Comptech Headers on 6-speed CL 1/4 mile?
01-30-2006, 12:42 PM
#5
It depends on traction, & driver skill at the track. A 6mt with headers only should get you in the mid 14's. Headers & other bolt on's should net you low 14's.
Extream bolt on's like allmotor's will net you lower times.
As will a good 1/4 mile track driver like joe5.0 proves.
Extream bolt on's like allmotor's will net you lower times.
As will a good 1/4 mile track driver like joe5.0 proves.
01-30-2006, 12:47 PM
#6
3-piece FTW
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
It depends on traction, & driver skill at the track. A 6mt with headers only should get you in the mid 14's. Headers & other bolt on's should net you low 14's.
Extream bolt on's like allmotor's will net you lower times.
As will a good 1/4 mile track driver like joe5.0 proves.
Extream bolt on's like allmotor's will net you lower times.
As will a good 1/4 mile track driver like joe5.0 proves.
Trending Topics
01-30-2006, 01:56 PM
#8
3-piece FTW
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sims
2003 Acura 3.2CL Type-S 6.5 14.9 - assumed 6sp
2002 Acura 3.2CL Type-S 6.8 15.0 - Auto.. obviously as its an 02.
2002 Acura 3.2CL Type-S 6.8 15.0 - Auto.. obviously as its an 02.
01-30-2006, 04:49 PM
#9
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 102
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by htown
I highly doubt that 2003 is a 6MT
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
dont see any other reason for an 03' to be 1/10th faster than an 02' unless its a 6spd.
01-30-2006, 05:51 PM
#11
14.3, 101.3mph (I/H)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montreal
Age: 44
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Theres no need to base times from magazines, based on some of the results we have on the board a cl-s 6 speed with a good driver, headers, a good set of tires will achieve high 13's in the 1/4 mile. Many auto's have run low 14's with a few bolt ons and the 6 speed is about .5 faster stock. I myself ran a 14.3 with just intake and headers. (auto)
01-30-2006, 05:58 PM
#13
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by Sims
hmmm good argument
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
dont see any other reason for an 03' to be 1/10th faster than an 02' unless its a 6spd.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
dont see any other reason for an 03' to be 1/10th faster than an 02' unless its a 6spd.
01-30-2006, 06:34 PM
#16
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by mrsteve
99% sure he did
01-30-2006, 06:38 PM
#17
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 102
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lets not forget altitude.. I'm sure I'll get flamed but its real. Check out the NHRA. They have correction factor tables. I myself am at 3000ft+barometric pressure so my car will run marginally slower here than at sea level.
01-30-2006, 07:01 PM
#18
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by typeR
i dont think so ..but he did have if i remember the comptech fly wheel ...funny im surprised more people dont ...
Yeah I might be wrong on that. He did have an extrude honded manifold and larger TB.
01-30-2006, 07:03 PM
#19
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by Sims
lets not forget altitude.. I'm sure I'll get flamed but its real. Check out the NHRA. They have correction factor tables. I myself am at 3000ft+barometric pressure so my car will run marginally slower here than at sea level.
A 14.0 @ 101 MPH at 3,000 ft is a 13.61 @ 103.65
01-30-2006, 08:12 PM
#20
TQ > MPG
I guarantee mine would run 13's w/headers, but wont find out for sure.
I ran:
14.5 @ 96.5 110% bone stock
14.29 @ 98.5mph dr's on stock wheels
14.0 @ 98.8mph lightweight 17's w/same dr's, and icebox
It took ALOT of practice to get that 14.0, most of the runs were in the 14.1-14.2 range. I need wider/taller tires to absorb some shock and get 2.1 60's to break the 13's as it sits now.
I ran:
14.5 @ 96.5 110% bone stock
14.29 @ 98.5mph dr's on stock wheels
14.0 @ 98.8mph lightweight 17's w/same dr's, and icebox
It took ALOT of practice to get that 14.0, most of the runs were in the 14.1-14.2 range. I need wider/taller tires to absorb some shock and get 2.1 60's to break the 13's as it sits now.
01-31-2006, 10:40 AM
#22
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Sun Diego CL-S
it could be cos you haven't around long. 
01-31-2006, 10:45 AM
#23
I now drive an accord....
Originally Posted by Sims
hmmm good argument
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
dont see any other reason for an 03' to be 1/10th faster than an 02' unless its a 6spd.
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
dont see any other reason for an 03' to be 1/10th faster than an 02' unless its a 6spd.
0-60:
5.9
Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile:
14.6
1/4 Speed:
98
0-60:
6.5
Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile:
14.9
1/4 Speed:
96
01-31-2006, 10:48 AM
#25
Instructor
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pueblo,CO
Age: 38
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
man i didn't think the CL's were actually that fast. it may because of the alitude. In that case either way i can't wait to see how my porsche does execpt i take it real easy on the tranny. How much does the CL way out of curiosity
01-31-2006, 10:56 AM
#26
Instructor
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 102
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM
k6biv
Member Cars for Sale
1
09-10-2015 06:37 PM
