Spied on the Street! 2018 Acura TLX (MMC)
#321
Burning Brakes
I can't speak for others but I'm feeling a brewing anger that they didn't seem to put any effort in from the sample pictures. I honestly believe they should stop the current design of the TLX completely - no fin on the back, no body kit, no new front grill. Start from scratch - sack the designer of the current tlx and their families, scorch the earth and start over. Putting a pretty bow on the elephant man isn't going to make him the prom queen. The list of grievances with the current TLX don't begin and end with the beak grill. The list is too extensive for an MMC. I understand it takes a few years to design a car from scratch but the writing has been on the wall far too long for an MMC.
Last edited by boe_d; 02-21-2017 at 05:09 PM.
#322
Banned
#323
Burning Brakes
Very rational, I saw a 2017 MDX and I really can't say I love it or even like it. The 2017 A4 lost points for motor trend car of the year due to bland exterior and cheapish interior. But it got points for driving dynamics and mechanics. Bet you the 2018 TLX will not be on that list based on info so far. Won't win for looks either...
The following users liked this post:
boe_d (02-21-2017)
#324
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes
on
526 Posts
Granted, styling is VERY subjective. A good non-Acura example is Lexus. Some people find the spindle grille attractive, while some find them very ugly.
However, the Q50 doesn't have the excellent 8AT from ZF.
Another comparo you can make is to another car in this class with 7-spd auto, the C450 AMG. The AMG is slightly lighter, and is rated at 362hp. With the help of its AWD system, it can do 0-60mph as fast as the Q50 RS. But after that, the Q50 RS is in a league of its own, as notable by the difference in 1/4 mile trap speeds - 108mph vs 112mph.
I can't speak for others but I'm feeling a brewing anger that they didn't seem to put any effort in from the sample pictures. I honestly believe they should stop the current design of the TLX completely - no fin on the back, no body kit, no new front grill. Start from scratch - sack the designer of the current tlx and their families, scorch the earth and start over. Putting a pretty bow on the elephant man isn't going to make him the prom queen. The list of grievances with the current TLX don't begin and end with the beak grill. The list is too extensive for an MMC. I understand it takes a few years to design a car from scratch but the writing has been on the wall far too long for an MMC.
"This may be one of the few times in recent memory Acura has delivered on all this talk of "athletic proportions", "Dynamic this and that". LOVE IT. good job Acura!"
"I completely agree. I give it a 9 out of 10 from a pure design perspective. I love the side and back profile, but still wish for a change to the grille in the front. I'm cool with the overall pentagonal shape...just wish they could tone down the chrome like on the NSX."
"Less is certainly more in my opinion... After 6 years of a very busy front and rear end (even after the MMC) a more toned down, conventional rear end is a welcome sight. Overall, I think they got it right. "
"Agreed. This car is drop dead gorgeous. Good job Acura keep it up!"
The problem is that when it comes to the production version, Acura toned it WAY down - much larger wheel gap, much smaller and less attractive looking rims, well placed chrome bits were gone, etc.
IMO, the concept was on the conservative side but in a good way. It's a timeless, inoffensive design that is quite pleasant on the eyes. The production version however is just too bland. It's not ugly, but it's very boring.
#325
The emblem is too big, like a clock around a rappers neck.
Other than that, it is a Honda, so we assume it will last longer and be more reliable.
Though it does not measure up in the "gotta have it" department.
Other than that, it is a Honda, so we assume it will last longer and be more reliable.
Though it does not measure up in the "gotta have it" department.
Last edited by nothome17; 02-21-2017 at 06:16 PM.
#326
Azine Jabroni
Right, and a new face doesn't change the blandness of the whole thing. I know it's an MMC, but the face is a step. Until we get the whole redesign, we don't know if it's a step in the right direction or not. The fully developed beak on the TLX fits the car it was on, this doesn't really fit at all.
