Covers behind lower grill blocking cold air intake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 06:22 PM
  #1  
kevinballer08's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 AM TL
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 2
From: La Palma, CA
Covers behind lower grill blocking cold air intake?

Hey I just installed my cold air intake last weekend and I just took a peek through my driver-side lower grill today to look at the filter and I noticed some piece of cover blocking most of the grill.

Should I take off this cover? Will the filter be more vulnerable to water?

Here a picture:

Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 06:35 PM
  #2  
07tl-s6spd's Avatar
Chapter Leader (Central New Jersey)
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 221
From: UA7 Heaven
you can remove the cover......an air filter is only in trouble when completly submerged into water....and if that cover is there or not makes no difference really
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 07:40 PM
  #3  
taker777's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
i cut through mine cause i was installing some fogs into the grill. Meh'... really didn't make a noticeable difference?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2011 | 10:54 PM
  #4  
Inaccurate's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 482
From: Houston, Texas
I did this mod 1-1/2 years ago. The lower front air ducts (ie, faux air ducts) were made fully functional by removing the obstructions. You say "air diverter", I say "obstruction" .


Pic below shows obstruction that was removed.




Pic below shows obstruction that was removed.









Some people will wonder if this mod will allow the air filter to become water logged during a rainstorm.

This is my daily driver with no days off due to bad weather. I have been thru more downpours than you could shake a boat oar at.

For example, I have drove thru 10 miles of very heavy rain. On the freeway, all traffic was doing 30-40 mph with wipers on "high". This was a non-stop intense downpour for 10 miles.

The exposed filter has always done great. Once I get away from the rain and back onto dry roads, I have normal throttle response. I romped on the throttle in various throttle positions to test. Perfect throttle response.

On the other hand, I did not do this mod to allow the air filter to breathe better. The obstruction does not hamper air flow to the filter. This mod was done to increase air flow into the engine bay.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 12:13 AM
  #5  
kevinballer08's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 AM TL
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 2
From: La Palma, CA
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
I did this mod 1-1/2 years ago. The lower front air ducts (ie, faux air ducts) were made fully functional by removing the obstructions. You say "air diverter", I say "obstruction" .


Pic below shows obstruction that was removed.




Pic below shows obstruction that was removed.









Some people will wonder if this mod will allow the air filter to become water logged during a rainstorm.

This is my daily driver with no days off due to bad weather. I have been thru more downpours than you could shake a boat oar at.

For example, I have drove thru 10 miles of very heavy rain. On the freeway, all traffic was doing 30-40 mph with wipers on "high". This was a non-stop intense downpour for 10 miles.

The exposed filter has always done great. Once I get away from the rain and back onto dry roads, I have normal throttle response. I romped on the throttle in various throttle positions to test. Perfect throttle response.

On the other hand, I did not do this mod to allow the air filter to breathe better. The obstruction does not hamper air flow to the filter. This mod was done to increase air flow into the engine bay.
Thank you for the informative post. I'll take mine off and give it a try.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 02:07 AM
  #6  
Bearcat94's Avatar
AZ Community Team
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 32,488
Likes: 7,771
From: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
....

On the other hand, I did not do this mod to allow the air filter to breathe better. The obstruction does not hamper air flow to the filter. This mod was done to increase air flow into the engine bay.
Exactly right.

It's not like there is some magic vacuum underneath the car and you have to "put" air in there. The CAI gets plenty of air with or without the mod.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 02:13 AM
  #7  
Inaccurate's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 482
From: Houston, Texas
^ Thanks for highlighting that Bearcat94. I was tempted to put that part in bold when I posted it.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 08:45 AM
  #8  
Jesstzn's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 294
From: Trail BC CanaDUH
The only thing I'd be concerned about if you live in snow country is a small rock they use for sanding the roads pentrating the filter media. The rocks are small enough to go through the grill work and have enough velocity to crack a windshield.

Now if you did this mod too I'd be less concerned. But I'll still leave the deffuser there.

Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 08:59 AM
  #9  
TwoZero's Avatar
Needs more cowbell
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Florida
I had a CAI on my old RSX-S and had a racing air duct installed in my bumper. It rains a lot in Florida, so all I did was throw a Hydroshield on it and had no problems with it at all. Never hyodolocked.

I tested it one time and put my CAI in my bathtub completely submerged in water and nothing really went it. Granted, it wasn't sucking anything in either so... who knows?

I vote take it off to let that baby breathe better and let the air flow!
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 09:32 AM
  #10  
ez12a's Avatar
the overexplainer
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,287
Likes: 385
From: OC, CA
AEM dryflow filter media is hydrophobic. It resists absorbing water.

I say leave it in/on. Despite being hydrophobic I dont like the filter being that exposed (unless that's what you were going for in terms of looks). And as mentioned above, it's not going to improve the performance as it's pretty hard to get heatsoak in that area where the filter is especially when the car is moving even with the "blockage".

Last edited by ez12a; Mar 2, 2011 at 09:34 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 09:38 AM
  #11  
Jesstzn's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,424
Likes: 294
From: Trail BC CanaDUH
Just my 2 cents on it .. The area where the filter is has lots of available air. The only way your going to make it better is to create a force and just opening it up doesn't do that when there is other places for the air to go . Path of least resistance.

Now if you created a complete housing that encased the filter and was only open at the front the increased pressure at speed might be a benifit. Same as the cowl induction on the old Chevelles.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 10:18 AM
  #12  
stvtec's Avatar
'06 WDP TL 6MT
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 58
From: Central NJ
Originally Posted by ez12a
AEM dryflow filter media is hydrophobic. It resists absorbing water.

I say leave it in/on. Despite being hydrophobic I dont like the filter being that exposed (unless that's what you were going for in terms of looks). And as mentioned above, it's not going to improve the performance as it's pretty hard to get heatsoak in that area where the filter is especially when the car is moving even with the "blockage".
Yeah. I don't think it's even a matter of heatsoak, or even just the temperature of the intake air. The thought is to increase pressure at the filter. However, the difference is so minuscule IMO when compared to the vacuum of the engine, that there is no appreciable difference aside from a wetter/dirtier filter.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 08:13 PM
  #13  
Bearcat94's Avatar
AZ Community Team
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 32,488
Likes: 7,771
From: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Originally Posted by stvtec
Yeah. I don't think it's even a matter of heatsoak, or even just the temperature of the intake air. The thought is to increase pressure at the filter. However, the difference is so minuscule IMO when compared to the vacuum of the engine, that there is no appreciable difference aside from a wetter/dirtier filter.
Miniscule is right.

Even 0.

Just to say it again: There is no special law of physics that magically creates a vacuum behind your TL bumper - there is PLENTY of air there. Always. Without exception.

OK, 1 exception: when you drive though a lake. But that's it.

As far as increasing pressure, you'll get NO "ram" effect. Unless you add JATO gear to get your speed up to ~200 mph.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
space_boy
ILX
51
Aug 15, 2017 12:06 PM
drone619
Car Parts for Sale
9
Jan 26, 2016 07:09 PM
theinsvnity
2G TL Problems & Fixes
2
Sep 10, 2015 10:22 PM
dlknight
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
Sep 3, 2015 07:54 PM
ptbarnett
3G RLX (2013+)
4
Aug 30, 2015 12:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.