CLs are slow?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2004, 03:01 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
Plague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by dustbuster4
I've beaten a WRX in the 1/4 mile! :P



To be honest, I never considered speed as a reason to buy my CL. If I was looking for speed, I would have bought another car. I bought it for the luxury and dependability.

With time, I worked on making it faster.
THANK YOU! About Time It Was Said! My Point Exactly!
Old 01-16-2004, 03:08 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
Plague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by truraysa
325 are slow cause of there weight as well ours cl's. tegs are alot lighter then cl's my cl is 3400lb and most base tegs are 2800. that 600lb diff. my delsol is 2500lb with a 1.6l 125hp and even less torque will take my cl by 2 car lenths to 100mph
Doesn't seem like there is an awfull lot to these cars to make them weigh that much... Hmmm?
Old 01-16-2004, 06:17 PM
  #43  
Kicking your Ass
 
351MachOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by proaudio22
The only way a WRX can get that time is to dump the clutch from a standstill. From a roll, they aren't so hot.
You nailed it.

The WRX gave up it's only advantage...
Old 01-16-2004, 06:19 PM
  #44  
Kicking your Ass
 
351MachOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Plague
Doesn't seem like there is an awfull lot to these cars to make them weigh that much... Hmmm?
The automatic, sunroof, power everything, leather and the v6 might have a thing or two to do with it...
Old 01-16-2004, 06:58 PM
  #45  
Banned
 
Plague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 351MachOne
The automatic, sunroof, power everything, leather and the v6 might have a thing or two to do with it...
Yes, Ovbiously, but they are just so little. I thing my Camaro doesn't weigh much more than that if at all. You know what I mean?
Old 01-16-2004, 07:32 PM
  #46  
-S namyaC-
 
proaudio22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your Camaro is about ~3500lbs. The 3.0CL is 3219lbs.
Old 01-16-2004, 08:37 PM
  #47  
Banned
 
Plague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Age: 47
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I beleive that was my point! Thanks for re-assuring me though! I believe the weight in question was 3400 lbs.
Old 01-17-2004, 09:04 PM
  #48  
Instructor
 
truraysa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hawaii
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my registration says 3370lb.
Old 01-17-2004, 11:40 PM
  #49  
'07 November = STI
 
legendaryCL98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 39
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dang.. camaros are heavy..
Old 01-19-2004, 05:58 AM
  #50  
Intermediate
 
See-L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fuck that!

thats a bunch of bull shit. my friend has a wrx with a bunch of bolt-ons and he still pulls on me like a mug! anyway he raced a 98' accord coupe V6 and he pulled on him easily, on top of all that i know of a 98' neon RT and a 86' corolla GTS that pulled on a 98' accord coupe V6. i'm pretty sure a 98' accord coupe V6 is much lighter than a 98' 3.0 CL. on top of all that i have a 2.3 CL 5speed with just bolt-ons that can pull/keep up with any 98' V6 Accord/CL.
Old 01-19-2004, 06:02 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
18anatak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orlando
Age: 44
Posts: 11,514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:whocares: the CL isnt a race car. It was never meant to be fast.
Old 01-19-2004, 10:20 PM
  #52  
'07 November = STI
 
legendaryCL98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 39
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Katana18
:whocares: the CL isnt a race car. It was never meant to be fast.
Old 01-19-2004, 10:23 PM
  #53  
A-CL Post Whore w/N2O
 
dustbuster4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: D.C. Suburbs
Age: 58
Posts: 10,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Katana18
:whocares: the CL isnt a race car. It was never meant to be fast.
Damn!
Old 01-19-2004, 10:28 PM
  #54  
The movement has started
 
baka_t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hawaii
Age: 44
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well i think the 3.0 would be faster if we had a tranny that could transfer the power better. Most of our power is lost in the tranny. At least if we had a stronger tranny, we could keep up with the newer stock cars.
Old 01-19-2004, 11:45 PM
  #55  
'07 November = STI
 
legendaryCL98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 39
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
like the bullet proof tranny?
Old 01-19-2004, 11:51 PM
  #56  
The movement has started
 
baka_t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hawaii
Age: 44
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who knows if its gonna hold out?? If it does, and your destin to keep the CL i'd say its worth it. No actual dyno's were done on a stock or modded car yet. Who knows what the drivetrain loss is with the new tranny.
Old 01-20-2004, 12:08 AM
  #57  
'07 November = STI
 
legendaryCL98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 39
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by baka_t
Who knows if its gonna hold out?? If it does, and your destin to keep the CL i'd say its worth it. No actual dyno's were done on a stock or modded car yet. Who knows what the drivetrain loss is with the new tranny.
yeah.. true.. true..
Old 01-20-2004, 12:17 AM
  #58  
The movement has started
 
baka_t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hawaii
Age: 44
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Imo rite now the 6sp swap looks like it had the best results.
Old 01-20-2004, 12:18 AM
  #59  
-S namyaC-
 
proaudio22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3.0CL>6speedCL-S swap (actual cars) looks like it might work
Old 01-20-2004, 12:57 AM
  #60  
The movement has started
 
baka_t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hawaii
Age: 44
Posts: 3,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its been done. Only in a 6th gen av6. Some parts are a retrofit, but it be worth it if you plan on keeping the car. It also mite be cheaper then buying the "bulletproof" tranny if your handy with a wrench.
Old 01-20-2004, 08:19 AM
  #61  
-S namyaC-
 
proaudio22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Age: 39
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was referring to selling the 3.0, and buying a CL-S6.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CL-S progression 01
Car Parts for Sale
65
01-26-2016 04:15 PM
Oakroadsteve
3G TL (2004-2008)
9
10-28-2015 10:28 PM
hashbrown
4G TL (2009-2014)
2
09-29-2015 12:13 PM
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
09-27-2015 06:16 PM
Brandle34
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
09-23-2015 07:20 PM



Quick Reply: CLs are slow?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.