MPGs in the COLD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #1  
bgillette79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
MPGs in the COLD

Ever since the air temp has gotten consistently below 40F I have been UNABLE to achieve much more than 17mpg city and 20mpg highway.

This is down considerably from my 19mpg city and 22-23mpg HW mileage when the weather was warm. Warmer than 50F.

I have never seen this kind of drop in any of my other cars...
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #2  
chipmunk's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 193
Likes: 4
From: 408, CA
My MID is actually showing higher numbers; however, I've only put about 40 miles on this tank so far.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 05:21 PM
  #3  
wrestrepo's Avatar
StayAtHomeDad
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 32
From: Limbo
I think that the problem may be the fuel and not the temperature. Turbo engines actually run much better with cold air. Remember that during winter the put additives in the gas that may affect your fuel economy.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #4  
bgillette79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
That might be true. I've been using Get-Go Gas recently because I have lots of Fuel discounts.

After this tank I'll run a couple SHELL tanks and see if that makes a difference.

I too thought the cold air would actually help the turbo in the RDX.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 05:41 PM
  #5  
wrestrepo's Avatar
StayAtHomeDad
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 32
From: Limbo
Is not the brand, is the blend that they make for the winter time....I think that your results will be just about the same going anywhere.....
People should expect decreased mileage during winter time....
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 10:28 AM
  #6  
greyghost04's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Is everybody still putting in Premium? I find that after a couple of months, it doesn't bother me anymore. Plus prices have subsided a little bit. MPG b on the MID which I have not touched since purchase has risen to 19.7
Not bad for a big CUV that is incredibly fast.

Last edited by greyghost04; Dec 22, 2009 at 10:32 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 11:44 AM
  #7  
tsx-pwp-nj's Avatar
2010 TSX 5AT PWP
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 2
From: Howell NJ
Originally Posted by greyghost04
MPG b on the MID which I have not touched since purchase has risen to 19.7
My MID is about 1 to 2 mpg better than actual calculated mpg.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #8  
MMike1981's Avatar
big shot.
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by greyghost04
Is everybody still putting in Premium? I find that after a couple of months, it doesn't bother me anymore. Plus prices have subsided a little bit. MPG b on the MID which I have not touched since purchase has risen to 19.7
Not bad for a big CUV that is incredibly fast.
what do you mean still? you should always.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 05:19 PM
  #9  
cwepruk's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 748
Likes: 3
From: Edmonton, Alberta
I get about 16.5 in winter. There are some slight changes to winter blend gas, but it shouldn't be that significant. Most of it is due to the less efficient driving - a lot more warm up time, slower traffic, more idling etc.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 07:01 PM
  #10  
catnippants's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 636
Likes: 5
This is going to be my 4th winter with my RDX - and I consistently get 19-20 in the winter (mixed, mostly rural driving), and 22-23 in the summer.

Mike
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 07:04 PM
  #11  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by greyghost04
Is everybody still putting in Premium? I find that after a couple of months, it doesn't bother me anymore. Plus prices have subsided a little bit. MPG b on the MID which I have not touched since purchase has risen to 19.7
Not bad for a big CUV that is incredibly fast.
ALWAYS put premium gas in a turbo vehicle!

Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #12  
wrestrepo's Avatar
StayAtHomeDad
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 32
From: Limbo
Saabs actually run just fine with regular or premium....their system automatically adjust the spark to run on either one.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 06:07 AM
  #13  
Syzygy's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 1
The $5 a week I could save by not using premium gas is not worth it to me. All gas is expensive these days. The difference in cost to use premium is actually pretty minor.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 07:52 AM
  #14  
greyghost04's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
I use about 1 tank a week. So it's only about 3-4 dollars more a week. I pump "Premium" because I have a Premium car
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #15  
mav238's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 971
Likes: 2
From: Hometown - Vancouver
I agree that premium gas is highly recommended for driveability of the vehicle. Why save on a few dollars when your car feels sluggish and just no more fun to drive? If we have to pay double for using premium gas, that would be a different case, I would probably stay away from cars requiring that.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #16  
black label's Avatar
Trolling Canuckistan
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 811
From: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
Originally Posted by mav238
I agree that premium gas is highly recommended for driveability of the vehicle. Why save on a few dollars when your car feels sluggish and just no more fun to drive? If we have to pay double for using premium gas, that would be a different case, I would probably stay away from cars requiring that.
If by drivability you mean to prevent detonation of your engine I agree fully.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #17  
cwepruk's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 748
Likes: 3
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Driveability includes engine output due to timing being retarded from knock on regular gas.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #18  
Carbon2008RDX's Avatar
Carbon Bronze Pearl 2008
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 684
Likes: 48
From: Connecticut
I've been using premium fuel ever since I bought my first new car back in 1987. My RDX is no exception. Premium all the way! As another post stated, with today's gas prices it doesn't make a whole heck of difference $ wise premium vs. regular. I feel better knowing the car's engine will perform the best it can.

