My dyno run :)
10-09-2012, 12:06 PM
#1
My dyno run :)
uncorrected first run 279 whp with 235wtq
uncorrected 2e run 280 whp with 236wtq
corrected 2e run 266 whp with 223wtq
http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0517.jpg
http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0516.jpg
http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0515.jpg
http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0509.jpg
uncorrected 2e run 280 whp with 236wtq
corrected 2e run 266 whp with 223wtq
http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0517.jpg
http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0516.jpg
http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0515.jpg
http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0509.jpg
10-09-2012, 12:19 PM
#5
Some decent numbers.
The following users liked this post:
hondazex (10-09-2012)
10-09-2012, 06:12 PM
#7
All motor
Pretty good numbers Zex. I'm a little surprised at the SAE numbers though, since you're a Type S. I put down very similar numbers in both hp & tq from my 3.0, also SAE corrected on a Dynojet. I do have more mods, but I thought you would be more in the 285/250 range. Any new track times? Didn't you trap 103 last time? That shows you are putting the power down pretty well. What wheels were your slicks on and what was the tire size?
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (10-10-2012)
Trending Topics
10-09-2012, 06:32 PM
#8
Pretty good numbers Zex. I'm a little surprised at the SAE numbers though, since you're a Type S. I put down very similar numbers in both hp & tq from my 3.0, also SAE corrected on a Dynojet. I do have more mods, but I thought you would be more in the 285/250 range. Any new track times? Didn't you trap 103 last time? That shows you are putting the power down pretty well. What wheels were your slicks on and what was the tire size?
10-10-2012, 10:50 AM
#12
All motor
^ True but you're on a Mustang dyno.
Zex you are still on the stock exhaust, correct? You should've disconnected the exhaust @ the Jpipe during one of these runs. Probably would've given you a good idea on how the car would perform with a catback. Being that the exhaust is your bottleneck, I'd assume you would've put down ~280/240 with the catback disconnected.
Zex you are still on the stock exhaust, correct? You should've disconnected the exhaust @ the Jpipe during one of these runs. Probably would've given you a good idea on how the car would perform with a catback. Being that the exhaust is your bottleneck, I'd assume you would've put down ~280/240 with the catback disconnected.
The following users liked this post:
kingkong_dav (10-10-2012)
10-10-2012, 11:43 AM
#14
All motor
If you did pulls on a Dynojet with the same CF you can. SAE to SAE or STD to STD you can compare. What were your numbers? I didn't see them with your recent setup.
10-10-2012, 08:10 PM
#16
^ True but you're on a Mustang dyno.
Zex you are still on the stock exhaust, correct? You should've disconnected the exhaust @ the Jpipe during one of these runs. Probably would've given you a good idea on how the car would perform with a catback. Being that the exhaust is your bottleneck, I'd assume you would've put down ~280/240 with the catback disconnected.
Zex you are still on the stock exhaust, correct? You should've disconnected the exhaust @ the Jpipe during one of these runs. Probably would've given you a good idea on how the car would perform with a catback. Being that the exhaust is your bottleneck, I'd assume you would've put down ~280/240 with the catback disconnected.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SinCityTLX
5G TLX (2015-2020)
20
10-07-2015 01:24 PM
