Acura: RLX News
#4201
Moderator
The XTS is, arguably, the least desirable car in the Cadillac lineup. I'm not sure winning a comparo with said car is all that much to write home about.
#4202
Yea, because soooooo many cadi xts and RL owners are going to be buying the cars because of how fast they are above 100 (they also compared the awd version of the caddy vs a fwd acura )
And you do realize Brembos (BBK's) arent designed to stop the car faster (that has more to do with the tires) what they will do is stop the car repeatedly with far less fade
Despite better 0-100 times and better mpg, Ive seen 100x more XTS's on the road than the RL( <-which is 0). And i have to say the XTS looks far better from a styling standpoint. (which is a shame because acura should have learned from the RL)
And you do realize Brembos (BBK's) arent designed to stop the car faster (that has more to do with the tires) what they will do is stop the car repeatedly with far less fade
Despite better 0-100 times and better mpg, Ive seen 100x more XTS's on the road than the RL( <-which is 0). And i have to say the XTS looks far better from a styling standpoint. (which is a shame because acura should have learned from the RL)
seeing on the road does not mean car is desirable. it could have better deals/discounts/free maintainance things.
RLX is super quiest/fast/fuel efficient/handle better. Its MT figure 8 score is the highest in FWD and very close to RWD competitors.
MT already mentioned the same tires in Lexus for lack of handling power. alot worse than Lexus ES350.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...50_comparison/
The new ES is even 55 pounds lighter than its predecessor, delivering 2.4 better combined EPA mileage (2013's 24.6 mpg versus 2012's 22.2). Some of that is because of its Michelin Primacy MXV4 tires, which happen to be the same low-rolling-resistance rubber worn by the ES 300h hybrid. Unfortunately, it shows. The Lexus understeered its way round the figure-eight course's corners at a crummy 0.76 g, not helped at all by its group-worst weight distribution (61% of it up front). Frankly, I wondered if this car had the wrong tires, but a call confirmed that these are indeed the prescribed footwear.
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz2RF8KeoJx
The new ES is even 55 pounds lighter than its predecessor, delivering 2.4 better combined EPA mileage (2013's 24.6 mpg versus 2012's 22.2). Some of that is because of its Michelin Primacy MXV4 tires, which happen to be the same low-rolling-resistance rubber worn by the ES 300h hybrid. Unfortunately, it shows. The Lexus understeered its way round the figure-eight course's corners at a crummy 0.76 g, not helped at all by its group-worst weight distribution (61% of it up front). Frankly, I wondered if this car had the wrong tires, but a call confirmed that these are indeed the prescribed footwear.
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz2RF8KeoJx
#4203
Senior Moderator
AWD should provide more traction off the the line. and with better weight balance handling should be better.
seeing on the road does not mean car is desirable. it could have better deals/discounts/free maintainance things.
RLX is super quiest/fast/fuel efficient/handle better. Its MT figure 8 score is the highest in FWD and very close to RWD competitors.
MT already mentioned the same tires in Lexus for lack of handling power. alot worse than Lexus ES350.
seeing on the road does not mean car is desirable. it could have better deals/discounts/free maintainance things.
RLX is super quiest/fast/fuel efficient/handle better. Its MT figure 8 score is the highest in FWD and very close to RWD competitors.
MT already mentioned the same tires in Lexus for lack of handling power. alot worse than Lexus ES350.
Not desirable huh? so seeing more on the road doesnt mean its a desirable car?? So what you are telling me is people are buying it because of better deals even though they dont like it?? Try again
#4204
AWD Should IF it had enough power to utilize/need the additional traction. But it doesnt. What it does do is add additional weight (XTS is 300lbs heavier) and additional drivetrain loss for power. Let the 2 drag race in the snow and see which wins. Bet the caddy is more than 3 seconds faster to 100 than the RLX fwd. The caddy wasnt built to be a 1/4 mile drag car. If you wanted something like that get the CTS-V which will destroy everything that acura currently has.
