My 5AT is FuuuuKD!
#1
My 5AT is FuuuuKD!
After reading alot on ATF's I decided to go with the Redline D4. My car is an 04 Base with 167k and after doing the last 3x3 the tranny is shifting hard and holding gears too long. IDK if it has to do with the D4 or the fact that I just did a full exhaust HFPC's, Jpipe, and Catback.
My question is, does anyone know if it's worth having these transmissions rebuilt, can they be rebuilt, or should I look for a used one?
Thanks
My question is, does anyone know if it's worth having these transmissions rebuilt, can they be rebuilt, or should I look for a used one?
Thanks
#3
Very curious to hear what's said for this one....I have virtually the same car, mileage and all. My tranny isn't holding too long, but it's shifting a little hard in my opinion.
#4
Senior Moderator
I can spot 2 potential issues:
1. With that high mileage and running the old fluid for so long, it's very possible that some debris (after the flush) is clogging a sensor or the pressure switches and causing an issue. A pressure switch change might fix it.
2. The 3x3 is your problem. The 3x3 changes out ALL of the fluid in the transmission. I've said this before, with high miles on a car you should NEVER do the 3x3 in a short period of time. The best thing to do is change it out once (1x3) and wait at LEAST a week or 100+ miles of driving to see how the transmission reacts. If the old fluid was in use for too long, then what happens is that the clutches inside start wearing down and putting microscopic pieces of clutch material in the fluid. As it keeps on happening the clutches wear more and more and the only thing keeping it running is the clutch material in the fluid. When you take out that fluid then the old worn clutches cannot mate with one another and thus the trans starts slipping or worse.
The following users liked this post:
P1zzaman (08-09-2011)
#5
fixed it.
I can spot 2 potential issues:
1. With that high mileage and running the old fluid for so long, it's very possible that some debris (after the flush) is clogging a sensor or the pressure switches and causing an issue. A pressure switch change might fix it.
2. The 3x3 is your problem. The 3x3 changes out ALL of the fluid in the transmission. I've said this before, with high miles on a car you should NEVER do the 3x3 in a short period of time. The best thing to do is change it out once (1x3) and wait at LEAST a week or 100+ miles of driving to see how the transmission reacts. If the old fluid was in use for too long, then what happens is that the clutches inside start wearing down and putting microscopic pieces of clutch material in the fluid. As it keeps on happening the clutches wear more and more and the only thing keeping it running is the clutch material in the fluid. When you take out that fluid then the old worn clutches cannot mate with one another and thus the trans starts slipping or worse.
I can spot 2 potential issues:
1. With that high mileage and running the old fluid for so long, it's very possible that some debris (after the flush) is clogging a sensor or the pressure switches and causing an issue. A pressure switch change might fix it.
2. The 3x3 is your problem. The 3x3 changes out ALL of the fluid in the transmission. I've said this before, with high miles on a car you should NEVER do the 3x3 in a short period of time. The best thing to do is change it out once (1x3) and wait at LEAST a week or 100+ miles of driving to see how the transmission reacts. If the old fluid was in use for too long, then what happens is that the clutches inside start wearing down and putting microscopic pieces of clutch material in the fluid. As it keeps on happening the clutches wear more and more and the only thing keeping it running is the clutch material in the fluid. When you take out that fluid then the old worn clutches cannot mate with one another and thus the trans starts slipping or worse.
Anyway, I am aware of the potential for problems when changing ATF with high mileage, and I actually did put a couple hundred miles between changes. So far the tranny is not slipping, just holding gears and hard shifts, (intermitent). It would be good if it is just some dirt caught in a valve body, but who knows. Any thoughts on having these trans. rebuilt?
Thanks
#7
Team Owner
Csmeance nailed it. It's probably a stuck valve or plugged switch/sensor/orifice. If you can find a shop that does actual diagnostics instead of replacing the whole trans at the first sign of trouble, you might be able to save it. Holding the gears and shifting hard won't wear it out, it's just uncomfortable for you. Bring line pressure way up to see if you can free it. This means going full throttle at least through 3rd gear a few times.
Trending Topics
#8
The sad thing is, they're not that weak, not when it comes to clutch holding power. It was when I saw one torn down on the bench that I started searching for the real cause of the failures. The 3rd gear clutch pack is no worse than any other trans, it's the electronics and OEM fluid that make them fail. The transmission itself is not bad mechanically.