#327
Burning Brakes
I thought I'd source my quotes -
"The tlx doesn't come close to the refined vibe offered by the BMW 3-seieries and the new Mercedes-Benz C-Class" "Combined with the schizophrenic dual-screen infotainment system and its anti-intuitive mix of hard and touch-screen controls, it adds up to a package that feels like it’s trying too hard to convince itself that it’s more than an Accord with a thicker, richer layer of frosting. Ultimately, Acura needs to step even further away from Honda by offering products that might compel buyers to shop Acura first and foremost, as it did in the brand’s heyday. If the TLX is the first step in that direction, it’s a baby step" Car and Driver 2014
" I’ll point out that wherever product planners wanted the TLX to land, in reality it’s handily outclassed by cars with more brand cachet like the Mercedes-Benz C300 (even with the I4 engine) and Lexus ES; in fact, for roughly the same money the Hyundai Genesis V6 absolutely runs luxury circles around the TLX." - Autoweek 2014
About the V6 " It uses an electronic shifter we first saw in the RLX, and it takes an eternity to engage drive, its shifts are clunky, and it's painfully slow to react to manual commands." Replacing the previous TL's sea of buttons is a touchscreen that works together with the Acura controller and a second screen. The multiple interfaces render the entire infotainment system confusing, made worse by illogical menus, inscrutable controls, and redundant displays. We suspect you'll get used to it over time, but the system is overly distracting and just a pain to use." - Road and Track 2014
"Styling was an especially sore point, as virtually every one of our editors expressed an indifferent opinion on the car's looks. One staffer, Dwight, noted that the TLX's appearance "does not create excitement," while another, Ben, called the vehicle's styling "lukewarm at best," noting in particular that the wheels on our Advance model looked "low-budget." Autotrader 2014
"The tlx doesn't come close to the refined vibe offered by the BMW 3-seieries and the new Mercedes-Benz C-Class" "Combined with the schizophrenic dual-screen infotainment system and its anti-intuitive mix of hard and touch-screen controls, it adds up to a package that feels like it’s trying too hard to convince itself that it’s more than an Accord with a thicker, richer layer of frosting. Ultimately, Acura needs to step even further away from Honda by offering products that might compel buyers to shop Acura first and foremost, as it did in the brand’s heyday. If the TLX is the first step in that direction, it’s a baby step" Car and Driver 2014
" I’ll point out that wherever product planners wanted the TLX to land, in reality it’s handily outclassed by cars with more brand cachet like the Mercedes-Benz C300 (even with the I4 engine) and Lexus ES; in fact, for roughly the same money the Hyundai Genesis V6 absolutely runs luxury circles around the TLX." - Autoweek 2014
About the V6 " It uses an electronic shifter we first saw in the RLX, and it takes an eternity to engage drive, its shifts are clunky, and it's painfully slow to react to manual commands." Replacing the previous TL's sea of buttons is a touchscreen that works together with the Acura controller and a second screen. The multiple interfaces render the entire infotainment system confusing, made worse by illogical menus, inscrutable controls, and redundant displays. We suspect you'll get used to it over time, but the system is overly distracting and just a pain to use." - Road and Track 2014
"Styling was an especially sore point, as virtually every one of our editors expressed an indifferent opinion on the car's looks. One staffer, Dwight, noted that the TLX's appearance "does not create excitement," while another, Ben, called the vehicle's styling "lukewarm at best," noting in particular that the wheels on our Advance model looked "low-budget." Autotrader 2014
#328
Around my neighborhood, there are quite a few 2017 MDX already. Gotta say they look a whole lot better in person than in pictures.
Granted, styling is VERY subjective. A good non-Acura example is Lexus. Some people find the spindle grille attractive, while some find them very ugly.
Granted, styling is VERY subjective. A good non-Acura example is Lexus. Some people find the spindle grille attractive, while some find them very ugly.
Right, and a new face doesn't change the blandness of the whole thing. I know it's an MMC, but the face is a step. Until we get the whole redesign, we don't know if it's a step in the right direction or not. The fully developed beak on the TLX fits the car it was on, this doesn't really fit at all.
I'm trying to reserve judgement for the MMC TLX until I see it in person but so far from the spy pics, it's much uglier than the current TLX. It's not quite original 4G TL ugly but close. Let's see if any of that changes once we get to really see the car. Something tells me it's not going to change until 2020, if even then.
#329
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,600 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
That said regardless of weight the 340 does very well overall in a run what you brung to the start line. Think we are getting close to a wrist slap for off topic.
Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 02-22-2017 at 09:30 AM.
#330
Burning Brakes
The 12.6 & 12.7 340 are AWD. 340 performance 6MT slowest, 8ZF middle & 8ZF-AWD quickest. Actual weight list by BMW in the specs is the base car in the series before options, only way to tell the true weight with options is track scales. Don't know how Infiniti lists theirs. Is RED a no option car?
