'07 RL to get only 3 months of XM!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2006 | 09:58 PM
  #1  
Mike_TX's Avatar
Thread Starter
AcurAdmirer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 352
From: Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX
'07 RL to get only 3 months of XM!

Dealer told me today the '07 RL's will come with only 3 months of XM and Traffic, as opposed to the full year we got with our '06's.

That's consistent with what the TL's get, as well as what most GM cars come with.

Since XM will gladly re-up you for a year for about 125 bucks for the whole works, I guess it's not a huge deal, but I thought it was kind of odd Acura would cut back on that.
.
.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #2  
pimpin-tl's Avatar
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,995
Likes: 148
From: San Antonio, TX
IMHO, most people who buy the RL do not use the XM in the first place. They just use the radio and cd's.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 12:18 PM
  #3  
Touge's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 869
Likes: 3
From: NYC | Chofu-shi
I dunno at 1st I thought the same, but now I constantly use the xm, way better than the radio and don't miss the commercials
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 01:11 PM
  #4  
Mike_TX's Avatar
Thread Starter
AcurAdmirer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 352
From: Dallas/Ft. Worth, TX
I have to admit I'm not a big satellite radio fan, but if it's there I'll use it occasionally. Especially on cross-country trips.

And since the XM Traffic is sorta integrated in (it costs less when bundled with XM Radio), I might possibly keep it when the freebie expires.

But on most car forums I find people are absolutely rabid about their sat radio!
.
.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #5  
Treblig's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,334
Likes: 218
From: Indiana
The convenience of "set-it-and-forget-it" gets to be quite a luxury. I like that about XM, not having to worry about losing a favorite station when crossing state lines or frequency borders. Never thougt that I would pay for radio when AM and FM bands are free, but I sure am going to find it hard not to renew when my free subscription is up.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2006 | 02:08 PM
  #6  
lflorack's Avatar
'05 Acura RL - CGP/Ebony
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Hilton, NY
Originally Posted by pimpin-tl
IMHO, most people who buy the RL do not use the XM in the first place. They just use the radio and cd's.
You could be right but that's not the case with the people I know. Most people I know who have Sat-radio are very heavy users. I virtually never use the radio and use XM a lot more than the CD/DVD player.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2006 | 11:14 PM
  #7  
kenny5's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: gotham, new york
The drawback of XM is its audio quality, when compared with the excellent DVD-A system. If XM is offered at $80 a year, then it is worth getting for its variety and commercial free format. As for On Star, I don't think it is popular or worth getting because most people choose to use their cell phone instead. GM must be losing $$$ with On Star.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2006 | 09:34 AM
  #8  
neuronbob's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 20,067
Likes: 4,698
From: Cleveland area, OH
The only use I can see for OnStar is in emergencies. When you're panicked, it's a lot easier to remember to push one button than to find your cell phone, then dial 911.

On the other hand, I am a heavy XM user and an early adopter of the technology. The sound quality sucks, especially in high-quality audio systems like those in the TL and RL, but the ability to listen to the same station all the way across the country, and to have access to CNN and the BBC at any time, can't be beat. Besides, XM is ideal for cars because....who does any REAL critical listening in their car, anyway? That's what I have a home system for.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2006 | 12:52 PM
  #9  
lflorack's Avatar
'05 Acura RL - CGP/Ebony
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Hilton, NY
Originally Posted by kenny5
The drawback of XM is its audio quality, when compared with the excellent DVD-A system. If XM is offered at $80 a year, then it is worth getting for its variety and commercial free format. As for On Star, I don't think it is popular or worth getting because most people choose to use their cell phone instead. GM must be losing $$$ with On Star.
I have a few OnStar cell phone minutes I purchased in case I get in a weak area because the OnStar phone is quite a bit more sensitive and stronger than a normal cell phone. I haven't used virtually any of them yet (just a test or two) Other than that, the real reason to keep OnStar (if I decide to when my year expires) is for the emergency capabilities -- such as bag notification, and in case the car is stolen. Not sure it's worth what it costs, but insurance never seems like a great deal.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #10  
jftjr's Avatar
'06 RL
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 819
Likes: 1
I've determined that I can't possibly live without the hockey channel...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidhuSaaB
3G TL Problems & Fixes
18
May 30, 2020 12:40 AM
CL-S progression 01
Car Parts for Sale
65
Jan 26, 2016 04:15 PM
Mr.Tea
2G RL (2005-2012)
15
Oct 2, 2015 10:32 PM
polish_pat
3G TL Problems & Fixes
17
Sep 30, 2015 12:22 PM
thegipper
3G TL (2004-2008)
5
Sep 28, 2015 01:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.