Csmeance nailed it. It's probably a stuck valve or plugged switch/sensor/orifice. If you can find a shop that does actual diagnostics instead of replacing the whole trans at the first sign of trouble, you might be able to save it. Holding the gears and shifting hard won't wear it out, it's just uncomfortable for you. Bring line pressure way up to see if you can free it. This means going full throttle at least through 3rd gear a few times.
Csmeance nailed it. It's probably a stuck valve or plugged switch/sensor/orifice. If you can find a shop that does actual diagnostics instead of replacing the whole trans at the first sign of trouble, you might be able to save it. Holding the gears and shifting hard won't wear it out, it's just uncomfortable for you. Bring line pressure way up to see if you can free it. This means going full throttle at least through 3rd gear a few times.
Thanks for the reply
#10
Team Owner
They really aren't bad at all. It's just the electronics that cause them to fail. I've seen them torn apart. There's plenty of clutch holding area for all gears, the trans isn't particularly undersized for the power and weight of the car. Take a look at Bert's 400whp/400wtq 100,000 mile plus original transmission. He replaced the switches and runs a Type-F fluid and it's worked flawlessly for 120,000 miles now with over 400hp at the wheels. If there were any inherent mechanical issues they would've showed up. All you have to do is replace the switches every couple years and use the Type F fluid and you will not have a failure. I have to wonder if these switches are not designed to cause the transmission failure at certain intervals. Think about it, if you wanted the trans to fail in a certain time period, electronics would be the way to do it since you have more control over when they fail. If I know what the problem is, Honda has to know but they do nothing about it and the techs are still clueless to the switch fix even though the rest of the trans rebuilding world knows about it.
FWIW, I did mine about 2 years ago and the shifts are just starting to get a little sloppy again. Getting ready to do the switches for the second time.
FWIW, I did mine about 2 years ago and the shifts are just starting to get a little sloppy again. Getting ready to do the switches for the second time.
#11
Being an Acha Bacha in
iTrader: (2)
They really aren't bad at all. It's just the electronics that cause them to fail. I've seen them torn apart. There's plenty of clutch holding area for all gears, the trans isn't particularly undersized for the power and weight of the car. Take a look at Bert's 400whp/400wtq 100,000 mile plus original transmission. He replaced the switches and runs a Type-F fluid and it's worked flawlessly for 120,000 miles now with over 400hp at the wheels. If there were any inherent mechanical issues they would've showed up. All you have to do is replace the switches every couple years and use the Type F fluid and you will not have a failure. I have to wonder if these switches are not designed to cause the transmission failure at certain intervals. Think about it, if you wanted the trans to fail in a certain time period, electronics would be the way to do it since you have more control over when they fail. If I know what the problem is, Honda has to know but they do nothing about it and the techs are still clueless to the switch fix even though the rest of the trans rebuilding world knows about it.
FWIW, I did mine about 2 years ago and the shifts are just starting to get a little sloppy again. Getting ready to do the switches for the second time.
FWIW, I did mine about 2 years ago and the shifts are just starting to get a little sloppy again. Getting ready to do the switches for the second time.
Well... I will be heeding your advice when I get my new transmission replaced in a few weeks since mine is fucked too. And this time I will change the switches much earlier and more frequent and hope that it lasts longer.
I think I have to change my tie rods as well... take a look at the new video I posted in my other thread and lmk your thoughts..
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#12
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-2004-2008-93/trans-fluid-question-827890/
Read post number 3.
Why did you not heed my advice?
EDIT: Nevermind you did. You sure it was a few hundred miles between each flush? You sure drive a lot.
Read post number 3.
EDIT: Nevermind you did. You sure it was a few hundred miles between each flush? You sure drive a lot.
Last edited by P1zzaman; 08-09-2011 at 01:02 AM.
#13
They really aren't bad at all. It's just the electronics that cause them to fail. I've seen them torn apart. There's plenty of clutch holding area for all gears, the trans isn't particularly undersized for the power and weight of the car. Take a look at Bert's 400whp/400wtq 100,000 mile plus original transmission. He replaced the switches and runs a Type-F fluid and it's worked flawlessly for 120,000 miles now with over 400hp at the wheels. If there were any inherent mechanical issues they would've showed up. All you have to do is replace the switches every couple years and use the Type F fluid and you will not have a failure. I have to wonder if these switches are not designed to cause the transmission failure at certain intervals. Think about it, if you wanted the trans to fail in a certain time period, electronics would be the way to do it since you have more control over when they fail. If I know what the problem is, Honda has to know but they do nothing about it and the techs are still clueless to the switch fix even though the rest of the trans rebuilding world knows about it.
