Some Oil reading misconceptions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2015 | 07:02 PM
  #1  
mylove4cars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 417
Likes: 78
Some Oil reading misconceptions.

I've noticed a large difference between hot and cold readings on Acura TL’s Gen 4 (SH-AWD) vehicles, up to 1/2 a quart difference between readings; cold in the morning and few Seconds after shutting a warm engine as per user manual.

Our dipsticks are calibrated for reading a few seconds after warm engine shutdown, when cold in the morning, reading can show up to a half quart low.

The reason behind this is the oil expansion factor, 4.5 QTY at 200 degree oil takes up more volume than 4.5 QTY at 40 degrees; which indeed can vary up to half a QTY.

Driving with too much oil in your engine is as bad as having to little.

Last edited by mylove4cars; May 3, 2015 at 07:12 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2015 | 09:47 AM
  #2  
hornedfrog's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 86
Likes: 6
From: Dallas, Tx
So on a fresh oil change, the dipstick should read half a qt low?
Reply
Old May 4, 2015 | 12:07 PM
  #3  
mylove4cars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 417
Likes: 78
Originally Posted by hornedfrog
So on a fresh oil change, the dipstick should read half a qt low?
Assume you change oil and filter. In the morning when the vehicle is cold (depending on the temperature IE. 40 degrees) the dipstick might read 1/4th to a half QTY low. Driving the car for 20 minutes and check the oil, the reading might indicate close to the upper mark on the dipstick.

In other words, some check there oil level in the morning when the engine is cold and think there nearly a half QTY low and decide to top it off adding half a QTY, you might be overfilling! Check your dipstick as the manual states.

Last edited by mylove4cars; May 4, 2015 at 12:10 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2015 | 03:10 PM
  #4  
ABDomega's Avatar
2011 SH-AWD 6MT
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 740
Likes: 51
From: Buffalo
It's true:

https://acurazine.com/forums/fourth-...ur-oil-927857/
Reply
Old May 4, 2015 | 03:23 PM
  #5  
mylove4cars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 417
Likes: 78
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by ABDomega
I looked at your post, unfortunately not to many paid attention; you would think with the many oil consumption problems and misconceptions you would have had more response.


Well the reason why is (Calibration, expansion, volume, temperature)
Reply
Old May 6, 2015 | 01:29 PM
  #6  
ABDomega's Avatar
2011 SH-AWD 6MT
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 740
Likes: 51
From: Buffalo
So true. In fact, after that thread I'm I don't think my car has an oil consumption issue.
Reply
Old May 6, 2015 | 10:14 PM
  #7  
Little Gator's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 14
I think there are two reasons to check the oil level.

1. to check the operating level (of course)
2. to check for oil consumption based on how the reading changes for one to the next.

When I do a typical oil change, or add oil, I follow it with a reading done per the manual (after shutting off) to make sure it is within proper range.

But, when I already know that the level is with range, but want to monitor oil consumption very closely to see if my TL has the start of the dreaded 1 quart or more oil use per 1000 miles, I check it cold. Like the next morning cold. I believe this gives a more accurate reading.
My thinking is;

1. I know my garage temperature does not vary 20 degrees all year. My garage temp. is more consistent than what my engine temp. is after a drive depending on how hard I just drove it on the highway in the Texas summer or went easy on it to the store.

2. It gives more then enough time for all the oil to drain into the pan.

3. It allows plenty of time for air bubbles to escape.

4. The room temp. (garage temp.) oil clings to the dipstick better because it is thicker, making it easier to see the level.
Reply
Old May 7, 2015 | 02:06 PM
  #8  
ABDomega's Avatar
2011 SH-AWD 6MT
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 740
Likes: 51
From: Buffalo
Originally Posted by Little Gator
I think there are two reasons to check the oil level.

1. to check the operating level (of course)
2. to check for oil consumption based on how the reading changes for one to the next.

When I do a typical oil change, or add oil, I follow it with a reading done per the manual (after shutting off) to make sure it is within proper range.