If you can't and/or don't want to spend for premium fuel then why drive a car that recommends it? Rather, go buy a fuel efficient Honda Civic, etc..
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #19  
mav238's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 971
Likes: 2
From: Hometown - Vancouver
Originally Posted by black label
If by drivability you mean to prevent detonation of your engine I agree fully.
By driveability, I mean the engine ECU compensating for the lower octane, by adjusting timing via the knock sensors. This will decrease the engine performance.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 12:14 PM
  #20  
princelybug's Avatar
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22,453
Likes: 210
From: Orange, CA
Originally Posted by tsx-pwp-nj
My MID is about 1 to 2 mpg better than actual calculated mpg.
This is surprising, but good. I always get the opposite results.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 12:16 PM
  #21  
princelybug's Avatar
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22,453
Likes: 210
From: Orange, CA
Originally Posted by catnippants
This is going to be my 4th winter with my RDX - and I consistently get 19-20 in the winter (mixed, mostly rural driving), and 22-23 in the summer.

Mike
Maybe this is because additives are added to the fuel, but lower temperatures usually lead to better mileage, and better performance.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 01:29 PM
  #22  
corduroygt's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 206
Likes: 8
i've been mixing it up, getting 8 gallons of 89 (mid-grade), then topping the rest 8+ gallons with premium, which is 93 octane here, since that will average up to recommended minimum of 91. It only saves 1.50 or so which I probably piss away every day by forgetting to turn on some lights at home, but the psychological effect makes me happy
Also when you turn on the heat using the auto AC mode (I just leave it on auto and adjust the temp), it will also turn on the AC compressor so your windows wont fog up, which will also decrease mileage.
I've also noticed less mpg, but that's normal because I've been leaving the engine on while cleaning the snow off the car. Leave your trip computer on average fuel economy and you'll see how bad idling reduces your average.

Last edited by corduroygt; Dec 25, 2009 at 01:32 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 05:16 AM
  #23  
C2SGuy's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Mileage is likely to be lower in the colder weather because the air is more dense. Since the vehicle senses Air/Fuel ratio, when the air is denser it will have to inject more fuel to achieve the proper ratio.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #24  
trademark's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
My mileage also drops slightly in the cold. I wonder if perhaps slightly lower tire pressure (due to dense air) if one hasn't readjusted also reduces the mpg a bit.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 06:55 PM
  #25  
wrestrepo's Avatar
StayAtHomeDad
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 32
From: Limbo
Why do you guys think it's called a Cold Air Intake? Why do you think that it is installed in car to improve performance and perhaps fuel consumption? Guys, cold temperature has nothing to do with the increased fuel consumption, it's the gasoline blend in the winter time (that's what I believe)

Also, I believe that the density of the air is a function of the barometric pressure, not temperature. If it is true that the air is colder in higher elevations, the added consumption is due to the altitude, not the temperature of the air.

EDIT: I understand that warm temperature excites the molecules of the air, therefore for a given mass of air, they occupy a bigger volume, then d=(m/v) will be smaller than what it would be in cold air........

Last edited by wrestrepo; Jan 5, 2010 at 06:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 10:55 PM
  #26  
cwepruk's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 748
Likes: 3
From: Edmonton, Alberta
For the second time, most of it is due to the less efficient driving - a lot more warm up time, slower traffic, more idling etc.

The fuel does contain a bit more light ends to aid in cold weather starting. I took a course on refining and the instructor said it might have a 0.5 mpg effect or so.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2010 | 02:39 PM
  #27  
engr456's Avatar
3rd Gear
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
2010 RDX FWD MPG Cold vs Warm Weather

Bought a 2010 RDX FWD in Nov. Just took it on a 1400 mile roundtrip to VA from FL. On the trip up in warm weather the MID indicated a mpg of 29.6. However, after driving in the bitter cold for 2 weeks and in the trip back to FL the MID indicated a 26.6 mpg.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 06:37 AM
  #28  
bgillette79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
A FWD RDX justs takes all the fun out of the SH-AWD...even if you are getting much better mpgs...
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 07:55 AM
  #29  
wrestrepo's Avatar
StayAtHomeDad
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 32
From: Limbo
Originally Posted by bgillette79
A FWD RDX justs takes all the fun out of the SH-AWD...even if you are getting much better mpgs...
Meh....most people will be fine without it...If I didn't need it I would totally buy the FWD....then again, If I didn't need it I would not have an SUV
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
Jul 16, 2017 07:33 AM
rcs86
Car Parts for Sale
3
Aug 2, 2016 06:52 PM
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
Sep 27, 2015 06:16 PM
jmaxima03
Member Cars for Sale
1
Sep 27, 2015 10:22 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.