FWIW, I did mine about 2 years ago and the shifts are just starting to get a little sloppy again. Getting ready to do the switches for the second time.
FWIW, I did mine about 2 years ago and the shifts are just starting to get a little sloppy again. Getting ready to do the switches for the second time.
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=827890
Read post number 3.
Why did you not heed my advice?
EDIT: Nevermind you did. You sure it was a few hundred miles between each flush? You sure drive a lot.
Read post number 3.
Why did you not heed my advice?
EDIT: Nevermind you did. You sure it was a few hundred miles between each flush? You sure drive a lot.
I think the fact that I drive the car pretty hard is adding to the problem.
#14
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
I have to say, I'm not too familiar with Auto's. The last tranny I rebuilt was a Muncie M21 that needed syncros(a few years back). I know that there is no pan to drop on the TL tranny so I imagine doing switches is a pretty big project?
Yeah, I do about 125-140 a day, damn sales job. But at the very least I had 180-225 between changes.
I think the fact that I drive the car pretty hard is adding to the problem.
Yeah, I do about 125-140 a day, damn sales job. But at the very least I had 180-225 between changes.
I think the fact that I drive the car pretty hard is adding to the problem.
#15
Team Owner
I have to say, I'm not too familiar with Auto's. The last tranny I rebuilt was a Muncie M21 that needed syncros(a few years back). I know that there is no pan to drop on the TL tranny so I imagine doing switches is a pretty big project?
Yeah, I do about 125-140 a day, damn sales job. But at the very least I had 180-225 between changes.
I think the fact that I drive the car pretty hard is adding to the problem.
Yeah, I do about 125-140 a day, damn sales job. But at the very least I had 180-225 between changes.
I think the fact that I drive the car pretty hard is adding to the problem.
#16
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
dude....dude....dude....
2 things....
1> switches....cant go wrong with them
2> interval between drain and refills....u cant just dump brand new fluid into a 167K old tranny and expect it to be ok....I had an interval of 1000 miles between drain and refills....i started off at:
147K with engine oil and transmission drain and refill...
148K with transmission drain and refill
149K with transmission drain and refill
150K with engine oil and transmission drain and refill...
so i switched my tranny and engine oil over 3K miles....so if you see anything going wrong you can switch back.....
now I would suggest doing the switches before you do anything else....see how they work and try switching to Stock/Type F slowly....
2 things....
1> switches....cant go wrong with them
2> interval between drain and refills....u cant just dump brand new fluid into a 167K old tranny and expect it to be ok....I had an interval of 1000 miles between drain and refills....i started off at:
147K with engine oil and transmission drain and refill...
148K with transmission drain and refill
149K with transmission drain and refill
150K with engine oil and transmission drain and refill...
so i switched my tranny and engine oil over 3K miles....so if you see anything going wrong you can switch back.....
now I would suggest doing the switches before you do anything else....see how they work and try switching to Stock/Type F slowly....
Last edited by swoosh; 08-09-2011 at 02:04 PM.
#17
dude....dude....dude....
2 things....
1> switches....cant go wrong with them
2> interval between drain and refills....u cant just dump brand new fluid into a 167K old tranny and expect it to be ok....I had an interval of 1000 miles between drain and refills....i started off at:
147K with engine oil and transmission drain and refill...
148K with transmission drain and refill
149K with transmission drain and refill
150K with engine oil and transmission drain and refill...
so i switched my tranny and engine oil over 3K miles....so if you see anything going wrong you can switch back.....
now I would suggest doing the switches before you do anything else....see how they work and try switching to Stock/Type F slowly....
2 things....
1> switches....cant go wrong with them
2> interval between drain and refills....u cant just dump brand new fluid into a 167K old tranny and expect it to be ok....I had an interval of 1000 miles between drain and refills....i started off at:
147K with engine oil and transmission drain and refill...