Not desirable huh? so seeing more on the road doesnt mean its a desirable car?? So what you are telling me is people are buying it because of better deals even though they dont like it?? Try again
Not desirable huh? so seeing more on the road doesnt mean its a desirable car?? So what you are telling me is people are buying it because of better deals even though they dont like it?? Try again
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._l_first_test/
RLX will have no problem with snow with proper tire setup. even in worst tire for performance with longest life it has good speed.
There is alot of cars on the road because they have good deals from free maintainance to cheap leases. and those things get reflected in used car market.
#4205
Team Owner
AWD should provide more traction off the the line. and with better weight balance handling should be better.
seeing on the road does not mean car is desirable. it could have better deals/discounts/free maintainance things.
RLX is super quiest/fast/fuel efficient/handle better. Its MT figure 8 score is the highest in FWD and very close to RWD competitors.
MT already mentioned the same tires in Lexus for lack of handling power. alot worse than Lexus ES350.
seeing on the road does not mean car is desirable. it could have better deals/discounts/free maintainance things.
RLX is super quiest/fast/fuel efficient/handle better. Its MT figure 8 score is the highest in FWD and very close to RWD competitors.
MT already mentioned the same tires in Lexus for lack of handling power. alot worse than Lexus ES350.
#4206
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 842 Likes
on
524 Posts
The way I see it is that, it's a comparison test between two mid level cars. We know the RLX has a AWD model, and we know the XTS will get the new 3.6TT engine soon. The comparison between those two models would be more interesting to enthusiasts. For now, this test is simply a comparison between two bread and butter trims.
#4207
Senior Moderator
Audi A8 3.0T. see how fast that one is. Ist this vehicle light weight.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._l_first_test/
.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._l_first_test/
.
#4208
6G TLX-S
So "no problem" and "good speed" won't cut it.
The FWD RLX will LOSE big time competing with AWD sedans in the snow, PERIOD.
#4209
Senior Moderator
#4210
Your simply not admiting that this Cadi is very poorly designed car. what do you think about RLX SH-AWD now?. Under 5 seconds with All season tire setup and under 4 seconds with summer performance tires.
#4211
Ultra Negro
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Holland, IL
Age: 42
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
28 Posts
Thought you knew homie Fanbois ALWAYS com back to spew misinformation for the manufacturing company that they love.
I expect even more irrational comments which pertain to cars that have nothing to do with the one he is talking about, then say how FWD from Honda is superior, and then talk about if he had the money he would buy it.
He can have it for all I care, only way i'd get one is if I won it as a prize.
Almost 4000 lbs and FWD....................LOL
Honda just needs to man up and make a damn 4.0 V8, all they need to do is put 2 k20's together, i mean hell that how they made a F1 engine back in the day. Oh and it needs to be RWD like the rest of the modern world....
I expect even more irrational comments which pertain to cars that have nothing to do with the one he is talking about, then say how FWD from Honda is superior, and then talk about if he had the money he would buy it.
He can have it for all I care, only way i'd get one is if I won it as a prize.
Almost 4000 lbs and FWD....................LOL
Honda just needs to man up and make a damn 4.0 V8, all they need to do is put 2 k20's together, i mean hell that how they made a F1 engine back in the day. Oh and it needs to be RWD like the rest of the modern world....
#4212
There is alot of AWD sedans. You put summer performance tires on them and put winter on RLX and see how much AWD is better.
#4214
6G TLX-S
If you want to use summer perf. tires in the snow, then :
AWD sedans (summer tires) vs. FWD RLX (summer tires) => FWD RLX will lose in the snow.
But if you want to use winter tires in the snow, then :
AWD sedans (winter tires) vs. FWD RLX (winter tires) => FWD RLX will also lose in the snow.
#4215
Please don't sidetrack, compare apple to apple !
If you want to use summer perf. tires in the snow, then :
AWD sedans (summer tires) vs. FWD RLX (summer tires) => FWD RLX will lose in the snow.
But if you want to use winter tires in the snow, then :
AWD sedans (winter tires) vs. FWD RLX (winter tires) => FWD RLX will also lose in the snow.
