Bing Maps Beta
Bing Maps Beta
Anyone play around with it?
Except for using silverlight, it could be better than google maps.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/
Except for using silverlight, it could be better than google maps.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/
Trending Topics
It seems a little smoother than Google. Birds eye is definitely a major plus over Google.
Anyone else think the rotate feature is kind of...backwards?
The old birds eye, when you hit the rotate button, say counter clockwise, it would rotate from the camera POV. Now, it rotates the map itself...
Anyone else think the rotate feature is kind of...backwards?
The old birds eye, when you hit the rotate button, say counter clockwise, it would rotate from the camera POV. Now, it rotates the map itself...
They've integrated photosynth into maps now too. So play with that it's pretty cool. you can try that out by clicking on explore in 3d in the upper left corner of the page. If you don't see any photosynths in the area you're looking at then zoom out until you do. they'll appear automatically when one is in your field of view.
A couple of the cool not obvious features:
When you zoom in, the first shift from a map to an birdseye view, is actually a 3D model and not an photograph.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#/l1m3gfldch42bbqw
The Streetside is cool. And if you open up one of the applications using the orange arrow, (photosynth, twitter, local lens for example), you can then see those pins on the street.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#/rq5h21b0htgjw64k
I agree it would be nicer if it didn't need a plugin to run. But alot of the features in it can't be done in Html / Javascript -- just like Google Maps StreetView uses Flash.
The blending of images as you zoom / pan around the map can't be done in Javascript (you see in javascript, unless the image is cached it displays a blank tile) whereas in Silverlight, as you zoom in, it blends the lower res image with the higher res image that its downloading (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Zoom).
The Javascript map (bing.com/maps) was also updated about a month ago, but the Silverlight map just blows it away in my opinion
You can use the mouse in bing maps beta as well.
-Slinks (an msft employee)
When you zoom in, the first shift from a map to an birdseye view, is actually a 3D model and not an photograph.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#/l1m3gfldch42bbqw
The Streetside is cool. And if you open up one of the applications using the orange arrow, (photosynth, twitter, local lens for example), you can then see those pins on the street.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#/rq5h21b0htgjw64k
Anyone play around with it?
Except for using silverlight, it could be better than google maps.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/
Except for using silverlight, it could be better than google maps.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/
The blending of images as you zoom / pan around the map can't be done in Javascript (you see in javascript, unless the image is cached it displays a blank tile) whereas in Silverlight, as you zoom in, it blends the lower res image with the higher res image that its downloading (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Zoom).
The Javascript map (bing.com/maps) was also updated about a month ago, but the Silverlight map just blows it away in my opinion
-Slinks (an msft employee)
A couple of the cool not obvious features:
When you zoom in, the first shift from a map to an birdseye view, is actually a 3D model and not an photograph.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#/l1m3gfldch42bbqw
The Streetside is cool. And if you open up one of the applications using the orange arrow, (photosynth, twitter, local lens for example), you can then see those pins on the street.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#/rq5h21b0htgjw64k
I agree it would be nicer if it didn't need a plugin to run. But alot of the features in it can't be done in Html / Javascript -- just like Google Maps StreetView uses Flash.
The blending of images as you zoom / pan around the map can't be done in Javascript (you see in javascript, unless the image is cached it displays a blank tile) whereas in Silverlight, as you zoom in, it blends the lower res image with the higher res image that its downloading (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Zoom).
The Javascript map (bing.com/maps) was also updated about a month ago, but the Silverlight map just blows it away in my opinion
You can use the mouse in bing maps beta as well.
-Slinks (an msft employee)
When you zoom in, the first shift from a map to an birdseye view, is actually a 3D model and not an photograph.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#/l1m3gfldch42bbqw
The Streetside is cool. And if you open up one of the applications using the orange arrow, (photosynth, twitter, local lens for example), you can then see those pins on the street.
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#/rq5h21b0htgjw64k
I agree it would be nicer if it didn't need a plugin to run. But alot of the features in it can't be done in Html / Javascript -- just like Google Maps StreetView uses Flash.
The blending of images as you zoom / pan around the map can't be done in Javascript (you see in javascript, unless the image is cached it displays a blank tile) whereas in Silverlight, as you zoom in, it blends the lower res image with the higher res image that its downloading (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Zoom).
The Javascript map (bing.com/maps) was also updated about a month ago, but the Silverlight map just blows it away in my opinion
You can use the mouse in bing maps beta as well.
-Slinks (an msft employee)
https://acurazine.com/forums/technology-16/microsoft-windows-7-office-2010-thread-693445/
err....nevermind you've posted twice in there
Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Dec 6, 2009 at 06:23 PM.
You work for MS and you haven't been in my Windows 7 thread!
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=693445
err....nevermind you've posted twice in there
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=693445
err....nevermind you've posted twice in there
Wow, very cool. I can see my house perfectly, in a bunch of different angles too! I can even see my car parked outside of my job at work. Although it was one of my older cars, the aerial is at least a yr+ old.
So far better than google maps.
Looks like they don't have Edinburgh, Tristan Da Cunha on the map yet. Google/Map it, really unbelievable.
So far better than google maps.
Looks like they don't have Edinburgh, Tristan Da Cunha on the map yet. Google/Map it, really unbelievable.
Last edited by FiftyFive; Dec 8, 2009 at 10:29 PM.
MS just showed off some new really cool stuff for bing maps at TED! Taking geo-tagged Flickr picks and making photosynths out of them, live video feed built into maps and WorldWide Telescope integration!!!!
I
WWT!
