building new computer, vista compatibility question
building new computer, vista compatibility question
I'm building a new computer for myself and originally decided on the athlon 64 4000+ with MSI K8NGM2-FID socket 939 mobo. It won't be used for gaming, mostly office work (the comp now is very outdated).
My main question is, in the next year or so, if I wanted to upgrade to Vista, would that be a problem? Should I just go ahead and get a socket AM2 dual core cpu?
edit: Maybe the question I should be asking is, will the motherboard be compatible with a Vista upgrade? Or are there any other forseeable problems?
My main question is, in the next year or so, if I wanted to upgrade to Vista, would that be a problem? Should I just go ahead and get a socket AM2 dual core cpu?
edit: Maybe the question I should be asking is, will the motherboard be compatible with a Vista upgrade? Or are there any other forseeable problems?
Last edited by zigzagzig; Aug 31, 2006 at 12:45 PM.
A Windows Vista Capable PC includes at least:
A modern processor (at least 800MHz1).
512 MB of system memory.
A graphics processor that is DirectX 9 capable.
A Windows Vista Premium Ready PC includes at least:
1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor1.
1 GB of system memory.
Support for DirectX 9 graphics with a WDDM driver, 128 MB of graphics memory (minimum)2, Pixel Shader 2.0 and 32 bits per pixel.
40 GB of hard drive capacity with 15 GB free space.
DVD-ROM Drive3.
Audio output capability.
Internet access capability.
A modern processor (at least 800MHz1).
512 MB of system memory.
A graphics processor that is DirectX 9 capable.
A Windows Vista Premium Ready PC includes at least:
1 GHz 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor1.
1 GB of system memory.
Support for DirectX 9 graphics with a WDDM driver, 128 MB of graphics memory (minimum)2, Pixel Shader 2.0 and 32 bits per pixel.
40 GB of hard drive capacity with 15 GB free space.
DVD-ROM Drive3.
Audio output capability.
Internet access capability.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
beta version is, doesnt mean the actual system wil be 

but there are a ton of features that definately will use up memory, so the more you have the better
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
beta version is, doesnt mean the actual system wil be 

I am running Build 5536 (Pre RC1)
Originally Posted by RyeCL
dual core > single core.... 

Originally Posted by bkknight369
very true. The recent builds are getting faster and faster
but there are a ton of features that definately will use up memory, so the more you have the better
but there are a ton of features that definately will use up memory, so the more you have the better
Originally Posted by Schizm
I have not installed the version we got a few weeks ago with our MSDN subscription. I really hope you're correct b/c I was extremely disappointed.
They just released the 5536 build in MSDN, but the one before that to the MSDN community was Beta 2, which if it is don't bother. Log into the MSDN web site and download the August build. It is much better than the earlier builds that had debug turned on.
Originally Posted by zigzagzig
oh and one more question, should i go with the X2 3800+ dual core or the athlon 64 4000+ single core? the X2 is almost $20 more, kinda negligible.
absolutely get the X2, and if you can get a socket am2 board, itll provide you with better upgrade options in the future as socket 939 is discontinued
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
171
Aug 4, 2024 10:35 AM