If you want to use summer perf. tires in the snow, then :
AWD sedans (summer tires) vs. FWD RLX (summer tires) => FWD RLX will lose in the snow.
But if you want to use winter tires in the snow, then :
AWD sedans (winter tires) vs. FWD RLX (winter tires) => FWD RLX will also lose in the snow.
on other hand with higher fuel economic and lower maintaince of FWD. you can afford winter tires and stick with ultra performance in summer.
#4216
Senior Moderator
I know but it is hardly 10% more power but far superior fuel economic/performance. almost 4 second difference in 0-100mph. This kind of difference comes from 40% more power.
Your simply not admiting that this Cadi is very poorly designed car. what do you think about RLX SH-AWD now?. Under 5 seconds with All season tire setup and under 4 seconds with summer performance tires.
Your simply not admiting that this Cadi is very poorly designed car. what do you think about RLX SH-AWD now?. Under 5 seconds with All season tire setup and under 4 seconds with summer performance tires.
#4217
Senior Moderator
why should i stick to apple to apple comparision. If you are investing in AWD price and fuel penalty. There is no reason to again spend the money for winter tires. Stick with what ever you had.
on other hand with higher fuel economic and lower maintaince of FWD. you can afford winter tires and stick with ultra performance in summer.
on other hand with higher fuel economic and lower maintaince of FWD. you can afford winter tires and stick with ultra performance in summer.
See how this works. Change the rules to suit you and you can win. If I change the rules for me, ill win. This is WHY one needs to compare APPLES TO APPLES!
Now lets get back to the RLX
Last edited by fsttyms1; 04-24-2013 at 06:47 AM.
#4218
Team Owner
I know but it is hardly 10% more power but far superior fuel economic/performance. almost 4 second difference in 0-100mph. This kind of difference comes from 40% more power.
Your simply not admiting that this Cadi is very poorly designed car. what do you think about RLX SH-AWD now?. Under 5 seconds with All season tire setup and under 4 seconds with summer performance tires.
Your simply not admiting that this Cadi is very poorly designed car. what do you think about RLX SH-AWD now?. Under 5 seconds with All season tire setup and under 4 seconds with summer performance tires.
Under 4 secs? Do you know what it takes to do under 4 secs with a car that weights like 4500 lbs.
#4219
6G TLX-S
why should i stick to apple to apple comparision. If you are investing in AWD price and fuel penalty. There is no reason to again spend the money for winter tires. Stick with what ever you had.
on other hand with higher fuel economic and lower maintaince of FWD. you can afford winter tires and stick with ultra performance in summer.
on other hand with higher fuel economic and lower maintaince of FWD. you can afford winter tires and stick with ultra performance in summer.
When people are spending extra money on AWD sedans and don't mind the fuel penalty, they are also more than willing to spend a little more on winter tires for the winter months.
But for those who can only afford the cheaper FWD sedans and are dime-counting their gasoline receipts, they are the ones who won't spend more money on buying expensive winter tires.
If you really don't like comparing apple to apple. Then I'll use your rule to play.
How about a FWD Honda Accord vs. a FWD RLX ? The Accord is much cheaper and is more fuel economy too, when compared with the FWD RLX.
So, either way, the FWD one will lose in the snow, when competing with the AWD ones.
Last edited by Edward'TLS; 04-24-2013 at 12:43 PM.
#4220
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
New article today from Motor Trend.....
This compares the RLX to the Cadillac XTS.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...s4_comparison/
This compares the RLX to the Cadillac XTS.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...s4_comparison/
#4221
Team Owner
New article today from Motor Trend.....
This compares the RLX to the Cadillac XTS.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...s4_comparison/
This compares the RLX to the Cadillac XTS.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...s4_comparison/
Not saying XTS looks $70k, just saying RLX does not even look $50k.
for the first time in my life i actually prefer the American car interior over Acura's. i love that LCD Screen.
Last edited by oonowindoo; 04-24-2013 at 02:07 PM.
