BMW: 1-Series News
#561
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by mrsteve
Green Monster's next car for sure ![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Ah... this is a repost anyways so it's gonna get merged with the 1-series thread...
#562
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
But still, this thing is gonna be a blast to drive and worth the price. IMO
With the car being made in the fatherland, and the euro vs. the dollar, I'm thinking that the 135 is going to not be that much cheaper then the 335...
I've been interested in the 128 anyways, but again, it's all going to come down to PRICING.
#563
Liquid Ice
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Still not cool with the weight. BMW is good at making heavy cars feel like they're super light, so hopefully the driving feel will still be good.
#566
Fahrvergnügen'd
Dude, I'm diggin' that 123d. Too bad it's not coming here. 0-60 in about 6.9 is still damn fast.
3267 for a 135i is pretty decent. It's a touch smaller than a Mazda3 sedan and weighs about 114lbs more than a Mazdaspeed3 so that gives you an idea of how much is probably attributed to the turbos and such.
My Mazdaspeed3 is still stock and is fast as I can handle. Add another 43hp, RWD, and 114lbs and I'm sure the 135 is going to fly.
Problem is that I think the 135i is going to be $5k less than a 335i and I'd rather either extend myself for the 335i or wait until I could afford it.
I simply wouldn't pay $37k for a reasonably loaded 135i.
3267 for a 135i is pretty decent. It's a touch smaller than a Mazda3 sedan and weighs about 114lbs more than a Mazdaspeed3 so that gives you an idea of how much is probably attributed to the turbos and such.
My Mazdaspeed3 is still stock and is fast as I can handle. Add another 43hp, RWD, and 114lbs and I'm sure the 135 is going to fly.
Problem is that I think the 135i is going to be $5k less than a 335i and I'd rather either extend myself for the 335i or wait until I could afford it.
I simply wouldn't pay $37k for a reasonably loaded 135i.
#567
What Would Don Draper Do?
interesting...i always assumed the 1-series was gonna be a hatch ala the a3. then i come here and find out it's a 300hp coupe.
very interesting and intriguing.
but at that price range, i would rather get the 3, which also looks better in my opinion.
very interesting and intriguing.
but at that price range, i would rather get the 3, which also looks better in my opinion.
#569
Pro
so, the 1 series is a little bit smaller (judging by one comment earlier, back seat space still good) and a little bit lighter than a 3 series, with similar engine output, but with a different chassis, and much worse interior (that silver boomerang thing is fugly).
I estimate that it will be a little bit cheaper than the 3 series, but probably not by too much. $3-4k, maybe? Still, the 128i will get a lot of customers.
I estimate that it will be a little bit cheaper than the 3 series, but probably not by too much. $3-4k, maybe? Still, the 128i will get a lot of customers.
#570
![Talking](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif)
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
And right back at ya'... But I don't use a smilie when I'm half serious...
You've never driven a RWD car in snow, have you ??![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
You've never driven a RWD car in snow, have you ??
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Last edited by acutsx; 07-23-2007 at 08:47 PM.
#571
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Communist, NY
Posts: 9,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
You've never driven a RWD car in snow, have you ?? ![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#572
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
The 1 series has my interest for sure.
My main concerns: Interior size and material quality
My main concerns: Interior size and material quality
#573
'Big Daddy Diggler'
Originally Posted by Siddig
1) lots of people will choose a car based on dealer/service experience. Take lexus for example. The win a lot of customers because of their renowned service.
2) BMW will/should have service that is much better then that of Acura, but there are some bad ones out there.
10-1 odds the bimmer service is better then the Acura's.
2) BMW will/should have service that is much better then that of Acura, but there are some bad ones out there.
10-1 odds the bimmer service is better then the Acura's.
#574
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Beltfed
RWD in snow being bad is completely blown out of proportion. With good dedicated snow tires (not all season shit)....combined with traction control. You can forge ahead in a good amount of snow, enough to get you to and from work or wherever without an issue.
My last car (94 Ford Tbird) had shitty all seasons, no traction control, and was RWD and I drove 65 miles each way to work for 2 years and never had a issue.
#576
Originally Posted by Siddig
2) BMW will/should have service that is much better then that of Acura, but there are some bad ones out there.
10-1 odds the bimmer service is better then the Acura's.
10-1 odds the bimmer service is better then the Acura's.
#577
Safety Car
In the six years I had my Z28 w/ all seasons, I drove through a lot of snow. I never had any problems, just had to slow it down a bit. Then I bought my CL with those shitty OEM "touring" tires. I could barely drive 2 feet with out sliding out of control. So although drivetrain configuration plays a big part, I think tires are just as much, if not more of, a factor in snow driving stability.
#578
E92
Originally Posted by acutsx
Have you guy seen the new BMW 1 series?
