Car/Driver Comments on CL vs BMW 330

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2002, 07:13 PM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NoVA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car/Driver Comments on CL vs BMW 330

In the July 2002 issue of Car and Driver, there is a comparison of the '03 CL Type-S 6-speed vs. the 330Ci. The BMW narrowly won, but that isn't my point.

In the review, C/D says that the CL has "the best front-drive system, anywhere, any time, bar none." They also said that the CL is "simply the finest-handling front-drive car we've ever tested."

Now, that's saying something. I can only assume that the TL has the same front-drive system? If so, then we are in good company....
Old 07-25-2002, 07:19 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
pianoman41's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Western MA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Car/Driver Comments on CL vs BMW 330

Originally posted by kennelm
In the review, C/D says that the CL has "the best front-drive system, anywhere, any time, bar none." They also said that the CL is "simply the finest-handling front-drive car we've ever tested."

Now, that's saying something. I can only assume that the TL has the same front-drive system? If so, then we are in good company....
No, actually it doesn't. The CL 6-speed has a helical limited slip differental in the front and no VSA. It's that combinaton that makes it the best. The LSD really helps getting the power down to the pavement in the twisties.

Don't get me wrong--I love our set-up too but the auto TLs and CLs are definitely different than the 6-speed.
Old 07-25-2002, 07:22 PM
  #3  
Advanced
 
OhioCLS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Age: 48
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: Car/Driver Comments on CL vs BMW 330

Originally posted by pianoman41


No, actually it doesn't. The CL 6-speed has a helical limited slip differental in the front and no VSA. It's that combinaton that makes it the best. The LSD really helps getting the power down to the pavement in the twisties.

Don't get me wrong--I love our set-up too but the auto TLs and CLs are definitely different than the 6-speed.


what he said
Old 07-25-2002, 07:24 PM
  #4  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NoVA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh well.

It still sounds pretty good for those with the 03 CL...
Old 07-25-2002, 08:13 PM
  #5  
Pro
 
Xorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Age: 60
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also don't forget that the TL is longer and heavier than the CL.
Old 07-25-2002, 08:27 PM
  #6  
Advanced
 
OhioCLS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Age: 48
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Xorg
Also don't forget that the TL is longer and heavier than the CL.
by how much?
Old 07-25-2002, 10:00 PM
  #7  
Burning Brakes
 
accordv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by OhioCLS6


by how much?
not much at all...200 lbs. maybe...that figure is probably off, but there is a small difference in the weight of the two cars.
Old 07-26-2002, 08:34 AM
  #8  
Instructor
 
BLUBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Age: 47
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

If the TLS is longer and heavier then the CLS, how did motor trend get there 02 TLS to go a tenth faster then the CLS. In the 0-60 and Qtr?
Old 07-26-2002, 09:07 AM
  #9  
16GS FSprt,03Max,12 335is
 
Monte TLS,MAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Age: 50
Posts: 976
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
It also has ATTS now the same system in the Prelude SH. C&D claimed the Lude SH was the best handling car under 30k a few years back as well.
Old 07-26-2002, 11:11 AM
  #10  
AZ O.G NoOldManVetteOwner
 
2K2SilverTL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NJ/NYC
Posts: 2,074
Received 204 Likes on 126 Posts
It's not the actual weight of the car that makes a difference, its the distribution of the weight. The 6-speed has more weight in the rear as opposed to the auto CL-S/TL-S counterparts, which have more weight in the front. This is the key difference, in addition with the HSLD already discussed
Old 07-28-2002, 12:15 AM
  #11  
Safety Car
iTrader: (1)
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,057
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
What's even more impressive is that they finally dethroned the auto 330i w/ the G35 auto in their latest comparo. I find it hard to believe the G outhandles the 330i sport pkg. but reading is sometimes believing. These things can be soooo subjective oftentimes, eh?!

I'd have to drive the Cl-S 6-spd and compare it to the Maxima 6-spd w/ the similar helical LSD ... the maxi seems lighter on its feet than does the Cl-S auto that I drove. The Max, as has been mentioned many times on this board before... is more "tossable" in the turns.

JMHO though,

pete
Old 07-28-2002, 12:23 AM
  #12  
Three Wheelin'
 
evolaerok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Age: 43
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BLUBYU
If the TLS is longer and heavier then the CLS, how did motor trend get there 02 TLS to go a tenth faster then the CLS. In the 0-60 and Qtr?
many things can account for this. Like the weather, elevation, humidity, etc...
Old 07-28-2002, 02:36 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Jaydef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westchester NY
Age: 39
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
my father has a CL (Non-S), and it handles alot better then my 00 TL. It cuts corners so much better, and the steering is tighter.
Old 07-28-2002, 02:40 PM
  #14  
Burning Brakes
 
Beason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LA
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BLUBYU
If the TLS is longer and heavier then the CLS, how did motor trend get there 02 TLS to go a tenth faster then the CLS. In the 0-60 and Qtr?
You dont always get the same time every time you race.
Old 07-28-2002, 03:06 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
SilverBulletCLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alamo
Age: 49
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: Car/Driver Comments on CL vs BMW 330

Originally posted by pianoman41


No, actually it doesn't. The CL 6-speed has a helical limited slip differental in the front and no VSA. It's that combinaton that makes it the best. The LSD really helps getting the power down to the pavement in the twisties.