148K with transmission drain and refill
149K with transmission drain and refill
150K with engine oil and transmission drain and refill...
so i switched my tranny and engine oil over 3K miles....so if you see anything going wrong you can switch back.....
now I would suggest doing the switches before you do anything else....see how they work and try switching to Stock/Type F slowly....
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
#18
9 mpg.
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sometimes here, sometimes there.
Age: 32
Posts: 1,628
Received 306 Likes
on
249 Posts
Don't go back to the stock Z1 ATF. It's garbage. Change your 3rd/4th gear pressure switches asap. See how it feels afterwards. If it was me, I'd replace the switches and do a single drain and fill of Redline Type-F ATF.
#20
Have you replaced your motor mounts? Specifically the Front and Side.
Last edited by SpiderX1016; 08-09-2011 at 05:26 PM.
#21
I have car ADD
iTrader: (6)
Honda Auto transmissions were garbage... until the 2G CL/TL & 6G Accord era...
after that, Honda put a lot of R&D into their transmissions, and the longevity behind them. the first few 3Gs (1st half of production year 2004), also had a lot of problems with them.
the 2007+/4G/MDX/RL transmission is practically bullet proof. engineered ingeniously.
don't forget, honda caught A LOT of bad press about this, spend millions in class action suits, and still have to honor replacing transmissions on some of the 2G CL/TL line up.
I happen to have an 03 CL-S.. and even though it had the recall and cooling jets installed when it was young (about 14k) I can still feel when i drive it, that its on borrowed time (cas has 82k now)
The new 07-11 5AT TLs, the transmissions feel awkward. a little harsh, stammers on down shifts and isnt very smooth... because its designed that way. My 2G CL transmission drives worlds smoother at low speeds/stop and go
my
after that, Honda put a lot of R&D into their transmissions, and the longevity behind them. the first few 3Gs (1st half of production year 2004), also had a lot of problems with them.
the 2007+/4G/MDX/RL transmission is practically bullet proof. engineered ingeniously.
don't forget, honda caught A LOT of bad press about this, spend millions in class action suits, and still have to honor replacing transmissions on some of the 2G CL/TL line up.
I happen to have an 03 CL-S.. and even though it had the recall and cooling jets installed when it was young (about 14k) I can still feel when i drive it, that its on borrowed time (cas has 82k now)
The new 07-11 5AT TLs, the transmissions feel awkward. a little harsh, stammers on down shifts and isnt very smooth... because its designed that way. My 2G CL transmission drives worlds smoother at low speeds/stop and go
my
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#22
10th Gear
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Flint, Texas
Age: 51
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am really interested to see if the switches fix yours. I am going to do the 3 switches (74,000 07 TLS) and 3x3 on ours next week. It always makes me nervous reading others mishaps after the change.
#23
Team Owner
Honda Auto transmissions were garbage... until the 2G CL/TL & 6G Accord era...
after that, Honda put a lot of R&D into their transmissions, and the longevity behind them. the first few 3Gs (1st half of production year 2004), also had a lot of problems with them.
the 2007+/4G/MDX/RL transmission is practically bullet proof. engineered ingeniously.
don't forget, honda caught A LOT of bad press about this, spend millions in class action suits, and still have to honor replacing transmissions on some of the 2G CL/TL line up.
I happen to have an 03 CL-S.. and even though it had the recall and cooling jets installed when it was young (about 14k) I can still feel when i drive it, that its on borrowed time (cas has 82k now)
The new 07-11 5AT TLs, the transmissions feel awkward. a little harsh, stammers on down shifts and isnt very smooth... because its designed that way. My 2G CL transmission drives worlds smoother at low speeds/stop and go
my![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
after that, Honda put a lot of R&D into their transmissions, and the longevity behind them. the first few 3Gs (1st half of production year 2004), also had a lot of problems with them.
the 2007+/4G/MDX/RL transmission is practically bullet proof. engineered ingeniously.
don't forget, honda caught A LOT of bad press about this, spend millions in class action suits, and still have to honor replacing transmissions on some of the 2G CL/TL line up.