I love my 04 TSX but I am seriously thinking about buying a new BMW 1 series next year. I have two main reasons. First is the Acura dealer's poor service (Yes, both dealership in Baltimore, MD).The mechanics always break something or spill de-greaser on the carpet and don't clean up the crap. This happened to me 3 times. Of course they fix it but it means another day in the shop for my TSX.Second is the poor paint quality ( I have too many paint chips to count), it just makes me mad when I look at the paint chips. Until Acura acknowledges and fixes the problems..I am buying something else.
I love my 04 TSX but I am seriously thinking about buying a new BMW 1 series next year. I have two main reasons. First is the Acura dealer's poor service (Yes, both dealership in Baltimore, MD).The mechanics always break something or spill de-greaser on the carpet and don't clean up the crap. This happened to me 3 times. Of course they fix it but it means another day in the shop for my TSX.Second is the poor paint quality ( I have too many paint chips to count), it just makes me mad when I look at the paint chips. Until Acura acknowledges and fixes the problems..I am buying something else.
#581
Ill hold my final judgement till I start seeing them in person on the street. Looks awfully cramped to me though. The E92 coupe is not big car really, and this one is even smaller.
#582
Senior Moderator
I was interested in the 135i until I found out it weighs 3439 lbs....
a car that small weighing that much.. I just don't get it.
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#583
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 39
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^---wrong, it weighs roughly 3,274lbs if you get rid of the bullshit weight. Also, for size comparisons, check this out:
http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=764
http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=764
#584
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Dem1K
^---wrong, it weighs roughly 3,274lbs if you get rid of the bullshit weight. Also, for size comparisons, check this out:
http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=764
http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=764
#585
Senior Moderator
ok that size comparison helped immensely. I dunno but it seems like people are making this car out to be some kind of micro-car.. which, it's not. thx
#586
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 39
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMW adds 165lbs for driver and luggage as 'unladen weight'. Hence, subtract the 165 from 3439 and voila ![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
As far as the size, the graphical representation shows that it's not TOO much smaller than your e46 coupe. So take a 335i and subtract a few hundred pounds, as well as a little bit of size, and you've got yourself a beast
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
As far as the size, the graphical representation shows that it's not TOO much smaller than your e46 coupe. So take a 335i and subtract a few hundred pounds, as well as a little bit of size, and you've got yourself a beast
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#587
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Dem1K
BMW adds 165lbs for driver and luggage as 'unladen weight'. Hence, subtract the 165 from 3439 and voila ![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
As far as the size, the graphical representation shows that it's not TOO much smaller than your e46 coupe. So take a 335i and subtract a few hundred pounds, as well as a little bit of size, and you've got yourself a beast![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
As far as the size, the graphical representation shows that it's not TOO much smaller than your e46 coupe. So take a 335i and subtract a few hundred pounds, as well as a little bit of size, and you've got yourself a beast
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#588
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 39
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha no worries, pretty much everyone thinks it weighs in at near 3450lbs, when in actuality it doesn't. I really hope they price this thing no more than $32k base, but that's a hell of a wish. I'm figuring I'll sell my 'lude for around $10-11 by that time, put that and another $5k down, and finance the remaining to hopefully $475/mo at a really low APR since my credit score is relatively high, but we'll see.
#589
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by srika
I dunno but it seems like people are making this car out to be some kind of micro-car.. which, it's not. thx
The 135 is 88lbs or 90 something lbs lighter than a 335 (depending on who you ask). You can goto the UK bmw site and compare the 135 to the 335 (and covert the kgs to lbs).
I'm sure it will sell well, but it's going to be about price (the 2002 was a relatively cheap car) and not about weight. The young fanbois and badge hounds will love this car for the cost, not about weight. I think most would buy the car even if it was heavier than the 335 as long as it's cheaper...
Now we're told that the 135 "draws inspiration from" the 2002 [1], but 88lbs doesn't seem like a lot inspiration to me
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
That being said, I'll probably still test drive one, but I don't think I'm going to be paying a markup to be the first one on the block with one. If it had been a tad bit under 3000lbs, I'd be asking who to give my deposit to
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
[1] http://www.bmwusa.com/Vehicles/futur...w1/default.htm
#590
Liquid Ice
GreenMonster - I completely agree with you, I'm definitely disappointed with the ~3200 lb weight. Its not a total show stopper, but if the price of the 135i is too close to the 335i, I'll just buy the 335i and figure out how to lose the 88 lbs ![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Its not impossible to make a car under 3000 lbs, the RSX-S only weighs 2800-2840 lbs. The Civic Si is only 2886 lbs. I guess neither car is on the same level luxury wise as BMW, plus both cars are FWD, but we haven't really seen what the 1-series interior is like (in person I mean).
