Difference between 2001 Cl and 2001 Cl Type-S
#1
10th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: california
Age: 37
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Difference between 2001 Cl and 2001 Cl Type-S
So what are the differences between both cars?Im talking about interior,exterior, and engine components/specs.
#2
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
base Specifications
Type: Midsize Coupe/Hatchback
Where Built: United States
Dimensions
Exterior
Length: 192 in. Width: 70.6 in.
Height: 55.5 in. Wheel Base: 106.9 in.
Ground Clearance: 6.2 in. Curb Weight: 3470 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 37.5 in. Front Hip Room: 52.9 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 56.4 in. Rear Head Room: 36.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 54.2 in. Rear Hip Room: 50.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.4 in. Rear Leg Room: 33 in.
Luggage Capacity: 13.6 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 4
Performance Data
Performance
Base Number of Cylinders: 6 Base Engine Size: 3.2 liters
Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 225 hp
Max Horsepower: 5600 rpm Torque: 217 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 4700 rpm Drive Type: FWD
Turning Circle: 37.4 ft.
Fuel Data
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 17.2 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Automatic: : 19 mpg / 29 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 326.8 mi. / 498.8 mi.
type s Specifications
Type: Midsize Coupe/Hatchback
Where Built: United States
Dimensions
Exterior
Length: 192 in. Width: 70.6 in.
Height: 55.5 in. Wheel Base: 106.9 in.
Ground Clearance: 6.2 in. Curb Weight: 3510 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 37.5 in. Front Hip Room: 52.9 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 56.4 in. Rear Head Room: 36.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 54.2 in. Rear Hip Room: 50.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.4 in. Rear Leg Room: 33 in.
Luggage Capacity: 13.6 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 4
Performance Data
Performance
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 6.57 sec. Base Number of Cylinders: 6
Base Engine Size: 3.2 liters Base Engine Type: V6
Horsepower: 260 hp Max Horsepower: 6100 rpm
Torque: 232 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 3500 rpm
Drive Type: FWD Turning Circle: 39.4 ft.
Fuel Data
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 17.2 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Automatic: : 19 mpg / 29 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 326.8 mi. / 498.8 mi.
basically the type s has 260 hp as compared to 225 and in interior has type s on the knob and some other stuff
Type: Midsize Coupe/Hatchback
Where Built: United States
Dimensions
Exterior
Length: 192 in. Width: 70.6 in.
Height: 55.5 in. Wheel Base: 106.9 in.
Ground Clearance: 6.2 in. Curb Weight: 3470 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 37.5 in. Front Hip Room: 52.9 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 56.4 in. Rear Head Room: 36.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 54.2 in. Rear Hip Room: 50.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.4 in. Rear Leg Room: 33 in.
Luggage Capacity: 13.6 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 4
Performance Data
Performance
Base Number of Cylinders: 6 Base Engine Size: 3.2 liters
Base Engine Type: V6 Horsepower: 225 hp
Max Horsepower: 5600 rpm Torque: 217 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 4700 rpm Drive Type: FWD
Turning Circle: 37.4 ft.
Fuel Data
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 17.2 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Automatic: : 19 mpg / 29 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 326.8 mi. / 498.8 mi.
type s Specifications
Type: Midsize Coupe/Hatchback
Where Built: United States
Dimensions
Exterior
Length: 192 in. Width: 70.6 in.
Height: 55.5 in. Wheel Base: 106.9 in.
Ground Clearance: 6.2 in. Curb Weight: 3510 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 37.5 in. Front Hip Room: 52.9 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 56.4 in. Rear Head Room: 36.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 54.2 in. Rear Hip Room: 50.4 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.4 in. Rear Leg Room: 33 in.
Luggage Capacity: 13.6 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 4
Performance Data
Performance
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 6.57 sec. Base Number of Cylinders: 6
Base Engine Size: 3.2 liters Base Engine Type: V6
Horsepower: 260 hp Max Horsepower: 6100 rpm
Torque: 232 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 3500 rpm
Drive Type: FWD Turning Circle: 39.4 ft.
Fuel Data
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 17.2 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Automatic: : 19 mpg / 29 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 326.8 mi. / 498.8 mi.
basically the type s has 260 hp as compared to 225 and in interior has type s on the knob and some other stuff
Trending Topics
#9
Registered Douchebag
Originally Posted by mrsteve
CLS seats alone are worth the price of admission over the regular CL. VSA, 17" wheels, and 35 extra HP is icing on the cake.
#10
Originally Posted by mrsteve
CLS seats alone are worth the price of admission over the regular CL. VSA, 17" wheels, and 35 extra HP is icing on the cake.
#12
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by Dannybags
i like the CL-P seats better and so do a bunch of people i know. My friend has a CL-S and he has shit coming out of all the little holes
Then he needs to take it to the dealer and have them replaced. I have 70k miles on my CL-S with no leather related problems.
The CL-S seats are worlds beyond the non-supportive, overly soft, and ugly CL-P seats.
#15
I shave my change purse
Originally Posted by MisterMehoff
major difference: more women would like me in my shiny Type S rather than the normal CL-P with ugly stock rims on it.
Sure cause all women say 'Wow that's a type s!"
#17
Kenpachi Teichou
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dannybags
i like the CL-P seats better and so do a bunch of people i know. My friend has a CL-S and he has shit coming out of all the little holes
#20
Registered Douchebag
Originally Posted by oneilc
All the women that sit in his CLS seats get wet. That's why!
the preforated leather wont allow the leather to be a saturated mess... dont worry CLP guy fat chance of that happening
#21
Originally Posted by sixgearcl
the preforated leather wont allow the leather to be a saturated mess... dont worry CLP guy fat chance of that happening
#24
TQ > MPG
I like the CL-P seats better. The CL-S seats are too firm and dont have lower leg support. I really cant stand how high it sits too.
To be honest the TL-P loaner I had was pretty decent. The tranny was disspointing, but it wasnt slow by any means, just not as much hp above 5k rpm.
To be honest the TL-P loaner I had was pretty decent. The tranny was disspointing, but it wasnt slow by any means, just not as much hp above 5k rpm.
#25
Originally Posted by mEnG702
why would u buy a cl-p instead of a cl-s.its only cost alittle more and the cl-s is top of the line
why would you buy a 2.3 when you can buy a 3.0?
why would you buy a 3.0 when you can buy a 3.2?
i opted for a navi system instead of the extra hp. i only had the money to afford one, and i dont race anymore. my ex-gf and a good friend of mine died racing, and i personally do not have any desire to do that anymore. my good friend has a CL-S and its a little better, but not enough to say that the CL-P sucks. plus his tranny died twice and he has the same amount of miles as i do. also the car has 225 hp, its not a 4 clyinder accord
#26
Registered Douchebag
Originally Posted by jtkz13
I like the CL-P seats better. The CL-S seats are too firm and dont have lower leg support. I really cant stand how high it sits too.
To be honest the TL-P loaner I had was pretty decent. The tranny was disspointing, but it wasnt slow by any means, just not as much hp above 5k rpm.
To be honest the TL-P loaner I had was pretty decent. The tranny was disspointing, but it wasnt slow by any means, just not as much hp above 5k rpm.
:ultraghey: "CLP's are awesssome :ghey:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pham Alvan
2G TL (1999-2003)
38
03-16-2016 09:17 AM
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
11-15-2015 05:52 PM