Comptech Supercharger Front Mount IC Air to Air Design...
#241
What was the deal in the Citizen's bank parking lot next to Discount tire in Concord. Looked like you were buying or selling an evo (switching plates)? I noticed as me and the family were leaving Steak and Shake...
#242
Originally Posted by Atrain
06WDP-TL,
This is just not so. A twin screw blower has an efficiency range like any compressor. The Lysholm and AutoRotor superchargers typically has an internal compression ratio of 1.35.
Twin screw designs by nature produce the hottest discharge temperatures at low boost and rpm levels. This is due to their internal compression of the air charge between the augers and screws. This means that the blower is compressing air even when it does not need to.
Squeezing and compressing the air and super heating it. Adiabatic efficiency at 2 psi is 30%. At 4-psi it is in the 40's. Peak adiabatic efficiency is 65% at 15-16 psi.
By comparison the Eaton M62 and Eaton M90 hybrid roots superchargers have a peak adiabatic efficiency of 65% at 4 psi. Most stock street cars cannot handle lots of boost since the engines aren't set-up for it. This makes the Eaton an easy choice plus the longevity of the Eaton is the best out there.
When used properly (read: not overspun) they go 100,000 miles without even checking their oil. Just look at all the GM and Ford guys running them. I have 50k on my M90 with 10-psi of boost. This is not to say they don't have problems from time to time, it's just when you look at OEM blowers that Ford and GM use...I don't see any Vortech or Paxtons under the hood.
Eaton even offers a new TVS twin screw supercharger for racing applications. This blower has been in the works for years and was tested on cars like the Terminator Cobra.
If you decide you want to run 15 psi or more, then a twin screw supercharger is the best choice if you want a P/D blower. If you think a twin screw is the most efficienct blower out there, you are wrong.
A-Train
This is just not so. A twin screw blower has an efficiency range like any compressor. The Lysholm and AutoRotor superchargers typically has an internal compression ratio of 1.35.
Twin screw designs by nature produce the hottest discharge temperatures at low boost and rpm levels. This is due to their internal compression of the air charge between the augers and screws. This means that the blower is compressing air even when it does not need to.
Squeezing and compressing the air and super heating it. Adiabatic efficiency at 2 psi is 30%. At 4-psi it is in the 40's. Peak adiabatic efficiency is 65% at 15-16 psi.
By comparison the Eaton M62 and Eaton M90 hybrid roots superchargers have a peak adiabatic efficiency of 65% at 4 psi. Most stock street cars cannot handle lots of boost since the engines aren't set-up for it. This makes the Eaton an easy choice plus the longevity of the Eaton is the best out there.
When used properly (read: not overspun) they go 100,000 miles without even checking their oil. Just look at all the GM and Ford guys running them. I have 50k on my M90 with 10-psi of boost. This is not to say they don't have problems from time to time, it's just when you look at OEM blowers that Ford and GM use...I don't see any Vortech or Paxtons under the hood.
Eaton even offers a new TVS twin screw supercharger for racing applications. This blower has been in the works for years and was tested on cars like the Terminator Cobra.
If you decide you want to run 15 psi or more, then a twin screw supercharger is the best choice if you want a P/D blower. If you think a twin screw is the most efficienct blower out there, you are wrong.
A-Train
As for screws vs. roots, screw-type is pretty much an upgraded roots. Roots will pretty always have hotter discharge temps compared to a Screw-type. A twin-screw design that compresses air unlike Roots type superchargers which pump the air into the motor. Screw type superchargers have an axial-flow design that compresses the air as it moves between the screws to create positive pressure without creating the heat that Roots type superchargers can create.
As for reliability, i'd say the twin-screw is just as reliable as the roots, if not better. Unlike a roots supercharger, the rotors in a twin screw supercharger do not actually touch, so there are virtually no wearing parts. For this reason, twin-screw compressors are commonly used to pressurize cabins in passenger aircraft. Like roots superchargers, twin screw s/c's are self lubricated and do not tap into the engine's oil supply.
But you're at least right about one thing, the twin-screw is compressing air even when it is not sending boost to the engine (i.e. under cruising or deceleration), but thats why theres a bypass valve to release the pressurized air.
I'll take a twin-screw over a roots whenever possible, thank you.
#244
Originally Posted by Meek32v6
Whats the diameter on your piping?
it's looks fairly large for your setup
it's looks fairly large for your setup
#245
Originally Posted by ndabunka
What was the deal in the Citizen's bank parking lot next to Discount tire in Concord. Looked like you were buying or selling an evo (switching plates)? I noticed as me and the family were leaving Steak and Shake...
#246
Originally Posted by 06WDP-TL
Back on the subject, i cant help but still point out how there are going to be VERY SHARP bends in the piping.