That said regardless of weight the 340 does very well overall in a run what you brung to the start line. Think we are getting close to a wrist slap for off topic.
That said regardless of weight the 340 does very well overall in a run what you brung to the start line. Think we are getting close to a wrist slap for off topic.
#331
#332
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,600 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
Back to the paid advertisements. I think the Acura Transmission problems have run their course, seems like almost zero complaint traffic on the 2016/17. Expect some of the delays caused pressure on them to get the car launched & forced them to release one that was not fully baked. In hind sight it might have been better for them to take the heat about slipping release dates & waiting till the issues were killed.
#333
The accord hybrid is excellent. It both offers very good MPG (about 40 in LA- probably 46 in most of the rest of the country) and good acceleration - about 7.4s 0-60. If they tweaked it a bit to get 0-60 in 7.0 I'm sure we'd lose some MPG but it still would be great. They could get make a 400HP type S for people who really wanted to focus on horse power. Maybe have a giant 400HP logo on the sides and back to let people know since they'll never get to use that unless they get a trailer hitch.
#334
Racer
for those saying the longer Acura release info on the '18 TLX the more likely it'll get new powertrain, i don't agree. putting in a new motor on a Honda is huge news, i don't think even the usual tight lip Honda can seal this from the auto spies out there. so don't get your hopes up, it'll be just cosmetic changes. i'm doing anti-jinx here if you're not noticing LOL
#335
Moderator
for those saying the longer Acura release info on the '18 TLX the more likely it'll get new powertrain, i don't agree. putting in a new motor on a Honda is huge news, i don't think even the usual tight lip Honda can seal this from the auto spies out there. so don't get your hopes up, it'll be just cosmetic changes. i'm doing anti-jinx here if you're not noticing LOL
For reference the movie A Faster Horse (available on Netflix) is pretty interesting - they go from design to production for a new rollout of a Ford Mustang. Well worth the watch to get an understanding of the whole process.
Home A Faster Horse
The following 4 users liked this post by mapleloaf:
#337
I talked to the Service Advisor yesterday while getting my A1 done on my 2015 2.4L TLX. We got to talking about the MMC and he told me the Acura rep had recently come to the dealership
to discuss the updates. According to him, the round exhaust model is going to be the Type S; he said they are expanding the TLX line and that there will be a Type S this year.
I asked if that meant Twin Turbos, Sport Hybrid, etc. and he did not know the specs. He said mid-year should be the announcement. Take that for what it is, but I believe the Type S will
come to fruition this year for the TLX.
to discuss the updates. According to him, the round exhaust model is going to be the Type S; he said they are expanding the TLX line and that there will be a Type S this year.
I asked if that meant Twin Turbos, Sport Hybrid, etc. and he did not know the specs. He said mid-year should be the announcement. Take that for what it is, but I believe the Type S will
come to fruition this year for the TLX.
#338
Banned
I talked to the Service Advisor yesterday while getting my A1 done on my 2015 2.4L TLX. We got to talking about the MMC and he told me the Acura rep had recently come to the dealership
to discuss the updates. According to him, the round exhaust model is going to be the Type S; he said they are expanding the TLX line and that there will be a Type S this year.
to discuss the updates. According to him, the round exhaust model is going to be the Type S; he said they are expanding the TLX line and that there will be a Type S this year.
#339
Team Owner
I had a feeling it's coming. The question still remains as to what will be powering it.
While Acura won't sell a ton of Type Ss, simply due to price, I think it might have peoples eyes turning back to the brand again. More so than the NSX- don't get me wrong- the NSX is a nice car, but many people simply can't even aspire to get into one. It's beyond their means. A Type S is stretching their pockets a bit more, but much much much more attainable.
While Acura won't sell a ton of Type Ss, simply due to price, I think it might have peoples eyes turning back to the brand again. More so than the NSX- don't get me wrong- the NSX is a nice car, but many people simply can't even aspire to get into one. It's beyond their means. A Type S is stretching their pockets a bit more, but much much much more attainable.
#340
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,521
Received 846 Likes
on
526 Posts
If that's the case - that Type S is coming, the most likely engine is the 2.0T derived from the CTR. It's only a 2.0L 4-banger but it would still be way more powerful than any J series that Honda has. The front end should also a bit lighter with a smaller engine (despite being turbocharged).
