AT&T U-verse
Thread Starter
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22,453
Likes: 210
From: Orange, CA
AT&T U-verse
I have U-verse for internet in my home. It works fine downstairs where the unit is set up. However, the signal is very weak upstairs.
Question: What's the best way to increase my internet signal strength all throughout my home, especially upstairs?
TIA.
Question: What's the best way to increase my internet signal strength all throughout my home, especially upstairs?
TIA.
Dont think it has anything to do with the telecom box outside.
Is this one of those 2WIRE combo modem/routers? Those dont have any external antennas which would probably explain the crappy range.
Repeater would do, but also know that you're also typically halving the wireless bandwidth to those connected to the repeater (this may not affect the online experience). This will become an annoyance for computer to computer data transfers.
Is this one of those 2WIRE combo modem/routers? Those dont have any external antennas which would probably explain the crappy range.
Repeater would do, but also know that you're also typically halving the wireless bandwidth to those connected to the repeater (this may not affect the online experience). This will become an annoyance for computer to computer data transfers.
The V-RAD has everything to do with it. I run a Netgear W3700 (no antennae), and I can catch a signal on my Sammy phone six lots down. Of course there is little run-out fade in cable.
And the V-RAD is not a little telecom box... it's the size of an icecream truck.
And the V-RAD is not a little telecom box... it's the size of an icecream truck.
Can you please explain just how a box outside with no wireless capability affect your personal wireless network?
U-verse service isn't wireless... it's fiber to node.
This has everything to do with the range on the router he's using.
edit: i think we're talking about different things. OP is talking about "Internet" which I can only assume means wireless internet. We're not dealing with multiple "u-verse TV" boxes.
and if you didnt know, AT&T is served over fiber or copper, making it just as effective as regular cable.
http://www.att.com/Common/about_us/f...vered_2-22.pdf
U-verse service isn't wireless... it's fiber to node.
This has everything to do with the range on the router he's using.
edit: i think we're talking about different things. OP is talking about "Internet" which I can only assume means wireless internet. We're not dealing with multiple "u-verse TV" boxes.
and if you didnt know, AT&T is served over fiber or copper, making it just as effective as regular cable.
http://www.att.com/Common/about_us/f...vered_2-22.pdf
Last edited by ez12a; Apr 28, 2012 at 10:07 AM.
Thread Starter
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22,453
Likes: 210
From: Orange, CA
Dont think it has anything to do with the telecom box outside.
Is this one of those 2WIRE combo modem/routers? Those dont have any external antennas which would probably explain the crappy range.
Repeater would do, but also know that you're also typically halving the wireless bandwidth to those connected to the repeater (this may not affect the online experience). This will become an annoyance for computer to computer data transfers.
Is this one of those 2WIRE combo modem/routers? Those dont have any external antennas which would probably explain the crappy range.
Repeater would do, but also know that you're also typically halving the wireless bandwidth to those connected to the repeater (this may not affect the online experience). This will become an annoyance for computer to computer data transfers.

This is what I've got:
Can you please explain just how a box outside with no wireless capability affect your personal wireless network?
U-verse service isn't wireless... it's fiber to node.
This has everything to do with the range on the router he's using.
edit: i think we're talking about different things. OP is talking about "Internet" which I can only assume means wireless internet. We're not dealing with multiple "u-verse TV" boxes.
and if you didnt know, AT&T is served over fiber or copper, making it just as effective as regular cable.
http://www.att.com/Common/about_us/f...vered_2-22.pdf
U-verse service isn't wireless... it's fiber to node.
This has everything to do with the range on the router he's using.
edit: i think we're talking about different things. OP is talking about "Internet" which I can only assume means wireless internet. We're not dealing with multiple "u-verse TV" boxes.
and if you didnt know, AT&T is served over fiber or copper, making it just as effective as regular cable.
http://www.att.com/Common/about_us/f...vered_2-22.pdf
Trending Topics
^ I don't know. I had ATT out, and their internet speeds were not even in the same ballpark as cable. The said I was at the end of the V-RAD.
I guess what I'm driving at is that a slow or weak signal coming into the house, the router won't make up the difference.
But I do stand corrected. Seems the OP is happy with downstairs speed.
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r239...ance-from-VRAD
I guess what I'm driving at is that a slow or weak signal coming into the house, the router won't make up the difference.
But I do stand corrected. Seems the OP is happy with downstairs speed.
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r239...ance-from-VRAD
Whiskers provides some solutions, short of cutting holes in the wall and running cat5/6 lol.
Powerline adapter uses your house's existing power outlets to send data. From there, you can plug in another wireless access point upstairs. I'm not too knowledgeable on the bandwidth hit (if any) going this route. Looks like 200mbs for powerline.
something like this: which seems to include it's own access point.
Or a wireless extender/repeater. This typically cuts your wireless network bandwidth in half for those connected to the repeater. This probably wont be noticeable for web browsing. But large file transfers from computer to computer using the repeater will be significantly slower.
Seems that a power line adapter would give you the best performance. I dont have any exp with one though.
Powerline adapter uses your house's existing power outlets to send data. From there, you can plug in another wireless access point upstairs. I'm not too knowledgeable on the bandwidth hit (if any) going this route. Looks like 200mbs for powerline.
something like this: which seems to include it's own access point.
Or a wireless extender/repeater. This typically cuts your wireless network bandwidth in half for those connected to the repeater. This probably wont be noticeable for web browsing. But large file transfers from computer to computer using the repeater will be significantly slower.
Seems that a power line adapter would give you the best performance. I dont have any exp with one though.
Last edited by ez12a; Apr 28, 2012 at 10:28 AM.
Thread Starter
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22,453
Likes: 210
From: Orange, CA
Whiskers provides some solutions, short of cutting holes in the wall and running cat5/6 lol.
Powerline adapter uses your house's existing power outlets to send data. From there, you can plug in another wireless access point upstairs. I'm not too knowledgeable on the bandwidth hit (if any) going this route. Looks like 200mbs for powerline.
something like this: http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-Powerl...5626520&sr=1-5 which seems to include it's own access point.
Or a wireless extender/repeater. This typically cuts your wireless network bandwidth in half for those connected to the repeater. This probably wont be noticeable for web browsing. But large file transfers from computer to computer using the repeater will be significantly slower.
Seems that a power line adapter would give you the best performance. I dont have any exp with one though.
Powerline adapter uses your house's existing power outlets to send data. From there, you can plug in another wireless access point upstairs. I'm not too knowledgeable on the bandwidth hit (if any) going this route. Looks like 200mbs for powerline.
something like this: http://www.amazon.com/NETGEAR-Powerl...5626520&sr=1-5 which seems to include it's own access point.
Or a wireless extender/repeater. This typically cuts your wireless network bandwidth in half for those connected to the repeater. This probably wont be noticeable for web browsing. But large file transfers from computer to computer using the repeater will be significantly slower.
Seems that a power line adapter would give you the best performance. I dont have any exp with one though.
Suggestions, please!
Thread Starter
LIST/RAMEN/WING MAHSTA 짱
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22,453
Likes: 210
From: Orange, CA
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UNCTYPE-S
Home Theater & Electronics
14
Jan 15, 2010 08:00 AM