Don't get me wrong--I love our set-up too but the auto TLs and CLs are definitely different than the 6-speed.
Excellent review for sure, but don't forget the new 6spd Maxima also has HLSD
Old 07-28-2002, 03:07 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
SilverBulletCLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alamo
Age: 49
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BLUBYU
If the TLS is longer and heavier then the CLS, how did motor trend get there 02 TLS to go a tenth faster then the CLS. In the 0-60 and Qtr?
My car weighed at the track 3440 lb with 3/4 of gas.
Old 07-28-2002, 03:08 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
SilverBulletCLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alamo
Age: 49
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by PeterUbers
What's even more impressive is that they finally dethroned the auto 330i w/ the G35 auto in their latest comparo. I find it hard to believe the G outhandles the 330i sport pkg. but reading is sometimes believing. These things can be soooo subjective oftentimes, eh?!

I'd have to drive the Cl-S 6-spd and compare it to the Maxima 6-spd w/ the similar helical LSD ... the maxi seems lighter on its feet than does the Cl-S auto that I drove. The Max, as has been mentioned many times on this board before... is more "tossable" in the turns.

JMHO though,

pete
True, the 6spd with its HLsd and the Max with the same thing would be very close. But in handling the Maxima will not come close to the CL-S. Don't forget the Maxima has a REAR MULTI-LINK BEAM suspension in the back. But it comes with better tires than our cars which help it.
Old 07-28-2002, 06:48 PM
  #18  
Instructor
 
MB-telecom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Bimmer beat the CL-S in 0-60 and the 1/4 each by I 'believe' a 1/10 of a second. If the CL-S had the kind of beefy rubber the Bimmer came with, then the CL-S for sure could have shaved another 1/10 - 3/10's of both 0-60 and the 1/4 and soundly beaten the Bimmer. You can see where in 0-100 and 0-130 the horsepower advantage of the CL-S is evident as it beat the Bimmer in both areas. What a most impressive performance by the CL-S!!!
Old 07-29-2002, 05:48 PM
  #19  
Instructor
 
91M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given the fact these cars aren't tire smokers, I don't think rubber would make that much of a difference (and who really cares about .1-.2 seconds in the 1/4 mile?). The BMW did not lose to the G35 until they factored in price. The BMW still won in the categories that are a high priority for me, handling, steering feel and slalom. I do like the G35 and this competition can be nothing but good. However, what if the next top 3 series is a 3.5? The 330i is the "oldest" of these cars in that it hasn't had any major changes in a couple of years.

I think the G35 will hurt Acura sales far worse than BMW sales. I will give kudos to Acura for fwd handling. They do make the best handling fwd cars. One thing that sucks about traction control is that all the newer cars, including many BMW's, aren't offered wtih an lsd.
Old 07-29-2002, 06:15 PM
  #20  
Advanced
 
OhioCLS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Age: 48
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 91M5
Given the fact these cars aren't tire smokers, I don't think rubber would make that much of a difference (and who really cares about .1-.2 seconds in the 1/4 mile?). The BMW did not lose to the G35 until they factored in price. The BMW still won in the categories that are a high priority for me, handling, steering feel and slalom. I do like the G35 and this competition can be nothing but good. However, what if the next top 3 series is a 3.5? The 330i is the "oldest" of these cars in that it hasn't had any major changes in a couple of years.

I think the G35 will hurt Acura sales far worse than BMW sales. I will give kudos to Acura for fwd handling. They do make the best handling fwd cars. One thing that sucks about traction control is that all the newer cars, including many BMW's, aren't offered wtih an lsd.

better tires would make a HUGE difference.........both aceleration and handling............the stock tires on the cls SUCK
Old 07-30-2002, 09:58 AM
  #21  
Instructor
 
91M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well that is Acura's fault isn't it? Maybe they should install the same tires on all the cars. However, they drive what they are given for the roadtest. Often they can't dictate what equipment the test car comes with.

I don't think that tires would make a huge difference in a 1/4 mile for either of these cars. Of course, they would make a big difference in handling tests. With most BMW's you get Conti Sport Contacts or Dunlops.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
asianspec
Cameras & Photography
43
07-03-2019 09:14 AM
Slow98teg
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
30
01-02-2017 09:01 AM
eastsideride
Car Parts for Sale
6
10-15-2015 04:26 AM
marinrain
ILX
5
10-06-2015 12:36 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
09-25-2015 06:05 PM



Quick Reply: Car/Driver Comments on CL vs BMW 330



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.