#341
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
I am anxious to see what they FINAL design is. I would be willing to trade in for a TypeS if it's all that and a bag of chips without the trans jerky jerky. I personally want the double screen to go away or at least have the top screen Navigation only. It is just too much going on (Bring back all the fun buttons to push) and I often find myself looking back up repeatedly to check traffic because I can't remember the button functions.
If its what a type s should be I'll be all over it
If its what a type s should be I'll be all over it
#342
If that's the case - that Type S is coming, the most likely engine is the 2.0T derived from the CTR. It's only a 2.0L 4-banger but it would still be way more powerful than any J series that Honda has. The front end should also a bit lighter with a smaller engine (despite being turbocharged).
#343
Azine Jabroni
#344
Banned
#345
Azine Jabroni
#347
![facepalm](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/facepalm.gif)
#348
Azine Jabroni
The following users liked this post:
TacoBello (03-04-2017)
#349
I read that CTR with 2.0T can get 0-60 in about 5.7 seconds. Current TLX SHAWD with NA V6 has about same numbers. So same 2 liter turbo cannot get noticeable performance increase for heavier TLX. So why waste Type S brand for that product?
#350
#351
Azine Jabroni
The question is whether or not that 2.0T can make more horsepower when mated with a SH-AWD where power can be sent to the rear wheels. Also, need to consider torque.
#352
![Sad](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/sad.gif)
#353
Burning Brakes
But that hasn't been Acura's focus in many many years. They've stopped focusing on developing nice looking cars, with more engine options or current dash tech or even nicely finished interiors. They aren't worried about Audi or BMW offering better driving experiences and they aren't worried about them and Lexus and Mercedes offering a far more refined finish. They had other things in mind when they put together the TLX.
#354
Azine Jabroni
But that hasn't been Acura's focus in many many years. They've stopped focusing on developing nice looking cars, with more engine options or current dash tech or even nicely finished interiors. They aren't worried about Audi or BMW offering better driving experiences and they aren't worried about them and Lexus and Mercedes offering a far more refined finish. They had other things in mind when they put together the TLX.
The following users liked this post:
TacoBello (03-04-2017)
#356
Team Owner
You're looking at it wrong. The 2.0T in the CTR is currently tuned to live high in the rpm range, for track purposes. The CTR is made to be kept high in the rpm range, so low down power isn't as important. The TLX-S, I feel, would have a completely different tune on it. The beauty of turbo systems (regardless of what Saintor believes and ultimately talks smack about) is that all Honda has to do is retune the engine to give it the specs they'd like to see. Granted, there are physical limitations to what can be done, but I highly doubt Honda would keep the same CTR tune if the TLX-S came with that engine.
They would likely shoot for high torque early on, etc. To be able to blast off the line.
#357
Team Owner
But that hasn't been Acura's focus in many many years. They've stopped focusing on developing nice looking cars, with more engine options or current dash tech or even nicely finished interiors. They aren't worried about Audi or BMW offering better driving experiences and they aren't worried about them and Lexus and Mercedes offering a far more refined finish. They had other things in mind when they put together the TLX.
And in in my mind, there's nothing wrong with that. Lexus didnt get to where they are today, just overnight. They've been taking steps with every gen they release. They also cater to a different part of the market- while they have sport offerings, they've never been interested in taking up BMW real estate. They cater to the softer suspensions, luxurious side, more than the sport side. Acura needs to figure out where they want to be and how long it will take to get there, then develop a plan to get them there. Once again, Ikeda admitted they were a bit lost. But figuring it out.
#358
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,600 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
Think the real problem is every few years they think where they want to be then a few years later change their corporate mind. Zero continuity of focus generation to generation.
#359
You're looking at it wrong. The 2.0T in the CTR is currently tuned to live high in the rpm range, for track purposes. The CTR is made to be kept high in the rpm range, so low down power isn't as important. The TLX-S, I feel, would have a completely different tune on it. The beauty of turbo systems (regardless of what Saintor believes and ultimately talks smack about) is that all Honda has to do is retune the engine to give it the specs they'd like to see. Granted, there are physical limitations to what can be done, but I highly doubt Honda would keep the same CTR tune if the TLX-S came with that engine.
They would likely shoot for high torque early on, etc. To be able to blast off the line.
They would likely shoot for high torque early on, etc. To be able to blast off the line.