Just dynoed my car with a DynoJet. It was a hot day.... Run conditions @ 92 degrees

Mods:
JDM h22
h23 tranny
K&N short ram
DC headers
Magnaflow Exhaust

159.40 whp
142.88 trq

 

wow.. not even 20 more lbs of torque than my f22... not even 30 more hp... crazy especailly since my clutch sucks hardcore ass

 

what the hell.. those numbers cant be right...

 

that dont look right

 

they seem about right, 92 deg. and probably a decent amount of humidity, he's probably untuned as well. with a better intake/header and tuned with crome or neptune he'd be around 185-190 whp

 

Yea, I was thinking about that... he definitely needs to get that thing tuned more than anything.

Seriously, fix those numbers! Otherwise, I'll

 

shiney, what kinda dyno did u run on? there's the dynopack and the dynojet. usually... from peoples experience, dynopacks are around 10-15% higher than dynojets. for example, my brother's ls vtec hit almost 200whp on a dynopack, while today he only hit 177. that was a huge difference. I believe dynopacks attach to ur wheels, while dynojets are rollers under ur wheels conducting actually hp to the actual ground when u are driving, instead of the wheels spinning in the air. But yes, i believe that the dyno today at hook upz (honda-tech free dyno day) was reading everyones very low. other h22s i saw was a jdm h22 open exhaust some expensive header that put 161whp, and another jdm h22 putting down 165whp with cams. Therefore, i'm pretty pleased with what mine did since it is pretty much stock.

 

i did it on a mustang dyno.. which also uses rollers

 

well, i dynoed at hookups in montclair. i'm pretty sure their dyno reads a bit low.. there was an ITR there that dynoed 155whp and 115 torq.

another JDM h22 with open JUN header hit 161 hp and 140 torq, and a h22 powered 95 integra LS hit 164 hp and 140 torque..

it was their free dyno day. highest output all motor car was an h22 that only did like 199 whp.. i'm sure the temperature and dyno calibration are why the numbers look the way they do..

i'm happy at least that 159 whp is basically 190 at the crank. and if this dyno reads a bit lower than say dynamic or atomics, that means i'm at about 200 crank hp at least. and this is a bone stock motor with simple IHE. cant complain really

 

mustang dynos read lower than dynojets

 

You should have gone to Rage Motorsports. They are right around the corner. Honda Hookups sucks....

 

It was free for dyno day!!! cant beat that!

 

dynapacks read lower than dynojets from my experience (made 212 on a dynojet = 169 on dynapack) and on a dynapack the wheels do not spin freely in the air, they bolt a hub onto your car and that goes into a hydraulic load box.

 

it wouldn't make sense for dynapack to read lower than dynojets. Dynapack measured from the hub (wheels off), and dynojet is measured from the rollers(wheels on). So in reality, it would take more power to rotate the wheels, making the dynojet read less. But who knows... it read what it read

 

the hubs weigh about the same as wheels