I happen to have an 03 CL-S.. and even though it had the recall and cooling jets installed when it was young (about 14k) I can still feel when i drive it, that its on borrowed time (cas has 82k now)
The new 07-11 5AT TLs, the transmissions feel awkward. a little harsh, stammers on down shifts and isnt very smooth... because its designed that way. My 2G CL transmission drives worlds smoother at low speeds/stop and go
my
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
'04 and earlier had lubrication problems along with pressure switch problems. Halfway through '04 the lube problems were cured but the pressure switch problem has yet to be cured. I read the whole NHTSA report on the failures and it was comical how they were blaming everything but the real cause for the 3rd gear clutch failures. Incorrect surface finish on the 3rd steels, bad pistons, etc. WTF is wrong with these people that they do a 1,000 page report and incorrectly diagnosed the problem.
That "borrowed time" you think the '03 is on is pressure switches. Replace them and use a DexIII or Type F fluid and I guarantee it will shift better than the day you bought it. The problem is, you have to do the switches before they cause a complete failure so time is of the essence. Just humor me and give it a try. I'll seriously paypal you $20 if it doesn't make it feel like a new trans.
#24
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
and i would do a 3x3 slowly...assuming something happened in your tranny case and a flush would take those shavings out....
true and hence I would say when doing a 3x3 into a different fluid take your sweet time....i would recommend an interval of 1K mile between drain and refill if switching to a different fluid....and you have almost half the miles of the OP...
#25
switches shouldnt be too bad....$80 for both 3rd and 4th...now if you have a 07+ then those have two 3rd and one 4th so it would be like 120ish...
and i would do a 3x3 slowly...assuming something happened in your tranny case and a flush would take those shavings out....
what do engine mounts have to do with this ? can you please elaborate your point of view ?...
true and hence I would say when doing a 3x3 into a different fluid take your sweet time....i would recommend an interval of 1K mile between drain and refill if switching to a different fluid....and you have almost half the miles of the OP...
and i would do a 3x3 slowly...assuming something happened in your tranny case and a flush would take those shavings out....
what do engine mounts have to do with this ? can you please elaborate your point of view ?...
true and hence I would say when doing a 3x3 into a different fluid take your sweet time....i would recommend an interval of 1K mile between drain and refill if switching to a different fluid....and you have almost half the miles of the OP...
I have about the same mileage and i'm having some kicks....would a drain and refill (considering Redline) and fixing those pressure switches help? Not 100% sure if the previous owner ever serviced the tranny (I'm sure i can find out) and I've heard some horror stories about changing it if it's never been done...
#27
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes
on
4,064 Posts
^^^ I agree with him....
First switch the pressure switches and then bring the redline in SLOWLY....do a drain and refill every 1000miles until you have done it 3 or 4 times. (I did 4 since the case came with 12 quarts, those extra 3 quarts are better off sitting in the tranny then in the garage) LOL
First switch the pressure switches and then bring the redline in SLOWLY....do a drain and refill every 1000miles until you have done it 3 or 4 times. (I did 4 since the case came with 12 quarts, those extra 3 quarts are better off sitting in the tranny then in the garage) LOL
#29
10th Gear
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Flint, Texas
Age: 51
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't worry I have 10q of the D4 on the way as well, its got to be better than factory or doing nothing.
#30
Team Owner
The majority have been going with Type F for a couple years. I've been on it for at least that long. Got a good 30,000 miles on it now. I think Inaccurate and Bert have been on it even longer. Both are good fluids but Type F should result in longer life. The catch is new pressure switches are more important with the Type F. With new switches and Type F you'll have amazing shift quality and very quick shifts. With Type F and old switches it can make harsh shifts even harsher.
#31
The majority have been going with Type F for a couple years. I've been on it for at least that long. Got a good 30,000 miles on it now. I think Inaccurate and Bert have been on it even longer. Both are good fluids but Type F should result in longer life. The catch is new pressure switches are more important with the Type F. With new switches and Type F you'll have amazing shift quality and ver withy quick shifts. With Type F and old switches it can make harsh shifts even harsher.
#33
Team Owner
Since D4 is a good fluid, I would do switches first. These have to be done regardless of what fluid is in there. In some cases, doing the Type F fluid with old switches can cause harsh shifts so that's another reason to do the switches now. Later, you can try a 1x3 of the Type F to see how you like it. Doing both will ensure a VERY long trans life.
The following users liked this post:
TLove It! (08-11-2011)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vpasla1
3G TL (2004-2008)
6
09-17-2016 07:24 PM
mrkingstonvi
Member Cars for Sale
2
02-22-2016 01:53 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
79
10-14-2015 08:47 AM