Speed in Rl
#4
Originally Posted by Ernie Golfs
110 and it didn't feel like 110. It was very smooth and quiet, felt more like 90 mph.
I would just be concerned about trying to push it over 110 unless you have tires rated for such. I'm not sure the stock Michelin's would be safe, or not.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Qatar
i hit 155 in 2004 New Years eve.
Thw car is very solid and steady and felt just like doing 85mph.
Thw car is very solid and steady and felt just like doing 85mph.
#9
Originally Posted by jftjr
That's a good trick, when the car's system limits your top speed to 137 MPH. Maybe re-badging the car makes it go faster?
Probably you should read my post carefully, i had rebadged my vehicle in March 2006, the incident was in December 2004. A little common sense would help.
#10
Originally Posted by Qatar
Probably you should read my post carefully, i had rebadged my vehicle in March 2006, the incident was in December 2004. A little common sense would help.
#11
OK boys, play nice. The car is electronically governed at 137 mph. Did Qatar find a way to get around the system?
No matter to me. The fastest I've taken my RL is 90 mph, and then only for about 15 seconds. With a new baby, I can't do this anymore on long road trips. Also the gas mileage at that speed is suckola.
No matter to me. The fastest I've taken my RL is 90 mph, and then only for about 15 seconds. With a new baby, I can't do this anymore on long road trips. Also the gas mileage at that speed is suckola.
#12
Mod, i think jftjr never got over the fact that the RL is a down graded version of the Legend and its been buggin him since i've replaced my Acura emblems with Honda.
Jftjr, like i said before, my money, my car.
I won't start another stupid argument about this, someone asked about the fastest i've been and i answered and you believing what i wrote is the last thing i'll worry about.
Jftjr, like i said before, my money, my car.
I won't start another stupid argument about this, someone asked about the fastest i've been and i answered and you believing what i wrote is the last thing i'll worry about.
#14
Originally Posted by Qatar
Mod, i think jftjr never got over the fact that the RL is a down graded version of the Legend and its been buggin him since i've replaced my Acura emblems with Honda.
Jftjr, like i said before, my money, my car.
I won't start another stupid argument about this, someone asked about the fastest i've been and i answered and you believing what i wrote is the last thing i'll worry about.
Jftjr, like i said before, my money, my car.
I won't start another stupid argument about this, someone asked about the fastest i've been and i answered and you believing what i wrote is the last thing i'll worry about.
... but I'm curious as well. If the RL (Legend) is electronically limited to 137, how did you manage 155? Did you reflash the ECU?
#17
Originally Posted by GoHawks
... but I'm curious as well. If the RL (Legend) is electronically limited to 137, how did you manage 155? Did you reflash the ECU?
But if i'm not mistaken, someone from VTEC.net was able to do 141 with the first Rl tester
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
10-08-2015 11:16 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
09-25-2015 06:14 PM