FM reception

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2004 | 06:13 PM
  #1  
paddiwakk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
FM reception

My impression is that for weak stations, reception is better with a whip type antenna. For example, I get a National Public Radio Station broadcast from buffalo up here in Ontario. I've noticed in all my TLs that that station sometimes barely comes in. When I have tried the Honda CRV and Toyota Camry, both with standard anennas, the station is much stronger.
Anyone know why Acura uses an antenna system built into the back window? Or how the reception can be improved (other than moving to Buffalo)?
Old 01-17-2004 | 07:14 PM
  #2  
rets's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 12,177
Likes: 86
From: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
Don't know if it's better...

Did you ever see someone netting steel wire or thread and replacing the broken attenna by this? That's the easy way to catch the radio signals. If you wire inside your room or above your roof, you can catch the signals too for your radio or TV.

If we net the antenna over your rear window, we should be able to get rid of the exterior antenna and this will be the great benefit for maintenance saving and the style design.

Will better materials help? Maybe.
Old 01-17-2004 | 07:55 PM
  #3  
Modeler's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
04 TL's FM reception is pretty poor, but is no worse than the 03's
Old 01-17-2004 | 09:05 PM
  #4  
RJC RSX's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
n/c
Old 01-17-2004 | 09:41 PM
  #5  
paddiwakk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Originally posted by dulnev
04 TL's FM reception is pretty poor, but is no worse than the 03's
I agree its no worse and for most of the stations there is no problem. I guess I'm interested to know what the perceived advantage is supposed to be with this type of antenna
Old 01-17-2004 | 11:18 PM
  #6  
LED Master's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
From: Supersonic at Low Altitude!
I think the advantage is purely cosmetic.

Not only did they give us an antenna in the window, they did NOT do what other makers do when this type of antenna is used, which is to use a dual diversity antenna system (two window type antennas with different patterns are used and the radio selects which has the better signal, works well on other cars and is CHEAP!)

Unfortunately I am not comparing this car to 2nd gen (I guess my standards would not be as high if I was) but to OTHER similar or CHEAPER cars!

Ok, I will get off my soap box now.
Old 01-17-2004 | 11:25 PM
  #7  
achadha100's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
i wouldn't know always listening to dvd-a's or XM
Old 01-18-2004 | 12:06 AM
  #8  
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Hercules, CA
I have been listining to XM, CD or DVD. In terms of FM reception, systems with "diversivied" antenna are normally better. These systems usually employ 2 antennas. A regular telescopic and another glass foil similar to what we have. Pioneer radios have often been pretty good with their FM tuners. My old Accord stock radio was an Alpine OEM.
Old 01-18-2004 | 12:43 AM
  #9  
Z Factor's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally posted by achadha100
i wouldn't know always listening to dvd-a's or XM
:lol1: Me too

Actually my reception is pretty good for FM as well
Old 01-18-2004 | 09:58 AM
  #10  
paddiwakk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
XM Radio? Its on my wish list for Canadian cars
Old 01-18-2004 | 08:22 PM
  #11  
MikeRadio's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 650
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
FM?

Oh that oldradio thing..

I wouldnt know what my car does as far as FM
Old 01-18-2004 | 08:53 PM
  #12  
Modeler's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Thumbs down XM sucks!

Personally, I don't like XM. I find that it:

1. Has poor selection of songs that I like. I have to jump channels a lot more than with FM stations. We have several great FM stations in DC area.

2. Related to 1: has good songs spread accross multiple channels. They simply don't have the staff (DJs) to put together good songs selection on a single channel. How hard would it be to have a good "oldies" station instead of one for 60s, one for 70s, one for 80s, etc.! I find myself CONSTANTLY changing channels. :banghead:

2. Has inconsistent tonal quality from one channel to the next (some stations have too much base and too little treble) AND inconsistent volume. I keep making very large adjustments to volume from channel to channel. Combined with having to switch channels frequently to hunt for a decent song, this is extremelly annoying! :banghead:

3. Takes too long to switch from channel to channel.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brocksolid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
9
09-29-2015 12:28 PM
iRaw
ILX
3
09-05-2015 12:10 AM
vanderveen44
ILX
7
09-02-2015 01:48 PM
elliot
Technology
5
11-01-2004 10:12 PM
CBR1100XX
Audio, Video, Electronics & Navigation
4
03-14-2004 01:33 PM



Quick Reply: FM reception



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.