uncorrected first run 279 whp with 235wtq
uncorrected 2e run 280 whp with 236wtq
corrected 2e run 266 whp with 223wtq

http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0517.jpg


http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0516.jpg


http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0515.jpg

http://i757.photobucket.com/albums/x...r/DSC_0509.jpg

 

not bad considering my base 6MT are near your numbers with similar mods!

the uncorrected one would be cool to boast tho!

 

not bad OP

makes me want to get mines dyno

 

same dyno against domgsr !!

http://s757.photobucket.com/albums/x...t=MOV_0511.mp4

vid !! first run

 

Some decent numbers.

 

You could have asked the owner to put our runs on the same sheet for comparison... I'll ask him when i'll get back there

 

Pretty good numbers Zex. I'm a little surprised at the SAE numbers though, since you're a Type S. I put down very similar numbers in both hp & tq from my 3.0, also SAE corrected on a Dynojet. I do have more mods, but I thought you would be more in the 285/250 range. Any new track times? Didn't you trap 103 last time? That shows you are putting the power down pretty well. What wheels were your slicks on and what was the tire size?

 

Yes, the torque seems low for a 3.5 vs your 3.0. I got 245 on the same dyno with similar whp, too bad he has not paid for the wideband option, maybe we could have seen something from the AFR...

 

s2000 rear wheel little polish inner for caliper brembo pass with mt et street 26x10.5x16 !! 102 mph and not no update track time .!!! and yes i paid for wideband and my wtq is at 6.233 rpm not the max tq !!!

 

first link saw AFR !!

 

Looks about right to me considering I put down 265 on a mustang dyno with HFPC's/j-pipe/atlp quads/aem v2

Not a bad 1/4 time, too.

 

^ True but you're on a Mustang dyno.

Zex you are still on the stock exhaust, correct? You should've disconnected the exhaust @ the Jpipe during one of these runs. Probably would've given you a good idea on how the car would perform with a catback. Being that the exhaust is your bottleneck, I'd assume you would've put down ~280/240 with the catback disconnected.

 

^i know we cant compare dyno vs dyno
but it gives me hope to see that my numbers ARE RIGHT UNDER NEATH HIS!!!!

 

If you did pulls on a Dynojet with the same CF you can. SAE to SAE or STD to STD you can compare. What were your numbers? I didn't see them with your recent setup.

 

yes sonnick true dual comming soon 2 1/4 to stock muffler and i redyno with muffler and without !!

 

Mustang dyno is the most accurate.