on its website. In at least two of the complaints, drivers told NHTSA that their cars took off and ran red lights before they were able to bring them to a stop by shifting them into neutral or park.

"This is an extremely dangerous situation," one driver wrote in a complaint. "There needs to be something done about this before it becomes fatal."

It's a problem similar to one that tarnished Toyota Motor Corp.'s reputation about two years ago. The Japanese automaker eventually recalled 14 million vehicles worldwide because of acceleration problems, which it blamed on ill-fitting floor mats and sticky accelerator pedals. At the time NHTSA said at least 52 people were killed in crashes linked to Toyota's acceleration problems. A NHTSA investigation cleared Toyota's electronic throttle controls as a cause of the problem.

Ford is cooperating with the NHTSA investigation, spokesman Daniel Pierce said Monday.
"It's asking for information like they have done in the past with other vehicles, and we will be working with them throughout the investigation," Pierce said. Ford received a request for information from NHTSA on Monday and it is just starting to look into how many complaints have been made to company dealers, Pierce said.

In its investigation NHTSA will determine how many cars had the same parts and whether the problem is widespread enough to trigger a recall. So far none of the cars has been recalled. The Taurus and Sable are nearly identical and share almost all the same parts.

The Taurus, which was introduced in late 1985, was the best-selling car in the U.S. for five years in the early 1990s. Ford let it languish while it focused on SUVs, and the Toyota Camry was soon outselling it. Ford renamed the Taurus the Five Hundred in 2006, but new CEO Alan Mulally insisted that the company return to the Taurus name with the 2008 model year.

Taurus sales have remained sluggish. Ford sold 63,526 of them last year, just 15 percent of the total sold at the car's peak in 1992. The company discontinued the Mercury brand in 2010.

Ford has recalled the Taurus before for problems with its cruise control system. In 2008, the company recalled 1993-1995 models of the Taurus SHO, a performance edition, because faulty cruise control switches were linked to engine fires.
Old 03-12-2012, 06:12 PM
  #212  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
:ibtoyotaconspiracypeepsbecomeFordconspiracypeeps:
Old 03-12-2012, 06:43 PM
  #213  
99 TL, 06 E350
 
Black Tire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 5,030
Received 164 Likes on 110 Posts
"2001 through 2006 model years."

Anybody worried that find these problems 6 years later?
Old 03-12-2012, 06:57 PM
  #214  
Team Owner
 
doopstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jersey
Age: 52
Posts: 25,352
Received 2,057 Likes on 1,142 Posts
It will be interesting to see if the media now attacks Ford like they did Toyota. Will Congress send Alan Mulally an invitation to testify?

Last edited by doopstr; 03-12-2012 at 06:59 PM.
Old 03-12-2012, 07:42 PM
  #215  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
What's the statute of limitations on stuff like this? A 2001 car is almost 12 model years old.
Old 05-29-2014, 08:52 PM
  #216  
Moderator
 
ttribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15,289
Received 5,913 Likes on 2,914 Posts
Ford recalls 1.39 million cars in North America

Ford is issuing safety recalls for nearly 1.4 million cars in North America.

The first recall affects 915 thousand Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner vehicles in North America for a potential issue with the torque sensor within the steering column.

Ford shares traded about 1 percent higher in mid-afternoon trade on Thursday.

Ford said the issue could result in the loss of electric power steering assist while driving.

The company is also recalling 195 thousand Ford Explorers in North America for a potential intermittent electrical connection in the steering gear that may result in the loss of electric power steering assist while driving.

Dealers will perform one of three service fixes, depending upon what diagnostic codes are shown when the vehicle is taken to the dealer.

The fixes will either update software for the power steering control module, replace the torque sensor or replace the steering column which includes upgraded power steering control module software.

In addition, the carmaker recalling about 200 thousand Taurus sedans in North America, affecting model years 2010 - 2014 for a corrosion issue.

It also recalled 82 thousand sedans because of floor mats that may interfere with the operation of the vehicles' gas pedals. The affected mats were put in 2006 - 2011 model year Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan and Lincoln Zephyr and MKZ sedans.

The automaker did not say how much the recall is expected to cost.

—CNBC.com
Source: http://www.cnbc.com/id/101714381
Old 05-29-2014, 09:56 PM
  #217  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemike
What's the statute of limitations on stuff like this? A 2001 car is almost 12 model years old.
I guess they wouldn't want to admit that their 2001 model is no longer used. If there is even one left on the road, in an ideal world they should do something.
Old 02-03-2022, 12:21 PM
  #218  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,334
Received 625 Likes on 504 Posts
Last November, Ford recalled one (yes, just one) Escape PHEV for a battery issue concerning the busbar terminal. Fast forward to the present day, and Samsung SDI, the supplier of the high-voltage battery, announces a new safety recall that involves 1,139 Ford vehicles and 24 Stellantis vehicles.
29 photos
Documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration don’t list which nameplates are affected, but Samsung SDI does mention the Escape PHEV recall mentioned in the opening paragraph. The company further lists a few part numbers of which nearly half are unknown to Google Search. The remaining three part numbers lead to the Jeep Wrangler 4xe, the plug-in hybrid variant that features a 2.0-liter turbo.

