Difference between 2001 Cl and 2001 Cl Type-S
#1
10th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: california
Age: 37
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Difference between 2001 Cl and 2001 Cl Type-S
So what are the differences between both cars?Im talking about interior,exterior, and engine components/specs.
#2
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 39
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
base Specifications
Type: Midsize Coupe/Hatchback
Where Built: United States
Dimensions
Exterior
Length: 192 in. Width: 70.6 in.
Height: 55.5 in. Wheel Base: 106.9 in.
Ground Clearance: 6.2 in. Curb Weight: 3470 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 37.5 in. Front Hip Room: 52.9 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 56.4 in. Rear Head Room: 36.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 54.2 in. Rear Hip Room: 50.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.4 in. Rear Leg Room: 33 in.
Luggage Capacity: 13.6 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 4
Performance Data
Performance
Base Number of Cylinders: 6 Base Engine Size: 3.2 liters
Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 225 hp
Max Horsepower: 5600 rpm Torque: 217 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 4700 rpm Drive Type: FWD
Turning Circle: 37.4 ft.
Fuel Data
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 17.2 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Automatic: : 19 mpg / 29 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 326.8 mi. / 498.8 mi.
type s Specifications
Type: Midsize Coupe/Hatchback
Where Built: United States
Dimensions
Exterior
Length: 192 in. Width: 70.6 in.
Height: 55.5 in. Wheel Base: 106.9 in.
Ground Clearance: 6.2 in. Curb Weight: 3510 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 37.5 in. Front Hip Room: 52.9 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 56.4 in. Rear Head Room: 36.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 54.2 in. Rear Hip Room: 50.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.4 in. Rear Leg Room: 33 in.
Luggage Capacity: 13.6 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 4
Performance Data
Performance
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 6.57 sec. Base Number of Cylinders: 6
Base Engine Size: 3.2 liters Base Engine Type: V6
Horsepower: 260 hp Max Horsepower: 6100 rpm
Torque: 232 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 3500 rpm
Drive Type: FWD Turning Circle: 39.4 ft.
Fuel Data
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 17.2 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Automatic: : 19 mpg / 29 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 326.8 mi. / 498.8 mi.
basically the type s has 260 hp as compared to 225 and in interior has type s on the knob and some other stuff
Type: Midsize Coupe/Hatchback
Where Built: United States
Dimensions
Exterior
Length: 192 in. Width: 70.6 in.
Height: 55.5 in. Wheel Base: 106.9 in.
Ground Clearance: 6.2 in. Curb Weight: 3470 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 37.5 in. Front Hip Room: 52.9 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 56.4 in. Rear Head Room: 36.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 54.2 in. Rear Hip Room: 50.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.4 in. Rear Leg Room: 33 in.
Luggage Capacity: 13.6 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 4
Performance Data
Performance
Base Number of Cylinders: 6 Base Engine Size: 3.2 liters
Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 225 hp
Max Horsepower: 5600 rpm Torque: 217 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 4700 rpm Drive Type: FWD
Turning Circle: 37.4 ft.
Fuel Data
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 17.2 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Automatic: : 19 mpg / 29 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 326.8 mi. / 498.8 mi.
type s Specifications
Type: Midsize Coupe/Hatchback
Where Built: United States
Dimensions
Exterior
Length: 192 in. Width: 70.6 in.
Height: 55.5 in. Wheel Base: 106.9 in.
Ground Clearance: 6.2 in. Curb Weight: 3510 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 37.5 in. Front Hip Room: 52.9 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 56.4 in. Rear Head Room: 36.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 54.2 in. Rear Hip Room: 50.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.4 in. Rear Leg Room: 33 in.
Luggage Capacity: 13.6 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 4
Performance Data
Performance
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 6.57 sec. Base Number of Cylinders: 6
Base Engine Size: 3.2 liters Base Engine Type: V6
Horsepower: 260 hp Max Horsepower: 6100 rpm
Torque: 232 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 3500 rpm
Drive Type: FWD Turning Circle: 39.4 ft.
Fuel Data
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 17.2 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Automatic: : 19 mpg / 29 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 326.8 mi. / 498.8 mi.
basically the type s has 260 hp as compared to 225 and in interior has type s on the knob and some other stuff
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Trending Topics
#9
Registered Douchebag
Originally Posted by mrsteve
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
CLS seats alone are worth the price of admission over the regular CL. VSA, 17" wheels, and 35 extra HP is icing on the cake.
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
#10
Originally Posted by mrsteve
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
CLS seats alone are worth the price of admission over the regular CL. VSA, 17" wheels, and 35 extra HP is icing on the cake.
#12
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by Dannybags
i like the CL-P seats better and so do a bunch of people i know. My friend has a CL-S and he has shit coming out of all the little holes
![Lame](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/lame.gif)
Then he needs to take it to the dealer and have them replaced. I have 70k miles on my CL-S with no leather related problems.
The CL-S seats are worlds beyond the non-supportive, overly soft, and ugly CL-P seats.
#15
I shave my change purse
Originally Posted by MisterMehoff
major difference: more women would like me in my shiny Type S rather than the normal CL-P with ugly stock rims on it.
![Lame](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/lame.gif)
Sure cause all women say 'Wow that's a type s!"
#17
Kenpachi Teichou
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dannybags
i like the CL-P seats better and so do a bunch of people i know. My friend has a CL-S and he has shit coming out of all the little holes
#20
Registered Douchebag
Originally Posted by oneilc
All the women that sit in his CLS seats get wet. That's why!
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
the preforated leather wont allow the leather to be a saturated mess... dont worry CLP guy fat chance of that happening
![Pimp](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pimp.gif)
#21
Originally Posted by sixgearcl
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
the preforated leather wont allow the leather to be a saturated mess... dont worry CLP guy fat chance of that happening
![Pimp](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pimp.gif)
#24
TQ > MPG
I like the CL-P seats better. The CL-S seats are too firm and dont have lower leg support. I really cant stand how high it sits too.
To be honest the TL-P loaner I had was pretty decent. The tranny was disspointing, but it wasnt slow by any means, just not as much hp above 5k rpm.
To be honest the TL-P loaner I had was pretty decent. The tranny was disspointing, but it wasnt slow by any means, just not as much hp above 5k rpm.
#25
Originally Posted by mEnG702
why would u buy a cl-p instead of a cl-s.its only cost alittle more and the cl-s is top of the line
why would you buy a 2.3 when you can buy a 3.0?
why would you buy a 3.0 when you can buy a 3.2?
i opted for a navi system instead of the extra hp. i only had the money to afford one, and i dont race anymore. my ex-gf and a good friend of mine died racing, and i personally do not have any desire to do that anymore. my good friend has a CL-S and its a little better, but not enough to say that the CL-P sucks. plus his tranny died twice and he has the same amount of miles as i do. also the car has 225 hp, its not a 4 clyinder accord
#26
Registered Douchebag
![Rant](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rant.gif)
Originally Posted by jtkz13
I like the CL-P seats better. The CL-S seats are too firm and dont have lower leg support. I really cant stand how high it sits too.
To be honest the TL-P loaner I had was pretty decent. The tranny was disspointing, but it wasnt slow by any means, just not as much hp above 5k rpm.
To be honest the TL-P loaner I had was pretty decent. The tranny was disspointing, but it wasnt slow by any means, just not as much hp above 5k rpm.
![pofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/pofl.gif)
:ultraghey: "CLP's are awesssome :ghey:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pham Alvan
2G TL (1999-2003)
38
03-16-2016 09:17 AM
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
11-15-2015 05:52 PM