dyno comparo between '06 TSX and '08 Accord V6
10-19-2007, 12:40 PM
#2
Advanced
Join Date: Mar 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-19-2007, 12:45 PM
#3
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Philadelphia Burbs
Age: 40
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think its because its from another forum.....can't do it that way...
I went to take a look and its a LARGE difference between the two, its VERY sad.....
I went to take a look and its a LARGE difference between the two, its VERY sad.....
10-19-2007, 12:54 PM
#5
mrgold35
Can't use the link. Can you type the dyno results?
Trending Topics
10-19-2007, 01:06 PM
#8
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by miken5678
10-19-2007, 01:59 PM
#9
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Philadelphia Burbs
Age: 40
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gftgrill
tsx - hp = 180, tq = 144
accord - hp = 211, tq = 188
edit:
try to copy the link and paste it into a new brower. it worked for me.
accord - hp = 211, tq = 188
edit:
try to copy the link and paste it into a new brower. it worked for me.
EDIT: Look at the 5.5k mark.....TSX has 125 TQ and the Accord has its max of 180TQ in addition to the HP difference......198 compared to like 135....that is significant!
10-19-2007, 02:11 PM
#10
Racer
Originally Posted by jwood_06TSX
yea but that 180 HP and 144 TQ on the dyno is due to the the torque converter locking up, it didn't really get that much HP. It was more like 170ish HP and 135ish TQ. So that is 40-50 HP more and 40 more TQ and the torque curve it much higher the whole way across. Either way, i think its a little on the low side for a TSX but still.....
EDIT: Look at the 5.5k mark.....TSX has 125 TQ and the Accord has its max of 180TQ in addition to the HP difference......198 compared to like 135....that is significant!
EDIT: Look at the 5.5k mark.....TSX has 125 TQ and the Accord has its max of 180TQ in addition to the HP difference......198 compared to like 135....that is significant!
the only fair comparison here is going to be comparing the tsx to the 4 cylinder accord.
otherwise you should be comparing the accord to a tl.
10-19-2007, 02:18 PM
#13
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Philadelphia Burbs
Age: 40
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gftgrill
that's fine, but you're forgetting you're comparing a 3.5L v-6 to a 2.4L I-4
the only fair comparison here is going to be comparing the tsx to the 4 cylinder accord.
otherwise you should be comparing the accord to a tl.
the only fair comparison here is going to be comparing the tsx to the 4 cylinder accord.
otherwise you should be comparing the accord to a tl.
10-19-2007, 02:22 PM
#14
mrgold35
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
I don't understand what the point of this thread is?
Add sh-awd to the 5AT and watch number drop more.
I still would pick a 5AT over a 6MT
10-19-2007, 02:55 PM
#15
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by mrgold35
The point is a 5AT in any car sucks!
Add sh-awd to the 5AT and watch number drop more.
I still would pick a 6MT over a 5AT
Add sh-awd to the 5AT and watch number drop more.
I still would pick a 6MT over a 5AT
fixed
10-20-2007, 01:25 PM
#17
Advanced
Join Date: Mar 2007
Age: 45
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
considering a hondata ihe 6spd can put 200 whp im not to worried.. there are others on the k20org website putting 260 to the wheels out of the modified k24s.. on stang dynos though
10-20-2007, 02:17 PM
#19
T.DoT P.I.M.P. lol
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by jwood_06TSX
yea but that 180 HP and 144 TQ on the dyno is due to the the torque converter locking up, it didn't really get that much HP. It was more like 170ish HP and 135ish TQ. So that is 40-50 HP more and 40 more TQ and the torque curve it much higher the whole way across. Either way, i think its a little on the low side for a TSX but still.....
EDIT: Look at the 5.5k mark.....TSX has 125 TQ and the Accord has its max of 180TQ in addition to the HP difference......198 compared to like 135....that is significant!
EDIT: Look at the 5.5k mark.....TSX has 125 TQ and the Accord has its max of 180TQ in addition to the HP difference......198 compared to like 135....that is significant!
However, if this thread is compare w/ the "new Accord" L-4 (not the base) engine, then it will be interesting. I'm not sure if they are using the same engine, but the output is very similar, and they can use 87 Octane gas....
10-20-2007, 02:48 PM
#20
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
I don't understand what the point of this thread is?*cough*
10-20-2007, 07:38 PM
#21
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by vitocorleone
As far as I can tell, it is to show that a 3.5L V6 has more hp and torque than a 2.4L I4. Until I saw this thread, I had no idea that this was true.
*cough*
*cough*
*cough*
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IBankMouse
1G TSX (2004-2008)
8
06-13-2020 12:53 PM
Eggs999bacon
2G TSX (2009-2014)
10
09-24-2015 10:08 AM