The South Korean supplier has identified welding issues in the manufacturing process of the high-voltage battery cell module, a condition that may lead to a loss of propulsion. The busbar pad was not seated properly or the power of the welding between the cell terminal and busbar was insufficient.

Manufactured by a South Korean sub-supplier by the name of Nex+, the faulty busbar will be replaced along with the high-voltage battery. Samsung’s battery-making division further highlights that the remedy battery cell module contains properly seated and welded busbars.

Somewhat worrying for such a serious problem, Samsung SDI still hasn’t determined when they’ll replace these batteries. They first have to talk with Ford and Stellantis, then secure enough replacement batteries from an already thinned supply chain. In any case, Samsung SDI further told the NHTSA that “owner notification letters will be mailed no later than 60 days after the submission of this report,” namely March 28th, 2022 at the latest.

On that note, Ford’s most fuel-efficient Escape is currently available only with front-wheel drive from $33,540 for the SE trim level. Considerably more powerful and more capable off the beaten path, the Jeep Wrangler 4xe comes exclusively with the four-door body from $52,530 for the Sahara.
Samsung SDI Recalls 1,163 Batteries Over Busbar Welding Issues - autoevolution
Old 03-01-2022, 09:13 AM
  #219  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,949
Received 5,371 Likes on 3,682 Posts
https://www.autoblog.com/2022/02/28/...ler-fire-risk/


Last month, Ford discovered an issue with connectors for the fuel filler pipe vapor line connector on 2022-model-year Mustangs. The vapor line connects to the main filler tube that runs from the gas tank to the fuel filler opening, the vapor line there to vent tank gases. The problem was a supplier-built connector that didn't meet the necessary engineering specs. Ford fixed all the Mustangs before they made their way to dealers. Problem is, 2022-model-year Ford Explorers and Lincoln Aviators built from Dec. 6, 2021, to Jan. 3, 2022, could suffer from a similar issue and did not get fixed at the factory. Hence, Ford is recalling 18,078 examples of the Explorer and Aviator to be repaired.

The matter with the SUVs is that the actual fuel filler tube can detach in a crash or even day-to-day operation. If this happens, a fuel leak can result, which might cause a fire. Ford said that "depending on the extent of the vapor leak," the check engine light might appear on the dash, throwing trouble codes P0456, P0442, P0455, or P04F0. The company isn't aware of any accidents or injuries due to the situation.

To check on whether your Explorer or Aviator is affected, you can go to the NHTSA recall site and enter your Explorer's or Aviator's VIN. The fix is a trip to the dealer to have a redundant locking clip installed, free of charge. Dealers have already been notified. Ford will begin informing customers on April 4. For more information, affected owners can call Ford Customer Service at 866-436-7332 and reference recall number 22C02, or get in touch with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration at 888-327-4236 and reference campaign number 22V-088.
Old 07-15-2022, 12:00 PM
  #220  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,949
Received 5,371 Likes on 3,682 Posts
https://www.carscoops.com/2022/07/fo...ine-fire-risk/


Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group has discovered 23 field reports of engine fires in vehicles equipped with its 2.5-liter hybrid or plug-in hybrid powertrain. It has, therefore, decided to issue a recall and a stop sale on 100,689 vehicles in the United States.

Included in the recall are the 2020-2022 Ford Escape, 2021-2022 Lincoln Corsair, and the 2022 Ford Maverick pickup truck. The recall affects vehicles built at Ford’s Louisville and Hermosillo plants between January 19, 2019 and June 13, 2022.

Ford first became aware of the issue on May 4, 2022, and the company’s Critical Concern Review Group decided to investigate. It analyzed data from 19 field reports of under hood fires or smoke on vehicles equipped with the 2.5-liter hybrid and plug-in hybrid drivetrains.

The reports were reviewed, and the problem was traced back to engine failures involving engine block or oil pan breaches. This would allow oil and gas to leak out of the engine and pool near hot surfaces in the engine bay, most relevantly the exhaust system, which could cause the fluids to ignite.

By June, the automaker had 23 warranty and field reports of fires or smoke related to this block or oil pan breach globally. Of these, nine were described as under hood or vehicle fires, six described as under hood melting, seven saw under hood smoke, and one could not be characterized. Fortunately, no injuries or accidents have been reported as a result of this problem.

Ford has decided to issue a recall and advised its dealers to make modifications to any affected units on the lot. The solution it has found is to drill additional drain holes in the under engine shield and to remove four blinds from the Active Grille Shutter, which can make the problem worse by not allowing air to flow through the engine bay and wick away fuel vapors. Oddly, there is no information in this recall about fixing the engine and oil pan breaches.

​​​​​​​At any rate, Ford will be getting in touch with owners starting on August 8 and asking them to come in to a dealer to have the fix installed free of charge.