#4222
Seriously, I don't like the Caddy grill at all, it looks just weird. Anyway we had a winner lol
"The XTS shines in physical presence and handling prowess, but takes a big hit because of its clunky user interface and relatively poor performance at the pump. The new RLX might lack the Cadillac's dramatic sheetmetal and doesn't hustle through the twisties with the same athleticism, but it delivers outstanding comfort, a creamy ride, a brilliant combo of speed and frugality, outstanding refinement (at highway speeds its cabin is as quiet as a tomb), and a boatload of technology that's far more accessible on a daily basis. By the narrowest of margins, the 2014 Acura RLX takes home the gold."
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz2RPjZMB3R
I can't wait for the hybrid model!
"The XTS shines in physical presence and handling prowess, but takes a big hit because of its clunky user interface and relatively poor performance at the pump. The new RLX might lack the Cadillac's dramatic sheetmetal and doesn't hustle through the twisties with the same athleticism, but it delivers outstanding comfort, a creamy ride, a brilliant combo of speed and frugality, outstanding refinement (at highway speeds its cabin is as quiet as a tomb), and a boatload of technology that's far more accessible on a daily basis. By the narrowest of margins, the 2014 Acura RLX takes home the gold."
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz2RPjZMB3R
I can't wait for the hybrid model!
#4223
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
#4224
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 842 Likes
on
524 Posts
For referece, C/D tested an Audi A8 4.0T 8AT with 420hp/406lbft/4635lb got pulled a 3.9s for 0-60mph. If it's true that Sports hybrid awd is lighter than sh-awd, then perhaps 370hp and instant torque at 0rpm along with DCT in a 4200lb car MIGHT be able to do the same in 4 seconds. But I'm not holding my breath.
#4225
Team Owner
Though it's still being a bit too optimistic, but I think SSFTSX was talking about RLX AWD......
For referece, C/D tested an Audi A8 4.0T 8AT with 420hp/406lbft/4635lb got pulled a 3.9s for 0-60mph. If it's true that Sports hybrid awd is lighter than sh-awd, then perhaps 370hp and instant torque at 0rpm along with DCT in a 4200lb car MIGHT be able to do the same in 4 seconds. But I'm not holding my breath.
For referece, C/D tested an Audi A8 4.0T 8AT with 420hp/406lbft/4635lb got pulled a 3.9s for 0-60mph. If it's true that Sports hybrid awd is lighter than sh-awd, then perhaps 370hp and instant torque at 0rpm along with DCT in a 4200lb car MIGHT be able to do the same in 4 seconds. But I'm not holding my breath.
It will feel just like a TL but heavier?
#4226
The sizzle in the Steak
SSFTSX: Making Acura vehicle threads 10 times longer than they should be.
The following 3 users liked this post by Moog-Type-S:
#4227
Moderator
#4228
While i admit the caddy engine may not be the best, you simply dont understand how HP and TQ work. Having 30 more hp and 60lb/ft more torque is a HUGE advantage, Especially having that much TQ 2500 rpm sooner. Combine that with 8 closer spaced gears and you can have a huge advantage. Not to mention like the bmw, these engines (audi) seem to be underrated in power.
how much faster is BMW 335i 6MT than Accord V6 Coupe 6MT? both have identical weights. I will not even go into putting all season tire setup on 335i. in that case Accord coupe will be likely to faster.
so where is that huge 30 bhps and 50 ft-lb of extra torque advantage for BMW?.
This exact comparable example of Cadi and Audi. Identical weight vehicles.
#4229
You just brought up an excellent point.
When people are spending extra money on AWD sedans and don't mind the fuel penalty, they are also more than willing to spend a little more on winter tires for the winter months.
But for those who can only afford the cheaper FWD sedans and are dime-counting their gasoline receipts, they are the ones who won't spend more money on buying expensive winter tires.
If you really don't like comparing apple to apple. Then I'll use your rule to play.
How about a FWD Honda Accord vs. a FWD RLX ? The Accord is much cheaper and is more fuel economy too, when compared with the FWD RLX.