One thing i like in this project is the NASA-grade thermal foil!
One thing i like in this project is the NASA-grade thermal foil!
#247
Well I believe you have fallen to the internet rederick...
If you check, roots blowers on the 3-valve mustangs are the worst performing type, pound for pound of boost.
Twin screw blowers are just as I said, efficient at high blower rpms with high boost levels. At low boost levels they are terrible. I realize a bypass valve is there, it's built into most late model Eaton superchargers as well.
I have tested a KB supercharged T-Bird with 9-psi on the track at Englishtown. I datalogged the PCM and monitored the ACT's after the intercooler (air-to-water). Suprise...suprise the 1.7L twin screw blower with an intercooler produced 180 degree discharge temps at WOT in 11 seconds. Meanwhile, my Eaton M90S with 10-psi of boost and a smaller Spearco intercooler discharged only 150 degree F ACTs. This was on a 91 degrees F day.
Even Roush's roots blower gets their ass handed to them by the Saleen/Whipple twin-screws. The roots dont have an aftercooler option as do the twin screws. Most efficient blower out there? At least for the mustangs, yes. I should've been more clear.
As for screws vs. roots, screw-type is pretty much an upgraded roots.
Roots will pretty always have hotter discharge temps compared to a Screw-type.
A twin-screw design that compresses air unlike Roots type superchargers which pump the air into the motor
I concur. Exactly...high blower rpm and high boost means the twin screw is a better design. Low blower rpm and lower boost levels means the hybrid roots from Eaton is more efficient. It's just the way it is.
Screw type superchargers have an axial-flow design that compresses the air as it moves between the screws to create positive pressure without creating the heat that Roots type superchargers can create.
Without an intercooler, you'll have lots of hot air, no spark and be highly knock constrained.
As for reliability, i'd say the twin-screw is just as reliable as the roots, if not better.
I'll take a twin-screw over a roots whenever possible, thank you.
Different strokes for different folks. There are guys running very decent numbers with both types of blowers.
A-Train
#248
Originally Posted by Atrain
Different strokes for different folks. There are guys running very decent numbers with both types of blowers.
A-Train
I find twin-screws, on applications i've worked with, to have no problems making good power running sub 9psi. Some cars are not lucky enough to have options between types of blowers, like most Honda's for one.
I can also go on all day on the subject matter, but i have a feeling, in the end, we'll be saying the same thing but in a different language and preaching to the choir.
#249
Originally Posted by ACCURATEin
Oh haha, that was my buddies evo. He saw that i had a random falken tires license plate bracket, and i said merry christmas and gave it to him...so we were putting it on.
#251
Originally Posted by SIRSIG
maybe it's been answered, but, what numbers did you put with the IC?
#254
Originally Posted by dan.....k
Lol, interfooler.
...almost all of my friends are like..."dude, when did you turbo your car"!! I could so easily get away with it!
#255
Originally Posted by stillhere153
sweet, this has been one lengthy process well for us readers and fans... can't wait till you finally get it bolted up
#256
Originally Posted by ACCURATEin
hahaha!! what up henryk.
...almost all of my friends are like..."dude, when did you turbo your car"!! I could so easily get away with it!
...almost all of my friends are like..."dude, when did you turbo your car"!! I could so easily get away with it!
#257
Originally Posted by ACCURATEin
I know man, and i apologize for it being such a long and drawn out project, but most of my mods have been that way, and this one just happens to be the longest!! Probably because i'm scared to see the results.
A guy on did some datalogging. Car went from high 100's, like 180 degree IAT's on the Eaton M62 to roughly 110 degrees IAT MAX, never went over 110 and it generally was around 90, and he was in Cali and posted those temps in the 80 degree weather. It did drop about 1.5psi but it runs SO much more efficiently and safely on the K20 that its worth the money. Just think about a Turbo w/o a front mount its the same results.
#259
Originally Posted by CCColtsicehockey
finish this already eric.
..done!
...seriously, i'm at a loss for words right now. Pictures of the piping later tonight. (the project is complete!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
#260
^^ I suppose i could elaborate a little bit for the time being about what's been going on here...
Number one, the project is complete.
Number two, it's deemed a success.
Number three, my brother said when i gave him a run by he swears the car looks faster when i take off.
Number four, i'm super ecstatic.
Number five, I can't wait to test it out more after night class.
Comments on the install:-Went very smooth, no major dilemnas or barracades in terms of design and innovation.
-Fuse box was relocated under the strut bar to allow for more clearance.
-Intake filter sits in the engine bay as a short ram
-The custom cool pipe that runs into the intake manifold looks flawless with TIG welds, soon to be wrapped in the signature heat foil
-Map sensor from elbow was relocated to the custom pipe that runs into the manifold.