With so many cars getting heavier and heavier (see G37 Coupe), I really was hoping the 135i would be the lighter alternative. I guess compared to cars like the G37 coupe, the 135i is light -- but for what it is, I expected the 135i to come in at more like 3000 lbs.
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Its not impossible to make a car under 3000 lbs, the RSX-S only weighs 2800-2840 lbs. The Civic Si is only 2886 lbs. I guess neither car is on the same level luxury wise as BMW, plus both cars are FWD, but we haven't really seen what the 1-series interior is like (in person I mean).
With so many cars getting heavier and heavier (see G37 Coupe), I really was hoping the 135i would be the lighter alternative. I guess compared to cars like the G37 coupe, the 135i is light -- but for what it is, I expected the 135i to come in at more like 3000 lbs.
#591
Senior Moderator
for its size, ~3267 is pretty good. remembers its as big as an E46 coupe.
#592
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 39
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
word...I think the whole "2002 reincarnation" is being a BIT blown out of proportion. Look, we're talking about a RWD, twin-turbo 6 that is a BMW (of a bit higher quality in materials and such). With the current standards in crash testing, etc... 3,250~ is a pretty damn good figure. I personally like the looks a lot as the rear and side profiling aren't your standard BMW look. It's a new car, and I like it. On top of that, it offers outstanding performance, a relatively decent size, good quality, and will hopefully come with a respectable/reasonable sticker. I, for one, am looking VERY forward to its release, regardless of its weight. But that's just me.
#593
Fahrvergnügen'd
Originally Posted by Dem1K
word...I think the whole "2002 reincarnation" is being a BIT blown out of proportion. Look, we're talking about a RWD, twin-turbo 6 that is a BMW (of a bit higher quality in materials and such). With the current standards in crash testing, etc... 3,250~ is a pretty damn good figure. I personally like the looks a lot as the rear and side profiling aren't your standard BMW look. It's a new car, and I like it. On top of that, it offers outstanding performance, a relatively decent size, good quality, and will hopefully come with a respectable/reasonable sticker. I, for one, am looking VERY forward to its release, regardless of its weight. But that's just me.
I can't imagine what the 135i is going to drive like. Slightly better HP/weight ratio and RWD too ... I'd guess really low 5s or high 4s to 60? 4.9 to 60 for $35k is amazing.
#594
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by charliemike
I can't imagine what the 135i is going to drive like. Slightly better HP/weight ratio and RWD too ... I'd guess really low 5s or high 4s to 60? 4.9 to 60 for $35k is amazing.
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Another thing... The price of the 1-series is going to KILL resale value on the 3 series. What self respecting badge whore is going to want a used 3-4 y/o 330 coupe when they could get a new 128i for around the same price brand new...
A 2004 330i coupe only weighs 3285lbs [1] so while the 1-series may be lighter than the e92, the weight difference from the E46 is negligible. A frugle minded driving enthusist might want to consider a E46 vs. the new 128i.
[1] http://www.edmunds.com/used/2004/bmw...739/specs.html
#595
I saw a 1-series convertible with heavy cladding here in Thousand Oaks (there's a building with "BMW DesignWorks" on it around here). It's much smaller than I thought it would be from the pictures.
Edit: oh right, pics? I was fumbling for my camera phone at the stoplight and I tried to keep up, but the @#$%er took off and left me for dead. Quick buggers they are.
Edit: oh right, pics? I was fumbling for my camera phone at the stoplight and I tried to keep up, but the @#$%er took off and left me for dead. Quick buggers they are.
Last edited by shrykhar; 08-03-2007 at 05:41 PM.
#596
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
A 2004 330i coupe only weighs 3285lbs [1] so while the 1-series may be lighter than the e92, the weight difference from the E46 is negligible. A frugle minded driving enthusist might want to consider a E46 vs. the new 128i. [1] http://www.edmunds.com/used/2004/bmw...739/specs.html
The 1 series might be narrower by a small amount compared to the E46 coupe. Not a car larger people probably, but not a micro car by any means. The 3 series is quite a bit larger now than it used to be. (Think about what an E30 sedan used to look like compared to an E90 sedan...)
#597
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,285
Received 2,795 Likes
on
1,989 Posts
hmm... if i were to get one i would carbon fiber the crap out of that car. make it weight what it should be.
#598
fap fap fap
Originally Posted by Mizouse
hmm... if i were to get one i would carbon fiber the crap out of that car. make it weight what it should be.
#599
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Age: 40
Posts: 63,285
Received 2,795 Likes
on
1,989 Posts
Originally Posted by Infamous425
and the $ you spend on carbon fiber-ing it you might as well buy an M3
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
#600
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 36
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1 series to start below 30k
hope its not repost
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/14/b...art-below-30k/
hope its not repost
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/09/14/b...art-below-30k/