So, either way, the FWD one will lose in the snow, when competing with the AWD ones.
When people are spending extra money on AWD sedans and don't mind the fuel penalty, they are also more than willing to spend a little more on winter tires for the winter months.
But for those who can only afford the cheaper FWD sedans and are dime-counting their gasoline receipts, they are the ones who won't spend more money on buying expensive winter tires.
If you really don't like comparing apple to apple. Then I'll use your rule to play.
How about a FWD Honda Accord vs. a FWD RLX ? The Accord is much cheaper and is more fuel economy too, when compared with the FWD RLX.
So, either way, the FWD one will lose in the snow, when competing with the AWD ones.
Accord is cheaper but it does not have outstanding refinement (designed from ground up for large noise reducing wheels) , stereo, highly automated safety features, and mid range torque of DI engine. Just adding this stereo to Accord will add $6k to $8k. see the B&O options on Germans. DI engine will add another $3k at mimimum. RLX is much greater vehicle than sum of Accord parts.
#4230
Burning Brakes
how much faster is BMW 335i 6MT than Accord V6 Coupe 6MT? both have identical weights. I will not even go into putting all season tire setup on 335i. in that case Accord coupe will be likely to faster.
so where is that huge 30 bhps and 50 ft-lb of extra torque advantage for BMW?
so where is that huge 30 bhps and 50 ft-lb of extra torque advantage for BMW?
My point is correct. if some one can pay monthly bills for XTS AWD fuel economic. They are more likely can afford Audi A8 3.0T with superior fuel economic or BMW 535X leases. It is non sense to change tires on AWD vehicles. Its All season should provide sufficient traction. You save couple of grand on RLX FWD fuel economic and can afford both summer and winter set.
#4231
Ultra Negro
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Holland, IL
Age: 42
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
28 Posts
My point is correct. if some one can pay monthly bills for XTS AWD fuel economic. They are more likely can afford Audi A8 3.0T with superior fuel economic or BMW 535X leases. It is non sense to change tires on AWD vehicles. Its All season should provide sufficient traction. You save couple of grand on RLX FWD fuel economic and can afford both summer and winter set.
Accord is cheaper but it does not have outstanding refinement (designed from ground up for large noise reducing wheels) , stereo, highly automated safety features, and mid range torque of DI engine. Just adding this stereo to Accord will add $6k to $8k. see the B&O options on Germans. DI engine will add another $3k at mimimum. RLX is much greater vehicle than sum of Accord parts.
Accord is cheaper but it does not have outstanding refinement (designed from ground up for large noise reducing wheels) , stereo, highly automated safety features, and mid range torque of DI engine. Just adding this stereo to Accord will add $6k to $8k. see the B&O options on Germans. DI engine will add another $3k at mimimum. RLX is much greater vehicle than sum of Accord parts.
#4232
Three Wheelin'
My point is correct. if some one can pay monthly bills for XTS AWD fuel economic. They are more likely can afford Audi A8 3.0T with superior fuel economic or BMW 535X leases. It is non sense to change tires on AWD vehicles. Its All season should provide sufficient traction. You save couple of grand on RLX FWD fuel economic and can afford both summer and winter set.
Wait... summer and winter tires on a FWD car - but all seasons are fine for AWD?
Clearly you have a very low understanding of friction, force, inertia, etc.
Seasonal compounds are made for specific reasons. All seasons (while they might be fine to use) will NEVER perform the same as winter tires in the snow - same can be said for summer tires vs all seasons in temps above 50*.
#4233
AZ Community Team
+1, and RWD which has the advantage of more weight transfer to the rear tires during acceleration allowing great traction to get more power to the ground. Something the opposite happens for FWD.
The following users liked this post:
ttribe (04-25-2013)
#4234
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 842 Likes
on
524 Posts
I think the new system has a higher capacity than the typical IMA system. I'd imagine the boost will last more than 4 seconds before becoming less effective. I'd think you'd need to have a pretty long straightaway before the battery is depleted to a point where it becomes less effective? I don't know..guess we will find out. I don't think this is much of an issue for the RLX, for the NSX though, it will be interesting to see how long the battery can stay effective before it has to be charged by the engine.