-7 hours of labor went into the custom piping, routing, and relocation.
Comments on the driveability aspect:
-To my surprise and relief, there is no surge from what i could tell during the 20 miles that i've driven the TL since the install.
-Seems to be putting down more power
-I tripped the mileage settings, and during the 60mph drive to the destination from the shop it was reading ~40mpg which is astounding. The highest i've gotten it to read under those conditions was 39mpg a long time ago.
Overall, i couldn't feel more relieved to know this design actually does work and could potentially have some beneficial gains when working in conjunction with the comptech supercharger.
Number one, the project is complete.
Number two, it's deemed a success.
Number three, my brother said when i gave him a run by he swears the car looks faster when i take off.
Number four, i'm super ecstatic.
Number five, I can't wait to test it out more after night class.
Comments on the install:-Went very smooth, no major dilemnas or barracades in terms of design and innovation.
-Fuse box was relocated under the strut bar to allow for more clearance.
-Intake filter sits in the engine bay as a short ram
-The custom cool pipe that runs into the intake manifold looks flawless with TIG welds, soon to be wrapped in the signature heat foil
-Map sensor from elbow was relocated to the custom pipe that runs into the manifold.
-7 hours of labor went into the custom piping, routing, and relocation.
Comments on the driveability aspect:
-To my surprise and relief, there is no surge from what i could tell during the 20 miles that i've driven the TL since the install.
-Seems to be putting down more power
-I tripped the mileage settings, and during the 60mph drive to the destination from the shop it was reading ~40mpg which is astounding. The highest i've gotten it to read under those conditions was 39mpg a long time ago.
Overall, i couldn't feel more relieved to know this design actually does work and could potentially have some beneficial gains when working in conjunction with the comptech supercharger.
#262
Originally Posted by MugenR
OMG! I'm so excited! take lot of detailed pics of the setup. I'd like to do something like this. get a dyno asap
did you notice any drop in pressure? PSI still at 3.5-4?
did you notice any drop in pressure? PSI still at 3.5-4?
I didn't monitor the boost gauge but the install guy, (Matt), told me he monitored it and with the hbp it looks to be running the same amount of boost, which is what we had hoped for.
Plethora of detailed pics to follow about 5 hours from now, so stay tuned.
#267
Originally Posted by stillhere153
aaaaw man, now you need to change your "Spoon Sports ftw" to Spoon'n Coolin not Foolin
#269
god dam i wanna see pics too, i'm a little late comming into this thread but i'm kinda glad i just came into it seeing as though it was started in 2006.....haha but glad to see i got here just in time to catch up on the whole year and a half of posts!!!
#270
Originally Posted by teinCL
i heard through the grapevine that pics will be up within the hour...
A good amount of credit goes out to teinCL for assisting with the early stages of the project.
....heading to the garage to take pics.
#272
Before i post these pics I would like to apologize for keeping everyone in suspense. As we've been following the concept/idea of this setup being worthy of any gains, or even functioning at all, we now have some truth behind the matter. The system works, whether is efficient or not is another story that will be found with test and tunes. Without further ado, I will now release one of the most challenging and innovative project yet, the FMIC completion photos! Please enjoy the images.
#277
VERDICT!:
This FMIC setup probably added 30+whp.
Gentlemen, i'm currently at a loss for words right now....i just went down the road about a mile to get some food and here's what happened...did two runs....
1st test: Kept in first, brought it up to 15mph, mashed the throttle...spun through first and second...decided to let off. I almost exploded in excitment!
2ns test: 2nd gear pull....the motor sounding violent. I've never really heard anything like it. The setup definitely changed the way it sounds. Sounds like a violent, whining roar like a tornado or something. My girlfriend automatically said it felt faster.
I'm ecstatic and can barely type.
fgjiogioerjtg34tg -0tu0-2 ehr534948
This FMIC setup probably added 30+whp.
Gentlemen, i'm currently at a loss for words right now....i just went down the road about a mile to get some food and here's what happened...did two runs....
1st test: Kept in first, brought it up to 15mph, mashed the throttle...spun through first and second...decided to let off. I almost exploded in excitment!
2ns test: 2nd gear pull....the motor sounding violent. I've never really heard anything like it. The setup definitely changed the way it sounds. Sounds like a violent, whining roar like a tornado or something. My girlfriend automatically said it felt faster.
I'm ecstatic and can barely type.
fgjiogioerjtg34tg -0tu0-2 ehr534948
#279
Originally Posted by MugenR
did you modify ANYTHING on the supercharger? and where did you put that tiny tube that goes from the black round thing with the warning on it to the spacer nea the intake manifold inlet?