Right Rear Upper Arm/ Camber TSB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #1  
danotto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Right Rear Upper Arm/ Camber TSB

I took my 2004 TSX in today to have the Camber TSB performed. The TSB states to replace upper arm if the right rear camber is greater than -1.0. Right rear camber was -1.1 before and -1.3 after the arm was replaced. I don't understand what the new arm accomplished. Any experts out there???
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #2  
JTso's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 9
From: WA
What is the complete before and after alignment spec?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 11:15 PM
  #3  
danotto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Here is the printout they gave me.

Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 05:19 AM
  #4  
moda_way's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,594
Likes: 4
From: Cincinnati, OH
Your right rear toe was out of spec., but not your camber. Anything between -1.0 and -1.5 degrees camber in the rear is within spec. The toe was the issue, so you really had no need to have the TSB performed, on an alignment.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 07:34 AM
  #5  
danotto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
That's what I was thinking. Acording to the TSB numbers I was a candidate for the new arm because my rr camber was greater than -1.0. Now with the new arm it is even further away from nominal specs. What a waste of time.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 07:55 AM
  #6  
JTso's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 9
From: WA
Notice how the rear left camber changed from -1.3 to -1.2 without any work done to the left upper control arm? Your original rear right camber was actually fine at -1.1 even without the control arm replacement. The camber setting will change slightly from a full tank of gas or a trunk full of stuffs. That's why there is an acceptable range which considers to be within spec. The front and rear toes were the problem areas.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 11:46 AM
  #7  
danotto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Atleast I got a free alignment out of the deal.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #8  
peter_bigblock's Avatar
C'mon, man! Row yer own.
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
From: WDMIA
Originally Posted by danotto
I took my 2004 TSX in today to have the Camber TSB performed. The TSB states to replace upper arm if the right rear camber is greater than -1.0. Right rear camber was -1.1 before and -1.3 after the arm was replaced. I don't understand what the new arm accomplished. Any experts out there???
-1.1 and -1.3 are not greater than -1.0. Sounds like the spec is -1.0 to -1.5. -0.9, for instance, is greater than -1.0. Do they really mean "greater than"?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #9  
jlukja's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,558
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach, CA
Originally Posted by peter_bigblock
-1.1 and -1.3 are not greater than -1.0. Sounds like the spec is -1.0 to -1.5. -0.9, for instance, is greater than -1.0. Do they really mean "greater than"?


I think they mean further from 0.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #10  
peter_bigblock's Avatar
C'mon, man! Row yer own.
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
From: WDMIA
Originally Posted by jlukja


I think they mean further from 0.
That's initially what I thought. You're probably right, just an observation.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
Feb 25, 2020 09:57 AM
james357
Car Parts for Sale
19
Feb 13, 2016 02:37 PM
o8 ENVII 8o
Car Parts for Sale
19
Nov 30, 2015 04:23 PM
CheeseyPoofs McNut
5G TLX (2015-2020)
35
Oct 11, 2015 11:25 AM
AZuser
Automotive News
4
Sep 17, 2015 10:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 PM.