But, when I already know that the level is with range, but want to monitor oil consumption very closely to see if my TL has the start of the dreaded 1 quart or more oil use per 1000 miles, I check it cold. Like the next morning cold. I believe this gives a more accurate reading.
My thinking is;

1. I know my garage temperature does not vary 20 degrees all year. My garage temp. is more consistent than what my engine temp. is after a drive depending on how hard I just drove it on the highway in the Texas summer or went easy on it to the store.

2. It gives more then enough time for all the oil to drain into the pan.

3. It allows plenty of time for air bubbles to escape.

4. The room temp. (garage temp.) oil clings to the dipstick better because it is thicker, making it easier to see the level.
That's fine but keep in mind the above thermal expansion. If you top off the oil so that it's at the top of the hash marks when cold it will assuredly be above the hash marks while warm and possibly overfilled.

I happen to check my oil while cold just because it's more convenient to check it right before setting off in the morning. It's usually half way in the hash marks while cold which is enough room for expansion. Only if it's below that mark will I add oil.
Reply
Old May 7, 2015 | 07:54 PM
  #9  
hornedfrog's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 86
Likes: 6
From: Dallas, Tx
First picture, engine stone cold...been sitting for over 24hrs, 1400 miles since oil change. Second photo, 30mins after a 20 minute drive home.



Reply
Old May 7, 2015 | 09:11 PM
  #10  
Little Gator's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 14
hornedfrog's photo's also demonstrates how it is more difficult to see the oil level on the stick when hot, and very easy to see it when cold. Thanks for photos.

I believe a reading taken first thing in the morning cold, and then comparing it to another reading taken later also first thing in the morning cold, will give a more accurate indication of how much oil has been consumed opposed to comparing a hot reading to another hot reading.

Yes, I am splitting hairs here. But after hearing so many other Acura/Honda owners claiming their engines have never used ANY oil has made me wonder just how little is "ANY". Is it none whatsoever, or is it just not enough to measure from one reading to the next? That is why I have decided to scrutinize my oil level cold. It takes no more time & effort, just when to do it.
Reply
Old May 9, 2015 | 12:05 PM
  #11  
Little Gator's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 14
Here is photo taken of cold oil reading, 77 degrees in my garage 4 hours ago;


Here is photo taken 8 minutes after 24.6 mile drive;


Oil level dropped.
Reply
Old May 9, 2015 | 05:40 PM
  #12  
Edward'TLS's Avatar
6G TLX-S
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,227
Likes: 1,181
From: YVR
^^^^^

Hot engine oil has been splashed around all over inside the engine, and hasn't got a chance to settle back on to the bottom.
Reply
Old May 9, 2015 | 06:38 PM
  #13  
Little Gator's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 14
I have now given it a 6 hour "chance to settle back on to the bottom". The oil level reading is exactly the same as the post drive hot reading.

My real world experience for my car is not what the original poster has experienced. My photos show that my engine does not read 1/2 quart higher when hot. If anything, it drops, albeit, very slightly. This is despite ABDomega saying "it will assuredly be above the hash marks while warm and possibly overfilled". I don't have misconceptions, just photos.
Reply
Old May 9, 2015 | 09:00 PM
  #14  
mylove4cars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 417
Likes: 78
^^^^^
Differences are best observed, engine stone cold check, engine check 2 minutes after a 20 minutes or longer drive.

Cubic Expansion of Oil 100 liters - 0.1 m3 - of oil is heated from 20oC to 40oC

The volumetric expansion can be calculated using the following equation.

dV = (0.1 m3) (0.00070 1/oC) ((40 oC) - (20 oC))

= 0.0014 m3

= 1.4 liter

Result: Around .06% volume per degree Centigrade in your engine.
Reply
Old May 16, 2015 | 11:56 AM
  #15  
mylove4cars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 417
Likes: 78
Originally Posted by Edward'TLS
^^^^^

Hot engine oil has been splashed around all over inside the engine, and hasn't got a chance to settle back on to the bottom.
After shutting down a hot engine (about 20 Minutes drive) and waiting a couple of minutes before checking the dip-stick; the amount to settle back to the bottom is about 1/16Th of a QTY.