It’s also advising owners are advised to park and shut off the engine “as quickly as possible if they hear unexpected engine noises, notice a reduction in
vehicle power, or see smoke”.
Old 09-05-2023, 02:40 PM
  #221  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,949
Received 5,371 Likes on 3,682 Posts
https://www.motor1.com/news/685240/f...-repair-costs/


Ford's latest recall will cost quite a bit to fix. The automaker issued it for certain Lincoln Aviator, Ford Bronco, Lincoln Navigator, and Ford Transit models due to potential issues with the rearview camera, a problem that has plagued the automaker. It affects 169,277 vehicles, with the numerous repairs costing the company an estimated $270 million, according to a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Affected vehicles could experience a loss of the rear camera image when the vehicle is in reverse. The issue could cause the screen to display a blue or black picture, potentially leading to a collision. The affected vehicles are certain 2020-2023 Lincoln Aviator crossovers, 2018-2021 Lincoln Navigator SUVs, 2022-2023 Ford Transit vans, and 2021 Ford Bronco SUVs.

The cause of the issue depends on the type of camera system installed in the vehicle. In some, fretting corrosion (corrosion that degrades surfaces) is forming on the internal camera connector, disrupting the image. The systems could also be suffering from manufacturing defects that misaligned the connector. In others, like the Transit, the issue is the image processing module.

In January 2023, Ford recalled 382,000 vehicles for similar rearview camera issues. That one included the Aviator, Ford Explorer, and Lincoln Corsair, which are vehicles Ford mentions in its September 1 SEC filing as part of its estimated $270 million cost.

According to the US Department of Transportation's DataHub, Ford again leads automakers in issuing recalls. So far this year, Ford has issued 42 recalls affecting 4.6 million vehicles. Chrysler has the next highest number of recalls – 33 – involving 2.1 million models. Ford ended 2022 with the most recalls of any automaker, just as it had ended 2021. Last year, the Blue Oval had 65 campaigns for over 8.6 million vehicles.

So far this year, Ford has issued recalls for the Bronco, F-150, Escape, Expedition, and others. In July, the automaker recalled nearly 900,000 F-150s because some models could suffer sudden electric parking brake activation. In June, 125,000 Escapes, Mavericks, and Lincoln Corsairs were recalled for an increased fire risk should the engine suffer a catastrophic failure.

Ford's recall headaches also affect older models like the Lincoln MKC, which the automaker had to recall for the possibility of a fire under the hood. The company also brought specific 2004-2006 Ford Ranger pickups back to the dealer to fix previously replaced airbags that may have been incorrectly installed.

The automaker will ask owners to bring their affected vehicles to a Ford or Lincoln service center for the free repair. The company will replace affected rearview camera systems and update the image processing module software. Ford will begin notifying affected customers starting October 2.
Old 09-05-2023, 02:41 PM
  #222  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,949
Received 5,371 Likes on 3,682 Posts
I have this recall on my Explorer, have had the blue/black screen maybe a dozen times in the past 6 weeks or so.
Also have a TSB to have the 360 cameras replaced due to hazy camera image, which was something I noticed pretty early on when I bought it.
Old 09-26-2023, 09:48 AM
  #223  
Moderator
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 25,949
Received 5,371 Likes on 3,682 Posts
https://carbuzz.com/news/over-240000...gines-replaced


The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced an investigation over 241,014 Ford EcoSport engines that could fail due to an oil pump assembly issue. Depending on the outcome of the investigation, owners of the 2018 to 2021 model years may need their vehicles' engines replaced.

According to the Office of Defects Investigation's (ODI) report summary, the office has received 95 consumer complaints relating to the issue. They report engine failures in the now-discontinued EcoSport following a low engine oil pressure warning lamp that later precedes a loss or reduction of motive power.

Fortunately, no crashes, fatalities, or injuries were reported related to the issue.

The engine in question is the 1.0-liter EcoBoost (turbocharged) engine, making around 123 horsepower and 125 lb-ft of torque. The engine may be considered an award-winning power unit, but the Blue Oval company faced a lawsuit of over $1 billion for reliability issues.

Looking at Ford EcoSport online forums, one owner of a 2018 model year with 68,000 miles on the odometer complained about a "dreaded" oil pump issue. Like the initial investigation assessment, the user kept receiving suggestions for an engine replacement.

Another user who owns a 2018 EcoSport with over 70,000 miles on the odometer had an engine failure after the wet timing belt snapped and blocked the oil pump. The user said around $9,000 was spent to repair the issue: $2,500 for a complete gearbox rebuild and $7,000 for an engine rebuild.

This is similar to the teardown of a 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine, where a mechanic believes the wet belt is a poor design.

We will keep track of the latest developments in the investigation. Ford would again lose tons of money for remedy works if the findings resulted in a recall. In our previous report, the company is estimated to spend about $270 million to fix faulty cameras in the Ford Explorer, Ford Bronco, and other Lincoln units.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
neuronbob
3G RLX (2013+)
14
11-27-2015 08:32 AM
cassull
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
1
11-13-2015 06:13 PM
dennis1a
2G RDX (2013-2018)
18
11-12-2015 08:07 PM
justin7779
2G TL (1999-2003)
1
11-11-2015 01:09 AM
stanbu815
5G TLX (2015-2020)
6
11-07-2015 07:39 PM



Quick Reply: Ford: Recall News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.