<object width="446" height="326"><param name="movie" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff"></param> <param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/BlaiseAguerayArcas_2010-medium.mp4&su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/BlaiseAgueraYArcas-2010.embed_thumbnail.jpg&vw=432&vh=240&ap=0&ti=766 &introDuration=16500&adDuration=4000&postAdDuratio n=2000&adKeys=talk=blaise_aguera;year=2010;theme=a _taste_of_ted2010;theme=new_on_ted_com;theme=the_c reative_spark;event=TED2010;&preAdTag=tconf.ted/embed;tile=1;sz=512x288;" /><embed src="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" pluginspace="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" bgColor="#ffffff" width="446" height="326" allowFullScreen="true" flashvars="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/BlaiseAguerayArcas_2010-medium.mp4&su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/BlaiseAgueraYArcas-2010.embed_thumbnail.jpg&vw=432&vh=240&ap=0&ti=766 &introDuration=16500&adDuration=4000&postAdDuratio n=2000&adKeys=talk=blaise_aguera;year=2010;theme=a _taste_of_ted2010;theme=new_on_ted_com;theme=the_c reative_spark;event=TED2010;"></embed></object>
I
WWT!<object width="446" height="326"><param name="movie" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff"></param> <param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/BlaiseAguerayArcas_2010-medium.mp4&su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/BlaiseAgueraYArcas-2010.embed_thumbnail.jpg&vw=432&vh=240&ap=0&ti=766 &introDuration=16500&adDuration=4000&postAdDuratio n=2000&adKeys=talk=blaise_aguera;year=2010;theme=a _taste_of_ted2010;theme=new_on_ted_com;theme=the_c reative_spark;event=TED2010;&preAdTag=tconf.ted/embed;tile=1;sz=512x288;" /><embed src="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" pluginspace="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" bgColor="#ffffff" width="446" height="326" allowFullScreen="true" flashvars="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/BlaiseAguerayArcas_2010-medium.mp4&su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/BlaiseAgueraYArcas-2010.embed_thumbnail.jpg&vw=432&vh=240&ap=0&ti=766 &introDuration=16500&adDuration=4000&postAdDuratio n=2000&adKeys=talk=blaise_aguera;year=2010;theme=a _taste_of_ted2010;theme=new_on_ted_com;theme=the_c reative_spark;event=TED2010;"></embed></object>
Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Feb 16, 2010 at 01:35 AM.
Massive points to Microsoft on this one.
Over the past three years, Microsoft has created a uniform, detailed map of the Continental United States and 17 countries in Western and Central Europe. The results are spectacular – a single view of about 7 million square miles, with relatively even lighting and height, at a granularity of about 30 centimeters of land per pixel of image.
It is an impressive home-grown undertaking – Google gets its images from many sources, and while they are decent, they change as you go from one location to another, or zoom in on something.
To do it, Microsoft developed its own highly efficient camera, and mounted it in several planes that were also loaded with 13 PCs for image processing. It then flew the planes north/south (for light standardization), in lines about eight kilometers apart, at 17,000 feet, shooting 220 megapixels every 2 seconds.
They’ve been quietly rolling much of this into Bing Maps for several months, and about 25% of the total is up, with more coming on every day. Total miles flown: about 730,000. Cost: about $130 million. No plans to do Asia as of now.
See the difference for yourself by playing around – zoom in, change angles — with these comparisons (sorry, once you click the address you have to click on “bird’s eye” in the drop down just above the map to get Bing’s version – Google still gets to its addressing):
Here are aerial photos of the Forbes headquarters at 60 Fifth Ave, New York, via Bing and Google Maps . Here is the “Hollywood” sign in Los Angeles in Bing and in Google .
Play around with the close-ups to the full effect of both services. In almost all instances I checked, there was indeed better, clearer information from Microsoft. The one exception, my own house, did have a slightly closer shot of the property, but that was clearly from different source than the other, more distant images.
Not only did Microsoft have to take and process a lot of images, it also had to correct for cloud cover, snow, and other impediments to a ground view.
http://blogs.forbes.com/quentinhardy...erial-victory/
Over the past three years, Microsoft has created a uniform, detailed map of the Continental United States and 17 countries in Western and Central Europe. The results are spectacular – a single view of about 7 million square miles, with relatively even lighting and height, at a granularity of about 30 centimeters of land per pixel of image.
It is an impressive home-grown undertaking – Google gets its images from many sources, and while they are decent, they change as you go from one location to another, or zoom in on something.
To do it, Microsoft developed its own highly efficient camera, and mounted it in several planes that were also loaded with 13 PCs for image processing. It then flew the planes north/south (for light standardization), in lines about eight kilometers apart, at 17,000 feet, shooting 220 megapixels every 2 seconds.
They’ve been quietly rolling much of this into Bing Maps for several months, and about 25% of the total is up, with more coming on every day. Total miles flown: about 730,000. Cost: about $130 million. No plans to do Asia as of now.
See the difference for yourself by playing around – zoom in, change angles — with these comparisons (sorry, once you click the address you have to click on “bird’s eye” in the drop down just above the map to get Bing’s version – Google still gets to its addressing):
Here are aerial photos of the Forbes headquarters at 60 Fifth Ave, New York, via Bing and Google Maps . Here is the “Hollywood” sign in Los Angeles in Bing and in Google .
Play around with the close-ups to the full effect of both services. In almost all instances I checked, there was indeed better, clearer information from Microsoft. The one exception, my own house, did have a slightly closer shot of the property, but that was clearly from different source than the other, more distant images.
Not only did Microsoft have to take and process a lot of images, it also had to correct for cloud cover, snow, and other impediments to a ground view.
http://blogs.forbes.com/quentinhardy...erial-victory/