Nevertheless, by warming up a cold engine the oil expands at .06 % per centigrade, which makes much more volume than the 1/16Th that needs more time to settle back to the bottom.
Reply
Old May 17, 2015 | 08:44 AM
  #16  
Little Gator's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 14
Here some more photos.
80 degrees room temperature heated to 150 degrees.



Oil used for test.





Room temperature 80 degree start level.





Oil level after 70 degrees of heating up to 150 degrees.
Reply
Old May 17, 2015 | 06:54 PM
  #17  
mylove4cars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 417
Likes: 78
^^^^^^^
Well you’re pretty close; you’re showing an expansion around 40ml on an amount of 900ml. 4.5 QTY = 4286 ml which should add about 200ml, now add another 70 degrees Fahrenheit and your close to that Half a QTY or 0.6% per centigrade.

Reply
Old May 17, 2015 | 08:21 PM
  #18  
Little Gator's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 14
Using the coefficient of volume expansion of unused motor oil: .00039/F degree.


.00039/F x 70 (F deg. temp. rise) x 90 ml = 2.457 ml + 90 ml = 92.457 ml

And 92.5 ml (rounded off) is what my last photo shows. So my experiment confirms the expansion rate.

So oil does expand, and I have proved it to myself.
So why then do my hot & cold dipstick readings show almost no difference?

Last edited by Little Gator; May 17, 2015 at 08:24 PM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2015 | 09:23 PM
  #19  
mylove4cars's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 417
Likes: 78
Originally Posted by Little Gator
Using the coefficient of volume expansion of unused motor oil: .00039/F degree.


.00039/F x 70 (F deg. temp. rise) x 90 ml = 2.457 ml + 90 ml = 92.457 ml

And 92.5 ml (rounded off) is what my last photo shows. So my experiment confirms the expansion rate.

So oil does expand, and I have proved it to myself.
So why then do my hot & cold dipstick readings show almost no difference?
To have a better reading on the dipstick, try this, differences are best observed, engine stone cold check, engine check 2 minutes after a 20 minutes or longer drive. In all your posts providing measurements you did not do this. Hence, besides all the chemistry you provided hornedfrog, ABDomega and many others have performed this simple test, we all came to the same conclusion. Maybe like you so eloquently mentioned, I'm about misconceptions and you about pictures. Kidding
Reply
Old May 18, 2015 | 11:47 AM
  #20  
JM2010 SH-AWD's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 571
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by Little Gator
Using the coefficient of volume expansion of unused motor oil: .00039/F degree.


.00039/F x 70 (F deg. temp. rise) x 90 ml = 2.457 ml + 90 ml = 92.457 ml

And 92.5 ml (rounded off) is what my last photo shows. So my experiment confirms the expansion rate.

So oil does expand, and I have proved it to myself.
So why then do my hot & cold dipstick readings show almost no difference?
Perhaps the heat expansion is offset by the fact that when the motor is still warm, all the oil has not flowed back to the pan?
Reply
Old May 19, 2015 | 06:21 AM
  #21  
rbailey86's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
doing my first oil change on the 08 TL today.


when replacing filter what is the exact amount i should put in, ive read 4.5-5


thanks
Reply
Old May 19, 2015 | 06:23 AM
  #22  
rbailey86's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
disregard^ im on wrong subforum
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mada51589
3G TL Problems & Fixes
80
Jan 9, 2025 04:40 PM
merc009
3G TL (2004-2008)
11
Jan 27, 2016 10:34 AM
thegipper
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
Oct 21, 2015 07:19 AM
Frathora
4G TL (2009-2014)
23
Sep 28, 2015 11:29 PM
asahrts
Member Cars for Sale
0
Sep 4, 2015 05:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.