Google Music Beta
there is no limit for pictures (at least in photo stream)
but yea i think 5GB is small.
Your purchased music, apps, and books, as well as your Photo Stream, don’t count against your free storage. That leaves your mail, documents, Camera Roll, account information, settings, and other app data. And since those things don’t use as much space, you’ll find that 5GB goes a long way.
So with Google you are getting much more for much less (free). Keep in mind you do have to pay for the iTunes matching. I know it's pennies, but I'll be damned if I'm paying anyone any amount to store my music for me. I've never had to do that in the past and I'm not starting now. I'd rather keep everything local.
So with Google you are getting much more for much less (free). Keep in mind you do have to pay for the iTunes matching. I know it's pennies, but I'll be damned if I'm paying anyone any amount to store my music for me. I've never had to do that in the past and I'm not starting now. I'd rather keep everything local.
only thing you're paying for is the iTunes match which just takes your ripped music and turns it into iTunes purchased music.
Google right now wins for me for the streaming.
Apple did do an interesting thing if I heard it correctly. It's basically going to be amnesty from the RIAA - pay us $25, and you can get legit copies of all your music that it can match. But if you can't download the legit better versions, I'm not sure what the point is.
I sincerely doubt it will just be via file names. If Shazam can identify a song in five seconds, Apple will have something similar.
Apple did do an interesting thing if I heard it correctly. It's basically going to be amnesty from the RIAA - pay us $25, and you can get legit copies of all your music that it can match. But if you can't download the legit better versions, I'm not sure what the point is.
I sincerely doubt it will just be via file names. If Shazam can identify a song in five seconds, Apple will have something similar.
So with Google you are getting much more for much less (free). Keep in mind you do have to pay for the iTunes matching. I know it's pennies, but I'll be damned if I'm paying anyone any amount to store my music for me. I've never had to do that in the past and I'm not starting now. I'd rather keep everything local.
For me, I have some photos synced with picasa years ago. Its right on the gallery in my phone. Won't have a problem with losing photos unless I run out of room of course.
Yea, Google will charge, but I really can't imagine them charging those who have already loaded their libraries into Google Music. If they did, people would start removing their music to avoid the charge. I don't think that is Googs intention.
Google right now wins for me for the streaming.
Apple did do an interesting thing if I heard it correctly. It's basically going to be amnesty from the RIAA - pay us $25, and you can get legit copies of all your music that it can match. But if you can't download the legit better versions, I'm not sure what the point is.
I sincerely doubt it will just be via file names. If Shazam can identify a song in five seconds, Apple will have something similar.
Apple did do an interesting thing if I heard it correctly. It's basically going to be amnesty from the RIAA - pay us $25, and you can get legit copies of all your music that it can match. But if you can't download the legit better versions, I'm not sure what the point is.
I sincerely doubt it will just be via file names. If Shazam can identify a song in five seconds, Apple will have something similar.

I guess what they could do to prevent scanning of pirated music is have you pop in the CD to scan it.
I guess what they could do to prevent scanning of pirated music is have you pop in the CD to scan it.
As far As I understand the way it works is that say you buy a song on your iPhone. iCloud sees that you bought the song, associates it with your account and then tells your other associated/linked devices that you own the song and then they automatically downloads the song.
It's not streaming.
As far As I understand the way it works is that say you buy a song on your iPhone. iCloud sees that you bought the song, associates it with your account and then tells your other associated/linked devices that you own the song and then they automatically downloads the song.
As far As I understand the way it works is that say you buy a song on your iPhone. iCloud sees that you bought the song, associates it with your account and then tells your other associated/linked devices that you own the song and then they automatically downloads the song.
These songs are stored locally and it's just a sharing system among your iphone and iPad? Seems not very useful.
That's what jobs talked about in the keynote. The difficulty if syncing so many devIces.
- Automatic Downloads. Purchase music from any device or computer and automatically download a copy to your Mac and iOS devices.
Mizouse: http://music.google.com/music/
So I assume then you can only stream to iTunes installed computers? If you're depending on a workstation with no admin rights, advantage Google.
So I assume then you can only stream to iTunes installed computers? If you're depending on a workstation with no admin rights, advantage Google.
No they showed the picture of CD's stacked that you bought legally and ripped legally to iTunes. You don't have to repurchase those. Therefore pirated allowed. I just think if you have the Dj Clue remix of Justin Bieber featuring Led Zeppelin - Beat It (remix by Timbaland), you probably can't stream that since it's likely not in iTunes.
I was talking about the free iCloud.
Yes iTunes match will turn CDs and I'm assuming pirated MP3s into legit iTunes purchased files on your devices.
Also he said if iTunes doesn't have it, then it will upload.
I dunno I need to let this shit soak in.
And stop saying streaming, because it's not.
Yes iTunes match will turn CDs and I'm assuming pirated MP3s into legit iTunes purchased files on your devices.
Also he said if iTunes doesn't have it, then it will upload.
I dunno I need to let this shit soak in.
And stop saying streaming, because it's not.
As far as playback, it seems to pre-downloads a little of up to the next 5 songs so that when you seek to the next one, it doesn't have to buffer. So in essence, while you're listening to one song, it downloads and completes that first, then pre-downloads the next songs. I've tested the app in areas I know that has bad reception and had no hiccups what so ever.
Not really a big deal. I left mine overnight and I uploaded about 10 GB worth of music and I would guess it took 6 hours to do all of it. You don't have to wait for all of it to finish uploading everything either. Whatever gets uploaded is ready for use. You can manage the collection on any device that can access music.google.com To upload songs you need to download an app called Music Manager to tell which folders you want it to sync and just let it do its thing. You can do this on any computer you authorize streaming access to.
But I'm asking could I upload music directly from an android cell phone or tablet?
If I'm understanding google music website, it's a no.
Not without pulling it off the device. So no. Luckily, its very easy to share files with Android. Just mount the phone like your normally do as a mass storage. Or you could sync it to a DropBox folder and then pull that song on a PC with Music Manager then upload it to the cloud. (You could technically automate this step as well but you would have to have a computer thats running all the time). If you already have the song on your device I don't see what the rush is to push it to the clouds unless you're trying to save space.
Last edited by CGFebTSX04; Jun 7, 2011 at 04:03 PM.
Right, plus it's not like you can't purchase song right from the phone. Vanilla Android even comes with the Amazon app pre-loaded. So just fire that up, buy whatever song you need to hear at that moment, then upload it to the cloud when you get a chance.
Which is exactly my question. If you already have the song on your device. What's the rush to push it to the cloud? The only reason you want the song in the cloud is to save space or share it on a device which isn't your primary and most people won't be purchasing stuff if its not their primary device.







I liked that it uploaded my iTunes playlists. It's set and forget, it's not a hassle at all.