#4235
Team Owner
I think the new system has a higher capacity than the typical IMA system. I'd imagine the boost will last more than 4 seconds before becoming less effective. I'd think you'd need to have a pretty long straightaway before the battery is depleted to a point where it becomes less effective? I don't know..guess we will find out. I don't think this is much of an issue for the RLX, for the NSX though, it will be interesting to see how long the battery can stay effective before it has to be charged by the engine.
So people who take NSX to the track can probably only do 1 lap at a time
#4236
Safety Car
If It Helps
Info from "Car & Driver":
Peak total system power is about 370 hp, but the car feels stronger thanks to the instantaneous torque of the electric motors, which assist propulsion up to 75 mph.
#4237
Team Owner
Info from "Car & Driver":
Peak total system power is about 370 hp, but the car feels stronger thanks to the instantaneous torque of the electric motors, which assist propulsion up to 75 mph.
Not that it matters.
but wait, more rear leg room and superior ground clearance will make up for it.
#4238
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 842 Likes
on
524 Posts
lol my understanding from that quote is that the RLX would feel like a 400hp car up to 75mph on full charge, and then feels like a 370hp after 75mph......
#4239
Team Owner
I really want to know how long it will take before the NSX runs out of juice. I mean that car is being tested at Nurburgring. I'd imagine it can last at least that long. Then again the system actually gets charged not just during braking, but also cornering. So I don't know if that would help anything....
lol my understanding from that quote is that the RLX would feel like a 400hp car up to 75mph on full charge, and then feels like a 370hp after 75mph......
lol my understanding from that quote is that the RLX would feel like a 400hp car up to 75mph on full charge, and then feels like a 370hp after 75mph......
#4240
6G TLX-S
My point is correct. if some one can pay monthly bills for XTS AWD fuel economic. They are more likely can afford Audi A8 3.0T with superior fuel economic or BMW 535X leases. It is non sense to change tires on AWD vehicles. Its All season should provide sufficient traction. You save couple of grand on RLX FWD fuel economic and can afford both summer and winter set.
Accord is cheaper but it does not have outstanding refinement (designed from ground up for large noise reducing wheels) , stereo, highly automated safety features, and mid range torque of DI engine. Just adding this stereo to Accord will add $6k to $8k. see the B&O options on Germans. DI engine will add another $3k at mimimum. RLX is much greater vehicle than sum of Accord parts.
Accord is cheaper but it does not have outstanding refinement (designed from ground up for large noise reducing wheels) , stereo, highly automated safety features, and mid range torque of DI engine. Just adding this stereo to Accord will add $6k to $8k. see the B&O options on Germans. DI engine will add another $3k at mimimum. RLX is much greater vehicle than sum of Accord parts.
If those who can pay monthly bills for XTS AWD fuel economic, and can afford Audi A8 3.0T with superior fuel economic or BMW 535X leases, they will have the dough to buy dedicated winter tires. A set of extra rims and winter tires means NOTHING to them.
But for those who can barely afford a FWD sedan, and are dime-counting their gas receipts, where on earth can they cough up the extra dough for expensive (to them) winter tires ?! When one has no money, he/she has NO MONEY. Where on earth can they find the extra storage space for the extra set of tires, unlike all those loaded people living in mega houses ?!
I too understand that the Accord doesn't have outstanding this and that. But if one has to worry so much about the fuel economy and gasoline bills, how on earth can they afford to buy a premium-priced FWD RLX with all the bells and whistles. When one has no money, they have to settle for something less. Everyone wants to get free lunches, but life doesn't work this way.
Besides, if one put fuel economy as top priority, they will never buy the big and heavy RLX in the 1st place. The huge size, the heavy curb weight, and the thirsty V6 are all working against good fuel economy.
So your logic is faulty.